:06 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Cores and and ranking (search quality)
On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 14:34 +0100, johnmu...@aol.com wrote:
My question is this: if I put my data in multiple cores and use
distributed search will the ranking be different if I had all my data
Thanks Walter. This explains a lot.
- MJ
-Original Message-
From: Walter Underwood [mailto:wun...@wunderwood.org]
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 4:41 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Cores and and ranking (search quality)
If the documents are distributed randomly across
On 3/10/2015 11:17 AM, johnmu...@aol.com wrote:
If I have two cores, one core has 10 docs another has 100,000 docs. I then
submit two docs that are 100% identical (with the exception of the unique-ID
fields, which is stored but not indexed) one to each core. The question is,
during
core (the one with 100,000)
docs?
Thanks!
-- MJ
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 11:47 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Cores and and ranking (search quality)
SOLR-1632 will certainly help. But trying
and and ranking (search quality)
On Mar 10, 2015, at 10:17 AM, johnmu...@aol.com wrote:
If I have two cores, one core has 10 docs another has 100,000 docs. I then
submit two docs that are 100% identical (with the exception of the unique-ID
fields, which is stored but not indexed) one to each
. If so,
than maybe this is not a design I can use.
- MJ
-Original Message-
From: Walter Underwood [mailto:wun...@wunderwood.org]
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 2:39 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Cores and and ranking (search quality)
On Mar 10, 2015, at 10:17
On Mar 10, 2015, at 10:17 AM, johnmu...@aol.com wrote:
If I have two cores, one core has 10 docs another has 100,000 docs. I then
submit two docs that are 100% identical (with the exception of the unique-ID
fields, which is stored but not indexed) one to each core. The question is,
will now be as if I had 1 core?
- MJ
-Original Message-
From: Toke Eskildsen [mailto:t...@statsbiblioteket.dk]
Sent: Thursday, March 5, 2015 9:06 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Cores and and ranking (search quality)
On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 14:34 +0100, johnmu...@aol.com
-Original Message-
From: Toke Eskildsen [mailto:t...@statsbiblioteket.dk]
Sent: Thursday, March 5, 2015 9:06 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Cores and and ranking (search quality)
On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 14:34 +0100, johnmu...@aol.com wrote:
My question is this: if I put my data
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Cores and and ranking (search quality)
Hi,
I have data in which I will index and search on. This data is well define
such that I can index into a single core or multiple cores like so:
core_1:Jan2015, core_2:Feb2015, core_3:Mar2015, etc.
My question
On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 14:34 +0100, johnmu...@aol.com wrote:
My question is this: if I put my data in multiple cores and use
distributed search will the ranking be different if I had all my data
in a single core?
Yes, it will be different. The practical impact depends on how
homogeneous your
Hi,
I have data in which I will index and search on. This data is well define such
that I can index into a single core or multiple cores like so: core_1:Jan2015,
core_2:Feb2015, core_3:Mar2015, etc.
My question is this: if I put my data in multiple cores and use distributed
search will the
12 matches
Mail list logo
