Re: query formulation

On 9/9/2016 9:17 PM, Prasanna S. Dhakephalkar wrote: > Further search on net got me answer > > The query to be > > a_id:20 OR (*:* NOT a_id:*) > > I don't understand this syntax The basic problem here is that negative queries don't work. If you're going to subtract X, you have to start with

Re: Detecting down node with SolrJ

On 9/9/2016 4:38 PM, Brent wrote: > Is there a way to tell whether or not a node at a specific address is > up using a SolrJ API? Based on your other questions, I think you're running cloud. If that assumption is correct, use the Collections API with HttpSolrClient (instead of CloudSolrClient)

RE: query formulation

Hi, Further search on net got me answer The query to be a_id:20 OR (*:* NOT a_id:*) I don't understand this syntax I am bit raw at solr query formations :) Regards, Prasanna. From: Prasanna S. Dhakephalkar [mailto:prasann...@merajob.in] Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2016

query formulation

Greetings Group, I am attempting to formulate a query that gives me all the records such that 1. The record does not have field a_id 2. If a_id field exists then it should have a value 20 So, for 1. I used -a_id:* (got 25 results) For 2. I used a_id:20 (got 3 results)

Re: [Rerank Query] Distributed search + pagination

Let me explain further, let's assume a simple case when we have 2 shards. ReRankDocs =10 , rows=10 . Correct me if I am wrong Joel, What we would like : 1 page : top 10 re-scored 2 page: remaining 10 re-scored >From page 3 the original scored docs. This is what is happening in a single sol

Detecting down node with SolrJ

Is there a way to tell whether or not a node at a specific address is up using a SolrJ API? -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Detecting-down-node-with-SolrJ-tp4295402.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Migrating: config found, but not mapped to collection

Sure - and the apps may not have been pointed at the new ZK? If you want the new apps to use the latest Solr, then I would assume you want them on the new ZK, but I'll bet a dollar that there are some configurations, etc, that need to change in the applications before that will work right... On

Re: Migrating: config found, but not mapped to collection

Sorry for the confusion... I forget that not everyone sees what I see ;) The other configs that I mention are from another application that uses Solr and Zookeeper. In theory, both apps should be able to share resources like Solr and ZK, but I need to double-check on the necessity to have both

Re: Migrating: config found, but not mapped to collection

I'm not sure, but based on what I saw in the script command line, I would expect ONLY otac_en to show up - since that is the only one mentioned on the -confname flag... Glad you've made some progress - happy to try to assist in figuring out the larger problem if you want to. I have sweat a lot

Re: Migrating: config found, but not mapped to collection

Hi again; To answer your questions: 1. I use a ZK browser, so I can see what happens in ZK. https://github.com/DeemOpen/zkui 2. Solr 4.3 is on it's own ZK, on one server. Solr 5.4 is on another ZK, on a different server. No mixing whatsoever. 3. Take to mean "ZK root", so, yes /ot is at the

Re: Migrating: config found, but not mapped to collection

I'm afraid I'm pretty confused about what's going on... Naturally, because it's new to me and you've been staring at it for a long time... I'm afraid I'll have to ask some basic questions to get myself on the right page... When you say this: The scrtipt does the job: the config is visible at

Re: Migrating: config found, but not mapped to collection

Hi JohnB; We have a script that calls the ZK CLI with this command: zk.bat -cmd upconfig -zkhost %SOLR_ZK_ENSEMBLE% -confdir %INSTALL_DIR%\etc\solr\otac\default-en\conf -confname otac_en The scrtipt does the job: the config is visible at /ot/solr/configs/otac_en You can see in Solr's error

Re: Migrating: config found, but not mapped to collection

Specifically, how did you push the configuration to Zookeeper? Does the config exist in a separate "chroot" on Zookeeper? If so, do all the collection names exist inside there (On Zookeeper)? On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 2:01 PM, igiguere wrote: > Hi; > > I am migrating

