Hello,
IIRC, DIH UI has some kind of verbose or debug option, which provides
expanded trace of what's going on. Can't you try to check it?
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:35 AM, Tim Hurring tim.hurr...@finzsoft.comwrote:
I'm new to SOLR and have managed to get some basic indexing and querying
I would first attempt to underline or assign another colour if the
scheme allows for it before increasing font size.
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 20:50:15 -0700, Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com
wrote:
How do you highlight terms in languages without boldface or italic
modes? Maybe raise the text size a
Team,
Is it possible to do replication with different Schema in solr ?
If not how can i acheive this .
Can any one can give an idea to do this
advance thanks ..
Thanks and Regards,
S SYED ABDUL KATHER
Hi,
Have you confirmed that disabling Hunspell in solrconfig gets you back to
normal speed?
What Hunspell configuration and dictionaries do you have?
Can you share more about your environment and documents?
Do you have a chance to run a profiler on your Solr instance? Try i.e. VisualVM
and run
Hi,
Language detection cannot do that as of now. It would be a great improvement
though. Language detectors are pluggable, perhaps if you know of a Java
language detector which can do this we could plug it in? Or we could extend the
current identifier with a capability of first splitting the
Hi All,
I was wondering if anyone knows of a free tool to use to monitor
multiple Solr hosts under one roof ? I found some non functioning cacti
munin trial implementation but would really like more direct
statistics of the JVM itself + all Solr cores (i.e. requests /s , etc.) ?
Does
Hello Alex!
Right now, SPM from Sematext is free to use so You can try that out :)
--
Regards,
Rafał Kuć
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Hi All,
I was wondering if anyone knows of a free tool to use to monitor
multiple Solr hosts under one roof ? I found some
Hi,
Yes, I confirmed that without Hunspell indexing has normal speed.
I did tests in solr 4.0 with Hunspell and PolishStemmer.
With StempelPolishStemFilterFactory the speed is normal.
My schema is quit easy. For Hunspell I have one text field I copy 14 text
fields to:
field name=text
Hi there,
Yes I know about that tool, however, we've decided that that's not
optimal for us, so i'm looking for something freely available.
Alex
On 03/13/2012 09:15 AM, Rafał Kuć wrote:
Hello Alex!
Right now, SPM from Sematext is free to use so You can try that out :)
Hi all,
I think that depending on the language detector implemention, things may
vary...
For Tika, it performs better with longer inputs than shorter ones (as it
seems to depend on the probabilistic distribution of ngrams -- of
different sizes -- to perform distance computations with
Yes, I do have that one, as well as a bunch of other jars. I moved the
lucidworks-solr-cell-3.2.0_01.jar to my classpath, I also placed it in
/contrib/extraction. I restarted Solr and tried to index the document again
and this is the result:
myfile=@troubleshooting_performance.doc
Hi Gora,
Thanks,
My one more concern,
Though Establishments, Events, Movies are not related to each other,
I have to make 3 search queries to their independent cores and club the
data to show, will that effect my relevancy?
There is movie with title Striker and Establishment with title Striker.
Google and Baidu highlight chinese queries by making text red.
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:50 PM, Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com wrote:
How do you highlight terms in languages without boldface or italic
modes? Maybe raise the text size a couple of sizes just for that word?
--
Lance Norskog
Nalini,
You're correct that spellcheck.q does not run through the
SpellingQueryConverter, so the workaround I suggest might be half-baked.
What if when using maxCollationTries to have it check the collations against
the index, you also had the ability to override both mm and qf? Then you
Hi,
I did some more tests for Hunspell in solr 3.4, 4.0:
Solr 3.4, full import 489017 documents:
StempelPolishStemFilterFactory - 2908 seconds, 168 docs/sec
HunspellStemFilterFactory - 3922 seconds, 125 docs/sec
Solr 4.0, full import 489017 documents:
StempelPolishStemFilterFactory - 3016
If by that you mean in a master/slave setup just replicate a single
field in the index, no you can't. Nor can you just replicate only the
changed fields in an index, Lucene isn't structured that way..
Otherwise, can you provide more background on what you're hoping for
here? Your question was
Hi,
I am studying solristas with its browse UI that comes in 3.5.0 example. I
have noticed the calls to /terms in order to get autocompletion terms have a
'timestamp' parameter.
What is it for? I did not find any such param in solr docs.
