On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 03:09:56PM +1100, Jeff Waugh wrote:
quote who=Crossfire
thats odd, since Sun Firmware uses ARP/RARP to get IP, not BOOTP/DHCP.
[and, oh boy is RARP fun]
It sucks of the arse, and... I was installing something crackful that didn't
like bootp recently. Maybe it
At 9:46 pm, Tuesday, January 1 2002, Simon Wong mumbled:
I tried that but it didn't fix it. Any other ideas?
Sure. Add the user to the dip group.
(Assuming Debian.)
--
Steve
jim Lemme make sure I'm not wasting time here... bcwhite will remove
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 03:04:35PM +1100, Crossfire wrote:
thats odd, since Sun Firmware uses ARP/RARP to get IP, not BOOTP/DHCP.
Recent versions can use either DHCP or RARP, although I'm fairly sure
that none of the versions for the sun4m's support it...
Scott
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User
On Wed, 2002-01-02 at 16:29, David Fitch wrote:
Trouble is I really want the cd install to work - if there's a problem later
and I can't boot off the disk (for some reason) I don't want to go through
all this again I want to be able to pop in the cd and go.
Invoking all my powers of
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 09:02:25PM +1100, Craige McWhirter wrote:
January's meeting is in a couple of short weeks and this would make for
much hacking-fun-buggery after Craig Small's talk. I could also bring my
CD's along which I know work with my SS20.
sounds good... and I would... except
On Wed, 2002-01-02 at 22:07, David Fitch wrote:
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 09:02:25PM +1100, Craige McWhirter wrote:
January's meeting is in a couple of short weeks and this would make for
much hacking-fun-buggery after Craig Small's talk. I could also bring my
CD's along which I know work
Netware incorporates proprietary system calls that can be utilised
by developers for file locking. date retrieval and many other
functions. If you are using mars-nwe the Netware server emulator,
it may be that not all these system calls are supported. The calls
themselves have changed since
OK Mozilla is crashing when I reply twice.I installed evolution and
it now works but it will not import Mozilla mail. ANy work arounds?
I read the FAQ there did not appear to be anything.
KenF
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info:
Now with added secure and midnight-closing parking in Lincoln Cr, across
the road from the hotel. Hopefully this map is not auto-generating and
it will still be there for you:
http://map3.whereis.com.au/telmap/map/map11571.gif
All day parking costs $7 so I'd hazard a guess that an hour or two
To clarify, I am looking at using samba not the netware emulator.
The other reason for upgrading is that they have reached the user limits of
their netware licence and will need to upgrade regardless (25 user, NW 4.10)
so removing load from the existing server will not be a solution.
The big
Hahaha!
On one hand it's funny, on the other... YOU HAVE PATCHES ALREADY!
http://www.mutt.org/announce/mutt-1.2.5.1-1.3.25.html
- Jeff
--
Trying to get a PC to analyse one of the most abstract forms of
language - the poem - is like trying to drill for oil with a banana.
hey all,
I thought I was starting to get an understaning of iptables when I stumbled
on this problem.
I've figured out how to SNAT and DNAT thanks to the help from the previous
post and SLUGGERS who explained it a bit better than the man pages.
My problem now is that I have rules (as below)
Anyone know what the exploit actually is?
Chuck
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 12:15:31AM +1100, Jeff Waugh wrote:
Hahaha!
On one hand it's funny, on the other... YOU HAVE PATCHES ALREADY!
http://www.mutt.org/announce/mutt-1.2.5.1-1.3.25.html
- Jeff
--
If it ain't broke, it
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 09:23:52AM +1100, George Vieira wrote:
I've figured out how to SNAT and DNAT thanks to the help from the previous
post and SLUGGERS who explained it a bit better than the man pages.
My problem now is that I have rules (as below) which allow incoming ports
for TCP, any
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 06:20:16PM +1100, Jeff Waugh wrote:
quote who=David Fitch
will rsync/wget just get the diffs? (assuming there is any)
Yep, use rsync. Servers are described on cdimage.debian.org.
doesn't seem to work for a single binary file (iso), ie. I did the
rsync and it
On Wed, 2002-01-02 at 18:16, Jeff Waugh wrote:
If pain persists, please read the man page, it's a much better reference
than my blabber. ;)
Am I the only one who read this as bladder?
--
Peter Hardy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More
George Vieira was once rumoured to have said:
hey all,
I thought I was starting to get an understaning of iptables when I stumbled
on this problem.
