graph traversal filter which uses document value in the query

Hi All, I'm using the graph query parser to traverse a set of edge documents. An edge looks like "id":"edge1", "recordType":"journey", "Date":"2021-03-04T00:00:00Z", "Origin ":"AAC", "OriginLocalDateTime":"2021-03-04T05:00:00Z", "Destination":"AAB",

Re: solr cell: write entire file content binary to index along with metadata

Lee C On 25 April 2018 at 00:37, Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote: > On 4/24/2018 10:26 AM, Lee Carroll wrote: > > Does the solr cell contrib give access to the files raw content along > with > > the extracted metadata?\ > > That's not usually the kind of

Re: Preventing solr cache flush when committing

>From memory try the following: Don't manually commit from client after batch indexing set soft commit to be a a long time interval. As long as acceptable to run stale, say 5 mins or longer if you can. set hard commit to be short (seconds ) to keep everything neat and tidy regards updates and

solr cell: write entire file content binary to index along with metadata

Does the solr cell contrib give access to the files raw content along with the extracted metadata? cheers Lee C

Re: custom response writer which extends RawResponseWriter fails when shards > 1

Hi, I've ended up processing the doclist in the response twice. Once in the write method and once in getContent. Its a bit inefficient but i'm only looking at top doc each time so probably ok. Is their a better way to do this ? Cheers lee C On 22 April 2018 at 13:26, Lee Carroll <lee.a.c

Re: custom response writer which extends RawResponseWriter fails when shards > 1

invariants is ignorant of what the params are. > > Since your writting custom code anyway, my suggestion would be that > perhaps you could make your custom ResponseWriter delegate to the javabin > responsewriter if/when you see that this is an "isShard=true" request? > > > >

Re: custom response writer which extends RawResponseWriter fails when shards > 1

. lee c On 19 April 2018 at 19:00, Mikhail Khludnev <m...@apache.org> wrote: > what if you put it into "defaults"? > > On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 8:42 PM, Lee Carroll <lee.a.carr...@googlemail.com > > > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I re

Re: custom response writer which extends RawResponseWriter fails when shards > 1

be some issues because usually > it's not a big deal to use one wt for responding user query like (wt=csv) > and wt=javabin in internal communication between aggregator and slaves like > it happens in wt=csv query. > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 2:19 PM, Lee Carroll <lee.a.c

Re: custom response writer which extends RawResponseWriter fails when shards > 1

mages/select?fl=content=id:1=1=csv; > csv.separator==null > ? > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 1:18 PM, Lee Carroll <lee.a.carr...@googlemail.com > > > wrote: > > > sorry cut n paste error i'd get > > > > { > > "responseHeader":{ > &

Re: custom response writer which extends RawResponseWriter fails when shards > 1

"response":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"docs":[ { "content":"my-content-value"}] }} but you get my point On 18 April 2018 at 11:13, Lee Carroll <lee.a.carr...@googlemail.com> wrote: > for http://lo

Re: custom response writer which extends RawResponseWriter fails when shards > 1

April 2018 at 10:55, Mikhail Khludnev <m...@apache.org> wrote: > Lee, from this description I don see why it can't be addressed by fl,rows > params. What makes it different form the typical Solr usage? > > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 12:31 PM, Lee Carroll < > lee.a.car

Re: custom response writer which extends RawResponseWriter fails when shards > 1

rom describing why you need to create own response writer. > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 7:02 PM, Lee Carroll <lee.a.carr...@googlemail.com > > > wrote: > > > Ok. My expectation was the response writer would not be used until the > > final serialization of

Re: custom response writer which extends RawResponseWriter fails when shards > 1

lave's wt indicated json. > As far as I know only javabin might be used to distributed search > underneath. Coordinator itself might yield json. > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 4:23 PM, Lee Carroll <lee.a.carr...@googlemail.com > > > wrote: > > > Sure > > > > wit

