Re: [sipx-users] Cisco 7912G gets SIP User ID "123" (sipxecs 4.0.4)

Please vote for this issue http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-8575 2010/6/17 Abdul Mayat > > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="utf-8" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > Organization: SipXecs Forum > In-Reply-To: > > X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a

Re: [sipx-users] ISA 2004 Firewall Configuration

Nathan ended up switching to a different firewall though I think... On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Tim Byng wrote: > I would like to use our second internet line as a backup if our dedicated > voip internet line goes down. However, I'm having a problem configuring ISA > 2004 Firewall for this.

[sipx-users] SIP Register Configuration test failed

Hi, I am building 4.2.1-018948 today and found SIP Register service failed with following info. Standard output * Error at file /usr/local/sipx/var/sipxdata/sipdb/alias.xml, line 2, char 83 * Message: Unknown element 'items' * Error at file /usr/local/sipx/var/sipxdata/sipdb/alias.xml

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs nat traversal

Tony and All - Thanks for the quick and thorough reply. I read the Remote User config carefully and realize it might work for us - I had some misunderstanding about the pinholes before. It seems a good in-box option and easy to use. I will try it out in NAT environ. At this point, I am eager to fin

Re: [sipx-users] Polycom IP650 Pickup Issues

From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Austin Curry [aus...@dnsms.com] We have some IP650's that are unable to do a directed call pickup. The phones have speed dial lines for other users on them

Re: [sipx-users] Unable to create Issue Tracker account

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/17/2010 04:54 PM, Al Campbell wrote: > Sorry about this folks.. Try it now as I think its sorted out. Hi Al, still failing for me on Fedora 13 w/ FF, Chromium, Epiphany. Cause: com.opensymphony.user.ImmutableException: No provider successfully

Re: [sipx-users] Unable to create Issue Tracker account

On 6/16/2010 11:09 AM, Joe Micciche wrote: > On 06/16/2010 11:02 AM, Martin Steinmann wrote: > >>> >>> On 6/16/2010 9:55 AM, Joe Micciche wrote: >>> I am still unable to create an account on the sipX JIRA Issue Tracker. Whenever I submit the form, it bombs out: http:

Re: [sipx-users] Sipxconfig on seperate host?

From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Staffan Kerker [ietf-li...@kerker.se] Can SipX (easily) be setup in the following scenario using three physical servers: Host 1. SipXconfig Host 2. Primar

Re: [sipx-users] QOS Best Practices for VOIP?

If you're tagging every packet ("on all interfaces") with the same QoS markings it's not really QoS is it? What you have to do is either have your switches or phones tag their packets with QoS markings. In the case of the switches, ONLY tag QoS on the VLAN, not on the entire switch. I did this

Re: [sipx-users] QOS Best Practices for VOIP?

Both the phone system and computers are all connected to a Cisco 3550 / 3560 switch. From there, to the Firebox. As far as QOS goes on the switches, I've been told that the default Auto QOS config is applied. I'm more of a server guy, so I'm not an expert at Cisco hardware.. I just need to find ou

Re: [sipx-users] Incoming calls failing on SIP trunk

From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Ferrara [jferr...@rhino.com.au] I have attached what I see in sipXproxy.log when an incoming call is placed and subsequently fails, I have also uploade

Re: [sipx-users] QOS Best Practices for VOIP?

>>> "Tran, Ly V." 06/17/10 1:31 PM >>>

Re: [sipx-users] QOS Best Practices for VOIP?

There's nothing on the other side of the equals sign. You haven't told us anything about how QoS tagging is done internally before it reaches the firebox. Who is your ITSP? Are you tagging packets at the switch level for the voice VLAN? More details are necessary. On 06/17/2010 12:30 PM, Tra

[sipx-users] QOS Best Practices for VOIP?

What are the essentials that one can do to improve call quality in using SipX? We have successfully replaced our Covad VOIP system with SipX. Covad was using MGCP and we had a 1.5M sDSL line dedicated to voice. In moving to SipX we installed a 10M DIA connection that comes to us through fiber, an

[sipx-users] ISA 2004 Firewall Configuration

I would like to use our second internet line as a backup if our dedicated voip internet line goes down. However, I'm having a problem configuring ISA 2004 Firewall for this. First of all, I changed the gateway on the sipXecs server to the secondary line. I also changed the Public IP Address settin

Re: [sipx-users] is there an AVAYA branded/commercial solutionbased onsipXecs?

They just said US. So I wouldn't be rocking the boat. I'm just saying there is aura in the US, not scs for dealers as far as I know. Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 Fax: 434.984.8431 Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net LAN/Telephony/Security and Contro

Re: [sipx-users] is there an AVAYA branded/commercial solutionbased onsipXecs?

