Hi all,
I'm trying to get TLS working properly between the connected endpoints (Polycom
Soundpoint IP335) and the SipXproxy. No firewalls/NAT or anything inbetween.
I'm running v3.2.5 on the Polycoms and SipXecs version 4.4.0-
2011-04-01EDT23:24:23 domU-12-31-39-0E-DD-81
I have followed the
I refactored the upgrade instructions extensively to make upgrade
process straightforward as possible
http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs/Upgrade+to+Latest+Stable+Versi
on
Just a note, in the section Before upgrading from 4.2.x the command rm
sipxecs-*.repo has no information
Thank you all for your comments, now trying to figure out what we can do
about those.
Eda
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Michael Scheidell
michael.scheid...@secnap.com wrote:
On 4/12/11 8:57 AM, Gerald Drouillard wrote:
On 4/12/2011 7:46 AM, Eda Ercan wrote:
Hi all,
Regarding this
I have proposed being able to upload phone CA via the config. I know
there are several CA for Polycom as documented in the site. Decrypt
Error seems to indicate that you have uploaded the wrong CA signature
than what your phone is sending. We need to pull some strings in
Polycom to get into
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Douglas Hubler dhub...@ezuce.com wrote:
Sorry, /etc/yum.repos.d is the right dir. I'll correct it when I get a
chance unless someone beats me to it.
Done
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List
I've noticed there aren't any instructions on how to properly perform an
upgrade on HA systems. Could you possibly add this information to the wiki?
Josh Patten
Brazos County Network Engineer
979.361.4676
-Original Message-
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
I've noticed there aren't any instructions on how to properly perform an
upgrade on HA systems. Could you possibly add this information to the
wiki?
Hmm, the third paragraph from Notes says:
If you have multiple systems in a cluster (all managed by one Management
server). Complete upgrade
I've installed the following chain of Polycom CAs in SipX (not via GUI though)
downloaded from http://pki.polycom.com/pki/
Polycom Root CA.crt
Polycom Equipment Policy CA.crt
Polycom Equipment Issuing CA 1.crt
Maybe I shall install the last one as well, the Polycom Issuing CA 2. I've
also, as
I would assume (I may be wrong) that the CA used to secure TLS with
the phone would require the phone conifg to specify the certificate
AND have the certiciate loaded in the phone. (i.e. use this on, here
it is). Have you checked the cfg files to see the certificate is
specified?
On Wed, Apr
Interesting - after I RTFM, I found a setting - VM TONE DETECT, which
was OFF! (even though manual says default is ON). So turned it on and
it works - but it still requires that external MWI setting.
Thanks,
-Bob
On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 17:20 -0400, Tony Graziano wrote:
You may be assuming
• Polycom phone with a certificate installed at the factory.
To verify that the certificate is installed, on the Polycom phone, press the
Menu button, and then select Status Platform Phone. If a certificate is
installed, “Device Certificate: Installed” will be listed. If a certificate is
not
No need for mutual authentication that is why putting the Polycom CA
into sipX is not documented in the wiki. However, it should also work
if you push the correct Polycom CA into sipX. Feel free to update the
wiki if you get it working.
On 04/13/2011 10:19 PM, Staffan Kerker wrote:
I've
On 13 apr 2011, at 16.39, Tony Graziano wrote:
• Polycom phone with a certificate installed at the factory.
To verify that the certificate is installed, on the Polycom phone, press the
Menu button, and then select Status Platform Phone. If a certificate is
installed, “Device Certificate:
Start switching to using numeric user-ids - I had started using flname - and
then switched after Tony kept yelling at me
-Original Message-
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Joe Micciche
Sent: Tuesday, April
I am planning on using the 4.4 release to move off of the 32 bit release. What
is the official word on restoring backups from 4.2.1 to 4.4? Can I install the
4.4 iso on another server and just restore my 4.2.1 backup - or do I need to
install 4.2.1 (64-bit) and restore - then update?
This
On 4/13/2011 10:41 AM, Nathaniel Watkins wrote:
I am planning on using the 4.4 release to move off of the 32 bit release.
What is the official word on restoring backups from 4.2.1 to 4.4? Can I
install the 4.4 iso on another server and just restore my 4.2.1 backup
Unless something has
sipx 4.2.0, using UK ITSP Gradwell.
We have had a number of cases where outbound calls produce a phantom call
approx 30 minutes later.
This continues until we restart SIP Trunking service. The key seems to be found
in sipxbridge.log
Yell? Me?
=
Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430
sip: tgrazi...@voice.myitdepartment.net
Fax: 434.326.5325
Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net
LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426
sip: helpd...@voice.myitdepartment.net
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Organization: SipXecs Forum
X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 58586
Message-ID: e4da.4da5d...@forum.sipfoundry.org
I've noticed something odd while testing shared line
appearance for remote workers in sipXecs
I remember this from wayyy back...
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.sipx.devel/18873/match=30+minutes
2011/4/13 Sven Evensen sven.even...@onrelay.com:
sipx 4.2.0, using UK ITSP Gradwell.
We have had a number of cases where outbound calls produce a phantom call
approx 30 minutes
My sipx server sits in dmz at ip 192.168.1.5. I make a remote ssl vpn
connection in tunnel mode the edge firewall, my phone device has ip
10.0.0.1. The sipx registration entry shows ip address as
192.168.1.1 (internal interface of the edge firewall) and private ip
as 10.0.0.1.
Does sipx like
Thanks for the clue Tony, I think that will be really helpful!
Sven
-Original Message-
From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net]
Sent: 13 April 2011 19:13
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Cc: Sven Evensen; John Mangan; Seshu Kumar
Subject: Re:
I remember it very well because I was rolling around laughing so hard Trying
to understand how someone Would feel want a found out It was not really a
person doing that. It was just too funny!
=
Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430
sip:
On 4/13/11 4:02 PM, Tony Graziano wrote:
I remember it very well because I was rolling around laughing so hard
Trying to understand how someone Would feel want a found out It was
not really a person doing that. It was just too funny!
anyone here remember bofbot?
(tinc...)
--
Michael
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Organization: SipXecs Forum
X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 58594
Message-ID: e4e2.4da61...@forum.sipfoundry.org
Cisco AS5400 is on the same subnet as sipXecs 4.4.0 server
and is not behind NAT.
Both
Doh!
Guess I need to read the whole thing before I go spouting my mouth off :-/
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] on behalf of Douglas Hubler
[dhub...@ezuce.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2011 3:30 PM
26 matches
Mail list logo
