haven't tried any of this, so no guarantees, but they are at least
worth a try!
Upayavira
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013, at 06:17 AM, SolrLover wrote:
I am trying to use the below query to boost the score of dismax component
but
it doesn't seem to work ..
str name=q
_query_:{!dismax qf=Fname v
I'm not entirely clear about your question. However, in replication, you
should never commit docs directly to your slave, it will mess up the
synchronisation of your indexes, and hence mess up your replication. If
that's what you are proposing, don't do it!
Upayavira
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013, at 08
fl is on the server side. Try it in a browser and you'll see that.
Upayavira
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013, at 10:44 PM, Matt Lieber wrote:
Hi,
I only want to return one field in the documents being returned from my
query.
I know there is the 'fl' parameter, which is described in the
documentation
still starts. I'm assuming that
Jetty would still listen on port 8983, but it wouldn't initialise the
Solr webapp:
java -DzkRun -DzkEnsembleOnly
-DzkHosts=zkhost01:9983,zkhost02:9983,zkhost03:9983 -jar start.jar
Is this possible? If it is, I'm happy to have a go at making it happen.
Upayavira
are unfamiliar with ZooKeeper, getting it up and
running can be a challenge (I've seen quite a few people fail at it
during training scenarios).
Upayavira
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013, at 03:21 PM, Timothy Potter wrote:
Curious what the use case is for this? Zookeeper is not an HTTP
service so loading
Make your two fq clauses separate fq params? Would be better for your
caches, and would mean the tag is easily associated with the whole fq
querystring.
Upayavira
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013, at 03:14 AM, 张智 wrote:
solr 4.3
this is my query request params:
lst name=responseHeaderint name=status0
If they ask, tell them that Solr *is* a database. Databases store their
stuff on a file system, so your data is gonna end up there in the end.
Putting Solr indexes inside a database is like storing mysql tables in
Oracle.
Upayavira
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013, at 08:18 PM, Sagar Jadhav wrote:
I think
And be sure to re-index your content.
Upayavira
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013, at 11:28 AM, Jeroen Steggink wrote:
Hi Alexander,
This is because you have length normalization enabled for that field.
http://ir.dcs.gla.ac.uk/wiki/Length_Normalisation
If you want it disabled set the following
Have a look at the DedupUpdateProcessorFactory, which may help you.
Although, I'm not sure if it works with multivalued fields.
Upayavira
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013, at 02:34 PM, tuedel wrote:
Hello everybody,
i have tried to make use of the UniqFieldsUpdateProcessorFactory in
order to achieve
And if Solr has to spit it out, perhaps you could do that with a simple
salt transform or velocity template.
Upayavira
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013, at 12:30 AM, Learner wrote:
Might not be useful but a work around would be to divide all scores by
max
score to get scores between 0 and 1
field length normalisation is based upon the number of terms in a field,
not the number of characters in a term. I guess with multivalued string
fields, that would mean a field with lots of values (but one match)
would score lower than one with only one matching value.
Upayavira
On Fri, Jun 28
You're wanting to make your search more fuzzy. You could try phonetic
search, but that's very fuzzy. Go to the analysis tab in the admin UI.
Locate the 'phonetic' field type in the drop down, and you can see what
will happen to terms when they are converted to phonetic equivalents.
Upayavira
you might use proximity. low blood pressure~6 might match #1 and #2
but not #3.
It says find phrases that require six or less position moves in order to
match my terms as a phrase.
Upayavira
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013, at 11:10 AM, venkatesham.gu...@igate.com wrote:
My search query is having
versions.
So, a re-index will set you in far better stead, if it is at all
possible.
Upayavira
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013, at 06:37 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
bq: I'm not sure if Solr 4.3 will be able to read Solr 1.4 indexes
Solr/Lucene explicitly try to read _one_ major revision backwards.
Solr 3.x
in the
same JVM as the client - i.e. no HTTP transport. It could be a useful
way to do off-line index creation,
I've never used it though so can't vouch for it.
Upayavira
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013, at 09:43 PM, Guido Medina wrote:
Never heard of embedded Solr server, isn't better to just use lucene
can you give an example?
