y.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Question re: handsets
That being said, what does the community feel is the best handset for
sipXecs implementations?
Polycom is great -- but the only issue for me is their lack of support
for LLDP-MED. Surprised the hell out of me that Polycom would only
support Ci
polycom is what we use as our "gold" standard.
LLDP is not a big one for us, we can just as easily autoconfigure the VLAN via
DHCP.
-M
>>> Robert B 11/22/09 7:45 AM >>>
That being said, what does the community feel is the best handset for
sipXecs implementations?
Polycom is great -- but th
le to configure within sipX.
Polycom has
sipx-users-requ...@list.sipfoundry.org wrote:
> Subject:
> Re: [sipx-users] Question re: handsets
> From:
> Robert B
> Date:
> Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:03:45 -0600
> To:
> Tony Graziano ,
> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.o
Tony,
LLDP-MED is extremely important for a handset. If one doesn't support
it, it means you have to take exactly the steps you mentioned -- hand
configuring every device! I'll never do that again. Can you imagine
having to do that with fifty or more phones? I have, and it's a
nightmare. LLDP
ailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Robert B
Sent: Sunday, November 22, 2009 7:45 AM
To: Matt White
Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Question re: handsets
That being said, what does the community feel is the best handset for
sipXecs implementations?
That being said, what does the community feel is the best handset for
sipXecs implementations?
Polycom is great -- but the only issue for me is their lack of support
for LLDP-MED. Surprised the hell out of me that Polycom would only
support Cisco's proprietary CDP.
Aastra -- nice handsets, pro
e phone.
sipx-users-requ...@list.sipfoundry.org wrote:
Subject:
[sipx-users] Question re: handsets
From:
Robert B
Date:
Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:55:07 -0600
FYI...the aastra does not support MoH or BLF.
Other than that they work ok. I've hit several bugs with their phones but they
where not SipX specific.
-M
>>> On 11/21/2009 at 06:07 PM, in message <4b0872b9.9070...@spudland.com>,
>>> Robert B wrote:
I agree... They don't look half bad.
Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Sent: Sat Nov 21 18:07:37 2009
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Question re: handsets
I agree... They don't look half bad. I still see some paper inserts, but
they are not garish like the Aastra ones.
I'm told they are very inexpensive and reasonably well built. The
I agree... They don't look half bad. I still see some paper inserts, but
they are not garish like the Aastra ones.
I'm told they are very inexpensive and reasonably well built. The fact
that even the basic ones support G.722 is important. That's a killer
feature to demonstrate to clients. Usual
lf Of Robert B
Sent: Saturday, November 21, 2009 4:55 PM
To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: [sipx-users] Question re: handsets
Folks,
I'm impressed with the array of support for Polycom handsets. That's
what I've been wanting to base my deployments off of because of the H
Folks,
I'm impressed with the array of support for Polycom handsets. That's
what I've been wanting to base my deployments off of because of the HD
voice support.
I know that Aastra now supports G.722 wideband. But Aastra's entry-level
handsets have a big deal-breaker for me -- those dang paper
12 matches
Mail list logo
