Hi All,
I'm using the graph query parser to traverse a set of edge documents. An
edge looks like
"id":"edge1", "recordType":"journey", "Date":"2021-03-04T00:00:00Z", "Origin
":"AAC", "OriginLocalDateTime":"2021-03-04T05:00:00Z", "Destination":"AAB",
Lee C
On 25 April 2018 at 00:37, Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote:
> On 4/24/2018 10:26 AM, Lee Carroll wrote:
> > Does the solr cell contrib give access to the files raw content along
> with
> > the extracted metadata?\
>
> That's not usually the kind of
>From memory try the following:
Don't manually commit from client after batch indexing
set soft commit to be a a long time interval. As long as acceptable to run
stale, say 5 mins or longer if you can.
set hard commit to be short (seconds ) to keep everything neat and tidy
regards updates and
Does the solr cell contrib give access to the files raw content along with
the extracted metadata?
cheers Lee C
Hi,
I've ended up processing the doclist in the response twice. Once in the
write method and once in getContent. Its a bit inefficient but i'm only
looking at top doc each time so probably ok.
Is their a better way to do this ?
Cheers lee C
On 22 April 2018 at 13:26, Lee Carroll <lee.a.c
invariants is ignorant of what the params are.
>
> Since your writting custom code anyway, my suggestion would be that
> perhaps you could make your custom ResponseWriter delegate to the javabin
> responsewriter if/when you see that this is an "isShard=true" request?
>
>
>
>
.
lee c
On 19 April 2018 at 19:00, Mikhail Khludnev <m...@apache.org> wrote:
> what if you put it into "defaults"?
>
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 8:42 PM, Lee Carroll <lee.a.carr...@googlemail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I re
be some issues because usually
> it's not a big deal to use one wt for responding user query like (wt=csv)
> and wt=javabin in internal communication between aggregator and slaves like
> it happens in wt=csv query.
>
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 2:19 PM, Lee Carroll <lee.a.c
mages/select?fl=content=id:1=1=csv;
> csv.separator==null
> ?
>
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 1:18 PM, Lee Carroll <lee.a.carr...@googlemail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > sorry cut n paste error i'd get
> >
> > {
> > "responseHeader":{
> &
"response":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"docs":[
{
"content":"my-content-value"}]
}}
but you get my point
On 18 April 2018 at 11:13, Lee Carroll <lee.a.carr...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> for http://lo
April 2018 at 10:55, Mikhail Khludnev <m...@apache.org> wrote:
> Lee, from this description I don see why it can't be addressed by fl,rows
> params. What makes it different form the typical Solr usage?
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 12:31 PM, Lee Carroll <
> lee.a.car
rom describing why you need to create own response writer.
>
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 7:02 PM, Lee Carroll <lee.a.carr...@googlemail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Ok. My expectation was the response writer would not be used until the
> > final serialization of
lave's wt indicated json.
> As far as I know only javabin might be used to distributed search
> underneath. Coordinator itself might yield json.
>
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 4:23 PM, Lee Carroll <lee.a.carr...@googlemail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Sure
> >
> > wit
ud
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 6:56 PM, Lee Carroll <lee.a.carr...@googlemail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > I've created a custom response writer which extends RawResponseWriter.
> The
> > basic operation is to output a single field value from the top matching
>
I've created a custom response writer which extends RawResponseWriter. The
basic operation is to output a single field value from the top matching doc
as the entire response. This works when shards = 1 but fails when shards
are greater than 1.
I throw an error if the field in question is missing
#Ignore, mis-read the comment and its context.
On 13 April 2018 at 13:08, Lee Carroll <lee.a.carr...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm writing a custom response writer to output a very simple rendition of
> a solr result set to clients.
>
> In my tests I do:
Hi all,
I'm writing a custom response writer to output a very simple rendition of a
solr result set to clients.
In my tests I do:
h.getCore().execute(h.getCore().getRequestHandler(null),req,rsp);
which for a q=*:* request object returns a response with a BasicResultContext.
In
The instructions at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/UIMA+Integration to set up
UIMA integration with solr requires an alchemy api key. This is no longer
available as its part of the ibm watson offering.
What is the status of https://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrUIMA ?
