I think you need to use parameter substitution for those nested queries
since the "boost" parameter takes a white-space delimited sequence of
function queries.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Kamal Kishore Aggarwal
Sent: Tuesday, June 3, 2014 2:22 AM
To:
11 * 11 or 121 query terms, which shouldn't be so bad.
But... maybe the Lucene FST for your synonym list is huge. Someone with
deeper Lucene knowledge would have to address that.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Branham, Jeremy [HR]
Sent: Tuesday, June 3, 2014 3:57
Try to stay with a separate collection/core for each tenant - otherwise
relevancy for document scores gets "polluted" by other tenants, even if you
do use filter queries to isolate what documents get returned for a tenant in
a multi-tenant core.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Origin
docvalues,
right?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson
Sent: Monday, June 2, 2014 10:46 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: change in EnumField configuration - what do you think?
Would both then be supported? I see where it would be easily detectable.
And I
x27;t dug into the new REST API to know the answer.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Archana R
Sent: Monday, June 2, 2014 10:44 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Solr 4.8 synonyms expansion for each primary term
we recently upgraded to Solr 4.8 and we are using REST A
When you restart, how long does it take it hit the problem? And how much
query or update activity is happening in that time? Is there any other
activity showing up in the log?
If you bring up only a single node in that problematic shard, do you still
see the problem?
-- Jack Krupansky
Make sure you checkout from the "tagged" branch, not trunk or the actual
release branch which has updates since the release.
See:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/dev/tags/
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: eShard
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 11:55 AM
To:
rks Search Solr-based product. It re-executes enhanced queries in a
query component. I don't think the source is available though. And I don't
recall if it was cloud-enabled.
See:
http://docs.lucidworks.com/display/lweug/Queries+and+Relevance
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message
Consider using the edismax query parser, which allows you to specify q.alt
which is an alternative query such as "*:". Or use an application layer to
handle the situation before it gets to Solr.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: vit
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014
Explain your use case a little more, but you can define terms as stop words
with a stop filter, which means they won't appear in the index.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Christian Loock
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 5:38 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject:
cases, but my personal
imagination is not at issue for this particular thread.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Heisey
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 9:46 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: wildcard matches in EnumField - what do I need to change in
code to
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Working+with+Enum+Fields
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Elran Dvir
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 2:50 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: wildcard matches in EnumField - what do I need to change in code to
enable wildcard matches?
H
HH:mm:ss'Z'
-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss
-MM-dd
-MM-dd hh:mm:ss
-MM-dd HH:mm:ss
EEE MMM d hh:mm:ss z
EEE, dd MMM HH:mm:ss zzz
, dd-MMM-yy HH:mm:ss zzz
EEE MMM d HH:mm:ss
See:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Uploading+Data+with+Solr+
Post the parsed query itself. Yes, edismax should always generate a
disjunctionmaxquery - in addition to the regexquery.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Lokn
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 1:53 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Regex with local params is not
You might consider an update request processor as an alternative. It runs on
the server and might be simpler. You can even use the stateless script
update processor to avoid having to write any custom Java code.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: T. Kuro Kurosaka
Sent
You could also consider DataStax Enterprise, which integrates Apache
Cassandra as the primary database and Solr for indexing and query.
See:
http://www.datastax.com/what-we-offer/products-services/datastax-enterprise
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Ali Nazemian
Sent
f the XML elements. It
appears that you mangled that message as well! Feel free to post the
complete message here as well.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Manikandan Saravanan
Sent: Monday, May 26, 2014 1:52 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Cc: Varuna Venkatesh
Subject
book". Your SYNONYMS.TXT file would
contain:
macbook,mac book
Only use the synonyms filter at index time. The standard query parsers don't
support phrases for synonyms.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: rachun
Sent: Monday, May 26, 2014 5:26 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apa
.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Yonik Seeley
Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2014 10:58 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Query translation of User Fields
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Jack Krupansky
wrote:
Hmmm... that doesn't sound like what I would
Are you sure that you compiled your code with the proper Solr jars so that
the class signature (extends, implements, and constructors) matches the Solr
4.7.2 jars? I mean, Java is simply complaining that your class is not a
valid value source class of the specified type.
