[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Carsten Ziegeler updated SLING-404:
---
Component/s: OSGi
> Move assembly stuff to whitebo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Carsten Ziegeler updated SLING-406:
---
Component/s: OSGi
> Move osgi/log to commons/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Carsten Ziegeler closed SLING-391.
--
Resolution: Fixed
The base module has been created.
> Create base launchpad module for bet
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Carsten Ziegeler closed SLING-311.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Added implementation of content loaded marker
Added overwrite and uninstall
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-400?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Carsten Ziegeler closed SLING-400.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Created new contentloader bundle.
> Separate content loading from resou
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Felix Meschberger wrote:
I was thinking about this option, too. But it has IMO two drawbacks: (1)
It mixes API and implementation and requires two bundles to export
things. The more problematic drawback is, that consuming bundles wire to
either the client or server
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 11:24 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok, this is part two :) ...
Hmm..just wondering how many episodes we signed up for ;-)
Hehe, until someone gives up...ok, seriously, I don't know; I'm going
through al
cluding
package renaming) as it contains a common thread pool implementation
which is usable outside of Sling.
This leaves us with removing the "extensions" from the bundle/package
names for the existing stuff.
WDYT?
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reporter: Carsten Ziegeler
Fix For: 2.0.0
The web-console and the obr servlet are common implementations which are better
hosted at the Apache Felix project.
This also includes the deploy part of the sling plugin.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to
Move osgi/log to commons/log
Key: SLING-406
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-406
Project: Sling
Issue Type: Task
Affects Versions: 2.0.0
Reporter: Carsten Ziegeler
Move assembly stuff to whiteboard
-
Key: SLING-404
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-404
Project: Sling
Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 2.0.0
Reporter: Carsten
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12593273#action_12593273
]
Carsten Ziegeler commented on SLING-405:
And the install part of the sling pl
Move jcr.default-rtp to samples
---
Key: SLING-403
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-403
Project: Sling
Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 2.0.0
Reporter: Carsten Ziegeler
Reporter: Carsten Ziegeler
Assignee: Carsten Ziegeler
Fix For: 2.0.0
The goal is to keep all commons stuff in commons/*
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Felix Meschberger wrote:
Congratulations to #400 !
:) We could start a competition - the person creating #1000 gets a free
drink at new ApacheCon :)
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
lient or
server)?
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Felix Meschberger wrote:
Hi Carsten,
Am Dienstag, den 29.04.2008, 17:28 +0200 schrieb Carsten Ziegeler:
Hi,
So, wrapping up:
a) "commons" is a place for common code/bundles which is not directly
tied to Sling (but used by Sling)
b) We move the stuff from the "osgi" dir
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-400?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Carsten Ziegeler reassigned SLING-400:
--
Assignee: Carsten Ziegeler
> Separate content loading from resource bun
ould have a JIRA for that ?
Hmm, where was this comment about someone being picky today... :) just
kidding.
Yupp, I'll add a jira and mark all upcoming commits with it.
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Felix Meschberger wrote:
Hi Carsten,
Am Dienstag, den 29.04.2008, 16:51 +0200 schrieb Carsten Ziegeler:
I'm wondering why we export the jackrabbit-api in our jcr.api?
The jcr api should imho not be tied to any jcr implementation.
You are right, of course and we should move the jackrabbi
tting stuff into /var/bla where something underneath bla is
unstructured. /var is usually an nt:folder.
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12593043#action_12593043
]
Carsten Ziegeler commented on SLING-399:
I have a patch for this on my machin
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
So, wrapping up:
a) "commons" is a place for common code/bundles which is not directly
tied to Sling (but used by Sling)
I forgot to mention that all modules in "commons" use o.a.s.commons.* as
package names.
b) We move the stuff from the &
not directly
tied to Sling (but used by Sling)
b) We move the stuff from the "osgi" dir to "better places"
c) osgi/assembly -> sandbox
d) osgi/commons -> commons/osgi-util
e) osgi/console-web -> Apache Felix
f) osgi/log -> commons/log
g) osgi/obr -> sandbox
Does this make sense?
