[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of voice
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 11:05 PM
To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: [sipx-users] Can support one and two armed operation: ??
Does not this mean 2 NIC's Otherwise some please explain this
http://sipx
On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 15:05 +0300, Nikolay Kondratyev wrote:
I’ve tried to configure sipxbridge as described in the wiki… both
external and public addresses are equal to the internet interface
address and local address is the address in the private network.
I am running sipxbridge with
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 8:42 AM, Kevin Thorley kevin.thor...@nortel.com wrote:
On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 15:05 +0300, Nikolay Kondratyev wrote:
I’ve tried to configure sipxbridge as described in the wiki… both
external and public addresses are equal to the internet interface
address and local
:39:08 AM
Subject: [sipx-users] Can support one and two armed operation: ?? to Ranga
That wiki is out of day 3 months ago. Your recommendation has no workable
outcome. You are handling us.
r
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
That wiki is out of day 3 months ago. Your recommendation has no workable
outcome. You are handling us.
r___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe:
On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 09:33 -0600, voice wrote:
This was the only/main reason to stick around sipX. This is what i
have called managed Open Source. In real Open Source you don't remove
features that compete with Pingtel and now Nortel commercial product.
Why would anyone buy Pingtels,
On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 11:53 -0600, voice wrote:
Please name the commercial version you are talking about
I meant the Nortel SCS500 http://www.nortel.com/scs500
sipXecs version 4.0 will be the basis for SCS500 version 3.0
--
Scott Lawrence tel:+1.978.288.5508
sipXecs project coordinator -
On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 11:53 -0600, voice wrote:
Please name the commercial version you are talking about
It's probably the Nortel SCS500:
http://products.nortel.com/go/product_content.jsp?parId=0segId=0prod_id=63420
Dale
___
sipx-users mailing
OpenSource answer too?
r
Re: [sipx-users] Can support one and two armed operation: ?? to Scott
a.. From: Scott Lawrence scott.lawre...@xx
b.. Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:04:19 -0500
On Wed, 2009-02-25
OpenSource answer too?
r
Re: [sipx-users] Can support one and two armed operation: ?? to Scott
From: Scott Lawrence scott.lawre...@xx
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:04:19 -0500
On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 11:53 -0600, voice wrote:
Please name
milosz wrote:
but, on a non-antagonistic note, i would actually be interested to
know what will differentiate sipxecs 4.0 from its commercial
antecedent.
http://sipx-wiki.calivia.com/index.php/Nortel_SCS500_vs._sipXecs_Comparison
BTW: sipXecs 4.0 will have conferencing
D.
On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 14:05 -0600, voice wrote:
Hi Scott
Took a look at the Nortel's SCS500 and now i understand what i
perceive is the 4.0 go slow release to coincide with Nortels SCS500
product release. Must not get a head of Nortels' production schedule.
And it's is obvious why you
Does not this mean 2 NIC's Otherwise some please explain this
http://sipx-wiki.calivia.com/index.php/SipXbridge_Overview_and_Configuration
Can support one and two armed operation: Can be configured to ITSP facing side
of the B2BUA on a publicly route-able address that is different from the side
. sipxbridge
functionality for two armed operation is not exposed.
[sipx-users] Can support one and two armed operation: ??
a.. From: voice vo...@xx
b.. Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:05:06 -0600
Does
14 matches
Mail list logo