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013, at 09:08 AM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
On a Solr 4.1 install I see that queries with use the fq parameter
take a long time (upwards of 120 seconds), both on the standard Lucene
query parser and also with edismax. I have added the {!cache=false}
As much as possible, use new configs. Take fieldType definitions from
your 4.x example dir, don't use the old ones. e.g. if you use the old
date field type, it won't be usable in various ways (e.g. in the MS()
function).
Upayavira
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013, at 11:00 AM, Sandeep Gupta wrote:
Thanks
It is all new, and as yet unreleased. It still has more work needed on
formatting, etc, so I guess you could say, make of it what you will, and
don't yet assume it will always be up and available.
Upayavira
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013, at 04:25 PM, Luis Lebolo wrote:
This page never came up on any
. Then
subscribe from the new address.
If you have difficulties with unsubscribing, then a mail administrator
can help you sort it.
Upayavira
What type of field are you grouping on? What happens when you distribute
it? I.e. what specifically goes wrong?
Upayavira
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013, at 09:12 PM, Bryan Bende wrote:
I was reading this documentation on Result Grouping...
http://docs.lucidworks.com/display/solr/Result+Grouping
give you a new field telling you how many times the
term 1000 appears in the authorid field for each document.
Upayavira
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013, at 09:34 AM, Flavio Pompermaier wrote:
Hi to everybody,
I have some multiValued (single-token) field, for example authorid and
itemid, and what I'd like
default.
I typed the syntax below from memory, so I might not have got it exactly
right.
Upayavira
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013, at 10:22 AM, Flavio Pompermaier wrote:
So, in order to achieve that feature I have to declare my fileds
(authorid
and itemid) with termVectors=true termPositions=true
The only way is using a frange (function range) query:
q={!frange l=0 u=10}my_external_field
Will pull out documents that have your external field with a value
between zero and 10.
Upayavira
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013, at 09:02 PM, Arun Rangarajan wrote:
http://docs.lucidworks.com/display/solr
rounding UpdateProcessors [1] that would allow you to do
this within Solr itself.
It'd be great if these were included in 4.4 :-) (hint to committers)
Upayavira
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4772
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013, at 11:14 AM, Jakob Frank wrote:
Hi all,
is it possible using
Create a new RequestHandler config, say /distrib. Requests will be
forwarded to /select, which doesn't have the shards parameter, and
everything will be just fine.
Upayavira
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013, at 02:17 PM, medley wrote:
Thanks.
It is working now and the QTime has been divided by 10.
I
happens is the best 'n' matches,
so exactly how those 'n' matches were located doesn't matter
particularly.
Simpler answer: try it!
Upayavira
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013, at 11:25 PM, Chris Toomey wrote:
What are the restrictions/limitations w.r.t. joins when using SolrCloud?
Say I have a 3-node
Or use update processors, such as the script update processor. Have one
field that is for needing purposes, and another that is for
storage/display.
If the point is to obscure the account number, shipping it in the HTML
and having CSS do it is too late, isn't it?
Upayavira
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013
a SolrCloud collection to use different configs within
the same collection? I'm not sure you can.
Upayavira
that, it isn't possible to
access the Highlighter components in the core's configuration.
Thoughts? Is this a useful feature?
Upayavira
in your scoring, but
may be better than a zero score in the meantime!
Upayavira
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013, at 05:21 AM, Joe Zhang wrote:
So, the reason is taht I'm getting zero values on FieldNorm.
documentation
tells me that there are 3 factors in play here:
- LengthNorm -- can this be zero
already. Is there more to it than that?
Upayavira
If they are running on port 8983, then you just use localhost:8983
instead of remoteserver:80. Those URLs will be used from the solr server
itself, so localhost should work.
Upayavira
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013, at 10:32 AM, medley wrote:
Hello,
I have this kind of url :
http://remoteserver
code they touched. See if you can find a way to add
something there.
Upayavira
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013, at 08:52 AM, Avner Levy wrote:
I have a core with millions of records.
I want to add a custom handler which scan the existing documents and
update one of the field (delete and add document
use to fix this. There is a
distributed IDF ticket in JIRA, maybe that is mature enough and might
help you.
Upayavira
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013, at 01:56 AM, Learner wrote:
Hi,
Sorry if its a very basic question but I am pretty new to SolrCloud and I
am
trying to understand the underlying mechanism
What version of Solr? I had something like this on 4.2.1. Upgraging to
4.3 sorted it.