Can be safely be removed?
thanks
--
View this message
Why would you want to? This seems like an
XY problem, see:
http://people.apache.org/~hossman/#xyproblem
See the confFiles section here:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication
although it mentions solrconfig.xml, it
might work with schema.xml.
BUT: This strikes me as really, really
It's just a function of the jquery suggest component being used, if I recall
correctly, to ensure that HTTP caching doesn't get involved since the request
changes by the timestamp for every request. I imagine it can be safely (at
the risk of getting cached results, I suppose) removed.
There are jmx plugins for most monitoring tools and solr exposes many jmx stats
- and the jvm does the same.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrJmx
- Mark Miller
lucidimagination.com
On Mar 13, 2012, at 5:07 AM, Alex Leonhardt wrote:
Hi All,
I was wondering if anyone knows of a free tool to
I suspected it was to avoid caching, but I thought what was the harm of
caching at http level taking place if it's just suggestions, I would say it
would be even better.
So I can remove it...
thanks
--
View this message in context:
On 13 March 2012 18:19, Abhishek tiwari abhishek.tiwari@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
My one more concern,
Though Establishments, Events, Movies are not related to each other,
I have to make 3 search queries to their independent cores and club the
data to show, will that effect my relevancy?
Would it be a good idea to have Solr throw syntax error if an empty string
query occurs?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Strange-behavior-with-search-on-empty-string-and-NOT-tp3818023p3823572.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at
Are indexed multi-value poly fields possible in sold?
If so where can I find an example?
Thank you,
-John
Hey Folks,
I'm new to lucene/solr so pardon my lack of knowledge.
I'm trying to feed some json to my solr instance through wget.
I'm using the command
wget 'http://localhost:8983/solr/update/json?commit=true'
--post-file=itemsExported.json --header='Content-type:application/json'
however the
I have a master with two slaves. For some reason on the master if I do an
optimize after indexing on the master it double in size from 42meg to 90
meg.. however, when the slaves replicate they get the 42meg index..
Should the master and slaves always be the same size?
Thanks,
Mike
Hmmm, this looks like it's generated by DocumentBuilder with the code
catch( Exception ex ) {
throw new SolrException( SolrException.ErrorCode.BAD_REQUEST,
ERROR: +getID(doc, schema)+Error adding field ' +
field.getName() + '=' +field.getValue()+', ex );
I just changed the exception handling in trunk to hopefully produce
better error messages when you don't have the full stack trace.
Shot in the dark: is tags the source for any copyField commands in the
schema? If so, make sure the targets are also multi-valued.
-Yonik
lucenerevolution.com -
Hey,Thanks for the lightning quick responses.
Unfortunalty no stack trace anywhere I can see. Where would you recommend I
look?
I think this is a very bad bad bug.
I changed my field name from tag to ptag and now it's working fine!
Thanks,
Alp
--
View this message in context:
Hi,
Thanks a lot for your detailed problem description. It definitely is an error.
Would you be so kind to register it as a bug ticket, including your
descriptions from this email?
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HowToContribute#JIRA_tips_.28our_issue.2BAC8-bug_tracker.29.
Also please attach to
And here is a page on how to wire Solr's JMX info into OpenNMS monitoring tool.
Have not tried it, but as soon as a collector config is defined once I'd guess
it could be re-used, maybe shipped with Solr.
http://www.opennms.org/wiki/JMX_Collector
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Interestingly I'm getting this on other fields now.
I have the fieldfield name=name type=text_general indexed=true
stored=true /
which is copied to text copyField source=name dest=text/
and my text field is simplyfield name=text type=text_general
indexed=true stored=true /
I'm feedin
left. the $20 under the tile with the hand prints. thx
On Tuesday, March 13, 2012, jlark alpti...@hotmail.com wrote:
Interestingly I'm getting this on other fields now.
I have the fieldfield name=name type=text_general indexed=true
stored=true /
which is copied to text copyField
optimize will generate new segments and delete old ones. if your master
also provides searching service during indexing, the old files may be
opened by old SolrIndexSearcher. they will be deleted later. So when
indexing, the index size may double. But a moment later, old indexes will
be deleted.
Hi, Tanguy,
For the other implementation (
http://code.google.com/p/language-detection/ ), it seems to be
performing a first pass on the input, and tries to separate Latin
characters from the others. If there's more non-Latin characters than
Latin ones, then it will process the non-Latin
35 matches
Mail list logo
