Thanks Erick.
I am going through the recommendations given in this email chain.
Best,
Modassar
On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 7:17 PM Erick Erickson
wrote:
> Oh dear.
>
> You made me look at the reference guide. Ouch.
>
> We have this nice page “Defining core.properties” that talks about
> defining co
Oh dear.
You made me look at the reference guide. Ouch.
We have this nice page “Defining core.properties” that talks about defining
core.properties. Unfortunately it has _no_ warning about the fact that trying
to use this in SolrCloud is a really bad idea. As in “don’t do it”. To make
matters
Hi Shawn,
I understand that we do not need to modify the core.properties and use the
APIs to create core and collection and that is what I am doing now.
This question of naming the core as per the choice comes from our older
setup where we have 12 shards, a collection and core both named the same
On 11/4/2020 9:32 PM, Modassar Ather wrote:
Another thing: how can I control the core naming? I want the core name to
be *mycore* instead of *mycore**_shard1_replica_n1*/*mycore*
*_shard2_replica_n2*.
I tried setting it using property.name=*mycore* but it did not work.
What can I do to achieve th
Hi Erick,
I have put solr configs in Zookeeper. I have created a collection using the
following API.
admin/collections?action=CREATE&name=mycore&numShards=2&replicationFactor=1&collection.configName=mycore&
property.name=mycore
The collection got created and I can see *mycore**_shard1_replica_n1*
inline
> On Nov 4, 2020, at 2:17 AM, Modassar Ather wrote:
>
> Thanks Erick and Ilan.
>
> I am using APIs to create core and collection and have removed all the
> entries from core.properties. Currently I am facing init failure and
> debugging it.
> Will write back if I am facing any issues.
>
Thanks Erick and Ilan.
I am using APIs to create core and collection and have removed all the
entries from core.properties. Currently I am facing init failure and
debugging it.
Will write back if I am facing any issues.
Best,
Modassar
On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 3:20 AM Erick Erickson
wrote:
> Do n
Do note, though, that the default value for legacyCloud changed from
true to false so even though you can get it to work by setting
this cluster prop I wouldn’t…
The change in the default value is why it’s failing for you.
> On Nov 3, 2020, at 11:20 AM, Ilan Ginzburg wrote:
>
> I second Erick'
I second Erick's recommendation, but just for the record legacyCloud was
removed in (upcoming) Solr 9 and is still available in Solr 8.x. Most
likely this explains Modassar why you found it in the documentation.
Ilan
On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 5:11 PM Erick Erickson
wrote:
> You absolutely need co
You absolutely need core.properties files. It’s just that they
should be considered an “implementation detail” that you
should rarely, if ever need to be aware of.
Scripting manual creation of core.properties files in order
to define your collections has never been officially supported, it
just ha
Thanks Erick for your response.
I will certainly use the APIs and not rely on the core.properties. I was
going through the documentation on core.properties and found it to be still
there.
I have all the solr install scripts based on older Solr versions and wanted
to re-use the same as the core.pro
You’re relying on legacyMode, which is no longer supported. In
older versions of Solr, if a core.properties file was found on disk Solr
attempted to create the replica (and collection) on the fly. This is no
longer true.
Why are you doing it this manually instead of using the collections API?
You
Hi,
I am migrating from Solr 6.5.1 to Solr 8.6.3. As a part of the entire
upgrade I have the first task to install and configure the solr with the
core and collection. The solr is installed in SolrCloud mode.
In Solr 6.5.1 I was using the following key values in core.properties file.
The configur
I guess you can do this by switching off the source data center, but you would
need to look more in your architecture and especially applications that use
solr to verify this.
It may look easy but I would test it before.
> Am 06.06.2019 um 17:24 schrieb Joe Lerner :
>
> Ooohh...interesting. Th
Ooohh...interesting. Then, presumably there is some way to have what was the
cross-data-center replica become the new "primary"?
It's getting too easy!
Joe
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
An alternative to backup and restore could be the data center replication in
Solr:
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_3/cross-data-center-replication-cdcr.html
> Am 05.06.2019 um 19:18 schrieb Joe Lerner :
>
> Hi,
>
> Our application is migrating from on-premise to AWS. We are currently on
On 6/5/2019 11:18 AM, Joe Lerner wrote:
Our application is migrating from on-premise to AWS. We are currently on
Solr Cloud 7.3.0.
We are interested in exploring ways to do this with minimal, down-time, as
in, maybe one hour.
One strategy would be to set up a new empty Solr Cloud instance in A
Hi,
Our application is migrating from on-premise to AWS. We are currently on
Solr Cloud 7.3.0.
We are interested in exploring ways to do this with minimal, down-time, as
in, maybe one hour.
One strategy would be to set up a new empty Solr Cloud instance in AWS, and
reindex the world. But reinde
Hi,
Apache Solr is an open source project, with contributors and users doing our
best
to both document and answer questions, but sometimes it may take time, either
due
busy schedules or because the answer is unknown or an uncommon one that very few
have tried.
