On 1/22/2013 8:33 AM, hassancrowdc wrote:
I thought that is the problem in the beginning but I have tried Kobo, but
it does not give me result(numFound=0) If you want i can send you xml of
resultset. and can you explain ho i can make it flexible so that it takes
care of upper/lowercase or any oth
one fieldtype (text) that would make this match - the
> analysis chain includes LowerCaseFilterFactory. You would have to
> change the types of one or more of your fields and then completely
> reindex.
>
> Thanks,
> Shawn
>
>
>
> --
> If
On 1/22/2013 8:16 AM, hassancrowdc wrote:
0
1
all
true
true
kobo
model
dismax
Based on what I can see, I am thinking it didn't match because what's in
your index is probably Kobo, and you are searching for kobo. The type
on all your fields except id is string, which is defined as StrField
obo
kobo
(+DisjunctionMaxQuery((model:kobo))
())/no_coord
+(model:kobo) ()
DisMaxQParser
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr-query-tp4035325p4035340.html
Sent fro
On 1/22/2013 7:32 AM, hassancrowdc wrote:
Hi,
I have indexed data from mysql database to solr. Indexing is successful
everything is woring ok but when i query through the fields of my table i
can only query from one field none of the rest are giving me any
resultset(numFound comes out to be 0) an
look for problem? I have seen logs it does not show anything
happen.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr-query-tp4035325.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
: I am trying to write a util which can parse a Lucene/Solr query and convert
: into an object representation to add more clauses to the query.
:
: Eg.
: Input: (name:John AND name:Doe)
: Output: ((firstName:John OR lastName:John) AND (firstName:John OR
: lastName:John))
edismax can support
Hi,
Have a look under
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateCSV#Methods_of_uploading_CSV_recordsabout
uploading a *local* file.
Otis
--
Solr & ElasticSearch Support
http://sematext.com/
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 3:59 AM, Uwe Clement wrote:
> Hi there,
>
>
>
> sometimes we have to load very big do
:
> Does anyone have a great tutorial for learning the solr query language,
> dismax and edismax?
> I've searched endlessly for one but I haven't been able to locate one that
> is comprehensive enough and has a lot of examples (that actually work!).
> I also tried
Does anyone have a great tutorial for learning the solr query language,
dismax and edismax?
I've searched endlessly for one but I haven't been able to locate one that
is comprehensive enough and has a lot of examples (that actually work!).
I also tried to use wildcards, logical operat
Hi there,
sometimes we have to load very big documents, 1-2 multi-value-fields of it
can contain 10.000 items. And unfortunately we need this informations.
We have to load 50 documents in order to show to the result table in the
UI.
The query takes around 50 seconds. I guess 48 seconds of
ery q = parser.parse();
maybe there is a one-line call to get the parser from solr core, but i
can't find it now. Have a look at one of the subclasses of QParser
--roman
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 4:27 AM, Sabeer Hussain wrote:
> Is there a way to get Lucene's query from Solr query?. I h
Is there a way to get Lucene's query from Solr query?. I have a requirement
to search for terms in multiple heterogeneous indices. Presently, I am using
the following approach
try {
Directory directory1 = FSDirectory.open(new
File("E:\\databas
/Improving-the-speed-of-Solr-query-over-16-million-tweets-tp4028222p4028228.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
value. So I am using wildcard for this.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Improving-the-speed-of-Solr-query-over-16-million-tweets-tp4028222p4028225.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Improving-the-speed-of-Solr-query-over-16-million-tweets-tp4028222.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ield we are using
for querying on shards?
-
Zeki ama calismiyor... Calissa yapar...
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Query-Parameter-ids-What-is-this-used-for-tp4024152p4024159.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 10:55 PM, deniz wrote:
> Hello, as it is clear in the title too, i wanna know for what solr uses this
> parameter... i see it on a sharding env on cloud, so i guess it is related
> with cloud but still there is no explanation about it in any of wiki pages
> that i have check
parameter?
-
Zeki ama calismiyor... Calissa yapar...
