On Wed, 9 Aug 2000, Dave Kempe wrote:
> > download faster than it uploads. In theory you can get a full 56k
> > download speed, but not upload (all depending on line quality).
>
> That is all defined by the V.90 standard. An article on Slashdot a while
> back suggest that the IEEE is going to ch
Dave Kempe wrote:
> That is all defined by the V.90 standard. An article on Slashdot a while
> back suggest that the IEEE is going to change it with a new standard. Make
> it symetrical both ways . I can't find any info so maybe im dreaming about
> that bit. Just gotta wait for damn communication
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/07/21/0242231&mode=nested
thatd be it.
Any one tried V.92 or even support it?
dave
> That is all defined by the V.90 standard. An article on Slashdot a while
> back suggest that the IEEE is going to change it with a new standard. Make
> it symetrical both
> Sounds about right to me. But I think there's a difference in the speed
> a 56k modem can upload and download - downloads should be faster,
> because there you're changing digital to analogue, which should work
> better than the analogue to digital required for uploading info. I think
> I've go
> Sounds about right to me. But I think there's a difference in the speed
> a 56k modem can upload and download - downloads should be faster,
> because there you're changing digital to analogue, which should work
> better than the analogue to digital required for uploading info. I think
> I've got
Jason Rennie wrote:
>
> > I've (very) occasionally seen 9-10 KB/s, fairly regularly get around 7,
> > most often it's around 5-6. I find it amusing that this is with a Lucent
>
> This apparent speed is actually hardware compression in the modem, or
> software compession by the computers. Unless
> mirror.aarnet we had 6.5-7.0k/s for 3 days straight.
> It was awesome. I dunnno why that was happening but it was definitely so.
> The average out over 3 days was correct too. So it wasn't just crazy client
> figures. Go dingo! :)
Maybe that is the upper limit, maybe the iso had some redundanc
When leeching the debian Alpha isos over our dingoblue 56k connection to
mirror.aarnet we had 6.5-7.0k/s for 3 days straight.
It was awesome. I dunnno why that was happening but it was definitely so.
The average out over 3 days was correct too. So it wasn't just crazy client
figures. Go dingo! :)
Dave Fitch wrote:
>
> Tom Massey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I've (very) occasionally seen 9-10 KB/s, fairly regularly get around 7,
> > most often it's around 5-6.
>
> yeah but that's throughput isn't it?
True - my 'real' speed is probably closer to 3-4 KB/s at max.
> I'm curious that people don'
> I've (very) occasionally seen 9-10 KB/s, fairly regularly get around 7,
> most often it's around 5-6. I find it amusing that this is with a Lucent
This apparent speed is actually hardware compression in the modem, or
software compession by the computers. Unless of course you manage this
sort of
> interesting you say "good quality lines" and that you get 50,667
> connects. I too get 50667 or 49333 connects and always called
> my phone line "reasonable". Is there anyone that gets more
> than 50667k from their 56k modem?
When i was working for isp's, i was lead to belive that it wasn't a
Tom Massey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Dave Fitch wrote:
> > interesting you say "good quality lines" and that you get 50,667
> > connects. I too get 50667 or 49333 connects and always called
> > my phone line "reasonable". Is there anyone that gets more
> > than 50667k from their 56k modem?
>
> I'v
Dave Fitch wrote:
> interesting you say "good quality lines" and that you get 50,667
> connects. I too get 50667 or 49333 connects and always called
> my phone line "reasonable". Is there anyone that gets more
> than 50667k from their 56k modem?
I've (very) occasionally seen 9-10 KB/s, fairly
>
> interesting you say "good quality lines" and that you get 50,667
> connects. I too get 50667 or 49333 connects and always called
> my phone line "reasonable". Is there anyone that gets more
> than 50667k from their 56k modem?
>
I friend in hornsby, who was very close to the exchange was ge
14 matches
Mail list logo
