[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12617894#action_12617894
]
Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-486:
Yonik, can we commit Noble's latest
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12617905#action_12617905
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-486:
---
Just because an Iterator was used for writing a value
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12617907#action_12617907
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-486:
---
I'm working on a fix.
Support binary formats for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12617919#action_12617919
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-486:
---
OK, I committed efficient Iterator/Iterable support.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12615067#action_12615067
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-486:
-
bq.That's a good idea - but do we actually use any
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12615054#action_12615054
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-486:
---
So if I understand the reasoning behind the iterator
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12605601#action_12605601
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-486:
---
OK, I just committed the latest changes.
Support
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12605629#action_12605629
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-486:
-
These two constructors are inconsistent
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12605648#action_12605648
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-486:
---
Fixed (committed) the constructor inconsistency.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12605306#action_12605306
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-486:
---
Thanks Noble, this looks pretty good.
I had
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12605329#action_12605329
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-486:
-
Another level of efficiency can be brought in by
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12605126#action_12605126
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-486:
-
If we take a look at the data that is written down by
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12603475#action_12603475
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-486:
-
I debugged through the problems
yonik: NamedlistCodec is
+1
On Jun 5, 2008, at 2:31 PM, Ryan McKinley (JIRA) wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12602740
#action_12602740 ]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-486:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12603135#action_12603135
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-486:
-
one test failed in distributed search results when I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12603136#action_12603136
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-486:
bq. or we will have to modify the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12602740#action_12602740
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-486:
Should we make this the default parser for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12602741#action_12602741
]
Erik Hatcher commented on SOLR-486:
---
+1
Support binary formats for QueryresponseWriter
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12602918#action_12602918
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-486:
-
+1
It is OK to make it default.
But we will have to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12589031#action_12589031
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-486:
-
Yonik: it would be nice the change the interface
FWIW, I've run apps that have thrown large XML files around and XML
processing _was_ a significant part of the overall processing, on
order of 10-15% due to significant compression (i.e. less to send over
the pipe) and faster encoding/decoding because you aren't constantly
doing string
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12589074#action_12589074
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-486:
---
Ian: you can sort of figure out what the total
Ian:Another important aspect is the client itself. We usually tend to
overlook the cost because we are only thinking of SOLR. The client
always has to parse the xml and this cost is usually significant . The
same math Yonik has given for server applies to client as well .A
typical tomcat usually
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12588904#action_12588904
]
Ian Holsman commented on SOLR-486:
--
i'm a bit clueless here.
you mention that it is 9 times
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12588402#action_12588402
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-486:
---
I'm hacking on this now... I like how you separated
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12579943#action_12579943
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-486:
---
This patch is small enough, perhaps just combine it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12579977#action_12579977
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-486:
-
I can do that.
I have a java class which can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12580007#action_12580007
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-486:
---
Great! If we can get it to handle everything that the
I shall cut a patch for this as soon as I test it properly
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 1:13 AM, Yonik Seeley (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12572024#action_12572024
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-486:
-
Without breaking the existing stuff we can add another
30 matches
Mail list logo