Re: Solr Collection Create API queries

Thank you Anshum. I would try the approach of managing it from outside first and see how it works. On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Anshum Gupta wrote: > If you want to build a monitoring tool that maintains a replication factor, > I would suggest you use the Collections

Re: Solr Collection Create API queries

If you want to build a monitoring tool that maintains a replication factor, I would suggest you use the Collections APIs (ClusterStatus, AddReplica, DeleteReplica, etc.) and manage this from outside of Solr. I don't want to pull you back from trying to build something but I think you'd be biting a

Re: Solr Collection Create API queries

I am experimenting on this functionality and see how the overseer monitors and keeps the minimum no of replicas up and running. In heavy indexing/search flow , if any replica goes down we need to keep the minimum no. of replicas up and running to serve the traffic and mainitain the availability

Re: Solr Collection Create API queries

Just to clarify here, I said that I really think it's an XY problem here. I still don't know what is being attempted/built. >From the last email, sounds like you want to build/support auto-addition of replica but I would wait until you clarify the use case to suggest anything. -Anshum On Fri,

Migrating: config found, but not mapped to collection

Hi; I am migrating collections from Solr 4.3 to Solr 5.4.1 The configuration was pushed to Zookeeper, on the Zookeeper connected with Solr 5.4.1: schema.xml: solrconfig.xml: 5.4.1 I can manually create a new core, using the Solr Admin UI, as long as I use the name "otac_en" for parameter

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Solr 5.5.3 released

09 September 2016, Apache Solr™ 5.5.3 available The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 5.5.3 Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform from the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text search, hit highlighting,

Re: [Rerank Query] Distributed search + pagination

I'm not understanding where the inconsistency comes into play. The re-ranking occurs on the shards. The aggregator node will be sent some docs that have been re-scored and others that are not. But the sorting should be the same as someone pages through the result set. Joel Bernstein

Bug with bootstrap_confdir?

Hi, I was having an issue setting up a Solr instance w/ a external Zookeeper. My SOLR_HOME is not set to the default location. I believe the problem is related to the following line and I wanted to confirm if this is a bug: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/master/solr/bin/solr#L1383

Re: Solr slow response collection-High Load

Thanks Erick and Kshitij. Would try both the options and see what works best. Regards Ankush Khanna On Fri, 9 Sep 2016 at 16:33 Erick Erickson wrote: > The soft commit interval governs opening new > searchers, which should be "warmed" in order > load up caches. Mu

Question : Invalid results on full-text search with a combination of numbers and dots in research terms

Hello, I have no results on full-text searching with a combination of numbers and dots in research terms (example : 304.411) Does Lucene core (version 4.1.3) have limits or do I have missing parameters ? Thanks in advance, Sambeau PRAK Efalia (DMS editor)

ConcurrentUpdateSolrClient threads

All, Running Solr 5.4.1 with embedded Jetty with frequent updates coming in and softCommit is set to 10 min. What I am noticing is occasional "slow" updates (takes 8 sec to 15 sec sometimes) and about the same time slow QTimes. Upon investigating, it appears that

Re: Strange error when I try to copy....

Le 09/09/2016 à 17:57, Shawn Heisey a écrit : On 9/8/2016 9:41 AM, Bruno Mannina wrote: - I stop SOLR 5.4 on Ubuntu 14.04LTS - 16Go - i3-2120 CPU @ 3.30Ghz - I do a simple directory copy /data to my HDD backup (from 2To SATA to 2To SATA directly connected to the Mothercard). All files are

Re: Strange error when I try to copy....

On 9/8/2016 9:41 AM, Bruno Mannina wrote: > - I stop SOLR 5.4 on Ubuntu 14.04LTS - 16Go - i3-2120 CPU @ 3.30Ghz > > - I do a simple directory copy /data to my HDD backup (from 2To SATA > to 2To SATA directly connected to the Mothercard). > > All files are copied fine but one not ! the biggest

Strange error when I try to copy....

