> still make a difference. Or not.
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Matt Lind
> *Sent:* Monday, September 09, 2013 8:01 PM
> *To:* softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
> *Subject:* RE: Softimage Rental?
>
>
> Well, if they want to generate revenue they’re not reading the situa
: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Marc-Andre
Carbonneau
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 4:16 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: RE: Softimage Rental?
Well because then it would become competition again
they transfer the COM/OLE core so they can kill Maya too?
>
> ** **
>
> Here’s to hoping.
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Matt
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com [
> mailto:softim
bject: Re: Softimage Rental?
There was some technology transfer from Soft to Maya, also.
Too less to live, too much to die... a deadlock.
What I still hope for is that what's left of the development resources is
invested as wisely as possible.
Best would be to improve extensibility, so
...@listproc.autodesk.com
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Brassard
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 11:37 AM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: Softimage Rental?
Quick question for Maurice, if you rent over time pass the two year mark, can
you then
&E) and Stig Grueman (head of M&E WWsales) were present at that meeting.
>
> As for the lack of Softimage rental, it's a shame Softimage didn't make
> the list, but I understand the reasoning for this.
> When you look at the whole Autodesk folio, only a relative small
oc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Eugen Sares
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 12:54 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: Softimage Rental?
Maya got enough other problems... I don't envy them, at all.
AD's predicament is, throttling down Softimage development too far is goin
ore so they can kill Maya too?
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Here’s to hoping.
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Matt****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> *From:* softimage-boun...@listproc.autod
y, September 10, 2013 7:41 AM
*To:* softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
*Subject:* Re: Softimage Rental?
There was some technology transfer from Soft to Maya, also.
Too less to live, too much to die... a deadlock.
What I still hope for is that what's left of the development resources
is invest
The meeting was
not to go into details about roadmaps and future development, but more to get
some direct feedback from customers. Chris Bradshaw (head of M&E) and Stig
Grueman (head of M&E WWsales) were present at that meeting.
As for the lack of Softimage rental, it's a shame Sof
Daniel is very correct. Even if Soft is one day EOL it continues to be very
valuable to AD$K
From: Daniel Brassard [dbrassar...@gmail.com]
Sent: 10 September 2013 05:35 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: Softimage Rental?
The hidden value of
ot.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Matt Lind
>> *Sent:* Monday, September 09, 2013 8:01 PM
>> *To:* softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
>> *Subject:* RE: Softimage Rental?
>>
>>
>> Well, if they want to generate revenue they’re not reading the si
er
> necessity they might come up with something - and if they hurry it might
> still make a difference. Or not.
>
>
>
>
> From: Matt Lind<mailto:ml...@carbinestudios.com>
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2013 8:01 PM
> To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com<mailto:so
d become competition again…
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> *From:* softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com [mailto:
>>> softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] *On Behalf Of *Mirko Jankovic
>>> *Sent:* 10 septembre 2013 10:09
>>>
>>>
Carbonneau
>
>> Well because then it would become competition again…
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> *From:* softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com [mailto:
>> softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] *On Behalf Of *Mirko Jankovic
>> *Sent:* 10 septembre 2013
] *On Behalf Of *Mirko
Jankovic
*Sent:* 10 septembre 2013 10:09
*To:* softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
*Subject:* Re: Softimage Rental?
If they hate SI that much why they don't just give it to someone else
that will actually develop it...
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Tim Crows
*On Behalf Of *Mirko
Jankovic
*Sent:* 10 septembre 2013 10:09
*To:* softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
*Subject:* Re: Softimage Rental?
If they hate SI that much why they don't just give it to someone else
that will actually develop it...
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Tim Crowson
&
orrectly in the first
>> place by your marketing and awareness people. There is a very big PR gap
>> that needs to be filled and expectations that need to be managed.
>>
>> Anyway thanks again
>>
>> Angus
>>
>>
>&
.
From: Matt Lind
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2013 8:01 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: RE: Softimage Rental?
Well, if they want to generate revenue they’re not reading the situation very
well.
To use an analogy, they’re running a lemonade stand and are realizing there
2:42 PM
To: mailto:softimage@listproc.autodesk.com>>
Subject: Re: Softimage Rental?
Hi Angus,
You are right about people wanting to maintain working pipelines
based on older versions. This is our expectation and this has been
taken into account. Still we have to start
ovic
> *Sent:* 10 septembre 2013 10:09
>
> *To:* softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
> *Subject:* Re: Softimage Rental?
>
> ** **
>
> If they hate SI that much why they don't just give it to someone else that
> will actually develop it...
>
> ** **
>
> On Tue, Sep
Well because then it would become competition again...
From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Mirko Jankovic
Sent: 10 septembre 2013 10:09
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: Softimage Rental?
If they hate SI that
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: RE: Softimage Rental?
Hi Maurice
Firstly thanks for stepping up to the plate ;) While I can understand your
logic, surely there should have been some explanation of this up front.
Whether its in the FAQ, or on the rental page. Part of the problem as
here is a very big PR gap
> that needs to be filled and expectations that need to be managed.