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Query-Parameter-ids-What-is-this-used-for-tp4024152.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I will get it quickly :)
thanks for advice !
Thread can be closed ^^
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-query-for-multiValued-Field-tp4022600p4022633.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
esponse.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message- From: Shaveta_Chawla
> Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2012 7:32 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Finding max value from a fieldvalue using solr query
>
> I have indexed an XML file in solr, which
he query response.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Shaveta_Chawla
Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2012 7:32 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Finding max value from a fieldvalue using solr query
I have indexed an XML file in solr, which looks like:
ABC
282307
121422
M
.472066.n3.nabble.com/Finding-max-value-from-a-fieldvalue-using-solr-query-tp4022167.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
for a single document.
Maybe what we need is a separate parameter for such aggregate functions.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Markus.Mirsberger
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 11:45 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Is it possible to use something like sum(
--- From: Markus.Mirsberger
>> Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 11:08 AM
>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: Is it possible to use something like sum() in a solr-query?
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> the subject says it all :)
>> Is there something like sum() available in a solr query to sum all
>> values of a field ?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Markus Mirsberger
: Markus.Mirsberger
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 11:08 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Is it possible to use something like sum() in a solr-query?
Hi,
the subject says it all :)
Is there something like sum() available in a solr query to sum all
values of a field ?
Regards,
Markus Mirsberger
Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Markus.Mirsberger
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 11:08 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Is it possible to use something like sum() in a solr-query?
Hi,
the subject says it all :)
Is there something like sum() available in a solr query to sum
Hi,
the subject says it all :)
Is there something like sum() available in a solr query to sum all
values of a field ?
Regards,
Markus Mirsberger
> Thanks Ahmet, however as I have
> mentioned in my e-mail, we're using Solr
> 1.4 here and edismax is supported from Solr 3.1.
I think 1.4 has http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DisMaxQParserPlugin
But you need to use - + unitary operators with this.
(day AND world) NOT night => +day +world -night
Thanks Ahmet, however as I have mentioned in my e-mail, we're using Solr
1.4 here and edismax is supported from Solr 3.1.
:-)
On 23 October 2012 13:42, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
>
>
> --- On Tue, 10/23/12, Sandeep Mestry wrote:
>
> > From: Sandeep Mestry
> > Su
--- On Tue, 10/23/12, Sandeep Mestry wrote:
> From: Sandeep Mestry
> Subject: Forming Solr Query for multiple operators against multiple fields
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2012, 2:51 PM
> Dear All,
>
> I have a requirement to search ag
Dear All,
I have a requirement to search against multiple fields like title,
description, annotations, comments, text and the query can contain multiple
boolean operators.
So, can someone point me out in right direction.
If the user enters a query like ,
- (day AND world) NOT night
I want to fo
sionalismo *É* Isso A*í*
>
>
> Please suggest me in this.
>
>
>
> AnilJayanti
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Problem-with-Special-Characters-in-SOLR-Query-tp4010712p4010878.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
cally incorrect
> (org.apache.lucene.queryParser.ParseException: Cannot parse 'Oot \': Lexical
> error at line 1, column 6. Encountered: after : "").
>
> anilJayanti
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Problem-with-Special-Characters-in-SOLR-Query-tp4010712p4010720.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 13:49 +0200, aniljayanti wrote:
> But getting error with below.
>
> q=Oot \& Aboot
>
> Error message :
> --
> message org.apache.lucene.queryParser.ParseException: Cannot parse 'Oot \':
> Lexical error at line 1, column 6. Encountered: after : ""
It seems like
p://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Problem-with-Special-Characters-in-SOLR-Query-tp4010712p4010720.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
uot; />
> ignoreCase="true" expand="true"/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> stored="true" />
>
> multiValued="true"/>
>
> text
>
>
>
> Please suggest me in this, and thanks in advance.
>
> AnilJayanti
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Problem-with-Special-Characters-in-SOLR-Query-tp4010712.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
r : "\"Healing
\\").
schema.xml
---
text
Please suggest me in this, and thanks in advance.
