Hi all,
i want PERIODIC ( 1x per 30s ) index the content of a directory to
solr. In doing that i will to index only the new files and add it to
the index.
Can I use for that the standard solr, or must I write own indexer? Can
I implement custom DIH.
The files are readable via HTTP.
Can someone
> Is the keyField over here the same thing as the "score" of
> the field?
It is not the same as score (it is an independent additional field) but you use
this field in FunctionQueries which means you can influence (multiply, add,
etc) score with it, or sort by it.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/
> Can i mention
> url,content defaultSearchField>
> to inlcude two default fields.?
No you cannot define two fields. Though you can change default field via URL
with &df= parameter.
If you want to query multiple fields you may consider using (e)dismax.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DisMaxQParser
How exactly do I define these external keyfields?For example, I have a document
in monitor.xml, and I want to define another field, lets say score1, to be used
in FunctionQueries.From what I got from the documentation, I have to define a
file called external_score1 in the index directory. In th
> i want PERIODIC ( 1x per 30s ) index the content of a
> directory to
> solr. In doing that i will to index only the new files and
> add it to
> the index.
Probably you can use DIH, there are different DataSource implementations.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler#DataSource
For exam
> How exactly do I define these external keyfields?For
> example, I have a document in monitor.xml, and I want to
> define another field, lets say score1, to be used in
> FunctionQueries.From what I got from the documentation, I
> have to define a file called external_score1 in the index
> director
Thanx for your help.
Can I configure with this components native solr or must I write own
Indexer that use
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.FileListEntityProcessor?
Someware must I transform the inputdocuments to the schema. My
iputdocuments are in different format.
Robert
2011/5/11 Ahmet Ars
> Can I configure with this components native solr or must I
> write own
> Indexer that use
> org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.FileListEntityProcessor?
You can use native solr. All things are configured in xml files,
data-config.xml, schema.xml etc.
There are examples in the directory example-
Hi,
we try to index logfiles. That are xmlfiles ( this can be not valid )
and text files. Unfortunately have all files not the same content
Regards,
Robert
2011/5/11 Ahmet Arslan :
>> Can I configure with this components native solr or must I
>> write own
>> Indexer that use
>> org.apache.solr.
I've just become aware of the XML Query parser, which seems to fit with my
needs which really are ability to send query syntax trees to Solr (I need to
do all query parsing in my client application).
However, I cannot find any examples on how to configure a solr request
handler for this query pars
I did exactly the stuff that was told in the link. I have certain items with ids
In schema.xml:I have set a fieldtype with name = idRankFile and keyField = id
Also, a field with name idRank and type idRankFile
In data directory, I made a text file external_idRankIn it, I set 3007WFP =
1.0wh
HI,
I am having a problem with highlighting which I cannot comprehend.
I'm using the solr/admin/form.jsp (full interface) to submit a search for "3
1 15" (with the quotes).
I have "Enable Highlighting" checked and I have specified the field to
highlight, in my case DOC_TEXT. Everything else defau
> I did exactly the stuff that was told in the link. I have
> certain items with ids
>
> In schema.xml:I have set a fieldtype with name = idRankFile
> and keyField = id Also, a field with name idRank and type
> idRankFile
> In data directory, I made a text file external_idRankIn it,
> I set 3007WF
--- On Wed, 5/11/11, Phong Dais wrote:
> From: Phong Dais
> Subject: Document match with no highlight
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Date: Wednesday, May 11, 2011, 1:29 PM
> HI,
>
> I am having a problem with highlighting which I cannot
> comprehend.
> I'm using the solr/admin/form.jsp (
I have some 25 odd fields with "stored=true" in schema.xml. Retrieving back
5,000 records back takes a few secs. I also tried passing "fl" and only
include one field in the response but still response time is same. What are
the things to look to tune the performance.
Thanks,
--
View this message
--- On Wed, 5/11/11, javaxmlsoapdev wrote:
> From: javaxmlsoapdev
> Subject: Solr performance
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Date: Wednesday, May 11, 2011, 2:07 PM
> I have some 25 odd fields with
> "stored=true" in schema.xml. Retrieving back
> 5,000 records back takes a few secs. I also
I just want to confirm, (as I'm not quiet familiar with the function query
syntax) will the following query be alright to search "car power adaptor", so
that the entry with highest idRank be displayed first?
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?indent=on&q=car%20power%20adaptor&fl=id,score,name&_va
> I just want to confirm, (as I'm not quiet familiar with the
> function query syntax) will the following query be alright
> to search "car power adaptor", so that the entry with
> highest idRank be displayed first?