Would I be
ecessary when -z is specified BTW. The
> -c will start an _internal_ zookeeper in the absence of a -z
> parameter.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 8:09 AM, Lee Carroll
> <lee.a.carr...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > Hi
> > running bin/solr sta
Hi
running bin/solr start does not start up in cloud mode despite having
ZK_HOST set in /etc/default/solr.in.sh.
running openjdk 1.8
solr 6.5.1 on aws linux
zookeeper 3.4.6 on aws linux (3 node ensemble)
logs look clean both in zookeeper and solr
running bin/solr zk ls / returns
Connecting
Hi,
on solr 4.7 I've ran into a strange issue. Whilst setting up a field I've
noticed in the analysis form when I use a char filter factory (for example
HTMLSCF) with a tokeniser (ST) the analysis chain grinds to a halt. the
char filter does not seem to pass anything into the tokeniser.
Field
B*ll*cks, before posting I spent an hour searching for issues, honest.
Soon as I post within seconds I find
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5800
On 20 October 2015 at 15:21, Lee Carroll <lee.a.carr...@googlemail.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> on solr 4.7 I've ran into
No Alexandre its just Sod's law (http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Sod's+Law)
:-)
Lee C
On 20 October 2015 at 15:38, Alexandre Rafalovitch <arafa...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On 20 October 2015 at 10:26, Lee Carroll <lee.a.carr...@googlemail.com>
> wrote:
> > B*ll*cks, before
Hi
it was jars copied into a solr-zk-cli directory to allow easy running of
solr zk cmd line client. well i think that is what fixed tomcat! I've also
tried with jetty with a clean solr home and that also works and seems a
much cleaner way of running multiple instances (probably more to do with
Hi all
Creating a new collection fails with class not found:
org.apache.solr.handler.component.SearchHandler
Running under tomcat 7.0.59 with solr 4.10.3. Solr app looks to be deployed
ok and the web app looks fine when browsing.
An external zookeeper set up looks fine and the configs are loaded
Hi All,
In solr 4.7 this query
/solr/coreName/select/?q=*:*fl=%27nasty%20value%27rows=1wt=json
returns
{responseHeader:{status:0,QTime:2},response:{numFound:189796,start:0,docs:[{'nasty
value':nasty value}]}}
This is naughty. Has this been seen before / fixed ?
.
-Yonik
http://heliosearch.org - native code faceting, facet functions,
sub-facets, off-heap data
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Lee Carroll
lee.a.carr...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi All,
In solr 4.7 this query
/solr/coreName/select/?q=*:*fl=%27nasty%20value%27rows=1wt=json
at 10:47 AM, Lee Carroll
lee.a.carr...@googlemail.com wrote:
The applications using the data may write solr data to the dom. (I doubt
they do but they could now or in the future. They have an expectation of
trusting the data back from solr).
As a straight forward attack you are right
I think he means a doc for each element. so you have a disease occurrence
index
doc
group1/group
dis1/dis
occurrenceexist/occurrence
unique Field1-1/unique field
/doc
assuming (and its a pretty fair assumption?) most groups have only a subset
of diseases this will be a sparse matrix so just
Hi It looks like when a DIH entity has a delta and delta import query plus
a transformer defined the execution of both query's call the transformer. I
was expecting it to only be called on the import query. Sure we can check
for a null value or something and just return the row during the delta
Hi
I've 2 tables with the following data
table 1
id treatment_list
1 a,b
2 b,c
table 2
treatment id, name
a name1
b name 2
c name 3
Using DIH can you create an index of the form
id-treatment-id name
1a name1
1b
Hi
We are doing a lat/lon look up query using ip address.
We have a 6.5 million document core of the following structure
start ip block
end ip block
location id
location_lat_lon
the field defs are
types
fieldType name=string class=solr.StrField sortMissingLast=true
omitNorms=true/
fieldType
?
Do any parts of the query repeat a lot? Maybe there is room for fq.
Otis
Solr ElasticSearch Support
http://sematext.com/
On Jan 9, 2013 6:08 AM, Lee Carroll lee.a.carr...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hi
We are doing a lat/lon look up query using ip address.
We have a 6.5 million document
I use *analyzer type*=*query* can you use search ?