AnilJayanti
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.c
: Hello Hoss!
: The case here would be: "if total result set contains any original medicines
: X,
: then remove all generic medicines Y such that Y is a generic form of X."
:
: In your example and in my case, the result should be Vaxidrop + Generipill
then wunder's suggestion of grouping on the
p://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-do-an-if-statement-in-a-Solr-query-tp4007311p4007853.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
: But when i search for some medicine, following my business rules, i have to
: verify if the result of my search contains any Original medicine, if there
: is any, then i wouldn't show the generics of this respective medicine, on
: the other hand, if there wasnt any original product in the resul
>> on
>>> the other hand, if there wasnt any original product in the result i
>>> would
>>> have to return its generics.
>>> Im currently returning the original and generics, is there a way to do
>>> this
>>> kind of "checking" in solr?
>>>
>>> Thanks! :)
>
>>
>
I have tought doing this Amit, but in this specific case,i would not be able
to show generics at all. a But i appreciate the help!
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-do-an-if-statement-in-a-Solr-query-tp4007311p4007468.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
If the fact that it's "original" vs "generic" is a field "is_original"
0/1 can you sort by is_original? Similarly, could you put a huge boost
on is_original in the dismax so that document matches on is_original
score higher than those that aren't original? Or is your goal to not
show generics *at a
Solr and your app.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SearchComponent
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Gustav
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 5:09 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Is it possible to do an "if" statement in a Solr query?
Hello everyone, I'm wo
You may be able to do this with grouping. Group on the medicine "family", and
only show the Original if there are multiple items in the family.
wunder
On Sep 12, 2012, at 2:09 PM, Gustav wrote:
> Hello everyone, I'm working on an e-commerce website and using Solr as my
> Search Engine, im reall
uct in the result i would
have to return its generics.
Im currently returning the original and generics, is there a way to do this
kind of "checking" in solr?
Thanks! :)
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-do-an-if-statement-in-a-Solr-
om
>>> Where Influence Isn’t a Game
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:40 AM, Bernd Fehling
>>> wrote:
>>>> Now this is very scary, while searching for "solr direct access per docid"
>>>> I got a hit
>>>&g
omeland Security Digital Library. Interested in what they have to
>>> tell me
>>> about my search I clicked on the link to the page. First the page had
>>> nothing unusual
>>> about it, but why I get the hit?
>>> http://www.hsdl.org/?collection/stratpol&i
hy I get the hit?
>> http://www.hsdl.org/?collection/stratpol&id=4
>>
>> Inspecting the page source view shows that they have the solr query
>> displayed direct
>> on their page as "span" with "style=display:none".
>> -- snippe
he page had nothing
> unusual
> about it, but why I get the hit?
> http://www.hsdl.org/?collection/stratpol&id=4
>
> Inspecting the page source view shows that they have the solr query displayed
> direct
> on their page as "span" with "style=display
hit?
http://www.hsdl.org/?collection/stratpol&id=4
Inspecting the page source view shows that they have the solr query displayed
direct
on their page as "span" with "style=display:none".
-- snippet --
*** SOLR Query *** — q=Collection:0 AND
(TabSection:(&qu
Hi,
Is there a way to make a SOLR query which will filter the result returned by
the group.
I am having the following three document in SOLR, and I want to pick up the
latest document based on RqDate which is associated with OrganizationIdRef:154.
So I wrote my query to group the results by
r of
> execution of boolean operators?
>
> I guess it is
>
> 1)Get result of B OR C
> 2) Get Result of A AND (result of step 1)
>
> Is it correct?. I am using solr 3.6.
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/what-is-the-sequence-o
Hi Amit,
Thanks for your response.
1. It's just sometimes I see solr doesn't sort by score desc, so I made it
like that. I will have to check that again.
2. q1 and q2 are doing the search but just on different fields. String
fields means that it must match exactly, and solr need the q parameter to
Couple questions:
1) Why are you explicitly telling solr to sort by score desc,
shouldn't it do that for you? Could this be a source of performance
problems since sorting requires the loading of the field caches?
