> 1)The drive bays are of the 'Lazer" brand, whilst the box
> says they are hot
> swappable, I have some reservations about doing this, for
> fear of spiking the drive and damaging it or the others on
> the machine. I know that one has to be present in the machine
> for the bios to detect t
> 1)The drive bays are of the 'Lazer" brand, whilst the box
> says they are hot
> swappable, I have some reservations about doing this, for
> fear of spiking the drive and damaging it or the others on
> the machine. I know that one has to be present in the machine
> for the bios to detect t
Just asking if anyone has played with t.rex firewall content filtering
software? Are there any +ives over spamassassin or squidGuard?
Thanks
--
Kevin Saenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
This one time, at band camp, Matt M wrote:
>
>
>>And totally unimplementable on a machine where the same binaries can have
>>different MD5 sums across different installations, e.g. the one you all are
>>(most likely) reading this mail on now.
>
>Unless the MD5 sums table is build when you install t
Hi,
does anyone have any knowledge/experience of there being problems
mixing *brands* of memory. The memory is PC2100 (266MHz) Reg Ecc. I
currenty have one 512M stick of Crucial installed, and need another,
but there seems to be upto about 25% difference in price depending on
brand (and of course
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 08:57, Jonathan Kelly wrote:
> Hi,
>
> does anyone have any knowledge/experience of there being problems
> mixing *brands* of memory. The memory is PC2100 (266MHz) Reg Ecc. I
> currenty have one 512M stick of Crucial installed, and need another,
> but there seems to be upto a
Jonathan Kelly wrote:
> does anyone have any knowledge/experience of there being problems
> mixing *brands* of memory. The memory is PC2100 (266MHz) Reg Ecc. I
> currenty have one 512M stick of Crucial installed, and need another,
> but there seems to be upto about 25% difference in price depending
G'day all...
How do I go about manually checking / setting my TimeZone settings?
FWIW, I'm using Mandrake 8.2
TIA
Mike
---
Michael S. E. Kraus
Administration
Capital Holdings Group (NSW) Pty Ltd
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone (02) 9955 8000 fax (02) 9955 8144
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - htt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Friday 31 Jan 2003 10:17 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> How do I go about manually checking / setting my TimeZone settings?
> FWIW, I'm using Mandrake 8.2
Hi Mike,
Your default timezone is set by the soft-link /etc/localtime - for instance on
my system (Ma
I'm about to install Linux as an internet firewall/router on a our small
internal network. We currently have an old box of unknown spec, routing onto
our LAN using a 56K dialup internet connection.
I'm thinking I'll buy red hat 8 personal to get the full latest beast and a
graphical interface.
My
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Friday 31 Jan 2003 10:43 am, Peter Hewett wrote:
Regarding 486 vs Pentium, I've no recent experience to help with that I'm
afraid.
> And will red hat 8 personal have everything I need to do the job ?
I tried experimenting with this, and found that if you i
Peter Hewett wrote:
>
> I'm about to install Linux as an internet firewall/router on a our small
> internal network. We currently have an old box of unknown spec, routing onto
> our LAN using a 56K dialup internet connection.
A 486 is fine for this.
There is a nice O'Reilly's book on Firewalls, v
On 2003.01.31 10:43 Peter Hewett wrote:
I'm about to install Linux as an internet firewall/router on a our
small internal network. We currently have an old box of unknown
spec, routing onto our LAN using a 56K dialup internet connection.
I'm thinking I'll buy red hat 8 personal to get the full la
G'day all...
I'm wanting to set up a third network segment at work to use as a DMZ and
place the external mail server in it.
I'm wondering what is the best (read simplest yet secure) solution -
Postfix or Qmail as the MTA.
Comments welcomed.
Thanks.
Mike
---
Michael S. E. Kraus
Administratio
Hi Peter,
Try IPCop, it's ideal for your application. It's only 25MB, it's free and
will even run on a 486.
www.ipcop.org
Yes it does have a gui.
Cheers,
- Guy.
At 10:43 am 31/01/2003 +1100, you wrote:
I'm about to install Linux as an internet firewall/router on a our small
internal network
On 31/01/2003 11:22 AM +1000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day all...
I'm wanting to set up a third network segment at work to use as a DMZ and
place the external mail server in it.
I'm wondering what is the best (read simplest yet secure) solution -
Postfix or Qmail as the MTA.
I recommend Post
The link to Cetus seems to be down.
Mike
---
Michael S. E. Kraus
Administration
Capital Holdings Group (NSW) Pty Ltd
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone (02) 9955 8000 fax (02) 9955 8144
Terry Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
31/01/2003 11:25 AM
To: Peter Hewett <[EMAI
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 11:22:31AM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm wondering what is the best (read simplest yet secure) solution -
> Postfix or Qmail as the MTA.
I have used both of these. I havn't really looked into it in the last
couple of years, but back then one of these two would be y
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> The link to Cetus seems to be down.
>
Try http://www.lankum.com same place (new name)
--
Terry Collins {:-)}}} email: terryc at woa.com.au www:
http://www.woa.com.au
Wombat Outdoor Adventures
"People without trees are like fish without clean water"
--
Care to elucidate upon the non-GPL licensing restrictions?