On 17 December 2012 11:01, Dirk Högemann dirk.hoegem...@googlemail.comwrote:
arr name=filter_queriesstr{!q.op=AND df=cl2Categories_NACE}08
Gewinnung von Steinen und Erden, sonstiger Bergbau/str/arrarr
and flexibility. You could make the
necessary parameter changes in the prepare() method and just make sure that
this safe parameter component comes before the query component in the
list of components for a handler and you should be fine.
Cheers!
Amit
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 5:39 AM, Lee Carroll
Hi Amit
I did not do this via a servlet filter as I wanted the solr devs to be
concerned with solr config and keep them out of any concerns of the
container. By specifying declarative data in a request handler that would
be enough to produce a service uri for an application.
Or have I missed a
Hi we are extending SearchHandler to provide a custom search request
handler. Basically we've added NamedLists called allowed , whiteList,
maxMinList etc.
These look like the default, append and invariant namedLists in the
standard search handler config. In handleRequestBody we then remove params
Cheers, saved the day
Lee C
On 28 September 2012 23:27, Chris Hostetter hossman_luc...@fucit.orgwrote:
: The issue we face is the f5 balancer is returning a cookie which the
client
: is hanging onto. resulting in the same slave being hit for all requests.
...
: My question is can
Hi Billy
see
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrSecurity
One approach is keep master internal, read only slaves with just select
handlers defined in the solr config for public facing requests.
See your app container security docs for other approaches
On 1 October 2012 16:32, Billy Newman
Hi
We have the following solr http server
bean class=org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.CommonsHttpSolrServer
id=solrserver
constructor-arg value=urlToSlaveLoadBalancer /
property name=soTimeout value=1000 /
property name=connectionTimeout value=1000 /
property name=defaultMaxConnectionsPerHost
this seems
like a red herring.
FWIW,
Erick
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Lee Carroll
lee.a.carr...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi
We have the following solr http server
bean class=org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.CommonsHttpSolrServer
id=solrserver
constructor-arg value
this unless and until you have a demonstrated need.
Best
Erick
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:07 AM, Lee Carroll
lee.a.carr...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Erick,
the load balancer in front of the solr servers is dropping the cookie not
the solr server themselves.
are you saying the clients
take a look at
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/QueryElevationComponent
On 20 July 2012 03:48, Siping Liu liu01...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have requirements to place a document to a pre-determined position for
special filter query values, for instance when filter query is
fq=(field1:xyz) place
Hi Bruno
I'm not sure if that makes sense for a query which does not have a boolean
element to it. What is your use-case
On 7 July 2012 18:36, Bruno Mannina bmann...@free.fr wrote:
Dear Solr users,
I have a field name fid defined as:
field name=fid type=string indexed=true stored=true
Hi Bruno,
As described See http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldCollapsing but also
faceting as this often fits the bill
On 7 July 2012 22:27, Bruno Mannina bmann...@free.fr wrote:
Dear Solr users,
I have a field named FID for Family-ID:
field name=fid type=string indexed=true stored=true
see http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPerformanceFactors#OutOfMemoryErrors
On 8 July 2012 12:37, Bruno Mannina bmann...@free.fr wrote:
Hi Lee,
I tried group to my FID field and outch error 500 + outofmemory...
I don't yet tested facets
Thanks,
Bruno
Le 08/07/2012 11:19, Lee Carroll
Sorry can't answer your question directly. However map scale may render
this very tricky or even redundant.
UI may be a better place for a solution rather than the data. Take a look
at https://developers.google.com/maps/articles/toomanymarkers for lots of
options
lee c
On 3 July 2012 03:49,
In your example de-normalising would be fine in a vast number of
use-cases. multi value fields are fine.
If you really want to, see http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Join but make
sure you loose the default relational dba world view first
and only go down that route if you need to.
On 27 June 2012
Sorry you have that link! and I did not see the question - apols
index schema could look something like:
id
name
classList - multi value
majorClassList - multi value
a standard query would do the equivalent of your sql
again apols for not seeing the link
lee c
On 27 June 2012 12:37, Lee
have a field which uses a synonym file of your antonyms and a keep
word filter and use this field in your not query
On 27 June 2012 15:54, RajParakh rajpar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I need to specify an antonym list - similar to synonym list.
Whats the best way to go about it?