Upayavira
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013, at 09:37 AM, Ophir Michaeli wrote:
Hi,
I built a 2 shards and 2 replicas system that works ok on a local
machine, 1
zookeeper on shard 1.
It appears ok on the solar
With two queries.
I'm not sure there's another way to do it. Unless you were prepared to
get coding, and implement another SearchComponent, but given that you
can achieve it with two queries, that seems overkill to me.
Upayavira
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013, at 10:59 AM, Prathik Puthran wrote:
Hi
debugQuery=true adds an extra block of XML to the bottom that will give
you extra info.
Alternatively, add fl=*,[explain] to your URL. That'll give you an extra
field in your output. Then, view the source to see it structured
properly.
Upayavira
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013, at 02:52 PM, Joe Zhang
get you the result you want.
Thus, exact phrase matches are boosted 10, docs that contain some of the
words are boosted 5, and fuzzy matches effectively get a boost of 1 (the
default).
Upayavira
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013, at 08:46 AM, Daniel Mosesson wrote:
What I am looking to do is take field
Your fq query is:
fq=asset_type:MUSIC ALBUM
This is actually interpreted as:
fq=asset_type:MUSIC text:ALBUM
You probably want:
fq=asset_type:MUSIC ALBUM
or
fq=asset_type:(+MUSIC +ALBUM)
or even:
fq:{!term f=asset_type}MUSIC ALBUM
Upayavira
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013, at 03:57 PM, Prathik Puthran
you have likely indexed it as a text/analysed field, not as a string
field. Your usage suggests that MUSIC ALBUM should be a single term,
thus you should index it as a string field.
Upayavira
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013, at 05:21 PM, Prathik Puthran wrote:
MUSIC ALBUM is the value of one of the field
the right config for the
TieredMergePolicy, and therefore don't get to use it, seeing the old
behaviour which does require periodic optimise.
Upayavira
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013, at 07:21 PM, Petersen, Robert wrote:
Hi Otis,
Right I didn't restart the JVMs except on the one slave where I
Use command line Xalan, debug the stylesheet outside of Solr. You can
save the XML output to disk, and then transform that with xalan.
Upayavira
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013, at 10:45 PM, O. Olson wrote:
Hi,
I am attempting to transform the XML output of Solr using the
XsltResponseWriter
.
Changing the status of a publication would require a single document in
the 'pubs' core to be changed, rather than re-indexing all documents.
Does this hit what you are trying to achieve?
Upayavira
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013, at 03:51 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
Correct.
Generally, I think most apps
, at this point, you can only search on them when they are
in another core, you cannot facet or sort, meaning join queries won't
work for you.
Upayavira
Solr, rename collection1 to another name, change the
references to it in solr.xml, then restart Solr.
Upayavira
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013, at 06:41 PM, bbarani wrote:
Erick,
Thanks a lot for your response.
Just to confirm if I am right, I need to use solr.xml even if I change
the
folder
Can you give examples? Show your field type config, the search terms you
used.
Also, did you reindex after changing your field type? As the index will
be written using the analyser that was active at the time of indexing,
so maybe your index still contains stop words.
Upayavira
On Sun, Jun 9
You haven't stated why figh is correct and sight isn't. Is it because
the first letter is different?
Upayavira
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013, at 02:10 PM, కామేశ్వర రావు భైరవభట్ల wrote:
Hi,
I have a problem where our text corpus on which we need to do search
contains many misspelled words. Same word
something?
Upayavira
then you press space after Jason.
Upayavira
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013, at 07:25 AM, Prathik Puthran wrote:
My use case is I want to search for any substring of the indexed string
and
the Suggester should suggest the indexed string. What can I do to make
this
work?
Thanks,
Prathik
On Thu, Jun 6
can use the cloud-scripts/zkCli.sh file in the example dir to upload
it.
Upayavira
documents with an old
last_indexed, and push them for re-indexing. If you get the full 100
docs, you make a subsequent request immediately. If you get less than
100 back, you know you're up-to-date and can wait, say, 30s before
making another request.
Upayavira
On Wed, May 29, 2013, at 12:00 PM, Dotan
On Wed, May 29, 2013, at 09:34 PM, bbarani wrote:
Check out..
wiki.apache.org/solr/LanguageAnalysis
For some reason the above site takes long time to open..
