Hi,
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-1 until we clarify whether we can actually use the JSON code, see [1]
and [2]. I just realized the potential issue when reviewing the
licenses. As mentioned in [2] there seems to be an alternatively
licensed version
Jukka Zitting wrote:
As discussed in [1], the consensus on legal-discuss seems to be that
the license is OK for us, so I'm lifting this -1.
Great :)
However, we should do something about the top level NOTICE and LICENSE
files, so I'm still -1 on the release as-is. Also, it worries me that
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:45 AM, Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I hereby cancel the vote to fix these remaining issues.
Thanks!
Once we're finished I would like that some people check the NOTICE files
*before* I cut a new release. It would be great, Jukka, if you could
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 6:32 PM, Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
let's give it a second try. I cut a new candidate as outlined today.
I was just wondering where we are with the release, given licensing
concern(s) pointed out by Jukka. Could we expect the release in the
next couple of
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Greg Klebus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 6:32 PM, Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
let's give it a second try. I cut a new candidate as outlined today.
I was just wondering where we are with the release, given licensing
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...The consensus on legal-discuss@ seems to be that we can include the
JSON code in Sling, i.e. the Good, not Evil condition is not a FOU
clause that we need to worry about
Here's a link to the relevant thread for our
Hi,
+1 for releasing.
And a big thank you for the effort you put in glueing this together,
Regards
Felix
Am Donnerstag, den 05.06.2008, 18:32 +0200 schrieb Carsten Ziegeler:
Hello everyone,
let's give it a second try. I cut a new candidate as outlined today.
I've put all release
David Nuescheler wrote:
hi carsten,
the release built just fine for me. congrats.
a couple of assertion seem to fail on the sling client side testing:
.../sling-test/sling/sling-test.html i don't think it is something major but
maybe we want to clean that up or remove from the release.
If
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 9:45 PM, David Nuescheler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...a couple of assertion seem to fail on the sling client side testing:
.../sling-test/sling/sling-test.html i don't think it is something major but
maybe we want to clean that up or remove from the release
IIRC the
Hi,
-1 until we clarify whether we can actually use the JSON code, see [1]
and [2]. I just realized the potential issue when reviewing the
licenses. As mentioned in [2] there seems to be an alternatively
licensed version of the code that we might need to switch to.
[1]
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...Also, -1 for the inadequate NOTICE and LICENSE files in the app and
webapp packages. The files may be correct for the individual bundles
contained in the packages (didn't yet check too carefully), but IMHO
it's even
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 6:32 PM, Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...I've put all release artifacts here
http://people.apache.org/~cziegeler/releases/sling/...
+1 on the release (assuming we solve Jukka's json library concern).
I enclose the list of what a checked below, can be useful
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...Also, -1 for the inadequate NOTICE and LICENSE files in the app and
webapp packages. The files may be correct for the individual bundles
Hi,
Also, -1 for the inadequate NOTICE and LICENSE files in the app and
webapp packages. The files may be correct for the individual bundles
contained in the packages (didn't yet check too carefully), but IMHO
it's even more important that the aggregate files are in proper shape.
BR,
Jukka
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 7:55 AM, Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexander Klimetschek wrote:
...I have some suggestions for changes to the i18n/message bundle node
types (although not finalized).
Could this artifact be released later?...
Would your changes be
Hi,
Thanks Carsten for preparing the release!
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 7:51 PM, Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...I've put all release artifacts here:
That's a lot, and I'm wondering how to check all that - comments below.
...The releases (source archives) are in
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 11:39 PM, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...Whoa, you are running almost 50 release votes in parallel?!? I'm all
for modularity, but isn't this a bit extreme?...
Ah - didn't see this message before writing my how to check the
release one ;-)
I'll probably create
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Here the goal is to check that the contents match what's tagged with
the same release number under
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/sling/tags/, right?
Yes, and to make sure that everything is correct from a legal pov.
However,
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 05.06.2008, 08:45 +0200 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 11:39 PM, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...Whoa, you are running almost 50 release votes in parallel?!? I'm all
for modularity, but isn't this a bit extreme?...
Ah - didn't see
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 8:54 AM, Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm, don't know - noone came up with this *before* doing the release. :)
I was expecting that we'd do a single release, not dozens of them at
the same time. :-)
In the end I see no real difference, you have to check
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 7:51 PM, Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
org.apache.sling.launchpad.app-2.0.0-incubator
...
org.apache.sling.launchpad.webapp-2.0.0-incubator...
