Re: Filter Query that matches all values of a field

: I have a single type field that can contain zero or more values (comma : separated values). This field stores some sort of access value. : : In the filter, I am given a list of allowed values for the field and a : document must be considered if all values contained in its field must be :

Re: Disabling solr scoring

: Can you please elaborate? I am passing user defined sort field and order whenever i search. I think Mikhail just missunderstood your question -- he was giving an example of how to override the default sort (which uses score) with one that would ensure scores are not computed. : > Is there

Re: Integrating Stanford NLP or any other NLP for Natural Language Query

Hi Puneet, your requirement : "I would like users to be able to write queries in natural language rather than keyword based search." Is really really vague :( Can you try to help us with some specific example, starting of course from the simplest use cases you have initially in mind ? Moving

Re: Searching Home's, Homes and Home

I second Jamal, using a soft stemmer for your language should solve the problem. Specifically to the english language and the cases you mentioned : 1) Minimal English stemmer should be a good solution [1] 2) The english porter stemmer can be valid for your use case as well [2] 3) Not sure if

Re: How to create highlight search component using Config API

If you already have highlighting defined from one of the default configsets, you can see an example of how the JSON is structured with a Config API request. I assume you already tried that, but pointing it out just in case. Defining a highlighter with the Config API is a bit confusing to be

RE: Searching Home's, Homes and Home

I would start by looking at the stemming documentation - It might be of help. Sas -Original Message- From: Surender [mailto:surender.si...@rsystems.com] Sent: Friday, July 8, 2016 8:30 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Searching Home's, Homes and Home User can type keyword

Searching Home's, Homes and Home

User can type keyword for search in many ways an and following are the few examples: if user types any of the keywords homes, home, home's then it should be able to search the following: 1. Home 2. Home's 3. Homes If user types Americas, the results should include 1. Americas 2. America's 3.

Re: SOLR 6: edismax search query with OR operator does not work as expected

Also take a look at: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8812 On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 7:02 AM, Jamal, Sarfaraz wrote: > This sounds like it might be of help - > > < solrQueryParser defaultOperator="AND"/> > > You can change it from and to or. > >

query / joint

"docs": [ { "id": "...", "type_s": "ticket", "customerid_s": "100", ... ... ... ... }, { "id": "...", "type_s": "customer", "customerid_s": "100", "name_s": "FISHER", ... ... ... ... } ] Hello, I have two entitys : -

RE: SOLR 6: edismax search query with OR operator does not work as expected

This sounds like it might be of help - < solrQueryParser defaultOperator="AND"/> You can change it from and to or. (If I understood you) - Sas -Original Message- From: Aleš Gregor [mailto:alg...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, July 8, 2016 9:37 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject:

Re: Internode communication failed when enable basic authentication Solr 6.1.0

Hello, could this be related to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9188 ? Ales Gregor 2016-06-24 15:15 GMT+02:00 Shankar Ramalingam : > Hi Team, > > Basic Authentication is enabled on Solr cloud and node1 is running on one > machine and node2 is runnin on

SOLR 6: edismax search query with OR operator does not work as expected

Hello, after migrating my index from Solr 4.3 to Solr 6 I noticed that the OR logical operator in search query no longer works as expected. On Solr 4.3 query - Blue OR Red - brings all documents with Blue or Red or both tokens found. On Solr 6 the same query only brings documents with both the

Re: Disabling solr scoring

Can you please elaborate? I am passing user defined sort field and order whenever i search. Thanks & Regards, Bhaumik Joshi From: Mikhail Khludnev Sent: Friday, July 8, 2016 4:13 AM To: solr-user Subject: Re: Disabling solr scoring What

Re: Integrating Stanford NLP or any other NLP for Natural Language Query

I've added multivalued fields within my SOLR schema for indexing entities extracted using NLP methods applied to the text I'm indexing, along with fields for other discrete data extracted from relational databases. A Java application reads data out of multiple relational databases, uses NLP on

group.facet=true and facet on field of type int -> org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Exception during facet.field

Hi all, are there any limitations in regard to retrieval of facet information, when grouping? When I send the following query where the field to facet ("m_pt_14_s_ns") on is of type "string", everything works fine. "q": "*:*", "facet.field": "m_pt_14_s_ns", "indent": "true", "group.facet":

Re: Suggester Issue

Taking a look to the code, basically the context field act as the default field in a Standard Query Parser. Even if having multiple context fields seems to be supported when building the auxiliary suggester index, it doesn't seem to work at query time. If you specify the context only at query

Re: Disabling solr scoring

What about sort=_docid_ asc ? 08 июля 2016 г. 13:50 пользователь "Bhaumik Joshi" < bhaumik.jo...@outlook.com> написал: > Hi, > > > Is there any way to completely disable scoring in solr cloud as i am > always passing sort parameter whenever i search. > > And disabling scoring will improve

Query Elevation

A new requirement to get particular document as second result in result page. For example, If the query is “coal”, this document(id: 222) should come as second result. Please let me know if you have any solution. -- View this message in context:

Disabling solr scoring

Hi, Is there any way to completely disable scoring in solr cloud as i am always passing sort parameter whenever i search. And disabling scoring will improve performance? Thanks & Regards, Bhaumik Joshi

Re: CDCR (Solr6.x) does not start

Hi Renaud, thank you for your response. You asked for some further information: 1. Log messages at the source cluster: As mentioned in my addendum "CDCR (Solr6.x) does not start (logfile)". I changed the log level for all Handlers to TRACE and I got three Messages for each shard caused by

RE: File Descriptor/Memory Leak

Is there a firewall between a client and a server by any chance? CLOSE_WAIT is not a leak, but standard TCP step at the end. So the question is why sockets are reopened that often or why the other side does not acknowledge TCP termination packet fast. I would run Ethereal to troubleshoot that.

RE: File Descriptor/Memory Leak

FYI - we're using Solr-6.1.0, and the leak seems to be consequent (occurs every single time when running with SSL). -Original Message- From: Anshum Gupta [mailto:ans...@anshumgupta.net] Sent: torsdag 7. juli 2016 18.14 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: File Descriptor/Memory