Re: [sipx-users] How to set up a non-NAT'd sipXecs IP PBX without giving public addresses to the phones

: Re: [sipx-users] How to set up a non-NAT'd sipXecs IP PBX without giving public addresses to the phones On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Burden, Mike wrote: I asked this once before, but maybe not in precise terms... Given that sipXecs cannot be dual-homed, if the sipXecs server is g

Re: [sipx-users] How to set up a non-NAT'd sipXecs IP PBX without giving public addresses to the phones

Lynk Systems, Inc e-mail: m...@lynk.com Phone: 616-532-4985 From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net] Sent: Monday, December 07, 2009 4:30 PM To: Burden, Mike Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-users] How to set up a non-NAT'd sipXecs IP PBX with

Re: [sipx-users] How to set up a non-NAT'd sipXecs IP PBX without giving public addresses to the phones

ndry.org > [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Burden, Mike > Sent: Monday, December 07, 2009 1:25 PM > To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org > Subject: [sipx-users] How to set up a non-NAT'd sipXecs IP PBX without > giving public addresses to the phones > > I asked t

Re: [sipx-users] How to set up a non-NAT'd sipXecs IP PBX without giving public addresses to the phones

-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Burden, Mike Sent: Monday, December 07, 2009 1:25 PM To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: [sipx-users] How to set up a non-NAT'd sipXecs IP PBX without giving public addresses to the phones I asked

Re: [sipx-users] How to set up a non-NAT'd sipXecs IP PBX without giving public addresses to the phones

nal Message- > From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org > [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Burden, Mike > Sent: Monday, December 07, 2009 1:25 PM > To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org > Subject: [sipx-users] How to set up a non-NAT'd sipXecs IP PBX with

Re: [sipx-users] How to set up a non-NAT'd sipXecs IP PBX without giving public addresses to the phones

On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 16:25 -0500, Burden, Mike wrote: > I asked this once before, but maybe not in precise terms... > > Given that sipXecs cannot be dual-homed, if the sipXecs server is given > a public IP address, does it create issues to have the phones behind > NAT? No. There are (unusual) N

Re: [sipx-users] How to set up a non-NAT'd sipXecs IP PBX without giving public addresses to the phones

non-NAT'd sipXecs IP PBX without giving public addresses to the phones I asked this once before, but maybe not in precise terms... Given that sipXecs cannot be dual-homed, if the sipXecs server is given a public IP address, does it create issues to have the phones behind NAT? If so, then d

Re: [sipx-users] How to set up a non-NAT'd sipXecs IP PBX without giving public addresses to the phones

On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Burden, Mike wrote: > I asked this once before, but maybe not in precise terms... > > Given that sipXecs cannot be dual-homed, if the sipXecs server is given > a public IP address, does it create issues to have the phones behind > NAT? > Yes, they need to be behind

[sipx-users] How to set up a non-NAT'd sipXecs IP PBX without giving public addresses to the phones

I asked this once before, but maybe not in precise terms... Given that sipXecs cannot be dual-homed, if the sipXecs server is given a public IP address, does it create issues to have the phones behind NAT? If so, then do the phones need non-NAT access to the ITSP, or just non-NAT access to the si