SipX media services at the moment can not support anything other than
G.711u. If you have 2 end points however that want to talk with a
different Codec, sipX does not care about that because it's not in the
middle of the conversation.
CAC - not to my knowledge.
QoS Marking - the phones can
Thanks Todd for the wise words. As was announced this deal will not
close before the end of the year the earliest. We are determined to
continue. Our primary goal is to close on a next release, 4.2, before
the year is out. Any help we can get towards that objective would be
great. In addition, spre
I was wondering if there is any support on SIPX for the following features:
- Codec support (other than G.711u). Can SIPX support G.729 or G.711a?
- Can SIPX support Call Admission Control (CAC)?
- Can SIPX support QoS marking for SIP signaling and RTP packets?
Thanks in advance for all help,
We have the following platform:
• SIPxecs 4.0.2
• Polycom 320/330
• Audiocodes TP260
The problem comes when I call autoattendant, the call is only transferred to
the operator not to the selected extension but, if the user is assigned a DID
if you can receive the call via the au
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 14:31 -0400, Nathaniel Watkins wrote:
> Does anyone know if there is a way to voice our support for keeping
> this project moving?
Buy many copies of Nortel/Avaya SCS!
Dale
___
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.
Perhaps donations to the Open Source Community of SipFoundry, which is not
owned by Nortel, is in order. Our loudest voice, I would think, is with our
wallets to support the open source concept. SipFoundry's destiny is their
own. And the user community plays a big part of their success or failur
Does anyone know if there is a way to voice our support for keeping this
project moving? I've been playing with sipx for a while - I don't know
if we will put all of our users on an open source (i.e. I have to fix
it) solution, but it is certainly a way for Avaya to get their foot in
the door goin
Matt White wrote:
True, Avaya has no pure "softswitch" product. So it would fill a hole
for them.
My concern is just that opensource and avaya are not the best of
friends. And with SipX being license LGPL they could start pulling
all new features in as non-opensource components. Leaving t
True, Avaya has no pure "softswitch" product. So it would fill a hole for them.
My concern is just that opensource and avaya are not the best of friends. And
with SipX being license LGPL they could start pulling all new features in as
non-opensource components. Leaving the opensource version
I've sent a description to the snom forum.
http://forum.snom.com/index.php?showtopic=2094
Nikolay.
_
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Nikolay
Kondratyev
Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:25 PM
To: 'Alberto'
Cc
Alberto,
I just checked and unfortunately setting server type support to nortel did
not help.
Meanwhile I belive it's a snom problem, either configuration problem or a
bug. Since the phone supports authorization during registration it must
support it during "unregistration".
And the problem is
Hi Nikolay,
I confirm the issue. You did an excellent deep analysis. I cannot tell
if there is a solution playing with the phone config.
I would suggest to try to set manually in your Identity (SIP) Server
Type Support to Nortel. I couldn't find a good reason to set it myself,
but someone rep
Hi all,
I found that when snom phone is rebooted it does not terminate current
registration.
To be more precise snom 360 (firmware 7.3.26) phone attempts to clear old
registration.
The phone sends Register with Expires=0.
But sipX (4.0.2-016420, installed from iso) challenges this "unregiste
That being said, they really don't have anything positioned like
sipXecs. Their solutions in the SMB space are all hardware based
solutions.
With competitors like Mitel (their 3300 call control is now available on
VMWare) and Shoretel (Shoreware Director runs in Windows) in the SME
space deliveri
14 matches
Mail list logo
