Re: [sipx-users] Remove "New software package update found. For details click: here" message in Webinterface

2010-05-17 Thread Rene Pankratz
Thank you! 2010/5/17 Tony Graziano > Disable the repo > > Tony Graziano, Manager > Telephone: 434.984.8430 > Fax: 434.984.8431 > > Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net > > LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: > Telephone: 434.984.8426 > Fax: 434.984.84

Re: [sipx-users] No Voice/IVR on Site-to-Site

2010-05-17 Thread Tony Graziano
There are several things you should do: 1. Make sure there is a filter to *allow* all GRE traffic (protocol:any, not just tcp), on both systems. 2. I will also assume you have two different sip domains. I will also assume they can lookup and resolve each other SRV records and resolve them to a pr

Re: [sipx-users] No Voice/IVR on Site-to-Site

2010-05-17 Thread Rhon
I'm using IPSEC GRE and pfsense interfaces have private IPs. should I still need NAT for that matter? Thanks On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 3:03 AM, Picher, Michael wrote: > It should be set to manual and yes. > > > > *From:* Rhon [mailto:c4rdi...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Monday, May 17, 2010 9:33 AM > *T

Re: [sipx-users] No Voice/IVR on Site-to-Site

2010-05-17 Thread Rhon
I'm using IPSEC GRE and pfsense interfaces have private IPs. should I still need NAT for that matter? Thanks On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 3:03 AM, Picher, Michael wrote: > It should be set to manual and yes. > > > > *From:* Rhon [mailto:c4rdi...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Monday, May 17, 2010 9:33 AM > *T

Re: [sipx-users] No Voice/IVR on Site-to-Site

2010-05-17 Thread Picher, Michael
It should be set to manual and yes. From: Rhon [mailto:c4rdi...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 9:33 AM To: Picher, Michael; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-users] No Voice/IVR on Site-to-Site Hello Michael, I have the static NAT port set to NO on pfsense. Also,

Re: [sipx-users] Instant messaging

2010-05-17 Thread WORLEY, Dale R (Dale)
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Jake Ballamis [jballa...@alliancetechsolutions.com] When I look at the phone, the message is displayed where the alerts are displayed: Beneath the date and

Re: [sipx-users] Instant messaging

2010-05-17 Thread Tony Graziano
Wipe the phone to defaults. Delete the user you created in sipx for the phone. make sure if your phone is local, you use 3.1.3revc or 3.2.3 9do not use 3.2.3 if phone is remote). Create the user. Add the line to the phone and ONLY enable instant messaging for the user at the sipx line (i.e. 200).

Re: [sipx-users] Instant messaging

2010-05-17 Thread Jake Ballamis
I promise, I did it exactly as I stated below. Sounds like I might need to either place a call to Polycom or delete the handset and add it again. Jake Ballamis Technical Support Manager p. 801-566-TECH (8324) f. 801-208-9317 jballa...@alliancetechsolutions.com This e-mail is intended solely fo

Re: [sipx-users] Instant messaging

2010-05-17 Thread JOLY, ROBERT (ROBERT)
> Ok, let me see if I can get more granular with my > explanation. I was in a hurry before and didn't give the > detail I should have. I apologize. Not a problem. Most times, it's hard to converge on the right solution without the full background. > > I am running sipXecs 4.2 with Polycom 6

Re: [sipx-users] Instant messaging

2010-05-17 Thread Tony Graziano
I don't follow you. You can't do the instant messages on a polycom phone. I made a wiki page on "setting an expectation" for IM "how does this work". You need spark or pidgin on a pc as a companion to a polycom. You need the bria im account on a bria. I think there is a footnote about NOT using th

Re: [sipx-users] Instant messaging

2010-05-17 Thread Jake Ballamis
Ok, let me see if I can get more granular with my explanation. I was in a hurry before and didn't give the detail I should have. I apologize. I am running sipXecs 4.2 with Polycom 650 phones. On my phone, I went to Menu > Features > Messages > Instant Messenger > New. I entered the extension I

Re: [sipx-users] voip.ms registration problem

2010-05-17 Thread Tony Graziano
I do this all the time, voip.ms too. I sincerely think if it is not registering it is a firewall config issue. I have a pdf that explains it well enough on http://blog.myitdepartment.net Look at the call setup example. Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 Fa

Re: [sipx-users] i18n translations not read from sipXconfig-web_XX.properties

2010-05-17 Thread Alfred Campbell
On 5/17/2010 10:30 AM, Eelco Brölman wrote: > web_nl.properties (with some basic translations) is not taken from the > sipxconfig_nl.jar file, but from the deployed sipxconfig.war file. > Eelco, Pretty sure there maybe a bug with language pack files overwriting the same files checked in to

Re: [sipx-users] Java goes to 89 percent an web console gets slow

2010-05-17 Thread Josh Patten
I can verify this is happening as well.. It seems to happen very suddenly, and the web interface will be very slow for about 5 minutes, then I'll get the white screen of death. The only way to revive it is to run the following from the command prompt: sipxproc -r ConfigServer Josh Patten Assis

Re: [sipx-users] voip.ms registration problem

2010-05-17 Thread Norman Branitsky
On 5/17/2010 6:13 AM, Tony Graziano wrote: > Port 5080 must be symettrically nat'ed to register. Just to confirm "Symmetric NAT" - sipXecs sends a request to voip.ms from 10.8.158.121 port 5080; firewall adds an entry to its NAT table and substitutes the external IP address 216.8.158.237 for 10.