Re: custom response writer which extends RawResponseWriter fails when shards > 1

ud > > > On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 6:56 PM, Lee Carroll <lee.a.carr...@googlemail.com > > > wrote: > > > I've created a custom response writer which extends RawResponseWriter. > The > > basic operation is to output a single field value from the top matching >

custom response writer which extends RawResponseWriter fails when shards > 1

I've created a custom response writer which extends RawResponseWriter. The basic operation is to output a single field value from the top matching doc as the entire response. This works when shards = 1 but fails when shards are greater than 1. I throw an error if the field in question is missing

Re: Difference between BasicResultContext and ResultContext in Response

#Ignore, mis-read the comment and its context. On 13 April 2018 at 13:08, Lee Carroll <lee.a.carr...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm writing a custom response writer to output a very simple rendition of > a solr result set to clients. > > In my tests I do:

Difference between BasicResultContext and ResultContext in Response

Hi all, I'm writing a custom response writer to output a very simple rendition of a solr result set to clients. In my tests I do: h.getCore().execute(h.getCore().getRequestHandler(null),req,rsp); which for a q=*:* request object returns a response with a BasicResultContext. In

uima

The instructions at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/UIMA+Integration to set up UIMA integration with solr requires an alchemy api key. This is no longer available as its part of the ibm watson offering. What is the status of https://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrUIMA ? Would I be

Re: can't start node in cloud mode

ecessary when -z is specified BTW. The > -c will start an _internal_ zookeeper in the absence of a -z > parameter. > > Best, > Erick > > On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 8:09 AM, Lee Carroll > <lee.a.carr...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > Hi > > running bin/solr sta

can't start node in cloud mode

Hi running bin/solr start does not start up in cloud mode despite having ZK_HOST set in /etc/default/solr.in.sh. running openjdk 1.8 solr 6.5.1 on aws linux zookeeper 3.4.6 on aws linux (3 node ensemble) logs look clean both in zookeeper and solr running bin/solr zk ls / returns Connecting

char filter factory and tokeniser issue in admin Analysis form

Hi, on solr 4.7 I've ran into a strange issue. Whilst setting up a field I've noticed in the analysis form when I use a char filter factory (for example HTMLSCF) with a tokeniser (ST) the analysis chain grinds to a halt. the char filter does not seem to pass anything into the tokeniser. Field

Re: char filter factory and tokeniser issue in admin Analysis form

B*ll*cks, before posting I spent an hour searching for issues, honest. Soon as I post within seconds I find https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5800 On 20 October 2015 at 15:21, Lee Carroll <lee.a.carr...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > on solr 4.7 I've ran into

Re: char filter factory and tokeniser issue in admin Analysis form

No Alexandre its just Sod's law (http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Sod's+Law) :-) Lee C On 20 October 2015 at 15:38, Alexandre Rafalovitch <arafa...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 20 October 2015 at 10:26, Lee Carroll <lee.a.carr...@googlemail.com> > wrote: > > B*ll*cks, before

Re: creating a new collection fails as SearchHandler can't be found

Hi it was jars copied into a solr-zk-cli directory to allow easy running of solr zk cmd line client. well i think that is what fixed tomcat! I've also tried with jetty with a clean solr home and that also works and seems a much cleaner way of running multiple instances (probably more to do with

creating a new collection fails as SearchHandler can't be found

Hi all Creating a new collection fails with class not found: org.apache.solr.handler.component.SearchHandler Running under tomcat 7.0.59 with solr 4.10.3. Solr app looks to be deployed ok and the web app looks fine when browsing. An external zookeeper set up looks fine and the configs are loaded

cross site scripting

Hi All, In solr 4.7 this query /solr/coreName/select/?q=*:*fl=%27nasty%20value%27rows=1wt=json returns {responseHeader:{status:0,QTime:2},response:{numFound:189796,start:0,docs:[{'nasty value':nasty value}]}} This is naughty. Has this been seen before / fixed ?