> http://localhost:8983/solr/select?indent=on&q=car%20power%20adaptor&fl=id,score,n
Hi,
Already tried that. Tried a ridiculously huge number and -1. Same result.
Some clarification. I submitted the search string:
DOC_TEXT:"3 1 15"
Thanks,
P.
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 7:01 AM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
>
>
> --- On Wed, 5/11/11, Phong Dais wrote:
>
> > From: Phong Dais
> > Subj
Finally, I found a workaround! It's absolutely ugly, but it works as well :D
: I have to put the plain text data in a file, which is then extract by
tika.
Now resolved.
Best regards.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-set-a-common-field-to-several-values-t
Have you checked that the search phrase are in the field you uses as
highlight field?
Its standard if it dont get hits in the defined highlight field it would
return emty result.
A way around this problem is to add more fields to highlight or merge the
searchable text into a single text field and
Hi,
When I "eyeball" the highlighted field, I do not find the search phrase in
the document that was returned as a match.
The search field is DOC_TEXT, the highlighted field is DOC_TEXT, and the
search query is DOC_TEXT:"3 1 15".
I get a match with "empty" highlight but it looks to me like it shou
> Already tried that. Tried a ridiculously huge number
> and -1. Same result.
>
> Some clarification. I submitted the search string:
>
> DOC_TEXT:"3 1 15"
Can you append &debugQuery=on and give us its output? And the complete search
URL will also help.
I did a facet query on my data field and it showed a list of words with
their count but it miss lot of words in facet count.
The query used was :-
http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=*:*&facet=true&facet.field=Data
How can I get the count of each word in my index and one more question
is it
> I did a facet query on my data field
> and it showed a list of words with their count but it miss
> lot of words in facet count.
>
> The query used was :-
>
> http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=*:*&facet=true&facet.field=Data
>
> How can I get the count of each word in my index and one
> mor
Mr. Bell,
Thank you for your help. Yes, the full index replicated every
1000, 1, 10 etc, if mergeFactor is 10 as per it's definition.
We do index every 5 minutes and replicate every 3 minutes just to make
sure consumers have immediate access to the indexed docs.
Thanks,
Ravi Kiran B
My understanding is that the Master has done all the indexing, that
replication is a series of file copies to a temp directory, then a move and
commit. The slave only gets hit with the effects of a commit, so whatever
warming queries are in place, and the caches get reset. Doing too many
commits to
The recent Amazon outage exposed a weakness in our architecture. We could
really use a Master-Master redundancy. We already have Master to multiple
Slaves. I've looked at the various options of converting a Slave into a
Master, of having a Repeater (hybrid master/slave) become the Master etc.
But,
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 7:07 AM, javaxmlsoapdev wrote:
> I have some 25 odd fields with "stored=true" in schema.xml. Retrieving back
> 5,000 records back takes a few secs. I also tried passing "fl" and only
> include one field in the response but still response time is same. What are
> the things
Theoretically, a commit alone should have negligible effect on the slave,
because of the same aspect of Solr architecture that makes too frequent commits
problematic --- an existing Searcher continues to serve requests off the old
version of the index, until the new commit (plus all it's warming
You can also turn off automatic replication pulling, and just manually issue a
'replicate' command to slave exactly when you want, without relying on it being
triggered by optimization or whatever. (Well probably not 'manually', probably
some custom update process you run that you'll have issue
Is the tagged release of solr 3.1 different from the one distributed in the
downloads page? It looks like a reproducible bug.
svn co -r 1101526
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/tags/lucene_solr_3_1 solr
This is the default query I get from
http://localhost:8080/solr/admin/form.jsp:
htt
Is this option available on entities of type JdbcDataSource? If so,
which version(s) of Solr are required to take advantage of this option?
Also, are there any limitations of this feature that I should be aware of?
Thanks
Hello,
I'm using the spatial solr plugin from jteam for SOLR 1.4. Now i want to use
SOLR 3.1 because it contains
a lot of bugfixes:) Now i want to get a distance field back in my results.
How can i do it?
My url looks like:
q=testquery&fq={!geofilt pt=52.78556,3.4546 sfield=latlon d=50}
I get
Hello everyone
We have succesfully installed SOLR on 2 servers (developpement and
production), using the same configuration files and paths.
Both SOLR instances have indexed the same contents and most queries give
identical results, but there's a few exceptions where the production
instance re
Hi Roy.
See this:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpatialSearch#Returning_the_distance
I recommend returning the point location and calculating the distance yourself
-- it's not hard. Getting Solr to return it is a bit of a hack now.