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...I think we should move the integration tests to a separate module
as ewll
As long as they run automatically and can also be run against a
separate Sling instance, I'm f
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 4:55 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
... For what is it used there?...
Integration tests only at the moment, which verify that the mechanism works.
:) Ok - I think we should move the integration tests to a separate
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 4:47 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
... I think we should move the default-rtp bundle from the jcr dir to the
samples. It's a nice little module which more servers as a sample
Agreed, but note that it is used b
I'm wondering why we export the jackrabbit-api in our jcr.api?
The jcr api should imho not be tied to any jcr implementation.
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I think we should move the default-rtp bundle from the jcr dir to the
samples. It's a nice little module which more servers as a sample.
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
... I'm not 100% sure, but I don't think that this is caused by a change in
Sling. It might be caused by changes in the repository implementation you
use? Perhaps some o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12592965#action_12592965
]
Carsten Ziegeler commented on SLING-298:
The alternative would be to use "
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Carsten Ziegeler updated SLING-190:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0.1)
> The Sling class of the launcher should verify minimum
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Carsten Ziegeler updated SLING-190:
---
Affects Version/s: 2.0.0
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0.0)
2.0.1
d by changes in the repository implementation
you use? Perhaps some other classes are missing in the global class
loader now?
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Carsten Ziegeler reassigned SLING-391:
--
Assignee: Carsten Ziegeler
> Create base launchpad module for better re
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12592830#action_12592830
]
Carsten Ziegeler commented on SLING-190:
I'm not 100% sure, but as the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Carsten Ziegeler reassigned SLING-311:
--
Assignee: Carsten Ziegeler
> Record loaded content to not reload inadverte
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12592824#action_12592824
]
Carsten Ziegeler commented on SLING-298:
Ok, can we come to a consensus here
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Carsten Ziegeler reassigned SLING-367:
--
Assignee: Carsten Ziegeler
> change sling:post: to sling: for "command"
de
is written using spaces instead tabs for indenting, and using two
spaces per indent level.
Well, it's actually four spaces for Java code :)
Carsten
> That's not terribly important, but it makes
it easier to work on other people's code.
-Bertrand
--
Carsten Ziegeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-394?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12592779#action_12592779
]
Carsten Ziegeler commented on SLING-394:
Do we need this prefix at all? I thin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12592752#action_12592752
]
Carsten Ziegeler commented on SLING-367:
Ok, rethinking the issue, I still w
r the embedded lib, so this is
not code duplication.
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12592587#action_12592587
]
Carsten Ziegeler commented on SLING-367:
Hmm, I totally agree that things shoul
nd as I pointed out,
as soon as you are heavily using any other format than html, you end up
with the same mess (all files named pdf.*)
So how do we want to proceed?
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12592401#action_12592401
]
Carsten Ziegeler commented on SLING-367:
I think there is a difference bet
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Carsten Ziegeler resolved SLING-392.
Resolution: Invalid
Your json is incorrect: you apply the mixin "mix:language"
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Carsten Ziegeler reassigned SLING-392:
--
Assignee: Carsten Ziegeler
> JSON Import: serialization fails with node type deny
Affects Versions: 2.0.0
Reporter: Carsten Ziegeler
Fix For: 2.0.0
For better reuse in own projects, the common stuff from the launchpad
app/webapp is moved to an own module.
This module is then used by app/webapp - we have to find a way to define the
bundles at a common place
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...Today you use
POMDs (plain old maven dependencies) and the plugin inspects them if they're
bundles. A special scope would do the same but require the developer to use
this s
Felix Meschberger wrote:
Hi,
Am Montag, den 21.04.2008, 15:38 +0200 schrieb Carsten Ziegeler:
Felix Meschberger wrote
I don't know - perhaps we could define this in a separate pom and then
use the assembly plugin, or we can write a custom plugin. I've written a
plugin that assemble
invoked on
the app, traverses the deps (including transitive ones) and adds the
found bundles.
