I can do a one off build of FC12 RPM's if anyone needs them (I 32 or 64 bit).
-Eric
On Apr 15, 2010, at 8:04 PM, Josh Patten wrote:
> +1
>
> I have plenty of VM resources I can dedicate to getting the 64 bit RPM's
> built.
>
> mkitchin.pub...@gmail.com wrote:
>> I don't need the ISO either. I
Earlier, I posted that we started noticing clicks and pops that we thought
hadn't been there before.
Strangely, I upgraded one of the servers that I reported earlier and after the
upgrade, it's clear as a bell now.
I'll upgrade another and see what happens.
_
Hi, All,
I am running 4.0.4-018580 in my lab and want to test Aggressive mode in
Media Relay. My sipx stays in 192.168.2.4 and two of my test end points
reside respectively in 192.168.2.31 and 10.33.150.150.
When I turn on the Aggressive mode in Medial Relay and then make a restart,
the call can
+1
I have plenty of VM resources I can dedicate to getting the 64 bit RPM's
built.
mkitchin.pub...@gmail.com wrote:
> I don't need the ISO either. If it is hardware resources or man hours needed
> to help get these created, I would be glad to help.
> Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
>
> -
I don't need the ISO either. If it is hardware resources or man hours needed to
help get these created, I would be glad to help.
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: Josh Patten
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:54:09
To:
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released
>>> On 4/15/2010 at 08:31 PM, in message <4bc7afde.7040...@co.brazos.tx.us>,
>>> Josh Patten wrote:
>>>
>>>Much better looking
>>>
>>>You know, I went to the forums today and saw there are posts that I'm
>>>not seeing in the mailing list. Is this the expected design or is
>>>something not right
Much better looking
You know, I went to the forums today and saw there are posts that I'm
not seeing in the mailing list. Is this the expected design or is
something not right?
Administrator wrote:
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="utf-8"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> Organization
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Organization: SipXecs Forum
In-Reply-To:
X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 <44727>
Message-ID:
I've applied your new template.
Lets see what people think.
On a side note, you might want to consider joinin
+1
I use all 64 bit CentOS on my server.
I don't care if there is an ISO as I prefer to do the OS install myself.
Josh Patten
Assistant Network Administrator
Brazos County IT Dept.
(979) 361-4676
On 4/15/2010 4:05 PM, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) wrote:
On 4/15/2010 3:42 PM, Scott Lawrence
Is there some way to configure it so the default music on hold is used while
calls are being transferred by the AA but when I hit 'hold' on an active phone
call from a polycom 650 or 335, or try to transfer the call to another
extension, its just silent? I keep spamming conference bridges with t
On 4/15/2010 3:42 PM, Scott Lawrence wrote:
At this time we don't have 64 bit rpms built (those build servers got
turned off a while ago for some reason - we'll try to get them back on
line soon. There are not and will not be 64bit ISO images, and I
suggest using 32bit for any new systems).
T
Build 4.2.0-018575 is posted and stable!
This release resolves over 900 issues - some of the highlights
are listed below.
XMPP – Instant Messaging Server
* [XX-4825] - Integration with XMPP
* [XX-6519] - Manage server-to-server federation for OpenFire
server
I have had a strange problem pop up.
One of my sites has a branch office that has its own AC gateway for outbound
calls.
All of the sudden, they can only sporadically dial out.
The calls that fail register in sipx but never hit the gateway.
A sipxtrace of the calls return a 404 error.
Other br
Should I start a new thread since this isn't memory related.
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 11:06:43 -0500, m...@grounded.net wrote:
> I seem to have an intermittent problem with a blade in a BladeCenter.
>
> DIAGS: 001-250-001-20100414-56-Core System : Failed ECC_MEM&1 (CPU 1:
> Single Bit Error Not Set
>
Forgot to mention... this is using sipx only. No gateways, nothing else, just
sipx and a phone on the LAN.
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 12:10:36 -0500, m...@grounded.net wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 11:16:51 -0500, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) wrote:
>
>> Here is someone else who was experiencing a
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 11:16:51 -0500, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) wrote:
> Here is someone else who was experiencing a clicking. Different
> scenario, but maybe you can find a common cause...