On 6/17/10 12:38 PM, Matt White wrote: >>> "Gerald Harper" 06/17/10 11:27 AM >>> >>Avaya purchased Nortel, the SCS is now an Avaya product. They have have said >>they like it and will continue to develop the product. We recently sold a sipx solution to a university in PA after Avaya demoed a

Re: [sipx-users] is there an AVAYA branded/commercial solutionbased onsipXecs?

>>> "Gerald Harper" 06/17/10 11:27 AM >>> >>Avaya purchased Nortel, the SCS is now an Avaya product. They have have said >>they like it and will continue to develop the product. We recently sold a sipx solution to a university in PA after Avaya demoed an SCS this fall, and then later told the c

Re: [sipx-users] is there an AVAYA branded/commercial solution based onsipXecs?

...and yet I have one connected to our CM as a conference bridge. Check out http://scsavaya.com/scs/ and http://www.avaya.com/usa/product/software-communication-system for more info. -- From: "Tony Graziano" Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 8:30 AM

Re: [sipx-users] Incoming calls failing on SIP trunk

Does your SipX implementation support remote users? What port does you ITSP send incoming calls when you use IP authentication vs. when you use registration? When you support remote users, the phones register using port 5060 and must authenticate with SipX to connect. If your ITSP tries to con

Re: [sipx-users] Incoming calls failing on SIP trunk

Yes, I forgot to mention that to get outbound calls working I had to set a password which I found was a bit strange. It's also a little odd that about one in every ten of the failing incoming calls I test are logged in the CDR, with the correct caller ID but marked as "Failed". ITSP is MyNetF

Re: [sipx-users] Incoming calls failing on SIP trunk

I have found I have to use "any" password on this in order for it to work. Is the DID 0245452590 If so is it in the alias of the user/dial plan for the aa. Who is the itsp? Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 Fax: 434.984.8431 Email: tgrazi...@myitdepa

Re: [sipx-users] Incoming calls failing on SIP trunk

Make sure you are set to auto register on your gateway settings. You can check Diagnostics -> Internal SBC Statistics. -Original Message- From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Ferrara Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010

[sipx-users] Incoming calls failing on SIP trunk

Hello, Sorry if this gets posted twice, Im resending since its been a few hours and I still haven't seen it hit the list. . . I am having some trouble with a SIP trunk that we are testing at the moment. The ITSP uses IP authentication (no periodic registration) and I can make outbound calls

Re: [sipx-users] is there an AVAYA branded/commercial solution based onsipXecs?

Avaya purchased Nortel, the SCS is now an Avaya product. They have have said they like it and will continue to develop the product. -- From: "Nathaniel Watkins" Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 8:15 AM To: Subject: [sipx-users] is there an AVAYA bran

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs nat traversal

> We are trying out sipXecs for internal usage. An important > factor for us is NAT traversal. We have some experience with > Microsoft OCS and it uses ICE for NAT traversal. It seems a > good way to handle this. > > I checked sipXecs docs and it is not very clear about how to > configure STUN

[sipx-users] is there an AVAYA branded/commercial solution based on sipXecs?

I'm not at all familiar with the AVAYA product line - do they have a branded sipXecs solution currently on the market (like the SCS 500)? This message and any files transmitted with it are intended only for the individual(s) or entity named. If you are not the intended individual(s) or entity n

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs nat traversal

>>> Richard Zhao 06/16/10 10:19 PM >>> >I know that sipXecs has some built-in NAT traversal mechanism but it >needs pinholes on the firewall. That is not acceptable in our >environment. I'd be interested in hearing why this is not acceptable in your environment. If your using siptrunking you al

Re: [sipx-users] Cisco 7912G gets SIP User ID "123" (sipxecs 4.0.4)

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Organization: SipXecs Forum In-Reply-To: X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 <47886> Message-ID: I have seen this same behaviour with 7912 phones in my testing. The only way around the issue I could find w

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs nat traversal

(actually a 4th option is to use a vpn enabled phone. snom is the only vendor I know of that has one, but quite frankly I never had good luck with the very first model they shipped, as you cannot have a 2 factor vpn credential like certificate and user/password). On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 6:11 AM, T

[sipx-users] Cisco 7912G gets SIP User ID "123" (sipxecs 4.0.4)

Cisco 7912 phone get configuration from sipXesc 4.0.4 server and I can change date/time format. But SIP User ID is always "123". Do anybody use 7912 phone? How you configure it? -- Alexander ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Li

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs nat traversal

Actually a third option for remote users is to VPN in. But that goes without saying. On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 6:09 AM, Tony Graziano wrote: > There are two ways to handle this... > > 1. Setup sipx to be behind nat, enabling support for remote users and > server behind nat, as well as enabling the

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs nat traversal

There are two ways to handle this... 1. Setup sipx to be behind nat, enabling support for remote users and server behind nat, as well as enabling the role for siptrunking and setup your firewall accordingly, which for whatever reason is "not acceptable in your environment". or 2. Do none of the