Re: [sipx-users] Transfer troubles : REFER-TO not routed/modified according to the dialplan

2011-09-01 Thread Nathaniel Watkins
I'm not much help here - we are linking to an old NEC (not voip aware) - so we are just routing calls via the PRI interface on the Patton. From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Tony Graziano Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 5:

Re: [sipx-users] Karoo Bridge: Stops Working

2011-09-01 Thread Joegen Baclor
Thanks for the log. I saw [CRIT] switch_time.c:799 Virtual Migration Detected! Syncing Clock. A quick google for the error message yielded this thread http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/2010-October/064511.html Anthony M. seems to be not surprized by freeswitch crashing/

Re: [sipx-users] Transfer troubles : REFER-TO not routed/modified according to the dialplan

2011-09-01 Thread Steve Beaudry
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Organization: SipXecs Forum In-Reply-To: X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 <63028> Message-ID: To answer your most recent question first, All 4 digit calls match a custom dialplan, I've named 'Nortel Loca

Re: [sipx-users] Transfer troubles : REFER-TO not routed/modified according to the dialplan

2011-09-01 Thread Tony Graziano
ha ha stupid auto correct. motel should be nortel. what type of dial plan rule are you using? what type of gateway? On Sep 1, 2011 6:47 PM, "Tony Graziano" wrote: > I have found them to be wrong on occasions... > > if the destination of 4495 is on the motel side, why are we dialling or > strippin

Re: [sipx-users] Transfer troubles : REFER-TO not routed/modified according to the dialplan

2011-09-01 Thread Tony Graziano
I have found them to be wrong on occasions... if the destination of 4495 is on the motel side, why are we dialling or stripping digits instead if defining the destination a d sending it as is? On Sep 1, 2011 6:40 PM, "Steve Beaudry" wrote: > > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="utf-8" > Content

Re: [sipx-users] Transfer troubles : REFER-TO not routed/modified according to the dialplan

2011-09-01 Thread Steve Beaudry
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Organization: SipXecs Forum In-Reply-To: X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 <63025> Message-ID: Thanks Tony, Absolutely nothing would make me happier than to have someone point out a simple solution to t

Re: [sipx-users] Transfer troubles : REFER-TO not routed/modified according to the dialplan

2011-09-01 Thread Tony Graziano
to be more specific, the patton should have the dialplan entry to forward that call to the nortel. it is referring the call back to sipx becaase it's (patton's) dialplan is telling it to do so. i think this is really a patton config issue. Nate you around to field this? You did this same thing a w

Re: [sipx-users] Transfer troubles : REFER-TO not routed/modified according to the dialplan

2011-09-01 Thread Tony Graziano
what you never said was that you were trunking a nortel option 61c to sipx via a smartnode. I think this has been done successfully a few times. suffice it to say your patton gateway needs a dialplan entry changed and why would you be dialling it via a sip domain when you should be dialling it num

Re: [sipx-users] Transfer troubles : REFER-TO not routed/modified according to the dialplan

2011-09-01 Thread Steve Beaudry
In Line 439 of the attached log, you can see the REFER-TO arriving at the Patton Smartnode 4960 gateway... the REFER-TO is destined for mailto:'4...@voip.royalroads.ca'. This results in the gateway trying to send the INVITE back to the SipXecs server, instead of to the correct remote destination (

Re: [sipx-users] Transfer troubles : REFER-TO not routed/modified according to the dialplan

2011-09-01 Thread Tony Graziano
I have not either though it is a requirement to have proper dns setup at both ends. you mentioned refer which makes me think that perhaps 1 of the systems you are connecting with is not capable of handling refer. explaining your call flow, gateways and user agent involved would be a good idea. On

Re: [sipx-users] Transfer troubles : REFER-TO not routed/modified according to the dialplan

2011-09-01 Thread Josh Patten
I've not, what phone/softphone are you having trouble with? On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Steve Beaudry wrote: > > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="utf-8" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > Organization: SipXecs Forum > In-Reply-To: > X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 <63017>

Re: [sipx-users] Transfer troubles : REFER-TO not routed/modified according to the dialplan

2011-09-01 Thread Steve Beaudry
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Organization: SipXecs Forum In-Reply-To: X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 <63017> Message-ID: I'm not hearing anything about this, so I'm wondering if I'm the only one having the problem, and it's just som