There's a known performance issue with the wiki. Admins are working on
it.
Upayavira
into the index.
Upayavira
On Tue, May 28, 2013, at 07:44 AM, Arkadi Colson wrote:
Is it ok to just change the multivalue attribute to true and reindex the
message module data? There are also other modules indexed on the same
schema with multivalued = false. Will it become a problem?
BR,
Arkadi
anything. But I have to say, I've never tried
that.
Thus - changing the schema will only impact on future indexing. Whether
your existing index will still be valid depends upon the changes you are
making.
Upayavira
SolrMeter?
Upayavira
On Sun, May 26, 2013, at 03:38 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
I'd like to run a repeatable test of having Solr ingest a corpus of
docs on disk, to measure the speed of some alternative things plugged
in.
Anyone have some advice to share? One approach would be a quick
summer sun would also match. However, with a gap of 100 for a
multivalued field, summer and sun would be considered 101 positions
apart - as such they're not next to each other and therefore wouldn't
constitute a phrase.
Upayavira
Have you tried 4.3 yourself? I'm sure it wouldn't be hard to do a simple
comparison on that feature.
Upayavira
On Fri, May 24, 2013, at 03:00 AM, Kazuaki Hiraga wrote:
Thank you for your comment.
Due to historical reasons, Our organization uses trunk version of
Solr-4.0, which is a bit old
* have a value in the text field: q=-text[* TO
*]
Upayavira
On Fri, May 24, 2013, at 12:23 AM, Shankar Sundararaju wrote:
Hi Erick,
Here's the output after turning on the debug flag:
*q=text:()debug=query*
yields
response
lst name=responseHeader
int name=status0/int
int name=QTime17
From looking at the ReplicationHandler code, it looks like if you hit it
with a 'details' request, it'll show you the details of the most recent
backup, including file count, status and completion time.
Upayavira
On Mon, May 20, 2013, at 08:46 AM, Furkan KAMACI wrote:
Ooops, you didn't say
implementation that you can include in your Solr setup. Or, if
you make it generic enough, offer it back as a contribution that can be
included in future Solr releases.
Upayavira
On Mon, May 20, 2013, at 12:14 PM, Sandeep Mestry wrote:
I doubt if that will be the correct approach as it will be hard
I can't give you much advice on the topic. I have reviewed the
HighlightComponent and found it complex and hard to follow, so expect it
to be challenging.
Upayavira
On Mon, May 20, 2013, at 01:28 PM, Sandeep Mestry wrote:
Thanks Upayavira for that valuable suggestion.
I believe overriding
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HierarchicalFaceting
On Wed, May 15, 2013, at 09:44 AM, varsha.yadav wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I am working on Hierarchical Faceting. I am indexing location of
document with their state and district.
I would like to find counts of every country with state count and
India/Maharastra
India/Maharastra/Pune
India/Maharastra/Pune/Dapodi
These fields can be multivalued.
Upayavira
On Wed, May 15, 2013, at 12:29 PM, varsha.yadav wrote:
Hi
I go through that but i want to index multiple location in single
document and a single location have multiple
Look at the source code for SolrJ, you'll find it is just a glorified
HashMap, and you might find a way to interact with it that suits you (I
think the end URL is just the result of calling toString() on the
HashMap).
Upayavira
On Tue, May 14, 2013, at 10:13 AM, Luis Cappa Banda wrote:
I know
need to retrieve all docs, you should sort by some static ID, and
grab them in batches, using range queries on that ID.
Upayavira
On Tue, May 14, 2013, at 04:34 PM, Furkan KAMACI wrote:
When I make a query:
:8983/solr/select?q=*:*
I have numFound: 4264579
and then when I make that query
Multiple fq params are ANDed. So if you have fq=clause1 AND clause2, you
should implement that as fq=clause1fq=clause2. However, if you want
fq=clause1 OR clause2, you have no choice but to keep it as a single
filter query.
Upayavira
On Mon, May 13, 2013, at 06:55 PM, Furkan KAMACI wrote:
Jason
I think you can put it in your data dir and it'll get reloaded on
commit. Try it and report back.
