PM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CSCS prosystems
The question of whether or not baking soda is acceptable
is not clear.
Explain to me why baking soda is a contaminant. That infers
it is harmful.
I want to know specifics from a bio-physiological
perspective, not just
Hi Nancy.
Thanks for your response on the CS Pro MHVAC generator. I genuinely value
the input. I looked back through the archives to find any previous posts you
had made on the subject because I didn't remember anybody making any
favorable comments about this particular model or line of models.
Cutting-Edge Science Meets Ancient Natural Remedy
Read astonishing testimonials by real people about how a harmless mineral
supplement is helping with hopeless health problems. Colloidal silver may
benefit you too. Click here for more details.
got this in my email,,, wondering if anyone else
- Original Message -
From: Langsley Russell bullo...@nitline.com
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2001 2:51 PM
Subject: Re: CSCS prosystems
Hi DG.
I don't know if I am one of the people you were addressing with your post,
but I started the thread asking for information
In article f33c98bi89qtpftysl100016...@hotmail.com,
D G rc_gli...@hotmail.com wrote:
I would like to know why some have posted Dr. Marx's CS makers as inferior
or substandard. He clearly is knowledgeable about the subject, and if I
recall has received recognition from one CS society; I don't
-To: silver-list@eskimo.com
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CSCS prosystems
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2001 03:21:21 -0600
In article f33c98bi89qtpftysl100016...@hotmail.com,
D G rc_gli...@hotmail.com wrote:
I would like to know why some have posted Dr. Marx's CS makers as
inferior
or substandard. He
Subject: Re: CSCS prosystems
The question of whether or not baking soda is acceptable is not clear.
Explain to me why baking soda is a contaminant. That infers it is harmful.
I want to know specifics from a bio-physiological perspective, not just
generalized comments.
From: j...@natel.net (John
Hi DG.
I don't know if I am one of the people you were addressing with your post,
but I started the thread asking for information on specific models of CS Pro
generators. I was
asking specifically about the MHVAC (UNI-PHASE 16, 48, MAX-128) systems
made by them.
All of the responses I got at
Hi D.G.
If you want bio-physiological perspectives from this list, your are in the
wrong list.
No one knows what chemical reactions take place inside of the cell, that is why
we seek to find the best DW possible.
Let me give you an example of what can happen with CS. When making CS by the
HVAC
In article f19opetxb23ffhg8wceb...@hotmail.com,
D G rc_gli...@hotmail.com wrote:
The question of whether or not baking soda is acceptable is not clear.
Explain to me why baking soda is a contaminant. That infers it is harmful.
I want to know specifics from a bio-physiological perspective,
Langsley Russell wrote:
Hi DG. I don't know if I am one of the people you were addressing with your
post, but I started the thread asking for information on specific models of CS
Pro generators. I was asking specifically about the MHVAC (UNI-PHASE 16, 48,
MAX-128) systems made by them. All of
Glad to get some comments about those CS generator units from CS Pro. That high
voltage information scares me. Plus they are way too expensive.
Josephine
. The main problem is the high voltages are potentially hazardous, are much
above the recommended optimum for fine particle size, and as
I would like to know why some have posted Dr. Marx's CS makers as inferior
or substandard. He clearly is knowledgeable about the subject, and if I
recall has received recognition from one CS society; I don't recall the
name.
I find his website quite informative and have spoken with him on
13 matches
Mail list logo