Are broken due to SLING-512, which apparently hides a slightly more
serious problem.
-Bertrand
Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 8:54 AM, Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm, don't know - noone came up with this *before* doing the release. :)
I was expecting that we'd do a single release, not dozens of them at
the same time. :-)
In the end I see no real
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jukka Zitting wrote:
With this release structure I don't think anyone in their right mind
would care to download the sources and build them, and that's IMHO a
bad thing.
Hmm, ok, this depends of course on your
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 8:32 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would your changes be backwards-incompatible?
No, unfortunately they are not. That's why I bothered to disturb your
release voting ;-)
We might also release now and re-release just this module later, no big deal.
If
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 05.06.2008, 11:41 +0200 schrieb Carsten Ziegeler:
Ok,
so I cancel this vote due to mainly two problems:
a) a bug (SLING-512) which will be solved by Felix :)
b) the source release should rather be one big archive
The plan for release is as follows:
a) We will fix
Ok,
so I cancel this vote due to mainly two problems:
a) a bug (SLING-512) which will be solved by Felix :)
b) the source release should rather be one big archive
The plan for release is as follows:
a) We will fix the bugs in the affected modules and then tag them as
2.0.2 bundles/modules.
b)
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 05.06.2008, 11:53 +0200 schrieb Alexander
Klimetschek:
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 8:32 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would your changes be backwards-incompatible?
No, unfortunately they are not. That's why I bothered to disturb your
release voting ;-)
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 12:41 PM, Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hope this is ok for everyone?
OK, with one concern:
e) All upcoming releases will be single bundle releases.
I'm a bit worried about this. Even though Sling consists of multiple
components, from the end user
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 05.06.2008, 08:53 +0200 schrieb Carsten Ziegeler:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Here the goal is to check that the contents match what's tagged with
the same release number under
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/sling/tags/, right?
Yes, and to make sure
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... e) All upcoming releases will be single bundle releases
I think Jukka has valid points here, but we don't need to decide on
this right now.
... I hope this is ok for everyone?...
Ok for me, thanks.
At some point
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... e) All upcoming releases will be single bundle releases
I think Jukka has valid points here, but we don't need to decide on
this right now.
... I hope this is ok for everyone?...
Hello everyone,
let's give it a second try. I cut a new candidate as outlined today.
I've put all release artifacts here:
http://people.apache.org/~cziegeler/releases/sling/
The releases are in
http://people.apache.org/~cziegeler/releases/sling/releases
This is a big source tree of our
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Hello everyone,
let's give it a second try. I cut a new candidate as outlined today.
I've put all release artifacts here:
http://people.apache.org/~cziegeler/releases/sling/
The releases are in
http://people.apache.org/~cziegeler/releases/sling/releases
This is a
+1 (even though non binding ;) looking forward to the release!
Cheers
JM
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 6:32 PM, Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everyone,
let's give it a second try. I cut a new candidate as outlined today.
I've put all release artifacts here:
+1
BR,
Juanjo
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 6:32 PM, Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello everyone,
let's give it a second try. I cut a new candidate as outlined today.
I've put all release artifacts here:
hi carsten,
the release built just fine for me. congrats.
a couple of assertion seem to fail on the sling client side testing:
.../sling-test/sling/sling-test.html i don't think it is something major but
maybe we want to clean that up or remove from the release.
regards,
david
On Thu, Jun 5,
Hello everyone,
after some struggling we finally managed to built the release candidates
(hurray); thanks for everyone helping in getting this done.
I've put all release artifacts here:
http://people.apache.org/~cziegeler/releases/sling/
The releases (source archives) are in
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 8:51 PM, Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This time we are releasing a lot of artifacts - after this first release
we will release one or two artifacts at a time in different intervals. As
always the initial release is the hardest one.
Although we release
Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
Whoa, you are running almost 50 release votes in parallel?!? I'm all
for modularity, but isn't this a bit extreme?
What's wrong with just tagging the entire trunk and having the release
candidate be the packaged svn export of that tag?
Hmm, don't know - noone came up
Alexander Klimetschek wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 7:51 PM, Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
org.apache.sling.i18n-2.0.0-incubator
I have some suggestions for changes to the i18n/message bundle node
types (although not finalized).
Could this artifact be released later? (AFAIK no
40 matches
Mail list logo
