Can anyone share positive experience how to interconnect Cisco CM and
sipXecs 4.0.4?
It seems to me that I cannot make right CM settings to receive calls from
sipXecs.
CM box - 192.168.1.3
sipXecs - 10.0.20.2 sip trunk without NAT to CM configured.
I can call from 7...@192.168.1.3 to
On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 18:01 -0500, Arjun Sambamoorthy wrote:
Hello All,
I accidentally ran into this issue with sipXecs while working on my
project. Thought of letting you guys know about it. May be its a known
issue. If it is, my apologies.
When I make a call from a valid user registered
On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 20:25 -0400, Roman Gelfand wrote:
After running configuration diagnostic tests, the bottom portion
pertaining to various web services like dsn, ftp, etc.. is showing
Starting DHCP server test.
Sending DHCPDISCOVER request.
Read timeout: Receive timed out
Network
Hi,
Thanks for the link. I've already seen it and will try the soonest. In the
meantime I need a working SEP.xml file for Cisco 7970G phone. SipXecs is
unable to load the phone by adding managed phones.
I'm unsure why at this moment.
Anyone here got this working with SipXecs-4.0.4.
Thanks
On
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Organization: SipXecs Forum
In-Reply-To: 2fa1e1781002221646m3a767739y78f09c25b206d...@mail.gmail.com
X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 43914
Message-ID: ab8a.4bacb...@forum.sipfoundry.org
The request is really
-Original Message-
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Dale D
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 6:49 AM
To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Delete VM After Email
Content-Type: text/plain;
just add your sipx server in the filed processNodeName on Node Name
and then it will work.
it took a while for me to find a fw that doesn't have issues so good luck
with that ;)
-gabriel
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Rhon wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the link. I've already seen it and will try the
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Organization: SipXecs Forum
In-Reply-To: 00d501cacd03$da2cb740$8e8625...@net
X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 43921
Message-ID: ab91.4bad0...@forum.sipfoundry.org
Todd Hodgen wrote on Fri, 26 March 2010 11:46
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Dale D d...@dejagers.net wrote:
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Organization: SipXecs Forum
In-Reply-To: 00d501cacd03$da2cb740$8e8625...@net
X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 43921
Message-ID:
-Original Message-
From: Scott Lawrence [mailto:xmlsc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 12:17 PM
To: Todd Hodgen
Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Call failures via UDP
On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 11:01 -0700, Todd Hodgen wrote:
I have a scenario where
Yes, I'll look at it this weekend. Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 2:17 PM
To: thod...@verizon.net
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Call failures via UDP
Does vop have a setting for topiology that let's you
On 3/26/2010 3:15 PM, Tony Graziano wrote:
Email systems are supposed to 1) attempt redelivery for at
least 24 hours on the sending side (which I assume sendmail
does in sipXecs) and 2) make provisions on the the receiving
side for an alternate mail server to accept, store,
Not sure if this is the right place for this.
I am looking into a SIP gateway that can front end an overhead paging
system and found the CyberData - Voip Paging Server
http://www.cyberdata.net/products/voip/legacyanalog/paginggateway/index
.html
They claim to be tested and/or certified
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Organization: SipXecs Forum
In-Reply-To: 4bad18d7.7000...@drouillard.ca
X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 43926
Message-ID: ab96.4bad1...@forum.sipfoundry.org
I was not trying to upset the IMAP applecart for
Ive looked at them and wondered as well, but valcom is a little more
serious. Depends on your application of course.
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Matt White mwh...@thesummit-grp.comwrote:
I've used them.
They do work out of the box, but I found the voice quality to be sub-par.
Currently
Both of you are making assumptions that a queue is involved with Javamail
aren't you? IMAP handling is done through Javamail which is somewhat
independent. While it may sync the data, verifying anything is a different
story.
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Dale D d...@dejagers.net wrote:
I've used them.
They do work out of the box, but I found the voice quality to be sub-par.
Currently we simply use a standard FXO gateway to traditional paging devices
like bogen.
McIlvin, Don don.mcil...@nrtnortheast.com 03/26/10 4:51 PM
o:shapedefaults v:ext=edit spidmax=1026 /
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Organization: SipXecs Forum
In-Reply-To: d99f07871003261427p42b3f908vecbe7a8910b1f...@mail.gmail.com
X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 43932
Message-ID: ab9c.4bad2...@forum.sipfoundry.org
I don't think I'm
-Original Message-
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Dale D
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 1:51 PM
To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Delete VM After Email
Content-Type: text/plain;
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Dale D d...@dejagers.net wrote:
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Organization: SipXecs Forum
In-Reply-To: d99f07871003261427p42b3f908vecbe7a8910b1f...@mail.gmail.com
X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 43932
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Arjun Sambamoorthy
[arjun...@gmail.com]
When I make a call from a valid user registered with sipX to another
valid registered sipX user. I get a 407 Proxy
If I were you I'd ensure the DNS for the sipx system is working properly.
A while back I did a how-to for the wiki on Snom m3 configuration. There
are a couple of things:
1. Upgrade the firmware, it takes a while.
2. Snom m3's do not properly lookup SRV records, older firmware locks up or
reboot
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Organization: SipXecs Forum
In-Reply-To: d99f07871003261557h47ec1f23t240bd8b45d345...@mail.gmail.com
X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 43937
Message-ID: aba1.4bad4...@forum.sipfoundry.org
I'll be happy to
But if the message is not delivered, deliverable or delayed, shouldn't it
remain in VM as a precautionary measure?
Or justzap it into an etherworld?
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
Fax: 434.984.8431
Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Organization: SipXecs Forum
In-Reply-To: 8add6249e22601697b6eab350640d...@mail.gmail.com
X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 43939
Message-ID: aba3.4bad4...@forum.sipfoundry.org
If the user wants the messages
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Organization: SipXecs Forum
X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 43940
Message-ID: aba4.4bad5...@forum.sipfoundry.org
I would like to manually configure a phone for eventlist BLF
because it is not being properly
On 3/26/2010 8:18 PM, Dale D wrote:
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Organization: SipXecs Forum
In-Reply-To:8add6249e22601697b6eab350640d...@mail.gmail.com
X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e843939
Hi,
What firmware version did you use so I can start looking for one?
Thanks
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 2:30 AM, gabriel g...@bayintegrated.net wrote:
just add your sipx server in the filed processNodeName on Node Name and
then it will work.
it took a while for me to find a fw that doesn't
28 matches
Mail list logo