2) Of the query parameters, q1 and q2, which one is actually doing
"text" searching on
Hi Erick and Michael,
It's not asterisk at all. Sorry to confuse you guys, it's actually
*dot *letter.
I put it that way because it contains quite a lot of fields there.
The reason I'm doing that is because I have some string fields and
non-string fields. The idea is to send quoted value to strin
Chamnap:
I've seen various e-mail programs put the asterisk in for terms that
are in bold face.
The queries you pasted have lots of "*" characters in it, I suspect
that they were just
things you put in bold in your original, that may be the source of the
confusion about
whether you were using wil
Chamnap,
I have a hunch you can get away with not using *s.
Michael Della Bitta
Appinions, Inc. -- Where Influence Isn’t a Game.
http://www.appinions.com
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 2:16 AM, Chamnap Chhorn wrote:
> Lance, I didn't use widcard at all
Lance, I didn't use widcard at all. I use only this, the difference is
quoted or not.
q2=*"apartment"*
q1=*apartment*
*
*
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Lance Norskog wrote:
> &q2=*"apartment"*
> q1=*apartment*
>
> These are wildcards
>
> On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Chamnap Chhorn
> wrote
&q2=*"apartment"*
q1=*apartment*
These are wildcards
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Chamnap Chhorn wrote:
> Hi Lance,
>
> I didn't use wildcards at all. This is a normal text search only. I need a
> string field because it needs to be matched exactly, and the value is
> sometimes a multi-word,
Hi Lance,
I didn't use wildcards at all. This is a normal text search only. I need a
string field because it needs to be matched exactly, and the value is
sometimes a multi-word, so quoted it is necessary.
By the way, if I do a super plain query, it takes at least 600ms. I'm not
sure why. On anot
Wildcards are slow. Leading wildcards are even more slow. Is there
some way to search that data differently? If it is a string, can you
change it to a text field and make sure 'apartment' is a separate
word?
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Chamnap Chhorn wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> Thanks for quick
Hi Michael,
Thanks for quick response. Based on documentation, "facet.mincount" means
that solr will return facet fields that has at least that number. For me, I
just want to ensure my facet fields count doesn't have zero value.
I try to increase to 10, but it still slows even for the same query.
Hi Chamnap,
The first thing that jumped out at me was "facet.mincount=1". Are you
sure you need this? Increasing this number should drastically improve
speed.
Michael Della Bitta
Appinions, Inc. -- Where Influence Isn’t a Game.
http://www.appinion
request hanlder is default="true" name="auto">
>
> edismax
> all
> 10
>
> id name Street_Addr
> id,name,Street_Addr
>
>
>
>
> Can some one give me a clue where I am going wrong
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-query-tp3992117.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
all
10
id name Street_Addr
id,name,Street_Addr
Can some one give me a clue where I am going wrong
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-query-tp3992117.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Original Message- From: Shameema Umer
> Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 7:37 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: sort by publishedDate and get published Date in solr query
> results
>
>
> Versions: Nutch: 1.4 and Solr: 3.4
publishedDate and get published Date in solr query
results
Versions: Nutch: 1.4 and Solr: 3.4
My schema file contains
But I do not know whether this feed plugin is working or not as I am new to
nutch and solr.
Here is my query
http://localhost:8983/solr
new tools that should make that easier.
>
> See:
> https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/SOLR-2802<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2802>
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message- From: Shameema Umer
> Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 4:12 AM
> To: so
-Original Message-
From: Shameema Umer
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 4:12 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: sort by publishedDate and get published Date in solr query results
Hi,
Please help me sort by publishedDate and get publishedDate in solr query
results. Do i need to install anything(plugin).
Thanks
Shameema
Change "blah blah" to "blah" "blah", two separate strings, two separate
query terms.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: anarchos78
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2012 1:28 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Solr query and double quotes
Hel
remove the double
quotes from Solr?
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-query-and-double-quotes-tp3984181.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I am newbie in "Solr" thing. But with your advices i am in track now (sort of
way).