I suspect the last reason for the
Hi Ana,
There is no documentation because this is not something that is common.
Assuming you are using SolrCloud and that you don’t want any downtime. What you
could do is set up new Solr node on the same box but configure it to use this
new disk. After it is set, you use ADDREPLICA and REMOVERE
Hello guys,
I would appreciate if you could kindly treat this topic with priority as
the lack of documentation is kind of a blocker for us.
Thanks in advance,
Ana
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 4:56 PM, Ana Mercan (RO) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have the following scenario, I'm having a shared cluster solr
Hi,
I have the following scenario, I'm having a shared cluster solr
installation environment (app server 1-app server 2 load balanced) which
has 4 solr instances.
After reviewing the space audit we have noticed that the partition where
the installation resides is too big versus what is used in te
ptember 23, 2016 5:32 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: FAST to SOLR migration
Hi All,
I am trying to migrate FAST esp to SOLR search engine.
I am trying to implement mode="ONEAR" from FAST in solr.
Please let me know if anyone has any idea about this.
ngram:string("750
Hi All,
I am trying to migrate FAST esp to SOLR search engine.
I am trying to implement mode="ONEAR" from FAST in solr.
Please let me know if anyone has any idea about this.
ngram:string("750 500 000 000 000 000",mode="ONEAR")
In solr we are splitting to split field in "750 500 000 000 000 000
On 10/15/2015 9:53 AM, fabigol wrote:
> i catch an old project working with Solr 1.4.1, jbossPortal and java 1.5.
> I try to migrate my solr version to solr 5.2.1 work with java 1.7.
> The solr indexation works but i fail to display the new results on my
> application.
> I want to know if i must
do?
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Migration-1-4-1-5-2-1-tp4234599.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
version
client (solr-solrj) can work with my new version Solr.
How do i do?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Migration-1-4-1-5-2-1-tp4234599.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
r. However, transfer the index files across
network could be longer.
I will test it with two-machine scenario.
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Planning-Solr-migration-to-production-clean-and-autoSoftCommit-tp4216736p4217122.html
Sent from the Solr - Us
there are too many issues with the "force replication", I might as well
> work out the "incremental indexing" option.
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Planning-Solr-migration-to-production-clean-and-autoSoftCommit-tp4216736p4217102.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Planning-Solr-migration-to-production-clean-and-autoSoftCommit-tp4216736p4217102.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
even every 2 hours a
>> day, so
>> > it is not rare. Manually managing replication is not an option. Is there
>> any
>> > other easy-to-manage option ?
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > View this message in context:
>> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Planning-Solr-migration-to-production-clean-and-autoSoftCommit-tp4216736p4216744.html
>> > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
ly managing replication is not an option. Is there
> any
> > other easy-to-manage option ?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Planning-Solr-migration-to-production-clean-and-autoSoftCommit-tp4216736p4216744.html
> > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
to-manage option ?
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Planning-Solr-migration-to-production-clean-and-autoSoftCommit-tp4216736p4216744.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
?
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Planning-Solr-migration-to-production-clean-and-autoSoftCommit-tp4216736p4216744.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
quot;clean" to true in the indexing job, what is the impact of this
> parameter to the search requests executed in slave machine?
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Planning-Solr-migration-to-production-clean-and-autoSoftCommit-tp4216736.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
in the master. When I set
the "clean" to true in the indexing job, what is the impact of this
parameter to the search requests executed in slave machine?
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Planning-Solr-migration-to-production-clean-and-autoS
etter.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: mrg81 [mailto:maya...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2014 1:11 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Endeca to Solr Migration
Hello --
I wanted to get some details on Endeca to Solr Migration. I am
Yes. I think so, but the scope seems challenging.
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 10:13 PM, mrg81 wrote:
> Thanks Mikhail. In your opinion, is this something that be done in 4-6
> months?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/
Thanks Mikhail. In your opinion, is this something that be done in 4-6
months?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Endeca-to-Solr-Migration-tp4144582p4144664.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hello,
Please check inlined below
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 10:10 PM, mrg81 wrote:
> Hello --
>
> I wanted to get some details on Endeca to Solr Migration. I am
> interested in few topics:
>
> 1. We would like to migrate the Faceted Navigation, Boosting individual
> re
Hello --
I wanted to get some details on Endeca to Solr Migration. I am
interested in few topics:
1. We would like to migrate the Faceted Navigation, Boosting individual
records and a few other items.
2. But the biggest question is about the UI [Experience Manager] - I have
not found a tool
We're holding a free webinar on migration from FAST to Solr. Details below.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
=
Solr To The Rescue: Successful Migration From FAST ESP to Open Source
Search Based on Apache Solr
Thur
42 matches
Mail list logo