-- Jack Krupansky
Feel free to look at the source code for post.jar. I mean, all it is really
doing is scanning the directory (optionally recursively) and then streaming
each file to Solr.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: benjelloun
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2014 8:15 AM
To: solr-user
Is there a particular reason you are adverse to using post.jar? I mean, if
there is some bug or inconvenience, let us know so we can fix it!
The Solr server itself does not provide any ability to "crawl" file systems
(LucidWorks Search does.) post.jar does provide that convenience.
class, or maybe
you would have to copy and edit it.
Also, note that the delete command also has a commitWithin setting.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Furkan KAMACI
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 6:36 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: How to Disable Commit Option and J
No, but it sure would be nice to have the Elasticsearch feature of supplying
a script for update.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Saumitra Srivastav
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 11:13 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Atomic update by query instead of ID
Is is
Hmmm... that doesn't sound like what I would have expected - I would have
thought that Solr would throw an exception on the "user" field, rather than
simply treat it as a text keyword. File a Jira. Either it's a bug or the doc
is not complete.
-- Jack Krupansky
-
No, I was rejecting BOTH methods 1 and 2. I was suggesting a different
method. I'll leave it to somebody else to describe the method so that it is
easier to understand.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Pavel Belenkovich
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 4:00 AM
To: solr
Yeah, I recall running into infinite loop issues with PDFBox in Solr years
ago. They keep fixing these issues, but they keep popping up again. Sigh.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Siegfried Goeschl
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 4:35 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Your original message had "q=toyota featured:true^100" and also using bq -
both are valid. If either is not working for you, please be specific about
what exactly is not behaving as you expected - what the symptom is.
Sometimes you have to experiment with the boost factor.
-- Jack
cific symptom?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Brian McDowell
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 12:24 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: pdfs
Has anyone had issues with indexing pdf files? Some pdfs are bringing down
Solr completely so that it actually needs to be man
Just add the boost to the keyword: q=toyota^100.
Or, use the dismax or edismax query parsers and then the boost can be
specified for the field: qf=keyword^100.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: manju16832003
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 12:04 AM
To: solr-user
The results will be scored, but only based on terms in q, not terms in fq.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: johnmu...@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 6:41 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Using fq as OR
Interesting!! I did not know that using &qu
Yes.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: vit
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 11:20 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: boosting multivalued fields
is it posiible to boost values of the same field. For example in a query
like
that:
category_id:(2271578^0.5 22718986^0.4
Nothing special for this use case.
This seems to be a use case that I would call "bulk data retrieval - based
on ID".
I would suggest "batching" your requests - limit each request query to, say,
50 or 100 IDs.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Pav
, or add a boosting query
using the bq parameter. The latter approach works for the dismax and edismax
query parsers only.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: johnmu...@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 5:51 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Using fq as OR
Hi
filtering terms to participate in the
document scoring.
In other words, what exactly were you trying to achieve by using fq?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: johnmu...@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 12:19 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Using fq as OR
Unfortunately the same query will be sent to all cores if you use the shards
parameter to query multiple cores.
Is there some characteristic of the first core that is distinct from the
second core so that you could OR the differences between the two?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message
g of documents
that is different?
For the latter, the fq is purely a "filter" that removes documents, but the
terms in fq do not participate in relevance or scoring calculation of
documents, so documents will not get boosted based on the terms present in
fq.
-- Jack Krupansk
il to follow it.
Or, maybe we should enhance Solr to check available memory and log a stern
warning if the index size exceeds system memory when Solr is started.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Heisey
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 1:49 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.
document would make it discontiguous with the rest of the block of
documents.
Just update the block by resending the entire block of documents.
For e previous discussion of this limitation:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/block-join-and-atomic-updates-td4117178.html
-- Jack Krupansky
there are some examples in my e-book that shows how
to map @ and _ to ALPHA.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Ahmet Arslan
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 4:55 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Howto Search word which contains the character "
Hi,
It is speci
addresses.