Saw that thread, haven't found an answer.
The testing we've done so far is to turn ACD off on two blade
Here is someone else who was experiencing a clicking. Different
scenario, but maybe you can find a common cause...
http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/msg23048.html
On 4/15/2010 11:06 AM, m...@grounded.net wrote:
> I seem to have an intermittent problem with a blade in a BladeCenter.
On 4/15/2010 10:45 AM, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) wrote:
Never mind.. I guess.
Deleted everything and re-added it for the 6th time, and it worked. I
must have been doing something out of the order it preferred.
SIP Trunking is still failing showing this error:
* Configuration file /
I seem to have an intermittent problem with a blade in a BladeCenter.
DIAGS: 001-250-001-20100414-56-Core System : Failed ECC_MEM&1 (CPU 1: Single
Bit Error Not Set
I'll change the memory out but am wondering what else I should look at. When
recording messages, we are hearing a sort of clickin
SIP Trunking is still failing showing this error:
* Configuration file /etc/sipxpbx/peeridentities.xml not found --
ignoring
* SipXbridge : Exception caught while running
* java.lang.NullPointerException
* at java.lang.String.(String.java:147)
* at
org.sipfoundry.sipxbri
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 16:09:16 -0400, Tony Graziano wrote:
> I don't prefer beer in my coffee. Something stronger and darker from a
> barrel out of kentucky.
This morning, just the thought of that makes my head spin.
We spent last evening on part two of a beer making class at a local distillery.
P
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Josh Patten wrote:
> (I was addressing Ranga, ensuring him that I didn't mean to avoid 4.2
> altogether, just to wait until the official announcement to start
> installing/upgrading).
>
> Also, to be honest I didn't even make the connection between my name and
> t
On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 08:07 -0500, Josh Patten wrote:
> http://sipxecssw.org/pub/sipXecs/index.php?dir=4.2.0%2F
>
> If this is the final release could someone update the web page please,
> and make a post to the mailing list?
As previously noted, there is (at this writing) still one outstanding
(I was addressing Ranga, ensuring him that I didn't mean to avoid 4.2
altogether, just to wait until the official announcement to start
installing/upgrading).
Also, to be honest I didn't even make the connection between my name and
that quote at first.
Josh Patten
Assistant Network Administrat
I was just making a Wargames reference.
On 4/15/2010 9:27 AM, Josh Patten wrote:
> What I meant was wait until the sipX team is finished publishing/posting
> the 4.2 version on the website and THEN have a go at it, not to avoid it
> altogether.
>
> Josh Patten
> Assistant Network Administrator
> B
What I meant was wait until the sipX team is finished publishing/posting
the 4.2 version on the website and THEN have a go at it, not to avoid it
altogether.
Josh Patten
Assistant Network Administrator
Brazos County IT Dept.
(979) 361-4676
On 4/15/2010 9:25 AM, M. Ranganathan wrote:
> On Thu,
How about a nice game of: Global Thermonuclear War
Kurt
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 9:03 AM, Josh Patten wrote:
> At this point I think "the only winning move is not to play"
>
> Josh Patten
> Assistant Network Administrator
> Brazos County IT Dept.
> (979) 361-4676
>
> On 4/15/2010 9:01 AM, Michael
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet)
wrote:
> Well said, Joshua.
>
> On 4/15/2010 9:03 AM, Josh Patten wrote:
>
> At this point I think "the only winning move is not to play"
Err... what exactly is our benefit of releasing an open source version
then? If you are ju
Well said, Joshua.
On 4/15/2010 9:03 AM, Josh Patten wrote:
At this point I think "the only winning move is not to play"
Josh Patten
Assistant Network Administrator
Brazos County IT Dept.
(979) 361-4676
On 4/15/2010 9:01 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 4/15/10 9:56 AM, Josh Patten wrote:
Also
On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 21:22 +0800, Rhon wrote:
> Bump on this thread!!
>
> We are still stuck with this problem despite many efforts to resolve
> it. We don't have any idea on why can't polycom able to call cisco
> 7970G phone connected on the same sipx server.