Dear Solr Users, I use since several years SOLR and since two weeks, I have a problem when I try to copy my solr index. My solr index is around 180Go (~100 000 000 docs, 1 doc ~ 3ko) My method to save my index every Sunday: - I stop SOLR 5.4 on Ubuntu 14.04LTS - 16Go - i3-2120 CPU @ 3.30Ghz

Re: Solr Collection Create API queries

I think you're missing my point. The _feature_ may be there, you'll have to investigate. But it is not named "smartCloud" or "autoManageCluster". Those terms 1> do not appear in the final patch. 2> do not appear in any file in Solr 6x. They were suggested names, what the final implementation

Re: Solr Collection Create API queries

I am working on solr 6.0.0 to implement this feature. I had a chat with Anshum and confirmed that this feature is available in 6.0.0 version. The functionality is that to allow the overseer to bring up the minimum no. of replicas for each shard as per the replicationFactor set. I will look

Re: Solr Collection Create API queries

You cannot just pick arbitrary parts of a JIRA discussion and expect them to work. JIRAs are places where discussion of alternatives takes place and the discussion often suggests ideas that are not incorporated in the final patch. The patch for the JIRA you mentioned, for instance, does not

Re: Solr slow response collection-High Load

The soft commit interval governs opening new searchers, which should be "warmed" in order load up caches. Mu guess is that you're not doing much warming and thus seeing long search times. Most attachments are stripped by the mail server, if you want people to see the images put them up somewhere

Solr Configuration for Hortontworks HA

Hi All, We implement the Hortonworks Standby NameNode and i'm wondering how to configure the Solr to point to the cluster name instead of the Name node Hostname? ? I tried to configure Dolr in several ways without succes: 1) Using the cluser name 2) using a "," separate host

Re: Default stop word list

I would partially agree with Walter - having more resources allows us to include stopwords in index and let scoring model do its job. However, there are other Solr features that can suffer from that approach: e.g. if you use edismax and mm=80%, in case of query with stopwords, you can end up

[Rerank Query] Distributed search + pagination

Hi guys, was just experimenting some reranker with really low number of rerank docs ( 10= pageSize) . Let's focus on the distributed enviroment and the manual sharding approach. Currently what happens is that the reranking task is delivered by the shards, they rescore the docs and then send them

Re: Sorting on DateRangeField?

Hi Alex, DateRangeField extends some spatial stuff, which has that error message in it, not in DateRangeField proper. You cannot sort on a DateRangeField. If you want to... try adding either one plain docValues field if you just have date instances, or a pair of them to hold a min & max and

solr json facets return format

Hi everybody, i'm currently working on using the json request api for solr and hit a problem using facets. I'm using solr 5.5.2 and solrJ 5.5.2 When querying solr by url-parameters like so:

Re: changed query parsing between 4.10.4 and 5.5.3?

After some more testing it feels like the parsing in 5.5.3 is _really_ messed up. Query version 4.10.4: (text:(star AND trek AND wars)^200 OR text:("star trek wars")^350) (text:(star AND trek AND wars)^200 OR text:("star trek wars")^350) (+(((+text:star +text:trek +text:war)^200.0)

Re: Solr slow response collection-High Load

Hi Ankush, As you are updating highly on one of the cores, hard commit will play a major role. Reason: During hard commits solr merges your segments and this is a time taking process. During merging of segments indexing of documents gets affected i.e. gets slower. Try figuring out the right

Solr slow response collection-High Load

Hello, We are running some test for improving our solr performance. We have around 15 collections on our solr cluster. But we are particularly interested in one collection holding high amount of documents. ( https://gist.github.com/AnkushKhanna/9a472bccc02d9859fce07cb0204862da) Issue: We see

Re: changed query parsing between 4.10.4 and 5.5.3?

Hi Greg, thanks a lot, thats it. After setting q.op to OR it works _nearly_ as before with 4.10.4. But how stupid this? I have in my schema and also had q.op to AND to make sure my default _is_ AND, meant as conjunction between terms. But now I have q.op to OR and defaultOperator in schema to