Thanks
Mike
---
Michael S. E. Kraus
Administration
Capital Holdings Group (NSW) Pty Ltd
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone (02) 9955 8000 fax (02) 9955 8144
Russell Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
31/01/2003 11:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECT
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003, Gonzalo Servat wrote:
> I recommend Postfix. *Much* easier to configure, is secure and very
> reliable. Qmail is also good but it's not the easiest MTA to
> configure.
I don't current run a multi-user server, so I'm not interested in this
for personal use, I'm just curious.
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 11:44:23AM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Care to elucidate upon the non-GPL licensing restrictions?
google for qmail licensing and you will get the idea.
In section 1.8 of Life with Qmail
http://www.lifewithqmail.org/lwq.html#license
1.8. License
qmail is copyrighted
* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-01-31 11:30]:
> Care to elucidate upon the non-GPL licensing restrictions?
http://www.linuxmafia.com/~rick/faq/#djb
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Care to elucidate upon the non-GPL licensing restrictions?
[I think you might have sent a reply to a private mail to this list.
Sometimes not what the author of the private mail wanted.]
Distribution of qmail is under the terms at:
http://cr.yp.to
What about Exim?
http://www.exim.org/
I've heard it's better than both postfix and qmail.
I use postfix currently but will look at exim based on a chat with Paul
Wickham. Apparently it's used at an ISP in the UK with several million
mailboxes "Energis Squared also use exim for their mail system
On 31 Jan 2003, Stuart Guthrie wrote:
[Exim]
> they also use it exclusively for email requirements. Maybe Paul could
> give us an overview sometime?
If Paul isn't interested, I could probably whip something up. I'm an old
sendmail hack from way back, took one look at exim and haven't been back.
I have tried to send a postscript file as a fax.
the document is only 2 pages, the problem is
when I use sendfax -n -d number file
the modem stays connected to the fax and continues
to send page after page I turned off the modem
after 6 pages can anyone tell me what I have possibly
done wrong?
I c
> What about Exim?
>
> http://www.exim.org/
>
> I've heard it's better than both postfix and qmail.
"Different"... It's just another MTA. Whilst postfix is a drop-in
replacement for sendmail, a lot of sendmail admins will find exim easier
going, as it's a bit more hackable and flexible. You ge
> So qmail is useful if you want to let non-privileged users configure their
> own virtual hosts without any need for a privileged user to do anything
> except the initial setup.
>
> Is there are way to do this with Postfix?
Yes, but you do it in a more traditional way - LDAP, databases, etc. w
Hi All,
Is there a place where i can find out about what distribution &
releases use which version of the linux kernel ?
As a quicky, could someone fill me on which kernel versions
are on Redhat 7.X & 8 ?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Raj
--
SLUG - Sydne
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> Yes, but you do it in a more traditional way - LDAP, databases, etc.
> with user permissions to change those details managed separately. I
> don't see any fundamental advantage to the Qmail method... to me, it's
> messy. 8)
I just wanted to know if it was
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 03:02:43PM +1100, Tiwari, Rajnish wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Is there a place where i can find out about what distribution &
> releases use which version of the linux kernel ?
>
> As a quicky, could someone fill me on which kernel versions
> are on Redhat
G'day...
Basically, my biggest two factors for choice are:
* How easy is it to set up in a DMZ and relay onto a host in the
internal network?
* How secure is it.
Wow, qmail and postfix really seem to flame each other in regards to
security. Some mutual chips on shoulders it woul
> Basically, my biggest two factors for choice are:
> * How easy is it to set up in a DMZ and relay onto a host in the
> internal network?
That's about four or five lines of configuration total with postfix. :-)
> * How secure is it.
Very secure, and very reliable. See the pos
if you have a redhat based system you could also do less
/etc/redhat-releases
to find out what kernel you have on your system
man uname
uname can help you
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 03:02:43PM +1100, Tiwari, Rajnish wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Is there a place where i can find out about what d
Both programmers know what they are talking about, also have
very large egos, but postfix is less confusing in configuring.
> G'day...
>
> Basically, my biggest two factors for choice are:
> * How easy is it to set up in a DMZ and relay onto a host in the
> internal network?
> *
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 11:12, Robert Thorsby wrote:
> On 2003.01.31 10:43 Peter Hewett wrote:
> > I'm about to install Linux as an internet firewall/router on a our
> > small internal network. We currently have an old box of unknown
> > spec, routing onto our LAN using a 56K dialup internet connecti
Hi All,
I have a couple of problems that I hope you can help me with:
1. a) I am trying to get Return to Castle Wolfenstein working with the
native linux binaries. The single player mode works without a hitch *IF*
I run it as root. If I run is as a normal user, it loads, I select
'play' and selec
Seen on a web forum aimed at helping Solaris users. Such a gem, had to
share it:
> dre1988 (MIS) Apr 25, 2002
> I tried a
>
> cat /dev/null > /var/adm/wtmpx
>
> This should send the file to /dev/null and create a 0 byte file for
> wtmpx.
> However, the file system is still 100% full. Is there a
39 matches
Mail list logo