And then you could output to multiple fields - one for the raw string for
wildcard matches, say, and one as an integer for proximity or range checks.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: SolrUser1543
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 3:04 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject
Read this web page for information about subscribing:
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/discussion.html
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Kamal Kishore Aggarwal
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 6:12 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Subscribe for Solr Mails
Dear Team
Normally a delete-by-query needs to be distributed to all shards since it is
not known which document keys it will affect.
It sounds like SolrCloud does not support the feature you would really like:
support for distrb=false.
You can file a Jira request for a feature "improvement."
What are you using for your default query operator, and do you have
autoGeneratePhraseQueries set to "true" for your field type?
I mean, a query for 192.168.1.4 shouldn't match 192.168.1.3 - unless you
have autoGeneratePhraseQueries set to "false" (the defa
01 k
CD-ROM. => CD-ROM. vs. CD ROM
Finally, the default for the splitOnNumerics attribute is "1" (true), which
is why "abc123xyz" is split into three terms. If you don't want that split,
set splitOnNumerics="0".
There are more details on WDF in my e-book:
sure would be nice to see more substantial and easier
to use support for Payload in Solr.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: ienjreny
Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2014 1:24 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: What is the usage of solr.NumericPayloadTokenFilterFactory
Add the debugQuery=true parameter and look at the "timing" section to see
which search component is consuming the time. Are you using faceting or
highlighting?
7 million documents is actually a fairly small index.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: mizayah
Sent:
exact query matches such as year without expanding
the date to a range for the full interval.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Dmitry Kan
Sent: Friday, May 9, 2014 6:41 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: date range queries efficiency
Hi,
There was a mention eith
For these specific examples, the results should be the same, but mostly
that's because the term is a simple sequence of letters.
I have an extended discussion of characters in terms in my e-book:
http://www.lulu.com/us/en/shop/jack-krupansky/solr-4x-deep-dive-early-access-release-7/
Is the mail list working again yet??
-- Jack Krupansky
Please don't re-use an existing message thread for a new, completely
independent question!
Also, try to make the subject line indicate something about the actual
issue.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: nativecoder
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 10:56 AM
To: solr
Inside of quotes you only have to escape quote and backslash.
Add the debugQuery=true parameter to see exactly how Solr processes
characters and generates queries.
But... in a URL you have to URL-encode URL query parameters:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Query_string
-- Jack Krupansky
nually add that to dates.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: hakanbillur
Sent: Friday, May 9, 2014 4:38 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Indexing DateField timezone problem
<http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/file/n4135079/Capture2.png>
<http://lucene.472066
ry parser:
http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_8_0/queryparser/org/apache/lucene/queryparser/classic/package-summary.html#Escaping_Special_Characters
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Romani Rupasinghe
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 11:14 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: KeywordT
at is your
rationale?
What is this odd "mcat.intent" query response writer type that you are
specifying with the qt parameter?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Aman Tandon
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 1:35 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: distrib=false i
I do have basic coverage for that filter (and all other filters) and the
parameter values in my e-book:
http://www.lulu.com/us/en/shop/jack-krupansky/solr-4x-deep-dive-early-access-release-7/ebook/product-21203548.html
That said, are you sure you want to be using the payload feature of Lucene
One of the hard-core Lucene guys is going to have to help you out. Or you
may have to write some custom code to fix the index for any such shard. If
you have deleted any documents, it may be sufficient to simply optimize the
index.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: yamazaki
Check out HDS from Heliosearch - it comes packaged with Tomcat, ready to go:
http://heliosearch.com/download.html
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Aman Tandon
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2014 8:23 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Easises way to insatll solr cloud
n any case, please clarify your use case.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Gharbi Mohamed
Sent: Friday, May 9, 2014 3:29 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: is it possible for solr to calculate and give back the price of a
product based on its sub-products
Hi,
I am usin
Please post your full field type analyzer. The letter tokenizer should in
fact return "I", "can", and "t" - if it is used properly.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: ienjreny
Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2014 8:28 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
S
Sorry, but you have to create the schema manually, but... you could possibly
get by with Solr schemaless mode to dynamically create the schema based on
the actual data values.
See:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Schemaless+Mode
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message
ad such an overstuffed index.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: [Tech Fun]山崎
Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2014 8:54 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Too many documents Exception
Hello everybody,
Solr 4.3.1(and 4.7.1), Num Docs + Deleted Docs >
2147483647(Integer.MAX_VALUE
Think of debugQuery as your "Solr BFF"!
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: nativecoder
Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2014 7:36 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Help to Understand a Solr Query
Thank you this is what I was looking for all this time
I
alternatives - at least one of the alternatives must match.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: nativecoder
Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2014 4:44 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Help to Understand a Solr Query
When I go through the debug results I f
tly from a
word processor source file will retain smooth curves on characters while a
PDF generated from scanned page images will show heavy pixelation.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Alexandre Rafalovitch
Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2014 1:30 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
S
The term "strict search" is not in the Lucene/Solr nomenclature - it could
mean any number of things.
It sounds as if maybe you want to do a phrase search, looking for an exact
phrase - yes, you can do that by enclosing the phrase in quotes.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Origin
what the document scores look like.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Ravi Solr
Sent: Monday, May 5, 2014 5:41 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Relevancy help
Hello,
I have a weird relevancy requirement. We search news content hence
chronology is very importan
an do
the reindex incrementally (as you replace existing documents) as well if you
don't mind if the difference in relevancy takes an extended time to become
apparent.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Michael Tracey
Sent: Monday, May 5, 2014 4:52 PM
To: solr-user@lu
"dismax" means Disjunction Maximum, which means Lucene takes the highest
scoring clause (field), for each search term. This is effectively an OR of
the clauses.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: nativecoder
Sent: Monday, May 5, 2014 11:21 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.
Read up on the edismax query parser first:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ExtendedDisMax
The "^" operator is known as boosting or field boosting and is used to
influence document scores for relevancy.
It has no analog in SQL.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: n
MappingCharFilterFactory.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Román González
Sent: Monday, May 5, 2014 7:00 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Wildcard malfunctioning
Hi all!
Sorry in advance if this question was posted but I were unable to find it
with search engines
ntity in your
request.
Maybe you should start by telling us what you are trying to achieve, in
plain English.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: nativecoder
Sent: Sunday, May 4, 2014 2:20 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Explain Solr Query Execution
How will a
Wildcards and stemming are incompatible at query time - you need to manually
stem the term before applying your wildcard.
Wildcards are not supported in quoted phrases. They will be treated as
punctuation, and ignored by the standard tokenizer or the word delimiter
filter.
-- Jack Krupansky
analyzed
at index time for wildcard to work.
Ditto is your filed type uses the word delimiter filter with the split
digits option enabled - the alpha and numeric portions will generate
separate terms - and cause a wildcard to fail.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Geepalem
Look at the SolrJ source code and doc.
JavaBin is more of a protocol than a file format.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Elran Dvir
Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2014 2:16 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: How can I convert xml message for updating a Solr index to
simply want to boost
documents containing a phrase - just use the pf, pf2, and pf3 parameters of
edsimax or explicitly boost the phrase, such as "research development"^20.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: ksmith
Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 5:38 AM
To: solr-user@luce
quot; for your text field type.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Kashish
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2014 2:49 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Not allowing exact match with WordDelimiterFilterFactory
Hi,
I am having some problem with WordDelimiterFilte
?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Ed Smiley
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2014 3:48 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: TB scale
Anyone with experience, suggestions or lessons learned in the 10 -100 TB
scale they'd like to share?
Researching optimum design for a Solr
No, neither Lucene nor Solr provide a "mask match" feature. You could write
custom code to emulate such a feature. Elasticsearch appears to have done
that with its "percolate" feature:
http://www.elasticsearch.org/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/search-per
these provide the tools to dynamically add
fields to a schema.
See:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Schemaless+Mode
Dynamic field are a very powerful feature of Solr, but please don't treat
them as a panacea for weak data modeling. Use them only in moderation.
-- Jack
ist, but it is not a substitute for professional review.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: John Thorhauer
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2014 7:10 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: dynamic field assignments
I have a scenario where I would like dynamically assign incoming
do
/ParseDateFieldUpdateProcessorFactory.html
There are some examples in my Solr 4.x Deep Dive e-book.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Niranjan
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2014 12:01 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: While Indexing in Solr getting "SolrException: Invalid Date
String:
.
