---
>> From: Alan Jones
>> To: silver-list@eskimo.com
>> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 10:29
>> Subject: Re: CS>44 PPM
>>
>> I wonder if Frank has changed his mind about this? I was scanning his web
>> site and he seems to be saying that ingesting ionic
Message -
From: ATOMICSILVER
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 09:42
Subject: Re: CS>44 PPM
Hi Jason, what is the best generator in your opinion , many thanks
On 22/09/2011, at 17:43, Jason R Eaton wrote:
Hi Alan:
It's the age old a
ement is that the reason
people experience results with Mesosilver is its ionic content.
Best Regards,
Jason
- Original Message -
From: Alan Jones
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 10:29
Subject: Re: CS>44 PPM
I wonder if Frank has changed his mind ab
From: Bob Banever
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 18:47
Subject: Re: CS>44 PPM
Neville,
But since the ionic content of Mesosilver is almost nonexistant how can
the results be attributed to it's ionic content? Particle silver perhaps
be
lin.com
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CS>44 PPM
Hi Neville,
I have listened to the discussions over the years and have finally decided that
if it works, it works. I really don't need to know the reasons. Both work for
me and Meso works for my wife. Its beyond me why, I just know
Hi Neville,
I have listened to the discussions over the years and have finally
decided that if it works, it works. I really don't need to know the
reasons. Both work for me and Meso works for my wife. Its beyond me
why, I just know they do.
I have reached the point of looking at the use
al
charge? Is this possible?
I'm not entirely sure anyone knows definitively, but I'd certainly welcome any
comment...Or opinion.
N.
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 19:15:05 -0700
From: craigs...@craigcchamberlin.com
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CS>44 PPM
Hi Bob and Nevi
5:56 PM
Subject:
RE: CS>44 PPM
Apologies, I did lose something in translation. I
misread it. I read that several times, and only AFTER posting did I
get it.
The suggestion is that it's NOT the particle content in Mesosilver, but
rather the ION content that gets result
-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 5:56 PM
Subject: RE: CS>44 PPM
Apologies, I did lose something in translation. I misread it. I read that
several times, and only AFTER posting did I get it.
The suggestion is that it's NOT the particle content in Mesosilver, bu
Subject: Re: CS>44 PPM
Hi Alan:
It's the age old arguement. Frank says that the reason people experience
good results with a good quality home brew is the particulate content. The
counter-arguement is that the reason people experience results with Mesosilver
is its ionic
e.red...@hotmail.com
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: CS>44 PPM
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 11:22:54 +1030
Unless I've misread something, all the advertising I've read regarding
Mesosilver is that it purports to be high in *particulate* content?
Have I lost something in translati
Unless I've misread something, all the advertising I've read regarding
Mesosilver is that it purports to be high in *particulate* content?
Have I lost something in translation?
N.
From: ja...@eytonsearth.org
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CS>44 PPM
Date: Thu, 22 S
Jason
- Original Message -
From: Alan Jones
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 10:29
Subject: Re: CS>44 PPM
I wonder if Frank has changed his mind about this? I was scanning his web
site and he seems to be saying that ingesting ionic silver is useless.
I wonder if Frank has changed his mind about this? I was scanning his web
site and he seems to be saying that ingesting ionic silver is useless.
*"All ionic silver will turn into silver chloride once inside the body
because of the readily available supply of chloride ions in many different
forms.
ber 19, 2011 6:46 PM
> To: silver-list@eskimo.com
> Subject: Re: CS>44 PPM [GishPuppy]
>
> Some years back Frank Key posted a reply to a debate that was going on then,
> about particles versus ions I think, and/or manufacturing protocol. It's
> all in the archives. (If
See below.
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan B. Britten [mailto:jbrit...@nakamura-u.ac.jp]
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 6:46 PM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CS>44 PPM [GishPuppy]
Some years back Frank Key posted a reply to a debate that was going on then,
about partic
Ok Renee - smile - I have done that one too
Take good care
Sandee
Attitude is everything !!
Penny Stock Jumping 3000%
Sign up to the #1 voted penny stock newsletter for free today!
