I'm also using that field for a facet:
|
dismax
explicit
1
many field but not store_slug
|many field but not store_slug|||
..., store_slug
2
2
*:*
default
true
tr
Hi Yonik,
I've been attempting to fix the SUBREADER insanity in our custom
component, and have made perhaps some progress (or is this worse?) -
I've gone from SUBREADER to VALUEMISMATCH insanity:
---snip---
entries_count : 12
entry#0 :
'MMapIndexInput(path="/io01/p/solr/playlist/c/playlist/index/
Hi,
because your search for /?q=produto_nome:"lubrificante intimo" is
a phrase search and will be handled different.
Your other search gets the synonyms, but the last synonym is a multi-word
synonym
and not a phrase
... produto_nome:lubrificante intimo) ))
See also:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/
We have configured 2 spellcheckers English and French in solr 4 BETA. Each
spellchecker works with a specific search handler. The English spellchecker is
working as expected with any word regardless of the case. On the other hand,
the French spellchecker works with lowercase words. If the firs
Hi Varun,
Running many Zookeeper instances improves read time but has a negative impact
on writing states to Zookeeper. Having a node only talk to the local Zookeeper
instance limits availability, your Zookeeper daemon will die at some point and
that will cut off your Solr node from the entire
Hi,
Rephrasing my question ... Let me know if anyone feel some problem with
following deployment of solrcloud
1) Have 200 solrcloud nodes ( serv1, serv2, .. serv200) with each machine
having both zookeeper and solr both.
2) zookeeper config contain the list of all servers
server.1=serv1:2888:38
I am trying to hit a an https url from the DIH and am having problems.
Basically I would like to give the DIH my server certificate (since
it is really the server that is running the DIH) to use to query my
https URL.
Currently the DIH throws exceptions when trying to request the https URL.
Any
Ok. I might get what you are looking for. Extends SolrTestCase4J (see
plenty samples in codebase). Obtain request via req(), obtain schema from
it by getSchema(), then getAnalyzer() or getQueryAnalyzer() and ask for
analysis org.apache.lucene.analysis.Analyzer.tokenStream(String, Reader).
You'll fi
"autoGeneratePhraseQueries" simply means that terms with embedded
punctuation that gets filtered to be whitespace will treat the resulting
sub-terms as if they were a quoted phrase, so A-D gets treated as "A D", a
phrase.
Did you maybe index the initial data with different field types and then
That's exactly the way I do it when I have to write some custom stuff.
My problem is that I do not know how to integrate an Analyzer's
reusability-feature into a Unit-Test to see what happens if - i.e. - a
TokenFilter-instance is going to be reused.
Some TokenFilter-prototypes I've seen are state
Looks like this important bug fix is making it into 4.0 !
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-release-4-0-take-two-tp4010808p4011255.html
On Oct 1, 2012, at 10:26 AM, David Smiley (@MITRE.org) wrote:
> Hi Ere,
>
> You are using it correctly. The problem is this:
> https://issues.apache.org/
It's not clear what you want to achieve. I don't always create custom
TokenStreams, but if I do I use Lucenes as a prototype to start from.
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Em wrote:
> Hi Mikhail,
>
> thanks for your feedback.
>
> If so, how can I write UnitTests which respect the Reuse strategy?
How is your request handler defined? Using store_slug for anything but fl?
Erik
On Oct 1, 2012, at 10:51, "giovanni.bricc...@banzai.it"
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to put a multivalued field into a qt definition as output field.
> to do this I edit the current solrconfig.xml definit
I use text_en_splitting from example distribution, which does have
autoGeneratePhraseQueries:
But I do not see the other omit options anywhere in solr.config and
definitely not for the field or field type definition:
I am not sure what the defaults are either. I am using version 1.5 of
You probably have omitTermFreqAndPositions=true or omitPositions=true in
your schema for that field. You MUST have position info to use phrase query.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Alexandre Rafalovitch
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2012 11:53 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.or
-Original message-
> From:Alexandre Rafalovitch
> Sent: Mon 01-Oct-2012 17:58
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: "Indexed without position data" - strange exception in
> eDisMax (Solr 4.0beta)
>
> I am getting a very strange exception when I use edismax handler and
> search qu
bq: I have the same problem. can you help me how to solve this?
CommonsHttpSolrServer is running very well.
