Maybe you can look into this:
https://lucidworks.com/2015/03/04/solr-suggester/
Which version of Solr are you using?
Regards,
Edwin
On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 at 17:00, Clemens Wyss DEV wrote:
> At the moment we are using spellchecking-component for suggestions which
> is suboptimal, to say the least.
Tomáš,
One thing that causes a clusterstatus call is alias resolution if the
HttpClusterStateProvider is in use instead of the ZkClusterStateProvider.
I've just been fixing spurious error messages generated by this
in SOLR-12938.
-Gus
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 1:08 PM Zimmermann, Thomas <
tzimmerm.
You should until this is resolved. The original purpose of that JIRA
doesn't count any longer, i.e. the speedup aspects since that's been
taken care of though.
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 3:50 PM Wei wrote:
>
> Also I notice this issue is still open:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10816
>
Also I notice this issue is still open:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10816
Does that mean we still need to have stored=true for uniqueKey?
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 2:14 PM Wei wrote:
> I see there is also a docValuesFormat option, what's the default for this
> setting? Performance wi
docValuesFormat="Memory" has been deprecated, so you shouldn't use it.
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 2:14 PM Wei wrote:
>
> I see there is also a docValuesFormat option, what's the default for this
> setting? Performance wise is it good to set docValuesFormat="Memory" ?
>
> Best,
> Wei
>
>
> On Tue, Nov
I see there is also a docValuesFormat option, what's the default for this
setting? Performance wise is it good to set docValuesFormat="Memory" ?
Best,
Wei
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 11:55 AM Erick Erickson
wrote:
> Yes, "the most efficient possible" is associated with that JIRA, so only
> in 7x.
>
Hmmm, ok. The replication failure could lead to the scenario I
outlined, but that's a secondary issue to the update not getting to
the follower in the first place as you say.
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 12:19 PM Jeremy Smith wrote:
>
> Thanks everyone. I added SOLR-12969.
>
>
> Erick - those sound lik
Thanks everyone. I added SOLR-12969.
Erick - those sound like important questions, but I think this issue is
slightly different. In this case, replication is failing even if the leader
never goes down.
From: Erick Erickson
Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2018 2:5
Yes, "the most efficient possible" is associated with that JIRA, so only in 7x.
"Does this still hold if whole index is loaded into memory?"
The decompression part yes, the disk seek part no. And it's also
sensitive to whether the documentCache already has the document.
I'd also make uniqueKey an
Kevin:
Well, let's certainly raise it as a JIRA, blocker or not I'm not sure.
I _think_ the new LIR work done in Solr 7.3 might make it possible to
detect this condition but I'm not totally sure what to do about it.
So let's say the leader gets an update while a follower is down. (one
leader and
I'm sorry I should have included that. We are running Solr 7.2. We use CDCR for
almost all of our collections. We have experienced several intermittent
problems with CDCR, this one seems to be new, at least I hadn't seen it before
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickeric
Erick Erickson - I don't have much time to chase this down. Do you think
this a blocker for 7.6? It seems pretty serious.
Jeremy - This would be a good JIRA to create - we can move the conversation
there to try to get the right people involved.
Kevin Risden
On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 7:57 AM Jeremy
Thanks Yasufumi and Erick.
---. 2. "it depends". Solr will try to do the most efficient thing
possible. If _all_ the fields are docValues, it will return the stored
values from the docValues structure.
I find this jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8344Does
this mean "Solr
What version of Solr? CDCR has changed quite a bit in the 7x code
line so it's important to know the version.
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 10:32 AM Webster Homer
wrote:
>
> Several times I have noticed that the CDCR action=QUEUES will return a
> negative queueSize. When this happens we seem to be mis
Several times I have noticed that the CDCR action=QUEUES will return a negative
queueSize. When this happens we seem to be missing data in the target
collection. How can this happen? What does a negative Queue size mean? The
timestamp is an empty string.
We have two targets for a source. One lo
Hi Shawn,
We¹re equally impressed by how well the server is handling it. We¹re using
Sematext for monitoring and the load on the box has been steady under 1
and not entering a swap state memory wise.
We are 100% certain the traffic is coming from the 3 web hosts running
this code. We have put som
This error comes every request,
in solr client or if i call url in chrome browser or curl from console.
I have no replicas actually for this test but it is NRT type.
There is no writes or another reads on this server (solr cloud) completely
isolated. (version 7.5 single docker container)
I have 6
Not really. It expect to work segment by segment. So it can buffer all doc
from one segment, hit redis and push all results into delegating collector.
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 8:29 PM John Thorhauer
wrote:
> Mikhail,
>
> Thanks for the suggestion. After looking over the PostFilter interface and
>
On 11/6/2018 10:12 AM, Zimmermann, Thomas wrote:
Shawn -
Server performance is fine and request time are great. We are tolerating
the level of traffic, but the server that is taking all the hits is
obviously performing a bit slower than the others. Response times are
under 5MS avg for queries on
Mikhail,
Thanks for the suggestion. After looking over the PostFilter interface and
the DelegatingCollector, it appears that this would require me to query my
outside datastore (redis) for security information once for each document.
