Just an fyi, the quadro k4000 is around 4 times slower than a 780 gtx for
redshift rendering...
On Wednesday, 2 April 2014, Stephen Davidson magic...@bellsouth.net wrote:
btw...most scenes, that you have already built in Softimage, will render
just fine with the Redshift render
instead of the
Yeah, if you're on time for a return it might be worth considering. The K4K
isn't great bang for buck, it has a massive quadro label overhead to the
price and it's not really that well featured.
I don't know if 4x is an actual measure of the difference, I don't have
both cards at hand to test nor
I've both cards and the 780 seems to be round about 3 times faster than
the quadro when rendering with redshift.
What really speeds up Redshift is VRAM on the graphicsCard to avoid slow
PCIe Traffic... 4GB and more makes a big difference.
I select my cards with this priorities:
1. VRAM
2. GPU-Cores
3. Mhz
4. ...
Good idea is a second card only for rendering: no memory used for
display stuff, complete
Just double checked my test figures and it is more like 3 times, sorry for
the confusion. This is on an indoor environment with a single character
with hair, GI and DoF. On heavier environments/multiple characters the
titan really shines.
2 quadro k4000 - 284.8 s
I have a Quadro 4000 and this has been discussed other Redshift forum.
It's not bad for Open GL working, but defenetly not for rendering
Quadro 4000 has around 400 cores while Titan has around 3000 cores. Also
comes the Memory 2Gb against 6Gb, and I can't tell for the Mhz but
overall it doesnt
Is that the GTX 780 ti or just the regular GTX 780?
On 02/04/2014 5:17 AM, Matt Morris wrote:
Just double checked my test figures and it is more like 3 times, sorry
for the confusion. This is on an indoor environment with a single
character with hair, GI and DoF. On heavier
Its a regular 780 - Gigabyte 780 windforce 3x - and one of the older gen
asus titans.
On 2 April 2014 16:35, Leoung O'Young digim...@digimata.com wrote:
Is that the GTX 780 ti or just the regular GTX 780?
Thanks Matt, I am just shopping for some cards and find there are so
many makers and flavors.
I narrowed down to these 3, although the 770 are quite a bit cheaper
than the 780
EVGA Nvidia GTX 680 Graphics card 2GB
*EVGA GeForce GTX780 Dual w/ ACX Cooler FTW 980MHZ 3GB 384BIT 6008MHZ
DVI
I have both and the 780 is probably worth the price difference
-Original Message-
From: Leoung O'Young digim...@digimata.com
Sent: 4/2/2014 12:19 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: Redshift - GPU accel on Quadro K4000
Thanks Matt, I am
If you can wait (and have slightly deeper pockets) the 780 6Gb will be out
at the end of april - shouldn't be that much more expensive than the 780
according to early reports.
That will be the best bang for buck card for RS, as the memory will really
help with larger scenes.
--
www.matinai.com
Matt, thanks for the suggestion.
On 02/04/2014 12:46 PM, Matt Morris wrote:
If you can wait (and have slightly deeper pockets) the 780 6Gb will be
out at the end of april - shouldn't be that much more expensive than
the 780 according to early reports.
That will be the best bang for buck card
There are only a handful of specific nodes that are unique to Redshift3D.
Everything else is exactly like you are used to in the Materials (nodes) in
Softimage.
They did a great job making it almost seamless
a unique example... if you want to bumpmap some object, you would select
the Redshift
13 matches
Mail list logo
