On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 16:25 -0500, Burden, Mike wrote: > I asked this once before, but maybe not in precise terms... > > Given that sipXecs cannot be dual-homed, if the sipXecs server is given > a public IP address, does it create issues to have the phones behind > NAT?
No. There are (unusual) NATs in the world that would defeat the compensation in sipXproxy, but most will work. The main thing is to turn _off_ any SIP "helpers" in the NAT routers if possible, and turn _off_ any NAT compensation in the phones. > If so, then do the phones need non-NAT access to the ITSP, or just > non-NAT access to the sipXecs server? Neither - the server will do media relay to deal with either or both NATs as needed (and not when not needed). _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
