> Has anyone here given thought on this thread that controls stick position
> at the transmiter doesn't really tell you anything at all about actual
> control throws at the surface of the model? Linkage, horn length, slop,
> flex, servo type and other variations wilklhave an effect on actual thr
Palm is popular in USA but not that popular outside. Most TX makers, if they
do something, will only want to do it once so Palm is not likely to be the
way they go. For the US market, Palm would be good.
I understand. I was just thinking of a way to avoid the OS issues,
and avoid Wintel altoget
As many of you are no doubt aware, the manufactures are in a bit of a spot
over the connectivity solutions.
On the one hand they want to provide something, but on the other is the
whole issues of costs. If they are going to provide a solution, they can
just about aford do one. The volumes are not
D]]
>Sent: Wednesday, January 01, 2003 12:46 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Cc: Craig Burton; RCSE
>Subject: RE: [RCSE] You gotta REALLY wanna do this!!!
>
>They already provide a way to get data in and out of the MPX TX so
>there's nothing new here just the documentation
>>you could save an unlimited number pf programs and
>>shuffle in and out the ones you neeeded
The general idea to this thread is understandable. But I must confess some
confusion.
As I and several others have pointed out; Multiplex comes pretty close to
what has been wished for right now. You ca
I would love the ability to do the programming for
different sailplanes on my computer at home and then
transfer a given set of saved settings onto my
transmitter. It would be very easy to do the GUI there
and do all the heavy lifting before sending to the Tx.
That way you coulod save an unlimited
6 matches
Mail list logo