Re: cross site scripting

. -Yonik http://heliosearch.org - native code faceting, facet functions, sub-facets, off-heap data On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Lee Carroll lee.a.carr...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi All, In solr 4.7 this query /solr/coreName/select/?q=*:*fl=%27nasty%20value%27rows=1wt=json

Re: cross site scripting

at 10:47 AM, Lee Carroll lee.a.carr...@googlemail.com wrote: The applications using the data may write solr data to the dom. (I doubt they do but they could now or in the future. They have an expectation of trusting the data back from solr). As a straight forward attack you are right

Re: Storing 2 dimension array in Solr

I think he means a doc for each element. so you have a disease occurrence index doc group1/group dis1/dis occurrenceexist/occurrence unique Field1-1/unique field /doc assuming (and its a pretty fair assumption?) most groups have only a subset of diseases this will be a sparse matrix so just

DIH - delta query and delta import query executes transformer twice

Hi It looks like when a DIH entity has a delta and delta import query plus a transformer defined the execution of both query's call the transformer. I was expecting it to only be called on the import query. Sure we can check for a null value or something and just return the row during the delta

DIH Problem: create multiple docs from a single entity

Hi I've 2 tables with the following data table 1 id treatment_list 1 a,b 2 b,c table 2 treatment id, name a name1 b name 2 c name 3 Using DIH can you create an index of the form id-treatment-id name 1a name1 1b

performance improvements on ip look up query

Hi We are doing a lat/lon look up query using ip address. We have a 6.5 million document core of the following structure start ip block end ip block location id location_lat_lon the field defs are types fieldType name=string class=solr.StrField sortMissingLast=true omitNorms=true/ fieldType

Re: performance improvements on ip look up query

? Do any parts of the query repeat a lot? Maybe there is room for fq. Otis Solr ElasticSearch Support http://sematext.com/ On Jan 9, 2013 6:08 AM, Lee Carroll lee.a.carr...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi We are doing a lat/lon look up query using ip address. We have a 6.5 million document

Re: Solr3.5 PatternTokenizer / Search Analyzer tokenizing always at whitespace?

I use *analyzer type*=*query* can you use search ? On 17 December 2012 11:01, Dirk Högemann dirk.hoegem...@googlemail.comwrote: arr name=filter_queriesstr{!q.op=AND df=cl2Categories_NACE}08 Gewinnung von Steinen und Erden, sonstiger Bergbau/str/arrarr

Re: custom request handler

and flexibility. You could make the necessary parameter changes in the prepare() method and just make sure that this safe parameter component comes before the query component in the list of components for a handler and you should be fine. Cheers! Amit On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 5:39 AM, Lee Carroll

Re: custom request handler

Hi Amit I did not do this via a servlet filter as I wanted the solr devs to be concerned with solr config and keep them out of any concerns of the container. By specifying declarative data in a request handler that would be enough to produce a service uri for an application. Or have I missed a

custom request handler

Hi we are extending SearchHandler to provide a custom search request handler. Basically we've added NamedLists called allowed , whiteList, maxMinList etc. These look like the default, append and invariant namedLists in the standard search handler config. In handleRequestBody we then remove params

Re: httpSolrServer and exyternal load balancer

Cheers, saved the day Lee C On 28 September 2012 23:27, Chris Hostetter hossman_luc...@fucit.orgwrote: : The issue we face is the f5 balancer is returning a cookie which the client : is hanging onto. resulting in the same slave being hit for all requests. ... : My question is can

Re: Deploying and securing Solr war in JBoss AS

Hi Billy see http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrSecurity One approach is keep master internal, read only slaves with just select handlers defined in the solr config for public facing requests. See your app container security docs for other approaches On 1 October 2012 16:32, Billy Newman

httpSolrServer and exyternal load balancer

Hi We have the following solr http server bean class=org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.CommonsHttpSolrServer id=solrserver constructor-arg value=urlToSlaveLoadBalancer / property name=soTimeout value=1000 / property name=connectionTimeout value=1000 / property name=defaultMaxConnectionsPerHost

Re: httpSolrServer and exyternal load balancer

this seems like a red herring. FWIW, Erick On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Lee Carroll lee.a.carr...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi We have the following solr http server bean class=org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.CommonsHttpSolrServer id=solrserver constructor-arg value

Re: httpSolrServer and exyternal load balancer

this unless and until you have a demonstrated need. Best Erick On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:07 AM, Lee Carroll lee.a.carr...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi Erick, the load balancer in front of the solr servers is dropping the cookie not the solr server themselves. are you saying the clients

