Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Organization: SipXecs Forum In-Reply-To: <d99f07871003261427p42b3f908vecbe7a8910b1f...@mail.gmail.com> X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 <43932> Message-ID: <ab9c.4bad2...@forum.sipfoundry.org>
I don't think I'm making any assumptions about how the existing system works, I was just try to specifiy a simple requirement for a feature that is not related to IMAP at all. One does not need IMAP to send an email via SMTP to a remote email system. One only needs IMAP to sychronize message stores. If the local store is not used and the message is simply sent off to somewhere else, then no IMAP is ever involved in what I'm proposing. I guess I did assume that at the bottom of all the sipXecs code that sendmail was ultimately used for the delivery of email off the system...why would one want to write another SMTP engine? Are you saying that sendmail is not used and that outbound SMTP traffic is implimented via some custom java code that does not do retries as required by the email RFCs? _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