> Both are collecting DHCP, DNS AND
On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 21:09 +0800, Rhon wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> Sipx to Sipx are working now. Thanks for all your help.
>
> Now our problem is how we can directly call an extension without
> passing the AA.
>
> Any thoughts on how to accomplish this?
perhaps you should write a new description
>
> Also I don't see any 64 bit RPM's. perhaps someone got trigger happy?
What you see is part of the preparation work required to create the 4.2 release
but we do not have our golden load yet. We are all pretty excited about
releasing 4.2 because it is a big milestone and trust me that it wil
At this point I think "the only winning move is not to play"
Josh Patten
Assistant Network Administrator
Brazos County IT Dept.
(979) 361-4676
On 4/15/2010 9:01 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 4/15/10 9:56 AM, Josh Patten wrote:
Also I don't see any 64 bit RPM's. perhaps someone got trigger h
On 4/15/10 9:56 AM, Josh Patten wrote:
Also I don't see any 64 bit RPM's. perhaps someone got trigger happy?
any guess as to if its stable enough (if we don't have polycom 650's
with FW 3.2.3) to UPGRADE an existing 4.04?
and what procedures, right after a backup would it be?
--
Michael
Also I don't see any 64 bit RPM's. perhaps someone got trigger happy?
Josh Patten
Assistant Network Administrator
Brazos County IT Dept.
(979) 361-4676
On 4/15/2010 8:40 AM, Matt White wrote:
On 4/15/2010 at 09:07 AM, in message<4bc70fa6.5060...@co.brazos.tx.us>,
Josh Patten wrote:
>
>>> On 4/15/2010 at 09:07 AM, in message <4bc70fa6.5060...@co.brazos.tx.us>,
>>> Josh Patten wrote:
>>>
>>>http://sipxecssw.org/pub/sipXecs/index.php?dir=4.2.0%2F
>>>
>>>If this is the final release could someone update the web page please,
>>>and make a post to the mailing list?
Tracker still s
Bump on this thread!!
We are still stuck with this problem despite many efforts to resolve it. We
don't have any idea on why can't polycom able to call cisco 7970G phone
connected on the same sipx server.
Both are collecting DHCP, DNS AND TFTP information on sipx server as well.
I have assigned g
Hi Michael,
Sipx to Sipx are working now. Thanks for all your help.
Now our problem is how we can directly call an extension without passing the
AA.
Any thoughts on how to accomplish this?
Thanks in advance.
Rhon
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Picher, Michael
wrote:
> Are the phones using
http://sipxecssw.org/pub/sipXecs/index.php?dir=4.2.0%2F
If this is the final release could someone update the web page please,
and make a post to the mailing list?
___
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipf
Back to topic: +1
2010/4/14 Tony Graziano
> I don't prefer beer in my coffee. Something stronger and darker from a
> barrel out of kentucky.
>
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 4:08 PM, m...@grounded.net
> wrote:
> > Must be something in my coffee. I think I need beer now.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 14 Apr 20
Are the phones using the same DNS as the PBX?
That should all work if DNS is working properly and there is a gateway
in each pbx for the other's SIP domain.
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of ronald teng
Sent: Thursday,
Hallo list members,
I know that there are already several posts about Polycom KIRK stations but
I but those features are never mentioned.
Is it possible to observe a KIRK handset's presence (for BLF) with another
VoIP Telephone?
http://www.polycom.com/global/documents/support/sales_marketing/prod
Hi all.
I might be blind but i can't seem to find itsp account settings such as
user name, password etc in 4.2 *4.2.0-018575*
They are not under gateway/advanced where i expect to find them. I
believe i looked everywhere and searched the wiki.
Sorry...thank you.
*Vänliga Hälsningar/Best Rega
Reconfigured my router/gateway w/ different ip(s) and setup gre vpn config
and now im back to having problems with receiving incoming calls. Same
symptoms, i can call the AA from an outside pstn line but when i ask it to
transfer me to a user extension, it just stays silent for a minute then goes
b
44 matches
Mail list logo