Re: custom sorter

take a look at http://wiki.apache.org/solr/QueryElevationComponent On 20 July 2012 03:48, Siping Liu liu01...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have requirements to place a document to a pre-determined position for special filter query values, for instance when filter query is fq=(field1:xyz) place

Re: MoreLikeThis and mlt.count

Hi Bruno I'm not sure if that makes sense for a query which does not have a boolean element to it. What is your use-case On 7 July 2012 18:36, Bruno Mannina bmann...@free.fr wrote: Dear Solr users, I have a field name fid defined as: field name=fid type=string indexed=true stored=true

Re: Getting only one result by family?

Hi Bruno, As described See http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldCollapsing but also faceting as this often fits the bill On 7 July 2012 22:27, Bruno Mannina bmann...@free.fr wrote: Dear Solr users, I have a field named FID for Family-ID: field name=fid type=string indexed=true stored=true

Re: Getting only one result by family?

see http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPerformanceFactors#OutOfMemoryErrors On 8 July 2012 12:37, Bruno Mannina bmann...@free.fr wrote: Hi Lee, I tried group to my FID field and outch error 500 + outofmemory... I don't yet tested facets Thanks, Bruno Le 08/07/2012 11:19, Lee Carroll

Re: How to space between spatial search results? (Declustering)

Sorry can't answer your question directly. However map scale may render this very tricky or even redundant. UI may be a better place for a solution rather than the data. Take a look at https://developers.google.com/maps/articles/toomanymarkers for lots of options lee c On 3 July 2012 03:49,

Re: how Solr/Lucene can support standard join operation

In your example de-normalising would be fine in a vast number of use-cases. multi value fields are fine. If you really want to, see http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Join but make sure you loose the default relational dba world view first and only go down that route if you need to. On 27 June 2012

Re: how Solr/Lucene can support standard join operation

Sorry you have that link! and I did not see the question - apols index schema could look something like: id name classList - multi value majorClassList - multi value a standard query would do the equivalent of your sql again apols for not seeing the link lee c On 27 June 2012 12:37, Lee

Re: Antonyms configuration

have a field which uses a synonym file of your antonyms and a keep word filter and use this field in your not query On 27 June 2012 15:54, RajParakh rajpar...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I need to specify an antonym list - similar to synonym list. Whats the best way to go about it? Currently, I

Re: Store matching synonyms only

If you go down the keep-word route you can return the tags to the front end app using a facet field query. This often fits with many use-cases for doc tags. lee c On 23 June 2012 22:37, Jack Krupansky j...@basetechnology.com wrote: One important footnote: the keep words/synonym analyzer

Re: Solr, I have perfomance problem for indexing.

what is your db schema ? do you need to import all the schema ? (128 joined tables ??) or are the tables all independant ? (if so dump them out and import them in using csv) cheers lee c On 7 June 2012 02:32, Jihyun Suh jhsuh.ourli...@gmail.com wrote: Each table has 35,000 rows. (35 thousands).

Re: Solr boost relevancy

I'm not sure about your approach, turning off most of the features which produce a similarity measure in a vsm and then wanting to sort by a similarity could lead to pain. (I don't know your usecase so this could still be valid) One approach to, (well what I think your usecase might be...) is to

Re: Faceted on Similarity ?

Take a look at the clustering component http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ClusteringComponent Consider clustering off line and indexing the pre calculated group memberships I might be wrong but I don't think their is any faceting mileage here. Depending upon the use case you might get some use out of

Re: change index/store at indexing time

Vazquez, Sorry I don't have an answer but I'd love to know what you need this for :-) I think the logic is going to have to bleed into your search app. In short copy field and your app knows which to search in. lee c On 30 April 2012 20:41, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com wrote: OK, I

Re: Synonyms file in solr

Your example are not synonyms so i don't think synonyms.txt by itself is going to work. This sounds like tagging using a taxonomy. Values written to the field storing this taxonomy could be like: livingthing/animal/cat [doc about cats] livingthing/animal/dog [doc about dogs] livingthing/animal

