String fields can be searched, but you have to give the complete
string, or a wildcard. And the upper/lower case has to be right.
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Xiao Li shinelee.thew...@gmail.com wrote:
I have used Solr 3.4 for a long time. Recently, when I upgrade to Solr 4.0
and reindex
Hi, What is the significance of Analyzer class attribute?
When I specify analyzer class in schema, something like below and do
analysis on this field in analysis page : I cant see verbose output on
tokenizer and filters
fieldType name=text_chinese class=solr.TextField
analyzer
Hi Hoss,
Did you perhaps forget to include RunUpdateProcessorFactory at the end?
What is that? ;-)
I had copied the config from http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateRequestProcessor
but removed the lines I thought I did not need. :-(
I've changed my configuration, and this is now WORKING
HI,
I haven't been following from the beginning but am still curious: is the war
file on a shared fs?
See also:
http://www.mail-archive.com/users@tomcat.apache.org/msg79555.html
Here are the working solutions for:
3.6.1 (or lower probably)
via ScriptTransformer in data-config.xml:
function prepareData(row) {
var cols = new java.util.ArrayList();
cols.add(spent_hours);
Jerry,
Glad it worked for you. I will also do the same thing. This seems easier
for me, as I have a solr start shell script, which sets the JVM params for
master/slave, Xmx and so on according to the environment. Setting a jdbc
connect url in the start script is convenient than changing the
When I specify analyzer class in schema, something
like below and do
analysis on this field in analysis page : I cant see
verbose output on
tokenizer and filters
fieldType name=text_chinese
class=solr.TextField
analyzer
I try to get the content from binary documents using
solr-cell and i follow
the wiki for that.
After putting some missing classes, i arrive on this
exception :
Caused by: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Error
Instantiating Request
Handler, solr.extraction.ExtractingRequestHandler
Yes faceting works as before. Regarding the cache, the suggestion is to
disable the cache for realtime NRT, for now.
Regards,
Nagendra Nagarajayya
http://solr-ra.tgels.org
http://rankingalgorithm.tgels.org
On 7/24/2012 2:57 PM, Andy wrote:
Nagendra,
Does RankingAlgorithm work with faceting
Hi all,
Sorry, but I could not find any spec on the binary format SolrJ is
using. Can you point me to an URL if any?
Thanks in advance.
Best,
Zsolt
Sorry, but I could not find any spec on the binary format
SolrJ is
using. Can you point me to an URL if any?
may be this?
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/trunk/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/response/BinaryResponseWriter.java
I'm using the 3.6.0 version.
Are you using the following lib directives (defined solrconfig.xml)
lib dir=../../../dist/ regex=apache-solr-cell-\d.*\.jar /
lib dir=../../../contrib/extraction/lib regex=.*\.jar /
or did you manually copied above jar files into solrHome/coreName/lib directory?
Here is my solrconfig.xml for one of the core :
lib dir=../../dist/ regex=apache-solr-cell-\d.*\.jar /
lib dir=../../contrib/extraction/lib regex=.*\.jar /
...
I've added the maven dependencies like this for the solr war :
dependencies combine.self=override
Hi,
I'm working on making our autocomplete engine a bit more smart.
The actual impl is a basic facet based autocompletion as described in the
'SOLR 3 Enterprise Search' book: we use all the typed tokens except the
last one to build a facet.prefix query on an autocomplete facet field we
built at
Each request thread may return updated results. Each component may also
in certain cases return updated results. The algorithm is designed to
handle these. The granularity of the returned results can be controlled
through a visible parameter.
Regards,
Nagendra Nagarajayya
You are changing the name, or someone at Apache told you the current name is
okay?
If someone at Apache told you it was okay, who was that?
You are certainly not using the Solr mark in an approved manner and I'd hope if
you are going to take advantage of our mailing list for promotion of your
So I am familiar with SOLR. I have built fairly extensive solr indexes
already. What I am trying to do now
is build very large indexes and then move them over to a sharded server
environment that will allow clients to query them.
These indexes will be built once and will not be updated or need
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 8:58 AM, spredd1208 [via Lucene]
ml-node+s472066n3997251...@n3.nabble.com wrote:
So I am familiar with SOLR. I have built fairly extensive solr indexes
already. What I am trying to do now
is build very large indexes and then move them over to a sharded server
Hi
Running a Solr cloud cluster after a while a Solr looses its connection
to its ZooKeeper cluster as seen in the ZooKeeper log below. The Solr
reconnects to another ZooKeeper in the ZK cluster and the only thing
seen in the Solr log (running warning level) is a newly programmatic
created
Hi Ugo,
You can use facet.prefix on a tokenized field instead of a String field.
Example:
field name=product type=string … /
field name=product_tokens type=text_split … /!-- use e.g.
WhitespaceTokenizer or WordDelimiter and others, see example schema.xml that
comes with SOLR --
facet.prefix
But Solr relies on cache in faceting for performance reason. If it is required
to disable the cache then faceting would be very slow under RankingAlgorithm,
no?