The list is nearly correct, only if you have a provided dependency on a
lib that is not a bundle, the corresponding wrapper bundle needs to be
added manually. But I think, we don't have this
and
setup the dependency list.
Is this correct ? Does this make sense ?
I think this makes sense. This enables creating own webapps without the
need of duplicating common stuff.
I'll try to come up with a solution for this next week (hopefully).
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Felix Meschberger wote:
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 18.04.2008, 16:35 +0200 schrieb Carsten Ziegeler:
Having scripts in /apps and /libs where /libs
has precendence of /apps still feels not very intuitive for me.
It is the other way around: /apps has precedence over /libs. And this is
IMHO intuitive
Felix Meschberger wrote:
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 18.04.2008, 16:22 +0200 schrieb Carsten Ziegeler:
Felix Meschberger wrote:
The search path from ResourceResolver.getSearchPath defines the order.
And this is currently configured to be [ "/apps", "/libs" ], thus giving
prece
quot;overwrites" in /apps.
Btw, shouldn't we prefix these dirs to make it clear that they are for
sling? Like "sling:libs" and "sling:apps" ?
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
right, didn't think about the script extension, sorry.
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Felix Meschberger wrote:
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 18.04.2008, 15:21 +0200 schrieb Carsten Ziegeler:
I was in fact thinking of calculating a weight value for each script
path and take the one with the greatest value. But I think, it is
probably even better to make use of the Comparable interface (or
is not related.
Therefore, I propose we split the jcr/resource bundle keeping the
ResourceResolver stuff in the jcr/resource bundle and creating a
jcr/loader bundle which takes over the initial content loader.
WDYT ?
Makes sense: +1
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Felix Meschberger wrote:
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 18.04.2008, 14:59 +0200 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 2:54 PM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Am Freitag, den 18.04.2008, 13:59 +0200 schrieb Carsten Ziegeler:
>...Given that we search in /A and /V,
and only if there is none, /V is searched? Or is the
script search alternating between /A and /V?
I think this is missing in the description.
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rethinking the whole issue, I'm not sure if it's really worth changing
the behaviour as this would mean that all users have to change their
paths for scripts.
So which real problems are we trying to fix?
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
with what we do currently (with
respect to selectors). But I am convinced, that we have to make a
concession on one end to get the other end. We cannot easily get all.
Exactly, that's why I wanted to discuss this before a release :)
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
e a complete description (followed by a
discussion/vote) before changing/implementing something.
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 1:22 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm currently using the launchpad/webapp to build my own webapp. All I need
from the webapp are the configuration files for Sling and the classes which
launch Sling; no bundles etc.
of it.
So it would be great if we could solve this somehow, perhaps by
splitting the configuration and classes into an own project?
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
... Hmm, the more I think about it, the more I have the feeling that initial
content comming from a bundle should only be used for "static" stuff - it
should not be abused
minutes :) I just wanted to come up with the
same idea :(
I assume, it's possible to specify several paths, like:
/content,
/resources;overwrite:=true
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...So the content loader should try to overwrite existing nodes and
properties ?
Yes. The only problem might be that a user has changed a property and this
gets then overwritten
Felix Meschberger wrote:
Taking this to the list ...
Thanks :)
Am Mittwoch, den 16.04.2008, 01:22 -0700 schrieb Carsten Ziegeler (JIRA):
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=1258
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12589463#action_12589463
]
Carsten Ziegeler commented on SLING-311:
I'm not sure if we can use the
Ok, *if* we want to change the behaviour of the script resolution, we
should definitly do this before our first planned release.