Re: Can this type of sorting/boosting be done by solr

Have you looked at external fields? http://lucidworks.lucidimagination.com/display/solr/Solr+Field+Types#SolrFieldTypes-WorkingwithExternalFiles you will need a process to do the counts and note the limitation of updates only after a commit, but i think it would fit your usecase. On 23

Re: Queried value and Indexed value are the same still no match in the query result

Hi You have a lot of language processing for a field which contains, at least in your example non words. Do you need the synonyms, two lots of stemming, etc what is the field for? I don't believe that this last point is what actually causes my unsatisfactory results it probably is On 13

Re: Queried value and Indexed value are the same still no match in the query result

and create field types that are more specific for different field contents, correct? But still, that does not explain why I have indexed this specific value EHT2011-2012 and the very same value does not match anything when I search for it. On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Lee Carroll lee.a.carr

Does the stats component cache

Does the stats component cache. If not what are the alternatives for finding Max / Min values of fields for a particular result set. We think we are running into performance issues with the stats component (250ms for a query when we issue a query with the stats component on) Cheers

Re: Solr and TF-IDF

content-based recommender so its not CF etc and its a project so its whatever his supervisor wants. take a look at solrj should be more natural to integrate your java code with. (Although not sure if it supports termv ector comp) good luck On 26 January 2012 17:27, Walter Underwood

Re: Search within words

check your defaultOperator, ensure its OR On 23 January 2012 05:56, jawedshamshedi jawedshamsh...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Thanks for the reply.. I am using NGramFilterFactory for this. But it's not working as desired. Like I have a  field article_type that has been indexed using the below

Re: Trying to understand SOLR memory requirements

on selection issue another query to get your additional data (if i follow what you want) On 22 January 2012 18:53, Dave dla...@gmail.com wrote: I take it from the overwhelming silence on the list that what I've asked is not possible? It seems like the suggester component is not well supported

Re: Faceting Question

 Does that make more sense? Ah I see. I'm not certain but take a look at pivot faceting https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-792 cheers lee c

Re: multi value field search

You could use a synonyms file for the alternative names. That way you do not need to store only index the alternatives. For faceting use a field were the analysis chain does not use the synonyms filter. For search the analysis chain will. You also get the benefit of only storing the normative

Re: How many defaultsearchfields we can have in one schema.xml file?

only one field can be a default. use copy field and copy the fields you need to search into a single field and set the copy field to be the default. That might be ok depending upon your circumstances On 25 November 2011 12:46, kiran.bodigam kiran.bodi...@gmail.com wrote: In my schema i have

Re: Search calendar avaliability

do your docs have daily availability ? if so you could index each doc for each day (rather than have some logic embedded in your data) so instead of doc1 (1/9/2011 - 5/9/2011) you have doc1 1/9/2011 doc1 2/9/2011 doc1 3/9/2011 doc1 4/9/2011 doc1 5/9/2011 this makes search much easier and

Re: Solr main query response input to facet query

Take a look at facet query. You can facet on a query results not just terms in a field http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters#facet.query_:_Arbitrary_Query_Faceting On 25 October 2011 10:56, Erik Hatcher erik.hatc...@gmail.com wrote: I'm not following exactly what you're looking

Re: multiple document types in a core

when replicating your index, but not much else. Is it worth it? If so, why? Best Erick On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 11:07 AM, lee carroll lee.a.carr...@googlemail.com wrote: Just as a follow up it looks like stored fields are stored verbatim for every doc. hotel index and store dest

Re: Controlling the order of partial matches based on the position

this link is on he mailing list recently. http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/dfa18d52e7e8197c/getting_answers_starting_with_a_requested_string_first#b18e9f922c1e4149 On 18 October 2011 00:59, aronitin aro_ni...@yahoo.com wrote: Guys, It's been almost a week but there are no

Re: multiple document types in a core

October 2011 11:54, lee carroll lee.a.carr...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi Chris thanks for the response It's an inverted index, so *tems* exist once (per segment) and those terms point to the documents -- so having the same terms (in the same fields) for multiple types of documents in one index