So I don't understand your problem. You say "CommonsHttpSolrServer is
running very well", so are you seeing the "connection refused" message
or not? And did you follow Shalin's clue and insu
I am struggling with how to protect the Solr URLs (esp. the admin
page(s)) when I deploy solr to JBoss. I know that I can extract the
web.xml from the war and mess with that, but was wondering if there
was a way to deploy the war as-is and modify some JBoss config file to
protect that wars URL(s).
Shalin Shekhar Mangar gmail.com> writes:
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 4:52 PM, dharhsana
gmail.com>wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi to all,
> > when i try to execute my query i get Connection refused ,can any one please
> > tell me what should be done for this ,to make my solr run.
> >
> > org.apache.solr.
Hello,
I would like to put a multivalued field into a qt definition as output
field. to do this I edit the current solrconfig.xml definition and add
the field in the fl specification.
Unexpectedly when I do the query q=*:*&qt=mytype I get the error
can not use FieldCache on multivalued fiel
Hi Ere,
You are using it correctly. The problem is this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-
Sadly, this just missed the 4.0 release which appears to be imminent. If
the release needs to be "respun" then I'll get this simple fix in it. Yeah
this sucks and it's very frustrating to
Hi Mikhail,
thanks for your feedback.
If so, how can I write UnitTests which respect the Reuse strategy?
What's the recommended way when creating custom Tokenizers and TokenFilters?
Kind regards,
Em
Am 01.10.2012 10:54, schrieb Mikhail Khludnev:
> Hello,
>
> Analyzers are reused. Analyzer is T
Store the literal question as the title or another separate field of the
document/answer and then do an edismax query using the query question with
q.op set to "OR" and pf2 and pf3 set to the field that contains the question
as well as the answer body field, with an extra boost for the question
The field reference applies only to the single term, quoted phrase, or
parenthesized sub-query that follows it, so maybe you meant:
(*:* -field1:"ABC XYZ")^1000
or
(*:* -field1:(ABC XYZ))^1000
Your pick as to whether you require the terms to be adjacent or merely
somewhere in the field. You
On Mon, 2012-10-01 at 14:20 +0200, Claudio Ranieri wrote:
> Is there a way to omit the cities with boosting 1?
> The number of cities is big, but the number of "important" cities is small.
Sorry, not with this simple trick.
Maybe a function query, as 曹霖 suggests, can help you, but I have no
exper
Hi Toke,
Is there a way to omit the cities with boosting 1?
The number of cities is big, but the number of "important" cities is small.
-Mensagem original-
De: Toke Eskildsen [mailto:t...@statsbiblioteket.dk]
Enviada em: segunda-feira, 1 de outubro de 2012 09:13
Para: solr-user@lucene.ap
On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 14:43 +0200, Claudio Ranieri wrote:
> name | city
> Jose | Campinas
> Jose | São Paulo
> Jose | Rio de Janeiro
> Jose | Rio Branco
> Jose | Ourinhos
>
> In search by "Jose", I wish return on top the documents (Jose | São
> Paulo and Jose | Rio de Janeiro).
If all documents h
I am using a negative query boosting for a particular field as given in the
solr wiki
(*:* -field1:ABC XYZ)^1000
When I do a search now, the top results does not contain value "ABC XYZ"
from field1.
When I give a search value as ABC DEF and accordingly change the negative
query boosting in bq pa
Hi Erick
The user will search in "name" field, not in "city" field.
I will create a third field "important" and I will sort by this field.
-Mensagem original-
De: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
Enviada em: segunda-feira, 1 de outubro de 2012 08:43
Para: solr-user@lucen
Unless I'm misreading something, this sounds like simple boosting
at query time, see:
https://lucene.apache.org/core/3_6_0/queryparsersyntax.html#Boosting a Term
Best
Erick
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 6:58 AM, Claudio Ranieri
wrote:
> Hi Erick.
>
> When I set up the query, I will inform the cities th
Hi Erick.
When I set up the query, I will inform the cities that I wish the weight has
increased. Is there any way I can do this?
How would I do for the contents of some fields increase the relevance (not
increasing for all values of the field)? Is there any function to do this?
How would I do
I am out of the office until 10/08/2012.
I will respond to your message when I return.
Note: This is an automated response to your message "Re: Lifecycle of a
TokenFilter from TokenFilterFactory" sent on 10/01/2012 2:54:17.
This is the only notification you will receive while this person is
Hello,
Analyzers are reused. Analyzer is Tokenizer and several TokenFilters. Check
the source org.apache.lucene.analysis.Analyzer, pay attention to
reuseStrategy.
Best regards
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Em wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I saw a bug in a TokenFilter that only works, if there is
33 matches
Mail list logo
