This one time, at band camp, Voytek Eymont wrote:
>and, yes, as the logs rolled, they reverted, and, after I stopped ,
So there's a log rotator in there? What does its configuration tell you?
Perhaps the log rotator is creating the new log file with the wrong
ownership?
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux Us
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 01:26:00PM +1000, Voytek Eymont wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 05:03:00PM +1000, Voytek Eymont wrote:
>
> > For that to work the log would have to be group-writeable.
> > Is it?
> doesn't seem to be:
> > Also check for selinux violations (/var/log/audit/audit.log) if
On Mon, October 22, 2007 9:02 pm, Matthew Hannigan wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 01:26:00PM +1000, Voytek Eymont wrote:
>>> Also check for selinux violations (/var/log/audit/audit.log) if
>>> everything else looks ok.
>> the /var/log/audit/ dir is empty...?
>
> You may need to install 'audit'
On Mon, October 22, 2007 9:09 pm, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Voytek Eymont wrote:
>
>> and, yes, as the logs rolled, they reverted, and, after I stopped ,
>
> So there's a log rotator in there? What does its configuration tell you?
> Perhaps the log rotator is creating
I have a thumbdrive/memory stick that has to be used in computers running
Windows and Ubuntu.
Windows recognises immediately when it's in the USB port.
Ubuntu doesn't even acknowledge its existence.
I'm told it's the formatting.
Is there a common format that can be used, even if it's less than
> Is there a common format that can be used, even if it's less than optimal
> for either system?
FAT32 is the most widely compatible disk format to use on pretty much any
device.
- Jeff
--
GNOME.conf.au 2008: Melbourne, Australia http://live.gnome.org/Melbourne2008
"Perdon; estoy busca
Hi
Any one know what has happened to ipv6.broadway.aarnet.net.au (::192.231.212.5)
, I used to use it as a 6to4 gateway. But it doesn't seem to be working any
more.
Alex
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subsc
On 10/23/07, Alex Samad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any one know what has happened to ipv6.broadway.aarnet.net.au
> (::192.231.212.5)
> , I used to use it as a 6to4 gateway. But it doesn't seem to be working any
> more.
I have an explicit tunnel (2001::/16), rather than 6to4 (2002::/16),
with b
On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 10:26 +1000, Alex Samad wrote:
> Hi
>
> Any one know what has happened to ipv6.broadway.aarnet.net.au
> (::192.231.212.5)
> , I used to use it as a 6to4 gateway. But it doesn't seem to be working any
> more.
I'll find out.
--
Glen Turner
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User'
On 23/10/2007, Jeff Waugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Is there a common format that can be used, even if it's less than
> optimal
> > for either system?
>
> FAT32 is the most widely compatible disk format to use on pretty much any
> device.
What about having a partition table on the dis
> > > Is there a common format that can be used, even if it's less than
> > > optimal for either system?
> >
> > FAT32 is the most widely compatible disk format to use on pretty much
> > any device.
>
> What about having a partition table on the disk? Would it help to have or
> not have one?
I'
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 10:38:28AM +1000, Christopher Vance wrote:
> On 10/23/07, Alex Samad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Any one know what has happened to ipv6.broadway.aarnet.net.au
> > (::192.231.212.5)
> > , I used to use it as a 6to4 gateway. But it doesn't seem to be working any
> > more.
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 11:08:34AM +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
>
>
> > > > Is there a common format that can be used, even if it's less than
> > > > optimal for either system?
> > >
> > > FAT32 is the most widely compatible disk format to use on pretty much
> > > any device.
> >
> > What about havi
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 10:54:29PM +1000, Voytek Eymont wrote:
> >>> Did you get amavis and clamav from the standard Fedora/Redhat
> >>> repos? If so you should raise a bug with them or mention on their
> >>> mailing lists.
> >> it seems yes, but I'll need to check the logs though
>
> > Better ch
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 11:04:08 +1000, Amos Shapira wrote:
> What about having a partition table on the disk? Would it help to have or
> not have one?
Mostly it doesn't seem to make a difference, but I do have one device
(a GPS) that doesn't handle memory cards with a partition table. Ubuntu
do
What's the story with running VNC version 4 on Ubuntu etc? For quite some
time version 4's been available and gets installed in Fedora 7 for example
yet the other camp's stuck on 3.3. Normally I wouldn't be too fussed but
version 4's just so much faster on the wire. Gotta get around to trying
the N
On Fri, October 19, 2007 8:55 am, Luke Vanderfluit wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I know theres some sound experts on this list.
> Im running kernel 2.6.18-1.2239.fc5
> Realplayer 10.0.8
>
> I have this problem where I try running realplayer after Ive used the
> sound device through another application (usually
> What's the story with running VNC version 4 on Ubuntu etc?
Version 4 appears to be included by default in 7.10.
- Jeff
--
GNOME.conf.au 2008: Melbourne, Australia http://live.gnome.org/Melbourne2008
"Debugging is at least twice as hard as programming. If your code is as
clever as y
On Tue, October 23, 2007 10:59 am, Matthew Hannigan wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 10:54:29PM +1000, Voytek Eymont wrote:
>
thanks, Matthew
> Try http://centos.karan.org/ - it's fedora4 extras rebuilt for centos.
> Both clamav and amavis are there.
ok, thanks for the tip
looks like they chan
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 12:50:03PM +1000, Voytek Eymont wrote:
>
> On Tue, October 23, 2007 10:59 am, Matthew Hannigan wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 10:54:29PM +1000, Voytek Eymont wrote:
> >
>
> thanks, Matthew
>
> > Try http://centos.karan.org/ - it's fedora4 extras rebuilt for centos.
>
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 12:48:59PM +1000, Matthew Hannigan wrote:
> There is no one right answer for this. If it was me, other things
> being equal I'd install the latest fedora or ubuntu, because Redhat/Centos
> just doesn't have clamav and amavis as core packages (apparently)
Something worth m
On 10/23/07, Alex Samad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I will want to set this on an openwrt box, do you see any problems ?
My gateway runs a different free OS, so I can't give explicit
step-by-steps, but I would expect Linux on your openwrt to be more
than adequate.
The ifconfig manual on my Linux
On Tue, October 23, 2007 12:48 pm, Matthew Hannigan wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 12:50:03PM +1000, Voytek Eymont wrote:
> Er you don't have both installed do you?! I'd remove every rpmforge
> package first.
yes, I have, you mean, doesn't the rpm take care of such niggly details??
g,d&r
no,
23 matches
Mail list logo