Re: multiple document types in a core

Hi Chris thanks for the response It's an inverted index, so *tems* exist once (per segment) and those terms point to the documents -- so having the same terms (in the same fields) for multiple types of documents in one index is going to take up less overall space then having distinct

Re: Field Collapsing and Record Filtering

current: bool //for fq which searches only current versions last_current_at: date time // for date range queries or group sorting what was current for a given date sorry if i've missed a requirement lee c On 13 October 2011 15:01, Mike Sokolov soko...@ifactory.com wrote: We have the identical

Re: Field Collapsing and Record Filtering

sorry missed the permission stuff: I think thats ok if you index the acl as part of the document. That is to say each version has its own acl. Match users against version acl data as a filter query and use last_current_at date as a sort On 13 October 2011 22:04, lee carroll lee.a.carr

Re: Searching multiple fields

see http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_4_0/api/org/apache/lucene/search/Similarity.html On 27 September 2011 16:04, Mark static.void@gmail.com wrote: I thought that a similarity class will only affect the scoring of a single field.. not across multiple fields? Can anyone else chime in with

Re: solr equivalent of select distinct

if you have a limited set of searches which need to use this and they act on a limited known set of fields you can concat fields at index time and then facet PK FLD1 FLD2FLD3 FLD4 FLD5 copy45 AB0 AB 0 x yx y AB1 AB 1 x

Re: I can't pass the unit test when compile from apache-solr-3.3.0-src

Hi Chris, That makes sense. I was behind fire wall when running both builds. I thought I was correctly proxied - but maybe the request was being squashed by something else before it even got to the firewall. I've just ran tests again but this time outside of fire wall and all pass. Thanks a lot

Re: I can't pass the unit test when compile from apache-solr-3.3.0-src

Not sure if this has progressed further but I'm getting test failure for 3.3 also. Trunk builds and tests fine but 3.3 fails the test below (Note i've a new box so could be a silly set up issue i've missed but i think everything is in place (latest version of java 1.6, latest version of ant)

Re: Best way to anchor solr searches?

I don't think solr conforms to ACID type behaviours for its queries. This is not to say your use-case is not important just that its not SOLR's focus. I think its a interesting question but the solution is probably going to involve rolling your own. Something like returning 1 user docs and

Re: Count rows with tokens

Hi This looks like a facteing problem. See http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrFacetingOverview cheers lee c On 22 August 2011 11:52, tom135 t.latu...@itspree.pl wrote: Hello, I want to use Solr as a search engine. I have indexed data like: ID | TEXT | CREATION_DATE Daily increase by 500 000

Re: document indexing

It really does depend upon what you want to do in your app but from the info given I'd go for denormalizing by repeating the least number of values. So in your case that would be book PageID+BookID(uniqueKey), pageID, PageVal1, PageValn, BookID, BookName On 10 August 2011 09:46, directorscott

Re: document indexing

            some text some text some text I wonder which index structure is better. lee carroll wrote: It really does depend upon what you want to do in your app but from the info given I'd go for denormalizing by repeating the least number of values. So in your case that would be book

Re: Strip special chars like -

Hi I might be wrong as I've not tried it out to be sure but from the wiki docs: These parameters may be combined in any way. Example of generateWordParts=1 and catenateWords=1: PowerShot - 0:Power, 1:Shot 1:PowerShot (where 0,1,1 are token positions) does that fit the bill ? On 9 August 2011

Stored Field

Hi Do Stored field values get added to the index for each document field combination literally or is a pointer used ? I've been reading http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_4_0/fileformats.pdf and I think thats the case but not 100% so thought I'd ask. In logical terms for stored fields do we get this

Re: How do I add a custom field?

Hi Gabriele, Did you index any docs with your new field ? The results will just bring back docs and what fields they have. They won't bring back null fields just because they are in your schema. Lucene is schema-less. Solr adds the schema to make it nice to administer and very powerful to use.

Re: Building a facet search filter frontend in XSLT

Hi Filype, in the response you should have a list of fq arguments something like arr name=fq strfield:facetValue/str strfield:FacetValue/str /arr use this to set your inputs to be selected / checked On 29 June 2011 23:54, Filype Pereira pereira.fil...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I am looking

moving to multicore without changing existing index

hi I'm looking at setting up multi core indices but also have an exiting index. Can I run this index along side new index set up as cores. On a dev machine I've experimented with simply adding solr.xml in slor home and listing the new cores in the cores element but this breaks the existing index.

