On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Burden, Mike <m...@lynk.com> wrote: > I asked this once before, but maybe not in precise terms... > > Given that sipXecs cannot be dual-homed, if the sipXecs server is given > a public IP address, does it create issues to have the phones behind > NAT? > Yes, they need to be behind a firewall that does not have an ALG turned on. Your are well-adviced to run a firewall in front of sipx though. Why would you do such a thing?
> > If so, then do the phones need non-NAT access to the ITSP, or just > non-NAT access to the sipXecs server? > > Neither. They will traverse NAT through their local firewall. Remote users need to be configured in sipx but not server behind nat. > > Mike Burden > Lynk Systems, Inc > e-mail: m...@lynk.com > Phone: 616-532-4985 > > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users > Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users > sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/ > -- ====================== Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 Fax: 434.984.8431 Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 Fax: 434.984.8427 Helpdesk Contract Customers: http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