[snip]
The other thing weird is that my rules aren't DROPPING non allowed packets
and yet my rules appear quite strict.. I usually ACCEPT
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 09:33:37AM +1100, Balial wrote:
Anyone know what the exploit actually is?
From looking at the patch for it, it looks like it is a buffer overflow
in parsing addresses in headers. I think I read somewhere that it is
only a 1 byte overflow, but still exploitable despite
The problem isn't that they can't reach the ports as the ports I allowed are
working.. it's the ports that aren't specified should be handled by the
default chain and/or the last chain which is supposed to be LOGGING and
DROPPING but aren't even run.
#
# DROP and log everything
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 10:25:13AM +1100, Peter Hardy wrote:
On Wed, 2002-01-02 at 18:16, Jeff Waugh wrote:
If pain persists, please read the man page, it's a much better reference
than my blabber. ;)
Am I the only one who read this as bladder?
No, but it didn't seem strange that Jeff
The big problem is that magical word support, If MYOB don't support
Linux
and the customer has problems with MYOB on linux, then MYOB can (and do)
say
sorry it's your network, not our software.
I think that this problem is a bit of a myth. Experience with these software
vendors shows that
Ahaa!! Crossfire was right. Packets do not pass through the INPUT chain
first and then the FORWARD chain like they do in IPCHAINS.
I have allowed the internet network on the internal device and dropped
practically everything else and it now logs and drops properly.
Thanks for that information. I
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 11:27:14AM +1100, Andrew Bennetts wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 09:33:37AM +1100, Balial wrote:
Anyone know what the exploit actually is?
From looking at the patch for it, it looks like it is a buffer overflow in
parsing addresses in headers. I think I read
Can anyone help with this?
I've been trying to setup a simple nfs betweens two machines but have hit a block:
I'm using RedHat 7.1 on both machines.
rpcinfo -p sever tells me the services on each ok.
rpcinfo -n 2049 -u server nfs gives:
program 13 version 2 ready and waiting
program
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 12:48:43PM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and yet when I try to mount a filesystem:
mount server:/remote/dir /local/dir I get:
mount: RPC: Timed out error.
I have tried all the options in the RedHat HOWTOS and still don't have a clue.
so you've got the nfs
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 01:14:35AM +, Pete Ryland wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 11:27:14AM +1100, Andrew Bennetts wrote:
From looking at the patch for it, it looks like it is a buffer overflow in
parsing addresses in headers. I think I read somewhere that it is only a
1 byte
\begin{Rob B}
OK ... this is what I have so far ...
aylee:/usr/src/kernel-source-2.4.14$ export PATCH_THE_KERNEL=YES
aylee:/usr/src/kernel-source-2.4.14$ sudo
make-kpkg --revision=loop.1.0 --added_patches xfs configure
aylee:/usr/src/kernel-source-2.4.14$ sudo make config
configure,
G'day all,
I have a little perl CGI script that sends its stdout to the browser with
the
appropriate Content-type header and data from a file.
The problem I am having is that I want it to be saved with a
filename determined by the script and not by the URL of the script.
I tried adding a name=
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 02:56:18PM +1100, Gareth Walters wrote:
The problem I am having is that I want it to be saved with a
filename determined by the script and not by the URL of the script.
I tried adding a name= field in the Content-type header but it didn't
make any difference.
Try
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey guys
I have a ultra 150 controller with a server, and am looking into
getting new replacement drives for it.
What i would like to know is if a ultra 160 scsi drive (for example,
a Seagate Cheetah 73.4GB 10K RPM Ultra 160) will work on this
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Bennetts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gareth Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 4:14 PM
Subject: Re: [SLUG] Slightly OT. overriding filename with headers from CGI
program.
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 02:56:18PM
Sluggers,
I was wondering if anyone here has had any
experience with restricting cpu/memory usage for users in a Solaris
environment.
Thanks
SH
on Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 03:57:56PM +1100, SH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sluggers,
I was wondering if anyone here has had any experience with restricting cpu/memory
usage for users in a Solaris environment.
I dont, but man ulimit might help.
BB
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 03:57:56PM +1100, SH wrote:
I was wondering if anyone here has had any experience with restricting cpu/
memory usage for users in a Solaris environment.
Theres nice/renice for cpu. Theres probably lots of way to set it up.
If you set their login shell with a low
34 matches
Mail list logo