It seems that "Lucene" community is responsible, and fortunately it doesn't
turns its back to newbies!
Thank you guys,
Tom
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nab
e- From: anarchos78
> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 5:04 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Solr query issues
>
>
> I have imported data from a database. When i set a type different than
> string
> solr throws error: Unknown fieldtype 'text' s
lds that have text you want to search on.
Then the (text) string fields would be searchable by default.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: anarchos78
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 5:04 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr query issues
I have imported data from
ucene will take it as a phrase query.
> so you need escape space like title:hello\\ world
> which will take "hello world" as a field value. and the analyzer then
> will tokenize it. so you should use analyzer which can deal with
> space. e.g. you can use keyword analyzer
>
>
d value. and the analyzer then
will tokenize it. so you should use analyzer which can deal with
space. e.g. you can use keyword analyzer
as far as I know
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 3:35 AM, Matt Kuiper wrote:
> Yes.
>
> See http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrQuerySyntax - The standard S
I have imported data from a database. When i set a type different than string
solr throws error: Unknown fieldtype 'text' specified on field biog at
org.apache.solr.schema.IndexSchema.readSchema(IndexSchema.java:511)
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/
Can you give me any example on how to do this?
I am really stuck
Thank you in advance
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-query-issues-tp3974922p3975384.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>
>
> words="lang/stopwords_hi.txt" enablePositionIncrements="true"/>
>
>
>
>
>
> positionIncrementGap="100">
>
>
>
> words="lang/stopwords_hu.txt" format="snowball"
> enablePositionIncrements="true"/>
> language="Hungarian"/>
>
>
>
>
>
> positionIncrementGap="100">
>
>
>
> words="lang/stopwords_hy.txt" enablePositionIncrements="true"/>
> language="Armenian"/>
>
>
>
>
> positionIncrementGap="100">
>
>
>
> words="lang/stopwords_id.txt" enablePositionIncrements="true"/>
>
> stemDerivational="true"/>
>
>
>
>
> positionIncrementGap="100">
>
>
>
> articles="lang/contractions_it.txt"/>
>
> words="lang/stopwords_it.txt" format="snowball"
> enablePositionIncrements="true"/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> positionIncrementGap="100" autoGeneratePhraseQueries="false">
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> tags="lang/stoptags_ja.txt" enablePositionIncrements="true"/>
>
>
>
> words="lang/stopwords_ja.txt" enablePositionIncrements="true" />
>
> minimumLength="4"/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> positionIncrementGap="100">
>
>
>
> words="lang/stopwords_lv.txt" enablePositionIncrements="true"/>
>
>
>
>
>
> positionIncrementGap="100">
>
>
>
> words="lang/stopwords_nl.txt" format="snowball"
> enablePositionIncrements="true"/>
> dictionary="lang/stemdict_nl.txt" ignoreCase="false"/>
>
>
>
>
>
> positionIncrementGap="100">
>
>
>
> words="lang/stopwords_no.txt" format="snowball"
> enablePositionIncrements="true"/>
> language="Norwegian"/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> positionIncrementGap="100">
>
>
>
> words="lang/stopwords_pt.txt" format="snowball"
> enablePositionIncrements="true"/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> positionIncrementGap="100">
>
>
>
> words="lang/stopwords_ro.txt" enablePositionIncrements="true"/>
> language="Romanian"/>
>
>
>
>
> positionIncrementGap="100">
>
>
>
> words="lang/stopwords_ru.txt" format="snowball"
> enablePositionIncrements="true"/>
> language="Russian"/>
>
>
>
>
>
> positionIncrementGap="100">
>
>
>
> words="lang/stopwords_sv.txt" format="snowball"
> enablePositionIncrements="true"/>
> language="Swedish"/>
>
>
>
>
>
> positionIncrementGap="100">
>
>
>
>
> words="lang/stopwords_th.txt" enablePositionIncrements="true"/>
>
>
>
>
> positionIncrementGap="100">
>
>
>
> words="lang/stopwords_tr.txt" enablePositionIncrements="true"/>
> language="Turkish"/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> required="true" />
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> id
>
>
> biog
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-query-issues-tp3974922p3975167.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Regards,
Dmitry Kan
/Solr-query-issues-tp3974922p3975167.html
Sent from the Solr - User
Yes.