This would be a big performance issue. I would like to be able
I should mention I¹m also hanging out in the Solr IRC Channel today under
the nick ³apatheticnow² if anyone wants to follow up in real time during
business hours EST.
On 11/6/18, 11:39 AM, "Shawn Heisey" wrote:
>On 11/6/2018 9:06 AM, Zimmermann, Thomas wrote:
>> For example - 75k request per min
Erik -
This box did have all the leaders for the dozen or so collections we have
when the cloud spun up. We were able to force the leaders for other cores
onto other nodes using the apis, but did not see this traffic load migrate
to the new hosts when leadership changed. All nodes are NRT. The re
On 11/6/2018 9:06 AM, Zimmermann, Thomas wrote:
For example - 75k request per minute going to this one box, and 3.5k RPM to all
other nodes in the cloud.
All of those extra requests on the one box are
"/solr/admin/collections?collection=collectionName&action=CLUSTERSTATUS&wt=javabin&version=2"
My understanding was that we always tried to use the cached version of
this information until either (a) Solr responds in a way that
indicates our cache is out of date, or (b) the TTL on the cache entry
expires. Though there might very well be a code path that behaves
differently as Erick suggests
2. "it depends". Solr will try to do the most efficient thing
possible. If _all_ the fields are docValues, it will return the stored
values from the docValues structure. This prevents a disk seek and
decompress cycle.
However, if even one field is docValues=false Solr will by default
return the
Looks like: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11086
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 8:19 AM Tomáš Hampl wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> i have error while running grouping query by date in collection with 5
> shards. When i try same query on collection with only one shard everything
> works.
>
> *query:*
>
> /
Is the box you're seeing this on the Overseer? Or is it in any other
way "special", like has all the leaders? And I'm assuming all these
are NRT replicas, not TLOG or PULL.
What are you doing when these occur? Queries? Updates? If you're doing
updates, are these coincident with each request? Each
Hi,
i have error while running grouping query by date in collection with 5
shards. When i try same query on collection with only one shard everything
works.
*query:*
/solr/search_cz/select?q=*:*&group=true&group.field=odjezd
*part of schema.xml*
...
*collection create *
/solr/admin/colle
On 11/6/2018 12:52 AM, waseem-farooqui wrote:
{
"document": "Fuzzy based semantic search.pdf",
"md5Hash": "md5",
"rated": [
{
"user": "John",
"comments": "Not Very useful",
"rating": 2,
"date":
Question about CloudSolrClient and CLUSTERSTATUS. We just deployed a 3 server
ZK cluster and a 5 node solr cluster using the CloudSolrClient in Solr 7.4.
We're seeing a TON of traffic going to one server with just cluster status
commands. Every single query seems to be hitting this box for statu
Hi,
It sounds like you are looking for the "Nested Child Documents"[1] and
"Block Join Query Parsers"[2] features in Solr. The terminology is weird
(block join, child/of, parent/which) but it should do what you want.
Do take note of the warning in the docs:
One limitation of indexing nested doc
Hi Toke,
sorry for the late reply. The query i wrote here is edited to hide
production details, but I can post additional info if this helps.
I have tested all of the suggested changes none of these seem to make a
noticeable difference (usually response time and other metrics fluctuate
over
It should be postfilter
https://lucidworks.com/2017/11/27/caching-and-filters-and-post-filters/, I
believe.
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 2:24 PM John Thorhauer
wrote:
> We have a need to check the results of a search against a set of security
> lists that are maintained in a redis cache. I need to b
We have a need to check the results of a search against a set of security
lists that are maintained in a redis cache. I need to be able to take each
document that is returned for a search and check the redis cache to see if
the document should be displayed or not.
I am attempting to do this by cr
Hi,
> 1. For schema version 1.6, useDocValuesAsStored=true is default, so there
> is no need to explicitly set it in schema.xml?
Yes.
> 2. With useDocValuesAsStored=true and the following definition, will Solr
> retrieve id from docValues instead of stored field?
No.
AFAIK, if you define both
Hi Shalin,
> You can expect as many connection evictor threads
I have (whysoever (*)) 27 SolrClient instances instantiated but I see ~95
"Connection Evictor" threads ...
>It turns out that I made a mistake in the patch I committed in...which names
>threads like pool-123-thread-1282.
>So if you
At the moment we are using spellchecking-component for suggestions which is
suboptimal, to say the least. What are best pracitces for suggestions using
Solr?
googling (with excellent suggestions 😉) I came along
https://blog.trifork.com/2012/02/15/different-ways-to-make-auto-suggestions-with-sol
Hi,
It seems a PDFBox issue, I think.
( https://pdfbox.apache.org/2.0/dependencies.html )
Thanks,
Yasufumi
2018年11月6日(火) 16:10 Furkan KAMACI :
> Hi All,
>
> I use Solr 6.5.0 and test OCR capabilities. It OCRs pdf files even it is so
> slow. However, I see that error when I check logs:
>
> o.a.
I am new with Solr and using Spring-data-solr to store my complete **pdf**
files with its contents now there raise a situation in which I want to store
the file rating, that can be rate by list of users means I would have object
something like this in my **DataModel** `List` in which
`FileRating` w
39 matches
Mail list logo