The simplest approach for now is to do the query-time synonym expansion in
your app layer as a preprocessor.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Ahmet Arslan
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2014 7:38 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: space between search terms
Hi Jack,
I
To resolve that, use a sloppy phrase:
q="indiranagar xyz"~1
Or, set qs=1 for the edismax query parser.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: kumar
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2014 6:34 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: space between search terms
Hi,
I Have a fiel
Make sure your field type has the autoGeneratePhraseQueries="true" attribute
(default is false). q.op only applies to explicit terms, not to terms which
decompose into multiple terms. Confusing? Yes!
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Alistair
Sent: Friday, April
Typically the white space tokenizer is the best choice when the word
delimiter filter will be used.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Heisey
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 11:03 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: WordDelimiterFilterFactory and
And try it with wt=xml ... maybe there's something odd with JSON.
And also with echoParams=all so we can be sure what's really passed.
I suppose if you had an "invariant" for "fl", then fl would be ignored,
but... that would be a less likely scenario.
-- Jack Kr
Also, "*:*" is a constant score query, so the score will always be 1.0. Not
a terribly good example to request the score.
Please provide the Solr query response, with the debug=true parameter so we
can see for ourselves that no score is returned.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Origin
this processor as well.
We could also write a generic script that takes a source and destination
field name and then does a specified operation on it, like add an offset or
multiple by a scale factor.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Sebastien Vachon
Sent: Tuesday
I should have suggested three levels in my question: 1) important to average
users, 2) expert-only, and 3) internal implementation detail. Yes,
expert-only does have a place, but it is good to mark features as such.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hostetter
Sent
therwise URL parsing will treat it
as a space.
See:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Working+with+Dates
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Darniz
Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2014 4:33 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Fetching document by comparing date
Consider the Heliosearch distribution of Solr (HDS) - it comes
pre-configured for Tomcat:
http://heliosearch.com/heliosearch-distribution-for-solr/
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Aman Tandon
Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2014 10:16 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject
all
terms and has a significant boost:
q=see spot run (+see +spot +run)^10
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Croci Francesco Luigi (ID SWS)
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 9:47 AM
To: 'solr-user@lucene.apache.org'
Subject: Search a list of words and returned order
Does your Solr schema match the data output by nutch? It’s up to you to create
a Solr schema that matches the output of nutch – read up on the nutch doc for
that info. Solr doesn’t define that info, nutch does.
-- Jack Krupansky
From: Xavier Morera
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 12:58 PM
To
The regex pattern should match the text of the fragment. IOW, exclude
whatever delimiters are not allowed in the fragment.
The default is:
[-\w ,\n"']{20,200}
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Furkan KAMACI
Sent: Monday, April 7, 2014 10:21 AM
To:
ay evening.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Siegfried Goeschl
Sent: Sunday, April 6, 2014 9:12 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Anyone going to ApacheCon in Denver next week?
Hi folks,
I’m already here and would love to join :-)
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
s the Solr stateless script
update processor.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Alexandre Rafalovitch
Sent: Sunday, April 6, 2014 8:29 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Rounding date indexing to minute
Have you tried date math formulas? Don't need to round u
One technique is to add a copyField directive to your schema, which can use
a wildcard to copy a bunch of fields to a single, combinaed field that you
can query directly, such as rullAll:key.
Or, consider using a multivalued field.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From
The LucidWorks Search query parser lets you use the "all" pseudo-field to
search across all fields.
See:
http://docs.lucidworks.com/display/lweug/Field+Queries
For example:
q = all:some_word
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Ahmet Arslan
Sent: Friday, April 4,
query
term phrase matches exactly.
-- Jack Krupansky
From: Nils Kaiser
Sent: Friday, April 4, 2014 10:10 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Strange behavior of edismax and mm=0 with long queries (bug?)
Hey,
I am currently using solr to recognize songs and people from a list of user
601 - 700 of 2508 matches
Mail list logo