Currently, I
If you go down the keep-word route you can return the tags to the
front end app using a facet field query. This often fits with many
use-cases for doc tags.
lee c
On 23 June 2012 22:37, Jack Krupansky j...@basetechnology.com wrote:
One important footnote: the keep words/synonym analyzer
what is your db schema ? do you need to import all the schema ? (128
joined tables ??)
or are the tables all independant ? (if so dump them out and import
them in using csv)
cheers lee c
On 7 June 2012 02:32, Jihyun Suh jhsuh.ourli...@gmail.com wrote:
Each table has 35,000 rows. (35 thousands).
I'm not sure about your approach, turning off most of the features
which produce a similarity measure in a vsm and then wanting to sort
by a similarity could lead to pain. (I don't know your usecase so this
could still be valid)
One approach to, (well what I think your usecase might be...) is to
Take a look at the clustering component
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ClusteringComponent
Consider clustering off line and indexing the pre calculated group memberships
I might be wrong but I don't think their is any faceting mileage here.
Depending upon the use case
you might get some use out of
Vazquez,
Sorry I don't have an answer but I'd love to know what you need this for :-)
I think the logic is going to have to bleed into your search app. In
short copy field and your app knows which to search in.
lee c
On 30 April 2012 20:41, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, I
Your example are not synonyms so i don't think synonyms.txt by itself
is going to work.
This sounds like tagging using a taxonomy. Values written to the field
storing this taxonomy could be like:
livingthing/animal/cat [doc about cats]
livingthing/animal/dog [doc about dogs]
livingthing/animal
Have you looked at external fields?
http://lucidworks.lucidimagination.com/display/solr/Solr+Field+Types#SolrFieldTypes-WorkingwithExternalFiles
you will need a process to do the counts and note the limitation of
updates only after a commit, but i think it would fit your usecase.
On 23
Hi You have a lot of language processing for a field which contains,
at least in your example non words.
Do you need the synonyms, two lots of stemming, etc
what is the field for?
I don't believe that this last point is what actually causes
my unsatisfactory results
it probably is
On 13
and create field types that are more
specific for different field contents, correct?
But still, that does not explain why I have indexed this specific value
EHT2011-2012 and the very same value does not match anything when I
search for it.
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Lee Carroll
lee.a.carr
Does the stats component cache. If not what are the alternatives for
finding Max / Min values of fields for a particular result set.
We think we are running into performance issues with the stats
component (250ms for a query when we issue a query with the stats
component on)
Cheers
content-based recommender so its not CF etc
and its a project so its whatever his supervisor wants.
take a look at solrj should be more natural to integrate your java code with.
(Although not sure if it supports termv ector comp)
good luck
On 26 January 2012 17:27, Walter Underwood
check your defaultOperator, ensure its OR
On 23 January 2012 05:56, jawedshamshedi jawedshamsh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Thanks for the reply..
I am using NGramFilterFactory for this. But it's not working as desired.
Like I have a field article_type that has been indexed using the below
on selection issue another query to get your additional data (if i
follow what you want)
On 22 January 2012 18:53, Dave dla...@gmail.com wrote:
I take it from the overwhelming silence on the list that what I've asked is
not possible? It seems like the suggester component is not well supported
Does
that make more sense?
Ah I see.
I'm not certain but take a look at pivot faceting
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-792
cheers lee c
You could use a synonyms file for the alternative names. That way you
do not need to store only index the alternatives.
For faceting use a field were the analysis chain does not use the
synonyms filter. For search the analysis chain will.
You also get the benefit of only storing the normative
only one field can be a default. use copy field and copy the fields
you need to search into a single field and set the copy field to be
the default. That might be ok depending upon your circumstances
On 25 November 2011 12:46, kiran.bodigam kiran.bodi...@gmail.com wrote:
In my schema i have
do your docs have daily availability ?
if so you could index each doc for each day (rather than have some
logic embedded in your data)
so instead of doc1 (1/9/2011 - 5/9/2011)
you have
doc1 1/9/2011
doc1 2/9/2011
doc1 3/9/2011
doc1 4/9/2011
doc1 5/9/2011
this makes search much easier and
Take a look at facet query. You can facet on a query results not just
terms in a field
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters#facet.query_:_Arbitrary_Query_Faceting
On 25 October 2011 10:56, Erik Hatcher erik.hatc...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not following exactly what you're looking
when replicating your index, but not much else.