From:Nagendra Nagarajayya nnagaraja...@transaxtions.com
To:solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Hi,
I have currently one big sharded Solr setup storing couple of million
documents
with some 'small' fields and one fulltext field in each doc. The latter
blows up the index.
My thought was, that I could separate indexes. So for the facet queries
where I don't need
fulltext search (so also no
Hard to determine from this info. With only WARN logging, you don't see a
lot of what is happening. Around what is the date of this build?
Close can actually be called quite often - it's used to cancel recoveries,
but new recovery threads can easily start up. What you should see if
Recovery truly
Mark,
Grant Ingersoll from ASF got in touch with me to ensure that I am
compliant with the Apache Trade Mark. I made changes to the names, web
pages, wiki, papers, etc. and sent back the links to Grant for approval.
You may want to check with Grant.
Regarding the fork, I am not creating a
hi,
i'm running two solr v3.6 instances:
rdta01:9983/solr/msg-core : 8 documents
rdta01:28983/solr/msg-core : 4 documents
the following two queries with rows=10 resp rows=0 return different
numFound results which confuses me. i hope someone can clarify this
behaviour.
URL with rows=10:
Hi,
thank you for the suggestions. However, I think that this is not going to
work.
Suppose I have a product with a title='kMix Espresso maker'. If I tokenize
this and put the result in product_tokens I should get
'[kMix][Espresso][maker]'.
If now I try to search with
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Nagendra Nagarajayya
nnagaraja...@transaxtions.com wrote:
Mark,
Grant Ingersoll from ASF got in touch with me to ensure that I am
compliant with the Apache Trade Mark. I made changes to the names, web
pages, wiki, papers, etc. and sent back the links to
Hi
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012, at 01:37 AM, Chantal Ackermann wrote:
I haven't been following from the beginning but am still curious: is the war
file on a shared fs?
No, it's not. Atm, all's on one fs.
See also:
http://www.mail-archive.com/users@tomcat.apache.org/msg79555.html
Hi
is there a tokenizer and/or a combination of filter to remove the first term
from a field?
For example:
The quick brown fox
should be tokenized as:
quick
brown
fox
thank you in advance
S
is there a tokenizer and/or a combination of filter to
remove the first term from a field?
For example:
The quick brown fox
should be tokenized as:
quick
brown
fox
There is no such filter that i know of. Though, you can implement one with
modifying source code of LengthFilterFactory
lib dir=../../dist/
regex=apache-solr-cell-\d.*\.jar /
lib dir=../../contrib/extraction/lib
regex=.*\.jar /
Thats okey, do you see something like below in logs:
INFO: Adding
'file:/Users/iorixxx/Desktop/solr-trunk/solr/contrib/extraction/lib/tika-parsers-1.1.jar'
to classloader
Hi there,
it looks like the old releases have been thrown out of the download
servers, for example
http://apache.mirrors.tds.net/lucene/solr/1.4.1/apache-solr-1.4.1.tgz
Is this on purpose or a mistake, or have I overseen something?
Thanks for clarification.
Cheers,
Nicolas
: it looks like the old releases have been thrown out of the download
: servers, for example
This is standard practice for apache projects so that the mirror network
doesn't have to store gigs and gigs of ancient files that most people
don't care about.
All historic apache releases are
Mark,
You are certainly not using the Solr mark in an approved manner and I'd hope if
you are going to take advantage of our mailing list for promotion of your
product, that you would not violate our trademark.
Apache Foundation do not own SOLR (R) trademark. I looked into registry
(USA and
On Jul 25, 2012, at 2:00 PM, Radim Kolar h...@filez.com wrote:
Mark,
You are certainly not using the Solr mark in an approved manner and I'd hope
if you are going to take advantage of our mailing list for promotion of your
product, that you would not violate our trademark.
Apache
Suppose I have a product with a title='kMix Espresso maker'. If I tokenize
this and put the result in product_tokens I should get
'[kMix][Espresso][maker]'.
If now I try to search with facet.field='product_tokens' and
facet.prefix='espresso' I should get only 'espresso' while I want 'kMix
On 07/25/2012 07:17 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: it looks like the old releases have been thrown out of the download
: servers, for example
This is standard practice for apache projects so that the mirror network
doesn't have to store gigs and gigs of ancient files that most people
Hello:
I'm trying to figure out if there is some limitation to a cross core join, or
if I'm must misunderstanding something. This has been working fine with a
small number of documents in the from index, but now I'm not getting the
expected results now that a given example here has 41K from
before I optimize (build my spellchecker index) my solr instance running in
tomcat uses about 2 gigs of memory
as soon as I optimize it jumps to about 5 gigs
http://d.pr/i/oUQI
it just doesn't seem right
http://pastebin.com/6Cg7F0dK
is there anything wrong with my configuration?
when i dump
An Analyzer object is a chain of Tokenizer and TokenFilters. These
text type definitions either use an analyzer class or describe the
Tokenizer and TokenFilters directly. The Analyzer classes create their
own sequence of Tokenizer and maybe TokenFilters, hard-coded in the
analyzer class. In
40 matches
Mail list logo