Re: [sipx-users] voip.ms registration problem

2010-05-17 Thread Tony Graziano
Wrong... read below... On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Norman Branitsky < nor...@cherniaksoftware.com> wrote: > On 10-05-17 6:13 AM, Tony Graziano wrote: > >> Port 5080 must be symettrically nat'ed to register. >> >> > Just to confirm "Symmetric NAT" - > sipXecs sends a request to voip.ms from

Re: [sipx-users] voip.ms registration problem

2010-05-17 Thread Norman Branitsky
On 10-05-17 6:13 AM, Tony Graziano wrote: > Port 5080 must be symettrically nat'ed to register. > Just to confirm "Symmetric NAT" - sipXecs sends a request to voip.ms from 10.8.158.121 port 5080; firewall adds an entry to its NAT table and substitutes the external IP address 216.8.158.237 for

[sipx-users] i18n translations not read from sipXconfig-web_XX.properties

2010-05-17 Thread Eelco Brölman
Hi all, In short: sipXconfig-web_nl.properties is not read from uploaded localization package, but from deployed sipxconfig.war file. Longer story: We are working on the Dutch translations of the webinterface. I followed the following guides: - http://sipx-wiki.calivia.com/index.php/Install

Re: [sipx-users] Ghost Calls

2010-05-17 Thread M. Ranganathan
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 9:46 AM, JOLY, ROBERT (ROBERT) wrote: >> >> On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Gabe Casey >> wrote: >> > I am seeing a strange issue periodically in 4.2 where a call is >> > getting stuck in the system and recalling the outside >> number every 30 >> > min. From the Logs each

Re: [sipx-users] Debian Lenny make build fail

2010-05-17 Thread Los Debillos
Well, it showed up that my previous complications were caused by broken source. After re-downloading the compilation error I mentioned seams not be a problem any more. But in this place I have another one, I think at very end of building. I'm realy new to sipxecs, and output sais nothing to me. I

Re: [sipx-users] Ghost Calls

2010-05-17 Thread JOLY, ROBERT (ROBERT)
> > On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Gabe Casey > wrote: > > I am seeing a strange issue periodically in 4.2 where a call is > > getting stuck in the system and recalling the outside > number every 30 > > min. From the Logs each call has the same Call-ID as the > original. Anyone else seen t

Re: [sipx-users] No Voice/IVR on Site-to-Site

2010-05-17 Thread Rhon
Also, I set the pfsense *to Manual Outbound NAT rule generation (Advanced Outbound NAT (AON))* My NAT rules below for my voice VLAN: WAN172.16.3.0/24 * * * * * NO Thanks again for your help. Brgds, Rhon On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Rhon wrote: > Hello Michael, > > I have the st

Re: [sipx-users] No Voice/IVR on Site-to-Site

2010-05-17 Thread Rhon
Hello Michael, I have the static NAT port set to NO on pfsense. Also, to I have to enable NAT traversal on sipx? Thanks On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Picher, Michael wrote: > Static NAT port on the pfSense? > > > > *From:* sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto: > sipx-users-boun..

Re: [sipx-users] Instant messaging

2010-05-17 Thread JOLY, ROBERT (ROBERT)
> When I upgraded to 4.2, I did a quick test of the IM system. > I sent a message from my phone to my office manager's phone. > The problem, we can't get rid of that message. I've tried > rebooting the phone and we've cleared all the messages on the phone. > > > > Suggestions? Yes, pleas

Re: [sipx-users] 4.2 VM missing options message

2010-05-17 Thread Fowler, Peter (Peter)
Could you provide the sequence of DTMF key strokes entered (starting from The main menu) and voice prompts heard? I've gone the through sequence of recording, listening to and setting a Standard greeting and the flow/options seem ok so want to determine the specific place the prompt you mentio

Re: [sipx-users] No Voice/IVR on Site-to-Site

2010-05-17 Thread Picher, Michael
Static NAT port on the pfSense? From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Rhon Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 9:14 AM To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: [sipx-users] No Voice/IVR on Site-to-Site Hi, I have a problem with

[sipx-users] No Voice/IVR on Site-to-Site

2010-05-17 Thread Rhon
Hi, I have a problem with our deployment with SipXecs 4.2 which was installed fresh using ISO build. We cannot hear anything on both sides but are able to connect and can ring the other end. Calling the IVR is ok but no audio as well. SITE A: 100 - 199 SITE B: 200 - 299 Everything passed using

Re: [sipx-users] Java goes to 89 percent an web console gets slow

2010-05-17 Thread Krisztian Ganyai
Hi, Haven't read the whole thread through yet, but to me it sounds like a garbage collection issue. It can be, that the config application is using almost all the heap space provided by the JVM when idle, and when a change is done to the settings, the JVM has to do constant garbage collection in

Re: [sipx-users] Remove "New software package update found. For details click: here" message in Webinterface

2010-05-17 Thread Tony Graziano
Disable the repo Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 Fax: 434.984.8431 Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 Fax: 434.984.8427 Helpdesk Contract Customers: http://www.myitdepartment

Re: [sipx-users] voip.ms registration problem

2010-05-17 Thread Tony Graziano
Port 5080 must be symettrically nat'ed to register. Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 Fax: 434.984.8431 Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 Fax: 434.984.8427 Helpdesk Contract

Re: [sipx-users] Remove "New software package update found. For detailsclick: here" message in Webinterface

2010-05-17 Thread Picher, Michael
You can rename your yum repo file to sipxecs.repo.old... then it won't check. Mike From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Rene Pankratz Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 2:44 AM To: sipx-users Subject: [sipx-users] Remove "New so