>
> Anyway thanks again
>
> Angus
>
>
> From: Maurice Patel [maurice.pa...@autodesk.com]
> Sent: 10 September 2013 12:42 PM
> To:
> Sub
ce.pa...@autodesk.com]
Sent: 10 September 2013 12:42 PM
To:
Subject: Re: Softimage Rental?
Hi Angus,
You are right about people wanting to maintain working pipelines based on older
versions. This is our expectation and this has been taken into account. Still
we have to start somewhere. Rental is th
nly
> going to last so long before the competition does likewise.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Angus
>
>
> From: Luc-Eric Rousseau [luceri...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 09 September 2013 08:28 PM
> To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
> Subje
st so long before the competition does likewise.
Kind regards
Angus
From: Luc-Eric Rousseau [luceri...@gmail.com]
Sent: 09 September 2013 08:28 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: Softimage Rental?
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Angus Dav
...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of pete...@skynet.be
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2013 10:48 AM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: Softimage Rental?
This does not come out of a need from Autodesk (or Adobe or any other vendor)
to accommodate your activities – it comes out of a need from them to
> *Sent:* 09 September 2013 17:24
> *To:* softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
> *Subject:* Re: Softimage Rental?
>
> ** **
>
> Those prices have to be a joke surely. Their quarterly prices are the same
> as my yearly subs. How exactly is that going to encourage people to re
with hardware or turnkey solutions – or
selling/licensing parts of software,...
From: Angus Davidson
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2013 7:17 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: RE: Softimage Rental?
Apart from the glaring omission of SI from that list the things that worries me
in
$1840 for a yearly rental of and individual license of Maya or 3DMax.
I'll stay on subscription, thank you!
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Luc-Eric Rousseau wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Angus Davidson
> wrote:
> >
> > Apart from the glaring omission of SI from that list the things
---
> *From:* Rob Wuijster [r...@casema.nl]
> *Sent:* 09 September 2013 05:38 PM
>
> *To:* softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
> *Subject:* Re: Softimage Rental?
>
> not seeing Softimage on that list
>
> Rob
>
> \/-\/\/
>
> On 9-9-2
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Angus Davidson
wrote:
>
> Apart from the glaring omission of SI from that list the things that worries
> me in the FAQ is that rental options dont have previous version rights.
> Unless I have read that incorrectly your SOL if your client needs you to work
> on a
ust to get access to Soft… Come on Autodesk!
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com [mailto:
> softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] *On Behalf Of *Sofronis
> Efstathiou
> *Sent:* 09 September 2013 16:51
> *To:* softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
>
7;; 'r...@casema.nl'
Subject: RE: Softimage Rental?
Doesn't it come with the Entertainment Creation Suite - Premium/Ultimate -
which is $425/525 Monthly?
Sofronis Efstathiou
Postgraduate Framework Leader and BFX Competition & Festival Director
Computer Animation Academic
51
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: RE: Softimage Rental?
Ahhh - you mean individually - arse.
Sofronis Efstathiou
Postgraduate Framework Leader and BFX Competition & Festival Director
Computer Animation Academic Group
National Centre for Computer Animation
Email:
desk.com
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Nicolas Esposito
Sent: 09 September 2013 16:44
To: r...@casema.nl; softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: Softimage Rental?
Maybe someone need to send an email to Autodesk, in case they forgot that they
acquired Softimag
not seeing Softimage on that list
Rob
\/-\/\/
On 9-9-2013 17:18, Eric Thivierge wrote:
So are we going to be getting a rental option?
http://www.autodesk.com/buy/us-prices
-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.33
This rental approach looks interesting. However, I hope they adopt a more
appstore approach for the UK and don't just swop the $ for a £ sign.
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Rob Wuijster wrote:
> not seeing Softimage on that list
>
>
> Rob
>
> \/-\/\/
>
> On 9-
into this at all.
From: Rob Wuijster [r...@casema.nl]
Sent: 09 September 2013 05:38 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: Softimage Rental?
not seeing Softimage on that list
Rob
\/-\/\/
On 9-9-2013 17:18, Eric
; Yeah.. where is Softimage on that list? I hope we won’t have to hire
>>> the Suite just to get access to Soft… Come on Autodesk!
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> *From:* softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com [mailto:
>>> softimage-boun..
Maybe someone need to send an email to Autodesk, in case they forgot that
they acquired Softimage a couple of years ago
Its amazing and really sad how they don't care about this software
Anyway a rental option would be nice
2013/9/9 Rob Wuijster
> not seeing Softimage on that list
>
>
> R
odesk!
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> *From:* softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com [mailto:
>> softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] *On Behalf Of *Sofronis
>> Efstathiou
>> *Sent:* 09 September 2013 16:51
>> *To:* softimage@listproc.autodes
So are we going to be getting a rental option?
http://www.autodesk.com/buy/us-prices
Isn't Soft free with Maya now!? Isn't a rental of Maya, in effect, a
Rental of Soft!?
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Byron Nash wrote:
> I discovered the other day that Maya has a 90 day "rental" for $199. Do
> they offer the same thing for Softimage if you install the trial?
>
45 matches
Mail list logo