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/4e78f29ab270c5
"Mike Monett" wrote:
>
>"PTFerrance" wrote:
>>
>>What I don't understand, Mike, is how everyone that contributes to this list
>>seems to be doing just fine on the CS they make for at least as long as I
>>have been on the list. Now you come along and tell people they are doing
>>everything wrong
"Mike Monett" wrote:
[...]
>The Hanna and COM-100 PWT cannot tell the difference between silver ions
>and any other source of contamination. So the readings mean nothing until
>they have been independently verified.
>
>One way to verify the performance of the system is to monitor the cell
>curre
"Mike Monett" wrote:
>
>Is there any other thing you would wish for?
I forgot. There is one other thing that is very important.
I show you how to make and interpret the conductance plot. This shows how
well your brew is progressing, what happens if you exceed the Nernst
Threshold current, why yo
Nope, sorry. Not a ham. I was crimping coax because I had to make a
certain length of cable for a TV situation.
Samala,
Renee
---Original Message---
Sandee George wrote:
>
>Hi There Mike - maybe Renee is a HAM like I am so, we both know about
>coax and more <>
Hi There Mike, as stated, the problem with this process is the quality
of the distilled water, if that base
is good then the rest will follow, I produce mine without any
problems, use nothing to change any
discoloration cause I do not have any - due to the fact I am more than
careful with the
Well well well Mike - you see how small the world is and how easily
one's secrets are divulged - I think this follow up needs to shift to
OT so will send the rest of this one there - 73s
Sandee
J37LB
Attitude is everything !!
Refina
I'm baffled by the comments. As I stated, Frank Key has stated clearly on the
Silver List, he recognizes the efficacy of the EIS that most members make.
That's a matter of record; it's in the archives.I don't understand the need
to attack him here in this manner.
On 2011/09/20, at
"Jonathan B. Britten" wrote:
>
>Some years back Frank Key posted a reply to a debate that was going on then,
>about particles versus ions I think, and/or manufacturing protocol. It's all
>in the archives. (If memory serves me, a person who wants particles could
>distill out the ions by addin
Sandee George wrote:
>
>Hi There to you both - (Mike & PT) I think what you are both missing
>is that each body is different,
>EIS is very fickle, depending on the status of the distilled water use
>in the manufacture of same. Putting
>the rest of this process into the mix the final result, as i
> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 3:54 PM
> To: silver-list@eskimo.com
> Subject: Re: CS>44 PPM [GishPuppy]
>
> Trem wrote:
>>
>> A few facts.
>>
>> I made a gallon batch several days ago with an SG7. It measured 47uS.
>>
>> Was still climbi
Sandee George wrote:
>
>Hi There Mike - maybe Renee is a HAM like I am so, we both know about
>coax and more
>Take good care
>Regards
>Sandee
>Attitude is everything !!
WooHoo! I am ex VE3CKS (Ontario), VE2BLB (Quebec), F7CD (France), and also
had a VE3 call when I lived in the states but
Hi There Mike - maybe Renee is a HAM like I am so, we both know about
coax and more
Take good care
Regards
Sandee
Attitude is everything !!
57-Year-Old Mom Looks 25
Mom Reveals $5 Wrinkle Trick That Has Angered Doctors!
http://th
Hi There to you both - (Mike & PT) I think what you are both missing
is that each body is different,
EIS is very fickle, depending on the status of the distilled water use
in the manufacture of same. Putting
the rest of this process into the mix the final result, as in most
things, it depen
"PTFerrance" wrote:
>
>What I don't understand, Mike, is how everyone that contributes to this list
>seems to be doing just fine on the CS they make for at least as long as I
>have been on the list. Now you come along and tell people they are doing
>everything wrong and can't possibly be getting
y they are
getting. What is your point? They are demonstrating that *whatever* they
are doing it is working for them.
PT
-Original Message-
From: Mike Monett [mailto:armor@gishpuppy.com]
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 3:54 PM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CS>44 PPM [Gis
Trem wrote:
>
>A few facts.
>
>I made a gallon batch several days ago with an SG7. It measured 47uS.
>
>Was still climbing when shut off.
>
>I made some batches in 2001 when designing the SG7. They were measured
>at 45+PPM. They were all clear and colorless.
>
>I check them every year or so. C
33 matches
Mail list logo