Carsten
Alexander Klimetschek wrote:
Am 14.04.2008 um 18:11 schrieb Carsten Ziegeler:
Hmm, isn't there a better way? This solves the problem only partially
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12589451#action_12589451
]
Carsten Ziegeler commented on SLING-311:
It would be great, if the content woul
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Carsten Ziegeler closed SLING-351.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> Use uppercase Sling in sling
Felix Meschberger wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 16.04.2008, 08:08 +0200 schrieb Carsten Ziegeler:
Felix Meschberger wrote:
Am Montag, den 14.04.2008, 15:50 -0500 schrieb Craig L. Ching:
yes, it seems. just comment out those modules in the pom. i get
another error that some taglibs are missing. so i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-361?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Carsten Ziegeler closed SLING-361.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> The sling/sample module fails to compile JSP scripts when run in a reac
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-361?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Carsten Ziegeler reassigned SLING-361:
--
Assignee: Carsten Ziegeler
> The sling/sample module fails to compile JSP scripts w
into it, or should i?
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ave no idea yet why they fail...investigating...
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Carsten Ziegeler closed SLING-348.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> Rename servlets-default to servlets-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Carsten Ziegeler reassigned SLING-348:
--
Assignee: Carsten Ziegeler
> Rename servlets-default to servlets-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Carsten Ziegeler closed SLING-381.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> Support for Multiple JcrResourceTypeProvid
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Carsten Ziegeler reassigned SLING-381:
--
Assignee: Carsten Ziegeler
> Support for Multiple JcrResourceTypeProvid
Affects Versions: 2.0.0
Reporter: Carsten Ziegeler
Fix For: 2.0.0
Currently only one (or none ) JcrResourceTypeProvider is allowed. It makes
sense to extend this to multiple providers.
The providers are queried in the order of their "service.ranking" property
(hig
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Carsten Ziegeler updated SLING-348:
---
Affects Version/s: 2.0.0
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0
> Rename servlets-default to servl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Carsten Ziegeler updated SLING-351:
---
Affects Version/s: 2.0.0
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0
> Use uppercase Sling in sling
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-361?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Carsten Ziegeler updated SLING-361:
---
Affects Version/s: 2.0.0
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0
> The sling/sample module fails
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Carsten Ziegeler resolved SLING-366.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0
Hi Tobi,
I applied your patch - could you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Carsten Ziegeler reassigned SLING-366:
--
Assignee: Carsten Ziegeler
> Add "copy" support to Sli
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-354?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Carsten Ziegeler closed SLING-354.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Implemented with parameter "name" and "nameHint"
> B
uld be "sling:nameHint"
regards,
david
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 4:38 PM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
...Can we find something
else than "
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-354?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12588991#action_12588991
]
Carsten Ziegeler commented on SLING-354:
We don't have a majority yet,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-354?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12588985#action_12588985
]
Carsten Ziegeler commented on SLING-354:
New proposal:
- if "nodeName&quo
resource type provider that looks for specific mixin types. Another part
of the app might use the path based approach etc.
WDYT?
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 9:06 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
... Sorry for the problems - I accidentally added the samples to the build
again - but due to the unfinished changes with the jsp compilation, the
sample module is not working aga
le module is not working again yet.
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
using a simple rule like "replacing the last slash with a dot"?
So instead of looking it /apps/foo/html.esp Sling would look at
/apps/foo.html.esp.
With selectors this becomes /apps/foo.selector.html.esp".
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
... Afaik, there is no maven problem with doing it one way or the other, so we
can do it either way as long as we are consistent
Ok - I was just wondering if that was another c
Felix Meschberger wrote:
Hi,
The cache project is "stupid" and useless at the moment. Shouldn't we
remove it completely for now ?
Hehe, I suggested this some months ago and you were reluctant at that
time :)
Big +1 for removing.
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I would prefer the first one.
Carsten
... And then, I would not filter or otherwise mangle the exact name (this is
the difference to Betrand's proposal) and rather fail if the name is
invalid
We are in agreement, that's what I suggested, no filtering for nodeName.
-Bertrand
--
Carsten Ziegeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
801 - 900 of 1341 matches
Mail list logo