~ David Smiley
Author: http://www.packtpub.com/solr-1-4-enterpri
Hi,
Does anyone know if I can do the following:
10
...
2
...
Cheers,
Dan
On 5/11/11 6:12 AM, Jasneet Sabharwal wrote:
I did a facet query on my data field and it showed a list of words
with their count but it miss lot of words in facet count.
The query used was :-
http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=*:*&facet=true&facet.field=Data
How can I get the count of each
Could it be something in the transmission of the query?
Or is it also identical?
paul
Le 11 mai 2011 à 17:19, Paul Michalet a écrit :
> Hello everyone
>
> We have succesfully installed SOLR on 2 servers (developpement and
> production), using the same configuration files and paths.
> Both SOL
Thanks for the hint :)
We ruled that out after having tested special characters, and if it was
an applicative bug, it wouldn't work consistently like it currently does
for the majority of queries.
The only difference we noticed was in the HTTP headers in the SOLR
response: occasionnally, the "C
Hi,
I can upload the search URL and part of the output but not all of it.
Company trade secrets does not allow me to upload the content of the
DOC_TEXT field. I can upload the "debug" output section and whatever else
is needed but I cannot upload the actual document data.
Please let me know if
> I can upload the search URL and part of the output but not
> all of it.
> Company trade secrets does not allow me to upload the
> content of the
> DOC_TEXT field. I can upload the "debug" output
> section and whatever else
> is needed but I cannot upload the actual document data.
>
> Please le
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Robert Naczinski
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we try to index logfiles. That are xmlfiles ( this can be not valid )
> and text files. Unfortunately have all files not the same content
Sorry: While Ahmet has done his best to help you out, you are
not providing enough details f
Fixed in 3.2
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2445
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
On 11. mai 2011, at 16.33, Gabriele Kahlout wrote:
> Is the tagged release of solr 3.1 different from the one distributed in the
> downloads page? It looks lik
We have two Solr nodes, each with multiple shards. If we query each shard
directly (no shards parameter), we get the expected results:
response
lst name="responseHeader"
int name="status" 0
int name="QTime" 22
result name="response" numFound="100" start="0"
d
You can map the attributes to the ignore field. Alternatively, override the
SolrContentHandler's newMethod() method to skip adding them. Come to think of
it, I'll put up a quick patch that breaks that out a bit more and makes it
easier to override. Longer term, a patch to exclude metadata wou
Ravi,
if you have what looks like a full replication each time even if the
master generation is greater than slave, try to watch for the index on
both master and slave the same time to see what files are getting
replicated. You probably may need to adjust your merge factor, as Bill
mentioned.
-A
I'm wondering if there is a way to get the field collapsing to collapse on
multiple things? For example, is there a way to get it to collapse on a
field (lets say 'domain') but ALSO something else (maybe time or something)?
To visualize maybe something like this:
Group1 has common field 'www.for
It appears that the older version of the Lucid Works KStemmer is
incompatible with Solr 3.1. Has anyone been able to get this to work? If
not, what are you using as an alternative?
Thanks
So now I did the following :
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?indent=on&q=car%20power%20adaptor&sort=idRank%20desc&fl=id,score,name
Yet, it's not taking idRank into account, it's just giving the results
according to the score.
Also, when I try to output idRank by including it in the fl
Hi,
Is there anyway to specify an 'OR' expression for facet filter?
For example docType="pdf" or docType="txt"
Many thanks in advance.
Yee
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Facet-filter-how-to-specify-OR-expression-tp2930570p2930570.html
Sent from the Solr - U
How about fq=docType:(pdf OR txt)
-
Thanx:
Grijesh
www.gettinhahead.co.in
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Facet-filter-how-to-specify-OR-expression-tp2930570p2930648.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Am 12.05.2011 02:05, schrieb Mark:
It appears that the older version of the Lucid Works KStemmer is incompatible
with Solr 3.1. Has anyone been able to get this to work? If not,
what are you using as an alternative?
Thanks
Lucid KStemmer works nice with Solr3.1 after some minor mods to
KStem
I've been trying to install the field collapse patch to solr 3.1.0 using the
following link
:https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236However, I'm not
entirely sure which patch to download. How do I decide on that?Also, as I
understand it, I have to cd into the apache-solr-3.1.0 directory
what kind of emails you want to parse ? MS emails ?
You could integrate apache tika but it depends on what kind of emails Tika
parser would be able to parse
You can define the fields that could be parsed and define that in your xml
schema
thanks
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Jörg Agatz wro
55 matches
Mail list logo