Is it worth it? If so, why?
Best
Erick
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 11:07 AM, lee carroll
lee.a.carr...@googlemail.com wrote:
Just as a follow up
it looks like stored fields are stored verbatim for every doc.
hotel index and store dest
this link is on he mailing list recently.
http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/dfa18d52e7e8197c/getting_answers_starting_with_a_requested_string_first#b18e9f922c1e4149
On 18 October 2011 00:59, aronitin aro_ni...@yahoo.com wrote:
Guys,
It's been almost a week but there are no
October 2011 11:54, lee carroll lee.a.carr...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Chris thanks for the response
It's an inverted index, so *tems* exist once (per segment) and those terms
point to the documents -- so having the same terms (in the same fields)
for multiple types of documents in one index
Hi Chris thanks for the response
It's an inverted index, so *tems* exist once (per segment) and those terms
point to the documents -- so having the same terms (in the same fields)
for multiple types of documents in one index is going to take up less
overall space then having distinct
current: bool //for fq which searches only current versions
last_current_at: date time // for date range queries or group sorting
what was current for a given date
sorry if i've missed a requirement
lee c
On 13 October 2011 15:01, Mike Sokolov soko...@ifactory.com wrote:
We have the identical
sorry missed the permission stuff:
I think thats ok if you index the acl as part of the document. That is
to say each version has its own acl. Match users against version acl
data
as a filter query and use last_current_at date as a sort
On 13 October 2011 22:04, lee carroll lee.a.carr
see
http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_4_0/api/org/apache/lucene/search/Similarity.html
On 27 September 2011 16:04, Mark static.void@gmail.com wrote:
I thought that a similarity class will only affect the scoring of a single
field.. not across multiple fields? Can anyone else chime in with
if you have a limited set of searches which need to use this and they
act on a limited known set of fields you can concat fields at index
time and then facet
PK FLD1 FLD2FLD3 FLD4 FLD5 copy45
AB0 AB 0 x yx y
AB1 AB 1 x
Hi Chris,
That makes sense. I was behind fire wall when running both builds. I
thought I was correctly proxied - but maybe the request was being
squashed
by something else before it even got to the firewall.
I've just ran tests again but this time outside of fire wall and all pass.
Thanks a lot
Not sure if this has progressed further but I'm getting test failure
for 3.3 also.
Trunk builds and tests fine but 3.3 fails the test below
(Note i've a new box so could be a silly set up issue i've missed but
i think everything is in place (latest version of java 1.6, latest
version of ant)
I don't think solr conforms to ACID type behaviours for its queries.
This is not to say your use-case is not important
just that its not SOLR's focus. I think its a interesting question but
the solution is probably going to involve rolling your own.
Something like returning 1 user docs and
Hi This looks like a facteing problem.
See
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrFacetingOverview
cheers lee c
On 22 August 2011 11:52, tom135 t.latu...@itspree.pl wrote:
Hello,
I want to use Solr as a search engine. I have indexed data like:
ID | TEXT | CREATION_DATE
Daily increase by 500 000
It really does depend upon what you want to do in your app but from
the info given I'd go for denormalizing by repeating the least number
of values. So in your case that would be book
PageID+BookID(uniqueKey), pageID, PageVal1, PageValn, BookID, BookName
On 10 August 2011 09:46, directorscott
some text some text some text
I wonder which index structure is better.
lee carroll wrote:
It really does depend upon what you want to do in your app but from
the info given I'd go for denormalizing by repeating the least number
of values. So in your case that would be book
Hi I might be wrong as I've not tried it out to be sure but from the wiki docs:
These parameters may be combined in any way.
Example of generateWordParts=1 and catenateWords=1:
PowerShot - 0:Power, 1:Shot 1:PowerShot
(where 0,1,1 are token positions)
does that fit the bill ?
On 9 August 2011
Hi
Do Stored field values get added to the index for each document field
combination literally or is a pointer used ?
I've been reading http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_4_0/fileformats.pdf
and I think thats the case but not 100% so thought I'd ask.