Upayavira
On Mon, May 13, 2013, at 06:01 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
Yes, restart Solr. Not to reindex, but simply to reload the file.
Well... depending on where you use the protected words, you
If you're using the latest Solr, then you should be able to do it the
other way around:
q=+location:bookshelf {!term f=myFieldName}G 23/60 12
You might also find the trick I mentioned before useful:
q=+location:bookshelf {!term f=myFieldName v=$productCode}productCode=G
23/60 12
Upayavira
the comma with a dot before it gets to be indexed.
Upayavira
On Wed, May 8, 2013, at 10:28 AM, Gora Mohanty wrote:
On 8 May 2013 14:48, be...@bkern.de be...@bkern.de wrote:
I will index for example:
field name=price19,95/field
field name=price25,45/field
I can only float with numbers with dots
={!term f=yourFieldName v=$productCode}productCode=G 23/60 12
which allows you to present the code as a separate request parameter.
Upayavira
synced, you can switch your app to use
this new collection, thus publishing your new index. You can then delete
the cores on the boxes you were using for indexing.
Now, that's not transparent, but would be do-able.
Upayavira
On Mon, May 6, 2013, at 01:37 PM, David Parks wrote:
I'm less concerned
There is no way to identify *which* synonyms triggered in your search
output.
You could implement a synonyms search component, that looks in the
stored values of configured fields for synonyms, and adds another block
of XML to the output. This old be useful component.
Upayavira
On Mon, May 6
of
undeleted docs is the same which is a good thing.
Do queries against each replica for a shard, with distrib=false, and see
whether the results are the same.
Upayavira
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013, at 09:14 AM, Cool Techi wrote:
Shouldnt the number of docs across shards be same, I can see a difference
Shard
You specify it as a default parameter for a requestHandler in your
solrconfig.xml, giving a default value for defType. Not sure that you
can set a default that will cover filter queries too.
Upayavira
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013, at 05:46 PM, Roman Chyla wrote:
Makes sense, thanks. One more question
Perhaps you should describe the problem you are tryin to solve. There
may be other ways to solve it.
Upayavira
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013, at 01:08 AM, davers wrote:
I would like to use the Query Elevation Component. As I understand it
only
elevates based on term. I would also like it to consider
it, without any intervention.
Upayavira
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013, at 08:36 AM, Furkan KAMACI wrote:
Hi Shawn;
I am sorry but what kind of Load Balancing is that? I mean does it check
whether some leaders are using much CPU or RAM etc.? I think a problem
may
occur at such kind of scenario: if some
I cannot say that I have researched it, but I have always taken it to be
random.
Upayavira
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013, at 12:23 PM, Furkan KAMACI wrote:
Thanks for your detailed explanation. However you said:
It will then choose one of those hosts/cores for each shard, and send a
request to them
Might be obvious, but just in case - remember that you'll need to
re-index your content once you've added docValues to your schema, in
order to get the on-disk files to be created.
Upayavira
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013, at 03:16 PM, John Nielsen wrote:
I apologize for the slow reply. Today has been
It is supposed to be one leader per shard, yes.
Upayavira
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013, at 01:21 PM, Furkan KAMACI wrote:
Does number of leaders at a SolrCloud is equal to number of shards?
render some features
non-functioning.
For example, I have an index in that situation. My date fields were of
type DateField not TrieDateField, meaning I could not use them in boost
functions.
If you can, try to think of and plan a way to re-index your content.
Upayavira
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013, at 12
I'd suggest using the analyze tab in the admin UI to unpick what is
going on. You can play with scenarios there without having to waste
round trips indexing stuff.
Upayavira
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013, at 08:25 AM, meghana wrote:
In solr , I have text as like below format.
1s: This is very nice
{
blah.blah.blah
assertEquals(response.getResults().getNumFound(), 1);
}
}
Neither of these methods get called when I execute the test. Any ideas
what's up?
Upayavira
Many thanks Yonik!
Upayavira
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013, at 09:32 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 7:33 AM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013, at 12:22 PM, Upayavira wrote:
I'm sure the best way for me to solve this issue myself is to ask it
publicly, so
understand, the Lucene query parser should combine these two
with an implicit OR, no?
Upayavira
it to Solr providing a tr= parameter that
points to an XSLT stylesheet which transforms your XML into an
adddoc format.
