[sipx-users] Different Auto-Attendants after hours, at Lunch , work hours

2009-05-14 Thread Bryan Hiller
I see that the number of auto attendants may be configured, but how do I get my incoming calls directed to a different auto attendants based on the time of day the call is received. For example: if I work M-F 9-12 1-5 .. I would like a caller to reach a different message at 10am vs 12

[sipx-users] registration issues with SipX 4.0

2009-05-14 Thread Ronny Tjoa
I have registration issue using VOIP routers (Billion7404VGPM and 7401VGPMR3, Dlink VOIP phone DPH-C160S). I can register with Billion 7404VGPM-old firmware, Cisco ATA 186, Xlite. My setup: Public IP SipX 4.0 NAT Traversal No NAT at SipX These routers work with Asterisk. In wireshark log, the

Re: [sipx-users] Enhancement suggestion

2009-05-14 Thread Michael Siebecker
As addition if not available already... Variables in Templates == Some variables should be available for use in templates so that information can be reused. In the given case, it shoud be possible to specify the setting of Caller ID based on data available at a different sour

Re: [sipx-users] Hunt Group >3 extensions is not falling back to an auto attendant

2009-05-14 Thread Nathaniel Watkins
Milosz 1) Different Subnets - No, we have been putting all of our VOIP devices on the same VLAN - so as far as layer 3 is concerned, they do not see any routing. 2) We are using SRV records. 3) I will install/test with audiocodes 5.2 firmware - hopefully tonight. A potentially dumb question...

Re: [sipx-users] Call Park Issue - sipxecs 3.11.12-014990

2009-05-14 Thread Tony Graziano
Two things to ask first: 1. Can assume you have your internal dialplan set for 4 digits? 2. Are you aware you are on a non-production version and that upgrading to a stable release might not be possible? That being said you should make sure you have a current AudioCodes firmware version, can you

Re: [sipx-users] Call Park Issue - sipxecs 3.11.12-014990

2009-05-14 Thread Dale Worley
On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 12:37 -0700, Jason Jason wrote: > Any assistance would be greatly appreciated J > Without a snapshot of a specific failure instance, there isn't much we can do. Dale ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Lis

Re: [sipx-users] Call Park Issue - sipxecs 3.11.12-014990

2009-05-14 Thread Scott Lawrence
On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 12:37 -0700, Jason Jason wrote: > Sipxecs Version: 3.11.12-014990 2009-03-22T14:01:49 ecs-centos5 > > Gateway: Audiocodes Mediant 600 > > Softphones: Eyebeam 1.5.19.5 Build 52344 > > Hardphones: Nortel 6830 > > Issue: Call Park Issue > > > > After setting up Call

[sipx-users] Call Park Issue - sipxecs 3.11.12-014990

2009-05-14 Thread Jason Jason
Sipxecs Version: 3.11.12-014990 2009-03-22T14:01:49 ecs-centos5 Gateway: Audiocodes Mediant 600 Softphones: Eyebeam 1.5.19.5 Build 52344 Hardphones: Nortel 6830 Issue: Call Park Issue   After setting up Call Park, giving it extension , we are having many issues including: · Softphones

Re: [sipx-users] Call Waiting ISSUE

2009-05-14 Thread Bryan Hiller
I have fixed the issue. Dale and Tony, you were both correct. It was both a bandwidth.com issue and outdated firmware/bootrom software. Tony, the update for the phone software went very smooth, thank you. Sometimes that wiki can be a little daunting considering 50-75% of the materials appear

Re: [sipx-users] Public IP Requirement is mendatory in ITSP and RemoteRegistration?

2009-05-14 Thread Todd Hodgen
You can use a Dymanic IP address with your ITSP. At least I do with mine - VOIP.MS You will need to open a pinhole in your router, and port forwarding in the router. I have a working configuration like that today that I would be happy to share. Stun isn't require, but if your ISP isn't consist

Re: [sipx-users] Public IP Requirement is mendatory in ITSP and Remote Registration?

