Re: [sidr] Working Group Last Call - draft-ietf-sidr-roa-format-06.txt

2009-11-29 Thread Geoff Huston
WG Co-Chair hat ON I have seen three comments on this draft in response to this WG last call - which is perhaps on the very lower bound of what could be considered an acceptable demonstration of WG consensus with the document. There have been positive responses in favour of moving this document

Re: [sidr] Working Group Last Call - draft-ietf-sidr-roa-format-06.txt

2009-11-25 Thread Samuel Weiler
I have reviewed the ROA format draft. In, general, I'm fine with sending it to the IESG now. Thanks again to the editors for putting together a readable doc. As with the architecture document, I have some reservations about publishing the data format documents before the validation algorithm

Re: [sidr] Working Group Last Call - draft-ietf-sidr-roa-format-06.txt

2009-11-23 Thread Rob Austein
I have read (and implemented) this document, and support it going forward. My only comment from this review is that the text "If it is present it MUST be ignored by the relying party" in sections 2.1.6.4.3 and 2.1.6.4.4 is perhaps a bit strong. The text immediately following in both cases is fine

Re: [sidr] Working Group Last Call - draft-ietf-sidr-roa-format-06.txt

2009-11-05 Thread Terry Manderson
Matt, In hindsight I think that any recommendations of ordering should exist in some other document (akin to the one you alluded to in the thread on sidr-arch-09 refresh cycle) which covers more operational aspects. Cheers Terry On 6/11/09 6:46 AM, "Matt Lepinski" wrote: > Terry, > > Can you

Re: [sidr] Working Group Last Call - draft-ietf-sidr-roa-format-06.txt

2009-11-05 Thread Matt Lepinski
Terry, Can you elaborate on what you'd like to see in section 3 of the document? My interpretation of your comment is that you would like to see a prescribed (or recommended) order for the checks performed in ROA validation. I am reluctant to put in such a prescribed ordering in this document

Re: [sidr] Working Group Last Call - draft-ietf-sidr-roa-format-06.txt

2009-10-28 Thread Terry Manderson
I support this document going forward. the only comment I have is that I'd prefer to see a preference order in validation (section 3) to help relying party S/W writers to make efficient choices in the validation path - but that isn't a stopping block for me. Cheers Terry On 28/10/09 12:48 PM, "G

[sidr] Working Group Last Call - draft-ietf-sidr-roa-format-06.txt

2009-10-27 Thread Geoff Huston
The WG chairs have received a Working Group Last Call request from the authors of draft-ietf-sidr-roa-format-06.txt. The document (and the draft history) is at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-roa-format-06 The Last Call will end as of the close of business on Monday 23rd November