Re: [sipx-users] Outlook vcard import User Portal

2011-09-01 Thread Michael Picher
i don't have an issue with you opening an issue, i'd just clearly define what the problem is because from your description I still don't understand. thanks, mike On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Kyle Haefner wrote: > Mike, > > When a user imports contacts from google into their phone book, thi

Re: [sipx-users] Feature Question

2011-09-01 Thread Tony Graziano
Thanks, tracker item created: http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-9834 On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Josh Patten wrote: > This would also speed up deployments as "group speeddials" don't take into > account that no one needs to monitor themselves with BLF so you have to > enter a different

Re: [sipx-users] Outlook vcard import User Portal

2011-09-01 Thread Kyle Haefner
Mike, When a user imports contacts from google into their phone book, this is what what I was getting at with an outlook import.I'll create a JIRA unless you see an issue. Kyle On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Michael Picher wrote: > Because admins should control generating the phone books

Re: [sipx-users] Spectralink 8400 (and 3.3 firmware) - Success!

2011-09-01 Thread Paul Curtis
Well I guess I will chime in. I also have a spectralink 8440 that I need to configure, glad to know that it works. Thanks for breaking the ice. I had previously tested the 3.3 stack on the 335 and 560 phones without issue. -- Paul From: Josh Patten mailto:jpat...@ezuce.com>> Reply-To: Disc

Re: [sipx-users] Spectralink 8400 (and 3.3 firmware) - Success!

2011-09-01 Thread Josh Patten
Huzzah!!! Finally a decent wifi phone!! On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) < mkitchin.pub...@gmail.com> wrote: > This is a fun 1 way conversation, but I will continue on. > The 8440 works great. You can tell it is built on the Soundpoint SIP stack. > It just works.

Re: [sipx-users] Feature Question

2011-09-01 Thread Josh Patten
This would also speed up deployments as "group speeddials" don't take into account that no one needs to monitor themselves with BLF so you have to enter a different list of users for every person in a group no matter what. A good feature in my opinion. On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 4:25 AM, Douglas Hubl

Re: [sipx-users] Karoo Bridge: Stops Working

2011-09-01 Thread Joegen Baclor
Please send me the freeswitch log offlist. On 09/01/2011 06:54 PM, Roman Gelfand wrote: After applying the latest update, I find that every couple of weeks the Karoo Bridge stop working. Not sure of the reason, but freeswitch log shows critical errors. After rebooting it works fine. Thanks i

[sipx-users] Karoo Bridge: Stops Working

2011-09-01 Thread Roman Gelfand
After applying the latest update, I find that every couple of weeks the Karoo Bridge stop working. Not sure of the reason, but freeswitch log shows critical errors. After rebooting it works fine. Thanks in advance ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users

Re: [sipx-users] Feature Question

2011-09-01 Thread Douglas Hubler
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 12:29 AM, Tony Graziano wrote: > Users can have personal speeddials. What I am seeing is there is not > import/export utility for the user. contact manager for end user that doesn't allow import/export does seem inflexible. Feature makes sense to me. So Jason would export

Re: [sipx-users] IMAP - Exchange 2010 Sync

2011-09-01 Thread Tony Graziano
MAPI is really for applications generating email and connecting to it, really to call a messaging server to send a message. Its a library to enhance the dataset on the more commercial aspect of mail (that's why when you install one of the big commercial email clients your mapi32.dll, etc., gets exc

Re: [sipx-users] Feature Question

2011-09-01 Thread Tony Graziano
In a lot of the use cases, someone inside who already had an account (with their own speeddials) took over jason's duties. Either way, there is no way to combine them except typing. On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 3:21 AM, Michael Picher wrote: > Well, wouldn't the easy thing to do be to re-purpose Jason

Re: [sipx-users] Feature Question

2011-09-01 Thread Michael Picher
Well, wouldn't the easy thing to do be to re-purpose Jason's account? Alternatively, something that would be really nice when setting up new users would be a 'copy' command. This would let you copy settings from one user to another (things you might not do in a group). Mike On Thu, Sep 1, 2011

Re: [sipx-users] IMAP - Exchange 2010 Sync

2011-09-01 Thread Michael Picher
davmail isn't really applicable. That's for multiple client types hitting Exchange. What most really are looking for here is a means to synchronize voicemail from the Voicemail server in sipXecs to Exchange. The back-end integration would allow users to listen / delete their mail in exchange and