2009-05-14 Thread Carlos Robotti
You can do this as follows: For outgoing traffic you will not have any problem, but with remote workers or incoming calls from ITSP they will need to find the sipx host. 1. DNS: a. If you have a dynamic ip address (DHCP lease) on your public interface you will need Dynamic DNS and re

Re: [sipx-users] Hunt Group >3 extensions is not falling back to an auto attendant

2009-05-14 Thread milosz
a few things: (1) are the audiocodes and the sipx gear/phones on different subnets? if so, make sure the sip alg is off on the device doing the routing between them. (2) is your dns resolution method set to A-record? if so, your proxy name should be the fqdn of your sipx server, not your sip dom

Re: [sipx-users] Call Waiting ISSUE

2009-05-14 Thread Dale Worley
On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 05:33 -0700, Bryan Hiller wrote: > I am having an issue with 4.0.0 and call waiting. > > issue: When I am on the line with someone and another caller is calls > in, the call I am on automatically drops. This is almost certainly not a sipX problem. If it is a problem with y

Re: [sipx-users] Call Waiting Issue

2009-05-14 Thread Tony Graziano
I don't think there will be any issue with running 3.1.3 firmware, even though sipx doesn't officially support it yet, because the differences ebtween 3.1.2 and 3.1.3 refer to a phone that you are not using, so you should be good there. I did post a link to bootrom 4.1.2, but should be revision

Re: [sipx-users] Upgrade from 3.11.12 to 4.0 stable - EPIC FAIL!

2009-05-14 Thread Kevin Thorley
On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 11:18 +0200, Borginger Rikard wrote: > Ok, sorry, I thought this was a common problem with a standard solution! =) > > Here are my output and logs.. > [...] Here is the interesting part (and the reason that sipXconfig is not starting): > "2009-05-12T14:13:26.437000Z":3:JAV

Re: [sipx-users] Call Waiting Issue

2009-05-14 Thread Tony Graziano
Your firmware and botrom are VERY old. Upgrade to bootrom 4.2 and firmware 3.1.2. >>> Bryan Hiller 05/14/09 10:41 AM >>> I know I have 1 trunk, but I am not sure Call waiting is disabled at bandwidth I will check Bootrom: 3.2.2.0019 Firmware: 2.2.2.013 Looks like I need to update... how

Re: [sipx-users] Call Waiting Issue

2009-05-14 Thread Tony Graziano
It's all in the wiki. Devices>Device Files>ADD FILES... Polycom Soundpoint Give it a name (no spaces), SAVE. Open the NAME you just created. Upload the files below to the bootrom and sip application locations it prvides. After the uploads are done (you do have to download them first), ACTVIVAT

[sipx-users] Call Waiting Issue

2009-05-14 Thread Bryan Hiller
I know I have 1 trunk, but I am not sure Call waiting is disabled at bandwidth I will check Bootrom: 3.2.2.0019 Firmware: 2.2.2.013 Looks like I need to update... how do I do this with sipx, or do I have to manually download the file to the tftp server? Bryan

Re: [sipx-users] CAll Waiting Issue

2009-05-14 Thread Tony Graziano
Still need to know bootrom and firmware on the phone. It might just be relevant, or at least make sure the bootrom is 4.2 and the firmware is 3.1.2. When you are on a call, how in the world is bandwidth.com sending you another call? It should be ringing busy. They shouldn't be doing that. Have t

[sipx-users] CAll Waiting Issue

2009-05-14 Thread Bryan Hiller
Bootrom/Firmware on your phone: Is your phone remote or local to sipXecs? Is the call you are on an outside call when you get the second call? How many siptrunks do you have? Who is your provider? When you say bandwidth do you mean bandwidth.com? What is your call waiting setting for the phone is

Re: [sipx-users] sipx and sipnet.ru

2009-05-14 Thread M. Ranganathan
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 6:42 AM, Alexey Lubimov wrote: > Is it possible to use gateway sipnet.ru  with sipX? > > Any solutions, howto to configure sipX 4.0? Absolutely no idea (my Russian is a bit rusty) but presumably they are an ITSP and if so it ought to work. Any idea what kind of infrastruct

Re: [sipx-users] Public IP Requirement is mendatory in ITSP and Remote Registration?

