[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12617919#action_12617919
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-486:
---
OK, I committed efficient Iterator/Iterable support.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12617907#action_12617907
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-486:
---
I'm working on a fix.
> Support binary formats for Qu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12617905#action_12617905
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-486:
---
Just because an Iterator was used for writing a value
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12617894#action_12617894
]
Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-486:
Yonik, can we commit Noble's latest
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12615067#action_12615067
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-486:
-
bq.That's a good idea - but do we actually use any iterato
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12615054#action_12615054
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-486:
---
So if I understand the reasoning behind the "iterator"
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12605648#action_12605648
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-486:
---
Fixed (committed) the constructor inconsistency.
> Su
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12605629#action_12605629
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-486:
-
These two constructors are inconsistent
{code:title=Common
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12605601#action_12605601
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-486:
---
OK, I just committed the latest changes.
> Support bi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12605329#action_12605329
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-486:
-
Another level of efficiency can be brought in by preloadi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12605306#action_12605306
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-486:
---
Thanks Noble, this looks pretty good.
I had previousl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12605126#action_12605126
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-486:
-
If we take a look at the data that is written down by Nam
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12603475#action_12603475
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-486:
-
I debugged through the problems
yonik: NamedlistCodec is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12603281#action_12603281
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-486:
-
bq.I don't see how this would help. If the ResponseParser
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12603136#action_12603136
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-486:
bq. or we will have to modify the CommonsHttpSolrSer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12603135#action_12603135
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-486:
-
one test failed in distributed search results when I chang
+1
On Jun 5, 2008, at 2:31 PM, Ryan McKinley (JIRA) wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12602740
#action_12602740 ]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-486:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12602918#action_12602918
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-486:
-
+1
It is OK to make it default.
But we will have to docum
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12602741#action_12602741
]
Erik Hatcher commented on SOLR-486:
---
+1
> Support binary formats for QueryresponseWriter
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12602740#action_12602740
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-486:
Should we make this the default parser for CommonsHt
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12589224#action_12589224
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-486:
---
Committed. Thanks Noble!
> Support binary formats fo
Ian:Another important aspect is the client itself. We usually tend to
overlook the cost because we are only thinking of SOLR. The client
always has to parse the xml and this cost is usually significant . The
same math Yonik has given for server applies to client as well .A
typical tomcat usually em
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12589074#action_12589074
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-486:
---
Ian: you can sort of figure out what the total overhea
FWIW, I've run apps that have thrown large XML files around and XML
processing _was_ a significant part of the overall processing, on
order of 10-15% due to significant compression (i.e. less to send over
the pipe) and faster encoding/decoding because you aren't constantly
doing string mani
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12589031#action_12589031
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-486:
-
Yonik: it would be nice the change the interface ObjectRes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12588909#action_12588909
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-486:
-
If the response not served from cached there is some extr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12588904#action_12588904
]
Ian Holsman commented on SOLR-486:
--
i'm a bit clueless here.
you mention that it is 9 times
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12588900#action_12588900
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-486:
-
The changes look good , infact very good. it is highly opt
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12588823#action_12588823
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-486:
---
Yep, those are about the numbers I'm seeing for text-h
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12588512#action_12588512
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-486:
-
performance numbers
=
bin vs. xml rea
that is great.
my intend was to make NamedListCodec very small and have as few
dependencies on other things
May be we can extend NamedList (which you may be doing already now.)
I never quite thought about streaming :(
I may be able to take a look once you post your patch.
--Noble
On Sun, Apr 13,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12588402#action_12588402
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-486:
---
I'm hacking on this now... I like how you separated th
I shall cut a patch for this as soon as I test it properly
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 1:13 AM, Yonik Seeley (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12580026#
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12580026#action_12580026
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-486:
---
I accidentally committed this in conjunction with anot
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12580007#action_12580007
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-486:
---
Great! If we can get it to handle everything that the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12579977#action_12579977
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-486:
-
I can do that.
I have a java class which can serialize/des
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12579943#action_12579943
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-486:
---
This patch is small enough, perhaps just combine it wi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12572024#action_12572024
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-486:
-
Without breaking the existing stuff we can add another int
38 matches
Mail list logo
