I really appreciated the information on Advanced Range Testing. While I've
had mostly good luck (yes - it really is 'luck') with 72MHz, the expense and
horror stories of 2.4 have kept me away. With this article, a realistic
analysis process seems possible which would address the reception problems.
The Futaba FASST system has two antennas and does not use a second RX.
Each antenna has a short piece of coaxial cable on it (very small
diameter) that is a few inches long. This makes it much easier to get
the antennas out and away from the CF in a fuse, etc.
Just wanted to throw that so it
I've been on 2.4 since September. No problems. Flew on 2.4 at the Visalia
contest and everything worked perfect (JR9303). I plan on flying the F3J world
champs next year on 2.4. I guess that means I'm sold on the technology. I think
I'll be posting some VHF stuff for sale soon (real cheap).
One
I really appreciated the information on Advanced Range Testing. While I've
had mostly good luck (yes - it really is 'luck') with 72MHz, the expense and
horror stories of 2.4 have kept me away. With this article, a realistic
analysis process seems possible which would address the reception problems.
Gordy,
You asked for a review of the articles. Having read the articles I felt they
were clear and well organized.
In the first Sherman focused on what he felt were key advantages of the 2.4 GHz
system. Much of the article was either quotes from the manual or the marketing
material, which he use
ugh get the JR921 or the Spektrum 9000. Everything else is SmartSafe.
As for model match I think that it is a great idea and will save quite a few
planes.
Walter
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 17:51:33 -0500Subject: Re: [RCSE]
'So, having read the 2.4 Articles in this
I was wondering the same thing. :-)
Patrick Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: why do grumpy,did we get up on the
wrong side of the bed, Gordy?
v/r
old retired military dude.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay this thread is about the articles and their content by Sherman
Knight in thi
why do grumpy,did we get up on the wrong side of the bed, Gordy?
v/r
old retired military dude.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay this thread is about the articles and their content by Sherman
Knight in this issue of RCSD.
After you have read the articles written by Sherman
No time to read, I'm working on my LSF 1 - YOU
Dan
- Original Message
From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Soaring@airage.com
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2007 10:50:42 AM
Subject: [RCSE] "So, having read the 2.4 Art
In response to the Failsafe issue.
There are several 2.4 receivers in the JR Horizon Hobby Catalog. They are:
1.AR9000 15 Grams Comes with both Smart Safe and Model Match
2.R921 (JR branded AR9000, I think) Same as above
3.AR7000 14 grams Comes with both Smart Safe and Mod
I am waiting to see what the recently released Airtronics stylus 2.4
has ot offer. 2.4 in general has huge appeal to me.
On Nov 24, 2007 10:50 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Okay this thread is about the articles and their content by Sherman Knight
> in this issue of RCSD.
>
>
> After yo
ure that all of the
lights are lit. There are two in the JR 921 and Spektrum 9000 and one in the
satellite receiver.
And thats what I think.
Walter
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 13:50:42 -0500Subject: [RCSE] 'So,
having read the 2.4 Articles in this Month's RCSD,
Okay this thread is about the articles and their content by Sherman Knight
in this issue of RCSD.
After you have read the articles written by Sherman Knight, what is
your opinion/ experience with 2.4?
We'd all like to hear your thoughts on the subject. AFTER having read the
articl
13 matches
Mail list logo