Upayavira
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013, at 10:36 AM, Max Bo wrote:
Thank you.
I changed it and now it works.
But is there any possibility to make the given timestamp
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013, at 12:22 PM, Upayavira wrote:
I'm sure the best way for me to solve this issue myself is to ask it
publicly, so...
If I have two {!join} queries that select a collection of documents
each, how do I create a filter query that combines their results?
If I do fq={!join
multiple tiers at play
meaning you can have more than ten segments.
There's also, I believe, properties that define the maximum size on disk
for a segment and the like that can prevent merges from happening.
Upayavira
That is the structure of your content? Is it formatted in the same XML
structure as the example data is? What URL are you posting to?
Upayavira
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013, at 02:08 PM, Max Bo wrote:
Hello,
I'm very new to Solr and I come to an unexplainable point by myself so I
need your help
compatible_productZ: 45, 85, 96
Then you can search for: q=compatible_productB: 5
This will find you all documents that are compatible with productB
version 5.
Upayavira
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013, at 03:04 PM, It-forum wrote:
Hello All,
I'd like to be able to index documents containing criteria and values
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013, at 02:51 PM, Michael Long wrote:
On 04/08/2013 09:41 AM, Upayavira wrote:
How many documents do you have? How big are the files on disk?
2,795,601 and the index dir is 50G
Note it says segments per tier, you may have multiple tiers at play
meaning you can have
Mark, have hunted, but not found docs for this feature. Can you point me
at something? It is a very useful feature.
Thx!!
Upayavira
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013, at 12:22 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
4.2 and 4.2.1 have collection aliasing (similar to what we had with
SolrCore aliasing at one point). You can
Thx, very useful.
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013, at 02:44 PM, bradhill99 wrote:
I think the api is :
http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/collections?action=CREATEALIASname=aliascollections=collection1,collection2,...
And you can do query like:
http://localhost:8983/solr/alias/select?... And it will
at index time and at query time, so stemmed
terms are stored in your index, and also, as you are seeing, stemming
happens on your query terms. You can use the 'analyze' option in the
admin interface to see what happens to terms at query/indexing time for
your various field definitions.
Upayavira
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013, at 11:36 AM, vsl wrote:
So why Solr does not return proper document?
You're gonna have to give us a bit more than that.
What is wrong with the documents it is returning?
Upayavira
: Found binding in
[jar:file:/Users/upayavira/.m2/repository/org/slf4j/slf4j-log4j12/1.7.2/slf4j-log4j12-1.7.2.jar!/org/slf4j/impl/StaticLoggerBinder.class]
SLF4J: Found binding in
[jar:file:/Users/upayavira/.m2/repository/org/slf4j/slf4j-jdk14/1.6.4/slf4j-jdk14-1.6.4.jar!/org/slf4j/impl
Why don't you index all ancestor classes with the document, as a
multivalued field, then you could get it in one hit. Am I missing
something?
Upayavira
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013, at 01:59 AM, Jack Park wrote:
Hi Otis,
That's essentially the answer I was looking for: each shard (are we
talking
Not sure, but if you put it in the data dir, I think it picks it up and
reloads on commit.
Upayavira
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013, at 09:11 AM, Kaneyama Genta wrote:
Dear all,
I investigating how to update synonyms.txt.
Some people says CORE RELOAD will reload synonyms.txt.
But solr wiki says
While you're in that mode, could you please add 'Upayavira'.
Thanks!
Upayavira
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013, at 02:41 PM, Steve Rowe wrote:
On Mar 25, 2013, at 10:32 AM, Swati Swoboda sswob...@igloosoftware.com
wrote:
Can I be added to the contributors group? Username sswoboda.
Added to solr
Use an EdgeNGramFilterFactory in your analysis time query parser. But
note this will significantly increase the number of terms you are
searching for, which will hit performance.
Upayavira
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013, at 03:47 PM, Niklas Langvig wrote:
Hi
How can in solr serach for all documents
Something is stripping your punctuation before it gets to your synonym
filter. Presumably this is the StandardTokenFilter. Try it with the
WhitespaceFilterFactory.
Also be careful to URL encode plus signs in queries - they represent a
space in a URL.
Upayavira
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013, at 10:52 PM
501 - 600 of 854 matches
Mail list logo