2009-05-14 Thread Scott Lawrence
On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 12:53 +0530, VG wrote: > Hi, > > I like to know do we need a Public IP must for both in ITSP Calling > and Remote registration? > > Without Public ip can both work on basis of stun.. Yes, you can use a dynamic ip address and stun. It is significantly less reliable that

Re: [sipx-users] Public IP Requirement is mendatory in ITSP andRemoteRegistration?

2009-05-14 Thread Robert Joly
> Thanks Tony. > > But i want to know simply that if i configure sipx on local > ip like sip 192.168.x.x and there is a dsl router comes in > picture with dynamic ip given by my isp then sipx will work > for itsp registration in that case. Any time you deploy sipX in a private network behind a

Re: [sipx-users] not able to register a sip user in 4.0 version.

2009-05-14 Thread Scott Lawrence
On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 15:16 +0530, VG wrote: > Hi, > > I am getting Trying and then 408 request timeout in response to registration > > I have attached the sipXproxy.log and sipregistrar.log for your kind > reference. You don't have all your DNS records set up correctly. These log entries from

Re: [sipx-users] Call Waiting ISSUE more info

2009-05-14 Thread Tony Graziano
It would be good to provide some more detail with something like this. Bootrom/Firmware on your phone: Is your phone remote or local to sipXecs? Is the call you are on an outside call when you get the second call? How many siptrunks do you have? Who is your provider? When you say bandwidth do you

[sipx-users] Call Waiting ISSUE more info

2009-05-14 Thread Bryan Hiller
The 1st caller is not dropped, They can hear my voice, but I can not hear theirs.This happens until the 2nd caller gets voicemail and then the call resumes. Thanks ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.

[sipx-users] Call Waiting ISSUE

2009-05-14 Thread Bryan Hiller
I am having an issue with 4.0.0 and call waiting. issue: When I am on the line with someone and another caller is calls in, the call I am on automatically drops. SetuP: Public IP 4.0.0 Bandwidth with 1 sip trunk 1 polycom sounpoint 301 1 user ext 301 All calls routed to 301 Any help would de

[sipx-users] sipx and sipnet.ru

2009-05-14 Thread Alexey Lubimov
Is it possible to use gateway sipnet.ru with sipX? Any solutions, howto to configure sipX 4.0? ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.o

Re: [sipx-users] Public IP Requirement is mendatory in ITSP and RemoteRegistration?

2009-05-14 Thread Tony Graziano
If your firewall has a dynamic ip address then you have to also use a DNS host that supports SRV, NAPTR and Dynamic DNS, wouldn't you? Any comments from anyone else? >>> VG 05/14/09 5:40 AM >>> Thanks Tony. But i want to know simply that if i configure sipx on local ip like sip 192.168.x.x a

[sipx-users] not able to register a sip user in 4.0 version.

2009-05-14 Thread VG
Hi, I am getting Trying and then 408 request timeout in response to registration I have attached the sipXproxy.log and sipregistrar.log for your kind reference. Also specify Where Can i found config.defs file for sipx.. Regards, VG log.tar.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data _

Re: [sipx-users] Public IP Requirement is mendatory in ITSP and RemoteRegistration?

2009-05-14 Thread VG
Thanks Tony. But i want to know simply that if i configure sipx on local ip like sip 192.168.x.x and there is a dsl router comes in picture with dynamic ip given by my isp then sipx will work for itsp registration in that case. I like to know that itsp calling module will first ask to stun for it

Re: [sipx-users] Public IP Requirement is mendatory in ITSP and RemoteRegistration?

2009-05-14 Thread Tony Graziano
This is two different questions, and the answer to one actually depends on the other. If your ITSP required registration, and can send you calls on a port other than 5060, then I think a dynamic isp address will work for both. If your ITSP requires a static IP address, then that does limit you o

[sipx-users] Public IP Requirement is mendatory in ITSP and Remote Registration?

2009-05-14 Thread VG
Hi, I like to know do we need a Public IP must for both in ITSP Calling and Remote registration? Without Public ip can both work on basis of stun. Regards, VG ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.