On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Gabe Casey wrote:
> In the case of calls originating from the pstn to my media gateways an
> operator trying to perform a consultative transfer will always fail because
> of this , what workaround options would you suggest given that the issue is
> slated to fix ve
In the case of calls originating from the pstn to my media gateways an operator
trying to perform a consultative transfer will always fail because of this ,
what workaround options would you suggest given that the issue is slated to fix
version 5 , would i be better off using another SBC for now
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Gabe Casey wrote:
> I was reading the wiki on SipXBride
>
> "Typically ITSPs do not handle certain types of SIP requests such as REFER
> which is used in Call Transfer operations. To implement call transfer,
> SipXbridge does signaling translation, converting a REF
I was reading the wiki on SipXBride
"Typically ITSPs do not handle certain types of SIP requests such as REFER
which is used in Call Transfer operations. To implement call transfer,
SipXbridge does signaling translation, converting a REFER request to an INVITE
request to the call transfer targ
I fooled around it rebooted and the process was there, 100% of the CPU
consumed. If I add conference role back in and restart services, all looks
good. I am thinking it could have to do with removing the role with the
conference disabled but present.
Is there a procedure to remove such a role besi
FWIW - even though http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XTRN-942 is closed and
"fixed", in Polycom 3.2.2, the firmware will not be supported until 4.2 (in
stable version anyway).
Having been down the road before, if you are on a stable version of sipx,
use a firmware that's KNOWN to work properly.
Could you post a link to the tracker with the issues enumerated.
I'd like to know the dangers.
s
> Do you mean bootrom 4.2.1 or firmware3.2.1? Firmware 3.2.1 has known issues
> (see the tracker)., so beware.
>
> Tony Graziano, Manager
> Telephone: 434.984.8430
> Fa
I have a wizard for traffic shaping with sipx on pfsesne.
Blog.myitdepartment.net
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
Fax: 434.984.8431
Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net
LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
Telephone: 434.984.8426
Fax: 43
Tim,
I have experience with all three products... definitely pfSense over
Untangle (shudder).
The new ISA / TMG from Microsoft is pretty good, but for pure speed I'd
look to pfSense.
Mike
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] O
Sorry. I meant bootrom 4.2.1
On 1/12/2010 12:43 PM, Tony Graziano wrote:
> Do you mean bootrom 4.2.1 or firmware3.2.1? Firmware 3.2.1 has known issues
> (see the tracker)., so beware.
>
> Tony Graziano, Manager
> Telephone: 434.984.8430
> Fax: 434.984.8431
>
> Email:
Do you mean bootrom 4.2.1 or firmware3.2.1? Firmware 3.2.1 has known issues
(see the tracker)., so beware.
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
Fax: 434.984.8431
Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net
LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
Teleph
Firmware 4.2.1 is working well for me.
On 1/12/2010 11:57 AM, Robert B wrote:
From a posting a few weeks ago, I recall it was 3.1.3c and BootROM
4.2.0... Is this still true?
-- Robert
___
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List
Yes
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
Fax: 434.984.8431
Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net
LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
Telephone: 434.984.8426
Fax: 434.984.8427
Helpdesk Contract Customers:
http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/
I have been using sipXecs with a dedicated ADSL line for a while now with
great success. Call quality has been excellent overall, with only a few rare
or minor issues. I have not had a need for QoS on this connection.
I now have a need to set up QoS for 1) remote workers, and 2) a new install
for
From a posting a few weeks ago, I recall it was 3.1.3c and BootROM
4.2.0... Is this still true?
-- Robert
___
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.s
I had thought of that, Michael, but it adds a layer of complexity to the flow
that I, frankly, don't want.
Dale, I am working with 3 Polycom 650's and 1 550, with boot ROM 4.2 and
firmware 3.1.3 Rev C
-Original Message-
From: Picher, Michael [mailto:mpic...@cmctechgroup.com]
Sent: Mo
Has anybody been successful getting MOH working on the Cisco 7941G phones? We
have it working on other phones, but not the Cisco. Any info would be greatly
appreciated.
We are running SIPX 4.0.4 and firmware 8.5.3 on the phones.
Dylan Ebner, Network Engineer
Consulting Radiologists, Ltd.
1221 N
We tried dropping the database, then when sipx asked for a new superadmin
password, we got the java error again. So we decided to reload the server and
restore from backups. Seems to be working... for now.
Dylan Ebner, Network Engineer
Consulting Radiologists, Ltd.
1221 Nicollet Mall, Minneapo
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 15:06 +1300, Justin Menga wrote:
> I have set up unsolicited MWI fine, however I notice that SIPXecs
> sends a NOTIFY message for every registration event from a SIP UA,
> including re-registrations.
>
> This behaviour differs from as an example Cisco Unity/CallManager,
> whi
Thanks to everyone that assisted, especially TOny for all his assistance. This
is now sorted, which was related tot he wrong domain setting bwing set in the
phone profiles.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net]
Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 07:21 P
20 matches
Mail list logo