Re: Solr 3.1 indexing error Invalid UTF-8 character 0xffff

Hi Markus I've seen similar issue before (but not with solr) when processing files as xml. In our case the problem was due to processing a utf16 file with a byte order mark. This presents itself as 0x to the xml parser which is not used by utf8 (the bom unicode would be represented as efbfbf

Re: Default schema - 'keywords' not multivalued

Hi Tod, A list of keywords would be fine in a non multi valued field: keywords : xxx yyy sss aaa multi value field would allow you to repeat the field when indexing keywords: xxx keywords: yyy keywords: sss etc On 27 June 2011 16:13, Tod listac...@gmail.com wrote: This was a little

Re: Understanding query explain information

time. 2011/6/22 lee carroll lee.a.carr...@googlemail.com Hi are you using synonyms ? On 22 June 2011 10:30, Alexander Ramos Jardim alexander.ramos.jar...@gmail.com wrote: Hi guys, I am getting some doubts about how to correctly understand the debugQuery output. I have a field named

Re: Complex situation

Hi Roy, You have no relationship between time and date due to the de-normalising of your data. I don't have a good answer to this and I guess this is a classic question. One approach is maybe to do the following: make sure you have field collapsing available. trunk or a patch maybe index not

Re: Parse solr json object

try this mail list http://docs.jquery.com/Discussion or this doc http://api.jquery.com/jQuery.each/ On 21 June 2011 07:32, Romi romijain3...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, for enabling highlighting i want to parse json object. for readilibility i included xml format of that json object. please tell me

Re: MultiValued facet behavior question

Can your front end app normalize the q parameter. Either with a drop down or a type a head derived from the values in the specialties field. that way q will match value(s) in your facet results. I'm not sure what you are trying to achieve though so maybe i'm off the mark. On 22 June 2011 04:37,

Re: MultiValued facet behavior question

Oh sorry forgot to also type: Often facet fields are not stemmed or heavily analysed. The facet values are from the index. On 22 June 2011 08:21, lee carroll lee.a.carr...@googlemail.com wrote: Can your front end app normalize the q parameter. Either with a drop down or a type a head derived

Re: MultiValued facet behavior question

Hi Bill, can you explain a little bit more around why you need this. Knowing the motivation might suggest a different solution not just involving faceting. On 22 June 2011 08:49, Bill Bell billnb...@gmail.com wrote: You can type q=cardiology and match on cardiologist. If stemming did not work

Re: MultiValued facet behavior question

Hi Bill, So that part works. Then when I output the facet, I need a different behavior than the default. I need The facet to only output the value that matches (scored) - NOT ALL VALUES in the multiValued field. I think it makes sense? Why do you need this ? If your use case is faceted

Re: Understanding query explain information

Hi are you using synonyms ? On 22 June 2011 10:30, Alexander Ramos Jardim alexander.ramos.jar...@gmail.com wrote: Hi guys, I am getting some doubts about how to correctly understand the debugQuery output. I have a field named itemName in my index. This is a text field, just that. When I

Re: MultiValued facet behavior question

as a facetvalue to the user. The same thing goed for the facets that are related to family doctors. They are returned as well, thus making it even moren unclear for the end-user. On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 2:27 PM, lee carroll lee.a.carr...@googlemail.comwrote: Hi Bill, So that part works. Then when I

Re: Why are not query keywords treated as a set?

name=parsedquery*content:past content:past*/str I was expecting the query to get parsed into content:past only and not content:past content:past. On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:12 AM, lee carroll lee.a.carr...@googlemail.comwrote: do you mean a phrase query? past past can you give some more detail

Re: Multiple indexes

your data is being used to build an inverted index rather than being stored as a set of records. de-normalising is fine in most cases. what is your use case which requires a normalised set of indices ? 2011/6/18 François Schiettecatte fschietteca...@gmail.com: You would need to run two

  1   2   >