On 10/01/2010 12:14 AM, Worley, Dale R (Dale) wrote:
>
> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
> [sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Massimo VIGNONE
> [massimo.vign...@unimore.it]
>
> In a HA scenario, with two servers running Sipx
2nd to this...
If I make new zones like:
sipx.site1zone.example.com
sipxdc.site2zone.example.com
Will I still be able to use u...@example.com as the uri for calls coming
in from outside? / remote users.
From: James Black
Sent: 01 October 2010 09:07 AM
To: 'sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.or
Hi All,
I am having an issue with site to site in my new sipx installs.
I have just setup 2 sites with 4.2.1 using the Centos 5.5 iso.
In the wiki, the setup of site to site calling has changed from the
Address of the Gateway from the FQDN to the Domain.
(as per
http://www.mail-archiv
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Jeff Gilmore wrote:
> Spa2102 works fine with Sipx, once you make a minor fix to sipx's default
> config file (See http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-7534). All config
> options seem to be supported by the Sipx GUI. But I can send you a copy of
> a config fil
Spa2102 works fine with Sipx, once you make a minor fix to sipx's default
config file (See http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-7534). All config
options seem to be supported by the Sipx GUI. But I can send you a copy of a
config file if you feel it would be helpful
I have 25 spa2102 workin
On Friday, 01 October, 2010 03:33 AM, Worley, Dale R (Dale) wrote:
>
> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
> [sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Ali EL MOUSSAWI
> [mouss...@gmail.com]
>
> Is there any way to configure sipXecs as
Nothing should hinder you from using STUN with sipX. If the STUN client
guessed the port bindings correctly, there shouldn't be any difference
whether it's NATed or not. However, the problem arises when the STUN
client guessed wrong and you expect sipX to compensate for it.
On Friday, 01 Oc
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Hiral Patel
[hiral.pa...@onrelay.com]
We have a regular occurrence with our current SIP trunk where now and then the
network responds with a TRYING event a
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Massimo VIGNONE
[massimo.vign...@unimore.it]
In a HA scenario, with two servers running Sipxecs 4.2.1-018932, users
registered on one server can't call user
Hiral,
I don't think the branch solution is what you think it is... At this point
in time.
Why don't you describe what you are trying to accomplish as an end-goal
(don't just say 'get a branch server working').
Mike
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Hiral Patel wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> Does a
Hi Nikolay,
I think maybe under here:
http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/xecsuserV4r2/Custom+FreeSWITCH+programmingmight
be the right location for that. What do you think?
Nice contrib btw...
Thanks,
Mike
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 2:24 AM, Nikolay Kondratyev wrote:
> HI all,
> I recently cr
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Ali EL MOUSSAWI
[mouss...@gmail.com]
Is there any way to configure sipXecs as a SIP outbound proxy?
Yes, you can u
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Talbot, Peter
wrote:
> In regards to the PermGen setting - I was able to set '-XX:MaxPermSize=256M'
> in the /usr/bin/sipxconfig.sh, and we've yet to have JAVA bork up on us -
> though we're only capped at 256MB. I wonder if I need to lift that some,
> just in case
In regards to the PermGen setting - I was able to set '-XX:MaxPermSize=256M'
in the /usr/bin/sipxconfig.sh, and we've yet to have JAVA bork up on us -
though we're only capped at 256MB. I wonder if I need to lift that some,
just in case.
Peter Talbot
[v1.0.07.109]
-Original Message-
From:
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Tony Graziano
wrote:
> I think there are some parameters that are being added to limit the ram
> usage and heap space that should help. It's been talked about on here
> lately.
yes, but more on the side of allocating more memory. ;) Only because
it's running out
I know that all the sipx remote worker FAQ's and docs say "don't use
an stun server, turn it off, click it out". but for some of us that just
seem to run into all kinds of nat transversal issues at the FAR end
(where we don't have as much control: wifi at starbucks, hotel,
airport), some 3G p
On 9/30/10 1:51 PM, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) wrote:
You are doing better (or worse) than me :)
[r...@nshpbx1 ~]# top -b |grep 18 |grep java
Did I mention that when I sold real time software/hardware and systems
for process control, a couple of companies came out trying to sell 'real
ti
Maybe this shows more detail
top - 12:53:10 up 4 days, 33 min, 1 user, load average: 0.27, 0.47, 0.48
Tasks: 142 total, 1 running, 141 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu0 : 2.7%us, 0.3%sy, 0.0%ni, 97.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si,
0.0%st
Cpu1 : 4.3%us, 1.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 93.6%id,
You are doing better (or worse) than me :)
[r...@nshpbx1 ~]# top -b |grep 18 |grep java
4623 sipxchan 18 0 2333m 154m 9720 S 0.0 1.9 0:05.06 java
5033 sipxchan 18 0 2326m 74m 11m S 0.0 0.9 0:02.27 java
7785 sipxchan 18 0 2486m 285m 12m S 0.0 3.6 26:08.46 java
On 9/30/
I think there are some parameters that are being added to limit the ram
usage and heap space that should help. It's been talked about on here
lately.
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Michael Scheidell <
michael.scheid...@secnap.com> wrote:
>
> old issue, but just to keep it on the forefront: ie:
old issue, but just to keep it on the forefront: ie: why you need a
64bit build? so you can put in 32GB ram to keep java happy
top -b | grep java
3323 sipxchan 18 0 190m 26m 6624 S 0.0 2.7 2:07.26 java
3474 sipxchan 18 0 186m 19m 6512 S 0.0 1.9 0:04.23 java
3800 sipxchan
Hello,
Does anyone have any information on how we install and configure the
branch office server, we have been trying for one week now and have got
no where.
We are not able to find any documentation on the wiki, so we are a bit
stuck.
If anyone has configured the branch office server c
On 9/30/10 11:17 AM, Tony Graziano wrote:
Is there an openvpn client for android?
yes.
you need a rooted droid so you can initiate the tun/tap driver.
or, ipsec (still need rooted phone to get around the silly built in
ipsec driver)
or, maybe we can figure out how to get around those nasty n
Prefer a npn client on a phone to work around hotspot and foreign
firewall issues.
Is there an openvpn client for android?
On 9/30/10, Michael Scheidell wrote:
>On 9/30/10 10:46 AM, Eric Varsanyi wrote:
>> Has anyone had any good or bad feedback about this new pure SIP/WiFi
>> phone?
>>
>> S
On 9/30/10 10:46 AM, Eric Varsanyi wrote:
> Has anyone had any good or bad feedback about this new pure SIP/WiFi phone?
>
> Seems pretty appealing if it could be configured to work on the inside Wifi
> when you're near the office then act as a 'remote worker' when you're out and
> about.
>
> -
Has anyone had any good or bad feedback about this new pure SIP/WiFi phone?
Seems pretty appealing if it could be configured to work on the inside Wifi
when you're near the office then act as a 'remote worker' when you're out and
about.
-Eric
___
sipx
Can anyone get sip communicator to authenticate with sipxecs/openfire
using jabber?
Kyle
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
I also have seen this issue in sipXecs version 4.2.1 (4.2.1-018930
2010-06-04T15:25:27 build34). In my case LDAP service (Microsoft
Active Directory) worked on the Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2.
--
Sincerely yours,
Alexey Kanukhin
2010/9/30 Александр Горбунов :
> I import user accounts fro
I import user accounts from AD and don't assign anything to "SIP
password" attribute. "SIP password" field remains empty. Sipxecs 4.2.1
I suppose that it's a bug. This
http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs/How+to+report+a+problem+or+request+a+feature
require use mail-list before issue tracker
29 matches
Mail list logo