In logical terms for stored fields do we get this
Hi Gabriele,
Did you index any docs with your new field ?
The results will just bring back docs and what fields they have. They won't
bring back null fields just because they are in your schema. Lucene
is schema-less.
Solr adds the schema to make it nice to administer and very powerful to use.
Hi Filype,
in the response you should have a list of fq arguments something like
arr name=fq
strfield:facetValue/str
strfield:FacetValue/str
/arr
use this to set your inputs to be selected / checked
On 29 June 2011 23:54, Filype Pereira pereira.fil...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am looking
hi
I'm looking at setting up multi core indices but also have an exiting
index. Can I run
this index along side new index set up as cores. On a dev machine
I've experimented with
simply adding solr.xml in slor home and listing the new cores in the
cores element but this breaks the existing
index.
Hi Markus
I've seen similar issue before (but not with solr) when processing files as xml.
In our case the problem was due to processing a utf16 file with a byte
order mark. This presents itself as
0x to the xml parser which is not used by utf8 (the bom unicode
would be represented as efbfbf
Hi Tod,
A list of keywords would be fine in a non multi valued field:
keywords : xxx yyy sss aaa
multi value field would allow you to repeat the field when indexing
keywords: xxx
keywords: yyy
keywords: sss
etc
On 27 June 2011 16:13, Tod listac...@gmail.com wrote:
This was a little
time.
2011/6/22 lee carroll lee.a.carr...@googlemail.com
Hi are you using synonyms ?
On 22 June 2011 10:30, Alexander Ramos Jardim
alexander.ramos.jar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
I am getting some doubts about how to correctly understand the debugQuery
output. I have a field named
Hi Roy,
You have no relationship between time and date due to the
de-normalising of your data.
I don't have a good answer to this and I guess this is a classic question.
One approach is maybe to do the following:
make sure you have field collapsing available. trunk or a patch maybe
index not
try this mail list
http://docs.jquery.com/Discussion
or this doc
http://api.jquery.com/jQuery.each/
On 21 June 2011 07:32, Romi romijain3...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, for enabling highlighting i want to parse json object. for readilibility
i included xml format of that json object. please tell me
Can your front end app normalize the q parameter. Either with a drop
down or a type a head derived from the values in the specialties
field. that way q will match value(s) in your facet results. I'm not
sure what you are trying to achieve though so maybe i'm off the mark.
On 22 June 2011 04:37,
Oh sorry forgot to also type:
Often facet fields are not stemmed or heavily analysed. The facet
values are from the index.
On 22 June 2011 08:21, lee carroll lee.a.carr...@googlemail.com wrote:
Can your front end app normalize the q parameter. Either with a drop
down or a type a head derived
Hi Bill, can you explain a little bit more around why you need this.
Knowing the motivation
might suggest a different solution not just involving faceting.
On 22 June 2011 08:49, Bill Bell billnb...@gmail.com wrote:
You can type q=cardiology and match on cardiologist. If stemming did not
work
Hi Bill,
So that part works. Then when I output the facet, I need a different
behavior than the default. I need
The facet to only output the value that matches (scored) - NOT ALL VALUES
in the multiValued field.
I think it makes sense?
Why do you need this ? If your use case is faceted
Hi are you using synonyms ?
On 22 June 2011 10:30, Alexander Ramos Jardim
alexander.ramos.jar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
I am getting some doubts about how to correctly understand the debugQuery
output. I have a field named itemName in my index. This is a text field,
just that. When I
as a
facetvalue to the user.
The same thing goed for the facets that are related to family doctors. They
are returned as well, thus making it even moren unclear for the end-user.
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 2:27 PM, lee carroll
lee.a.carr...@googlemail.comwrote:
Hi Bill,
So that part works. Then when I
name=parsedquery*content:past content:past*/str
I was expecting the query to get parsed into content:past only and not
content:past content:past.
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:12 AM, lee carroll
lee.a.carr...@googlemail.comwrote:
do you mean a phrase query? past past
can you give some more detail
your data is being used to build an inverted index rather than being
stored as a set of records. de-normalising is fine in most cases. what
is your use case which requires a normalised set of indices ?
2011/6/18 François Schiettecatte fschietteca...@gmail.com:
You would need to run two
1 - 100 of 172 matches
Mail list logo