On Mar 29, 2012, at 5:01 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
Serial Notify, sec 5.2 of draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-26.txt, provides
such a mechanism
Not what I'm talking about.
What notifies a cache that it needs to fetch new objects from a RPKI
repository? As best I understood, it's largely done on cron
. Scudder wrote:
Andrew,
On Feb 24, 2011, at 1:17 AM, Andrew Lange wrote:
Given the thread, I can understand your frustration. And, I could have made
myself more clear. I'll try: given the policies that AS_B might be
implementing, we cannot know for certain, without AS_B publishing
split it's
route-objects into the more specifics and register them.
Andrew
On Feb 24, 2011, at 3:51 PM, Sriram, Kotikalapudi wrote:
Andrew,
Comment below.
Sriram
-Original Message-
From: sidr-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:sidr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Andrew Lange
Sent
assertion that it would be useful to have a
relationship object and gently trying to understand your reasoning behind
holding that view.
Geoff
On 24/02/2011, at 9:12 AM, Andrew Lange wrote:
Geoff,
Do you disagree as to its utility?
Andrew
On Feb 23, 2011, at 4:16 PM, Geoff
overhead? (yes, I know that data
integrity becomes an issue, but data integrity is always an issue.)
Andrew
On Feb 28, 2011, at 8:16 PM, Andrew Lange wrote:
John,
But wouldn't a record of an existing announcement also show that AS_B did in
fact announce which of AS_A's routes and in what form
Hi Sandy,
Reply is inline.
On Feb 23, 2011, at 2:52 AM, Sandra Murphy wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011, Andrew Lange wrote:
To divert the discussion a bit back into the realm of requirements.
What is the current diameter of the Internet? From my recollections it
was converging toward about
Geoff,
Do you disagree as to its utility?
Andrew
On Feb 23, 2011, at 4:16 PM, Geoff Huston wrote:
On 24/02/2011, at 8:09 AM, Robert Loomans wrote:
On 24/02/2011, at 09:17, Andrew Lange wrote:
From a work item perspective, it would be useful to have a relationship
object signed
To divert the discussion a bit back into the realm of requirements.
What is the current diameter of the Internet? From my recollections it was
converging toward about 4 ASes in diameter. This would mean that for most
paths we have:
AS_A -- AS_B -- AS_C -- AS_D
If we have already
