taste in the CS which may be interpreted as bitter.
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Ode Coyote [mailto:odecoy...@alltel.net]
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 5:33 AM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CSPpm question
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal
1] *Ramp up to current* take longer in larger volumes of water...more water
to bring to the level of conductivity that pulls the electrical current.
2] The better the water is, the longer it takes...exponential runaway
curve that gets leveled out by current control, starting out fairly flat in
- Original Message -
From: Ode Coyote odecoy...@alltel.net
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 10:02 PM
Subject: Re: CSPpm question
Morning List,
Odes' severely snipped quote:
[PS Meters are a pretty bad way to gauge PPMbut it's the best bad way
I have just made a new batch of CS in an 8 ounce jar. Usually I use a 16 ounce
jar and the TDS meter reads about 7 as a rule. When I made it in the smaller
jar, it reads 11 even after four days. The big jar takes about ten hours to
make, but the small one takes four. Can anyone explain any
Yes, the smaller amount of water will take much less time to get to the
same ppm. I assume you are starting out fresh, so it takes less time to
get to the point where the machine puts out a constant amount of silver
into the water. Or maybe the water was more conductive that you
thought to
You make and sell the c/s gel??
How much is it, and what size??
Freight?
Mary
-- Original message from Sandee George oha...@juno.com:
--
Thanks for this one Wayne - so true, I have been making and selling my
gel internationally for about seven years now - it is all
He has taken what has been discussed here for years, and applied for a
patent. No way it could ever stand up in court, nothing new, everything
he has in it was common public knowledge. Plus the method of making it
is almost identical to the patent I filed for in 1999, which was thrown
out as
Thanks for this one Wayne - so true, I have been making and selling my
gel internationally for about seven years now - it is all bunkum !
Everyone of the so called patented
gels I have seen and tried out of interest - do not come up to my formula
- and therein lies the truth. The reality
That is the process I was using from 1999 through about 2005. Applied
for a patent on it, but was denied as not being anything over the
present art.
Marshall
Clayton Family wrote:
I'm not an expert on this sort of thing, but I can see it is a high
voltage electrolysis machine with stirring.
Smaller particles affect viruses better than larger ones. Lower ppm EIS
tends to have smaller particles. Higher ppm EIS can have a little
hydrogen peroxide added to it to make the particles smaller, and thus be
even more effective.
Marshall
Sharlene Miyamura wrote:
Wayne:
I agree totally
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CSPPM question
This is the ready-made CS that I buy through a mlm company with
the exclusive rights to the 14 ppm, 18 ppm and silver gel through this
company that owns the patent. The patent holders also sell the 10 ppm
They probably do not look at previous submissions when there are legal fees
to be harvested. Faith G.
- Original Message -
From: Marshall Dudley mdud...@king-cart.com
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 10:08 AM
Subject: Re: CSPPM question
He has taken what
.
- Original Message -
From: Marshall Dudley
To:
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 10:08 AM
Subject: Re: CSPPM question
He has taken what has been discussed here for years, and applied for a
patent. No way it could ever stand up in court, nothing new, everything
he has
, January 29, 2008 10:08 AM
Subject: Re: CSPPM question
He has taken what has been discussed here for years, and applied for a
patent. No way it could ever stand up in court, nothing new, everything
he has in it was common public knowledge. Plus the method of making it
is
almost identical
I was thinking you had talked about making a colloidal suspension with
HV. This sounded like what you had described previously. Does this
really make a colloid, as opposed to an 80/20 ionic solution? I was
just wondering, maybe somebody sent some in to the lab for analysis.
On another
I don't know about that, but I do know that I made and used about 5 PPM
for the first year or so that I used cs, and it worked great. I
believe it is not the actual ppm, but the amount of silver total- so if
it is 5ppm, you just use more of it, more often. Perhaps the product
is different?
This is the product's patent.
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1Sect2=HITOFFd=PALLp=1u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htmr=1f=Gl=50s1=7,135,195.PN.OS=PN/7,135,195RS=PN/7,135,195
I hope someone can scan it and tell me if it is different from EIS.
On Jan 28, 2008 7:26 AM, Clayton
I'm not an expert on this sort of thing, but I can see it is a high
voltage electrolysis machine with stirring. It claims to make a mostly
colloidal suspension, with little ions. I am not familiar with high
voltage machines. But EIS = electrically isolated silver (but it
really refers to
This is the ready-made CS that I buy through a mlm company with the
exclusive rights to the 14 ppm, 18 ppm and silver gel through this company
that owns the patent. The patent holders also sell the 10 ppm on the
general market but I was told that the 10 ppm would be better for viruses
and not to
18 ppm and silver gel through this company that owns the patent. The
patent holders also sell the 10 ppm on the general market but I was told
that the 10 ppm would be better for viruses and not to mention much cheaper.
The patent is a fraud, worthless, and more.
For one simple reason, it
Wayne:
I agree totally with what you're saying, I don't give a hoot about the
patent anyway. My main reason for writing was if anyone had heard about the
low level of ppm affecting the virus more effectively than the bacteria, but
I guess not. I thought by sending the patent someone could look
Would the level of ppm have any bearing on it's effectivenss on whether it
is a virus or bacteria?
I've heard another forum that the higher the ppm is, the less effective it
is on a virus but more effective on bacteria.
Is there any truth to this? So some are preferring to go with the 10-14 ppm
If I add an equal amount of distilled water to my 10ppm CS,
would I be correct in assuming the result to be 5ppm?
Thanks,
jr
--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org
To post, address your
23 matches
Mail list logo
