something like this might work. .
http://cpansearch.perl.org/src/SULLR/Net-SIP-0.55/bin/stateless_proxy.pl
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
ISN: 1259*1300
>*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
* Best Intrusion Prevention Product, Networks Product Guide
* Certif
el Scheidell
Cc: mkitchin.pub...@gmail.com, "sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org users"
Sent: Fri, Aug 20, 2010 07:14:56 GMT+00:00
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] port 5060/ port 5080, proxy why?
I don't think you would need a second system "just" for this. Adding a
second system also m
om, "sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org users"
Sent: Fri, Aug 20, 2010 07:14:56 GMT+00:00
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] port 5060/ port 5080, proxy why?
I don't think you would need a second system "just" for this. Adding a
second system also means instituting HA mode, both would have to be pr
I think you need to look at this:
http://faq.pfsense.com/index.php?action=artikel&cat=8&id=29&artlang=en&highlight=reflectionighlight=reflection
It's not supported for 1:1 but you may be able to wrap port forwards on top
of the 1:1 to achieve what you are looking for.
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 4:
actually, if you are using 1:1 NAT, you might find the configuration much
easier using a recent pfsense 2.0 snapshot, where you have much more
granular control in outbound rules, etc.
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 3:14 AM, Tony Graziano wrote:
> I don't think you would need a second system "just" for
I don't think you would need a second system "just" for this. Adding a
second system also means instituting HA mode, both would have to be proxies
(which is not a bad thing). Having asked the dev team before, it is not
possible to run sipxbridge as a standalone system "just" for SBC purposes,
it ha
THANKS! possibly if I have the cisco rule I can transliterate it to
pfsense or pf.
On 8/19/10 10:31 PM, Matthew Kitchin (Public) wrote:
I will have to ask my network engineer tomorrow what he did. Not my
area of expertise.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
ISN: 125
I will have to ask my network engineer tomorrow what he did. Not my area of
expertise.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Scheidell
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 22:27:46
To:
Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org users
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] port 5060/ port 5080, proxy why?
just to conclude
just to conclude:
on cisco, you can tell it that if one certain source ip hits port 5060
on your public sip ip, it redirects it to the private ip on port 5080.
then EVERYONE else hitting port 5060 goes to the internal port 5060?
(I know pfsense can't do this nativity, I tried)
On 8/19/10 10:2
From: "Martin Steinmann"
> Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 21:49:43
> To: ; 'Michael
> Scheidell'; us...@list.sipfoundry.org>
> Subject: RE: [sipx-users] port 5060/ port 5080, proxy why?
>
> Why not a centralized deployment with only phones and optional gateways
&g
I'm not sure what would work for your situation. I don't have this issue. I was
just throwing an idea out there.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Scheidell
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 21:48:05
To:
Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org users
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] port 5060/
On 8/19/10 9:46 PM, Matthew Kitchin (Public) wrote:
Maybe NAT 2 external IPs to it. One that does 5060->5080 and one that
doesn't. Whatever needs to hit it on 5060 would use the IP with no
translation.
as I suspected. tcp connection is one way.
telnet ip2 5060 does indeed to private 5080, but
trying that now, but the reflection (internal ip back out) would use,
what public ip?
On 8/19/10 9:46 PM, Matthew Kitchin (Public) wrote:
Whatever needs to hit it on 5060 would use the IP with no translation.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
ISN: 1259*1300
> *| *SECNA
unable to find a way to make it
work for us. I'll be glad to keep discussing if you think there is a way.
-Original Message-
From: "Martin Steinmann"
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 21:49:43
To: ; 'Michael
Scheidell';
Subject: RE: [sipx-users] port 5060/ port 50
19, 2010 9:43 PM
> To: Martin Steinmann; 'Michael Scheidell'; sipx-
> us...@list.sipfoundry.org
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] port 5060/ port 5080, proxy why?
>
> Using 2 hosts (sipxbridge on a dedicated one) was the other option we
> looked at. I didn't do it for 2
-4818
--martin
From: Michael Scheidell [mailto:michael.scheid...@secnap.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 9:41 PM
To: Martin Steinmann
Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] port 5060/ port 5080, proxy why?
can';t run it on different NICS' as the JIRA
ject: Re: [sipx-users] port 5060/ port 5080, proxy why?
it can do port translation, as in if it sees ANYTHING hit port 5060 it
can translate it to an internal 5080.
it can't do this:
itsp.public hits sipxpublic:5060 it goes to sipxprivate:5080
everyone else hits port 5060 it goes to sipxprivate
it can do port translation, as in if it sees ANYTHING hit port 5060 it
can translate it to an internal 5080.
it can't do this:
itsp.public hits sipxpublic:5060 it goes to sipxprivate:5080
everyone else hits port 5060 it goes to sipxprivate:5060
On 8/19/10 9:39 PM, Matthew Kitchin (Public) wr
(on a bberry, I
think that is what they are called) boxes at the small sites, and adding a
second box wasn't practical.
-Original Message-
From: "Martin Steinmann"
Sender: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 21:30:34
To: 'Michael Scheidell
can';t run it on different NICS' as the JIRA says.
how do I run sipx on a different host?
On 8/19/10 9:37 PM, Martin Steinmann wrote:
That is not what I meant. If you run the proxy and sipXbridge on
different NICs or different hosts, then they both can use port 5060
--
Michael Scheidell, CT
h Cat 5/6.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Scheidell
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 21:29:17
To:
Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org users
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] port 5060/ port 5080, proxy why?
it doesn't look like pfsense can do this specifically. so I am going to
try to add two rules (4
@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] port 5060/ port 5080, proxy why?
I can simulate that with pfsense, anything hitting ip1:5060 goes to sip:5080
anything ip2:5060 goes to sip:5060. but I assume the reverse would be a
problem.
the phones and itsp won't like traffic coming from an ip that
users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] *On Behalf Of *Michael
Scheidell
*Sent:* Thursday, August 19, 2010 9:15 PM
*To:* sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org users
*Subject:* [sipx-users] port 5060/ port 5080, proxy why?
Lost in several old emails is 'why
-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Michael
Scheidell
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 9:15 PM
To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org users
Subject: [sipx-users] port 5060/ port 5080, proxy why?
Lost in several old emails is 'why' sip
it doesn't look like pfsense can do this specifically. so I am going to
try to add two rules (4 I guess)
two natting rules and two firewall rules.
the last question everyone at level 3 asks is WHY.? (you do know that
this is some of the issues with firewalls, QOS services, etc. they
don't exp
Subject: [sipx-users] port 5060/ port 5080, proxy why?
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx
Lost in several old emails is 'why' sipx needs to have trunk calls come
in on port 5080 and not 5060.
Several ITSP's insist that they will only send the calls on port 5060
since that is the standard.
I am working with Level3 on a different issue than the first one, and it
involves a different SI
Hi,
if i read this correct and you are talking about access from
external/internet then the iirc, the default port configured is 5080.
5060 would be for internal parties.
Greetings.
On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 04:45 +, dim hatzi wrote:
> Hi,
> i have installed sipx 4.0 onto a VPS knowing that this m
Hi,
i have installed sipx 4.0 onto a VPS knowing that this may cause some problems,
and i am facing one issue:Port 5060 seems not to be listening and causing
problems to registration. Is there any way of knowing what is the problem?
I have made (i think) all the nessesary setting to sipxconfig a
29 matches
Mail list logo