See http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrQuerySyntax - The standard Solr Query
Parser syntax is a superset of the Lucene Query Parser syntax.
Which links to http://lucene.apache.org/core/3_6_0/queryparsersyntax.html
Note - Based on the info on these pages I believe the "+" symbo
Below are the configuration files:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/file/n3974922/conf.rar conf.rar
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-query-issues-tp3974922.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Regards,
Dmitry Kan
://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/file/n3974922/conf.rar conf.rar
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-query-issues-tp3974922.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi :)
I remember that in a Lucene query, there is something like mandatory
values. I just have to add a "+" symbol in front of the mandatory
parameter, like: +myField:my value
I was wondering if there was something similar in Solr queries? Or is
this behaviour activated by default?
Gary
Shawn:
Ahhh, so *that* was what your JIRA was about
Consider https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2429
for your ACL calculations, that's what this was developed
for.
The basic idea is that you can write a custom filter that returns
whether the document should be included in the results
On 4/5/2012 3:49 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
Of course putting more clauses in an OR query will
have a performance cost, there's more work to do
OK, being a smart-alec aside you will probably
be fine with a few hundred clauses. The question
is simply whether the performance hit is acceptable.
Of course putting more clauses in an OR query will
have a performance cost, there's more work to do
OK, being a smart-alec aside you will probably
be fine with a few hundred clauses. The question
is simply whether the performance hit is acceptable.
I'm afraid that question can't be answered in
Hi All,
I am working on an application which makes few solr calls to get the data.
On the high level, We have a requirement like this
- Make first call to Solr, to get the list of products which are
children of a given category
- Make 2nd solr call to get product documents based on a l
storedprocedures in solr query..
Importance: Low
Hi all,
Is it possible to execute to stored procedures placed in data-config.xml file
in solr ?
please give response ...
Thanx in advance.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/using-storedprocedures-in-solr-query
Hi all,
Is it possible to execute to stored procedures placed in data-config.xml
file in solr ?
please give response ...
Thanx in advance.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/using-storedprocedures-in-solr-query-tp3880557p3880557.html
Sent from the Solr - User
Hi,
Thank you guys Erik and Mikhail , You saved my day
Thanks
Balaji
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-Query-Intersection-tp3818756p3819571.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
gle & IE" , "Google & Firefox"
>
> Is it possible to do with the Query Intersections or do I need to write
> separate queries for all the above , If not please suggest how it can be
> achieved
>
>
> Thanks
> Balaji
>
>
> --
> View this message
Hi,
I got your point are you suggesting me to run using the *facet.query*
param for the various combinations
Thanks
Balaji
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-Query-Intersection-tp3818756p3819165.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at
Hi Mikhail,
Yes I am trying to get the facets counts for all these and populate the
chart , but comparison between the values is what I am wondering
Will facets handle all the 3 possible scenarios
Thanks
Balaji
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR
it possible to do with the Query Intersections or do I need to write
> separate queries for all the above , If not please suggest how it can be
> achieved
>
>
> Thanks
> Balaji
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-Query-
tion among them like "Google & IE" , "Google & Firefox"
Is it possible to do with the Query Intersections or do I need to write
separate queries for all the above , If not please suggest how it can be
achieved
Thanks
Balaji
--
View this message in context:
h
We are excited to announce the launch of soleami - a free visualization service
for Apache Solr query log.
soleami - Visualize the needs of your visitors.
http://soleami.com/
Soleami summarizes Solr query logs of past 12 months by search keyword.
It is a very useful tool for you to see various
Hi Ahmet,
awesome! Now it works.
2012/2/10 Ahmet Arslan :
>> I'm using the NGramFilterFactory for indexing and querying.
>>
>> So if I'm searching for "overflow" it creates an query like
>> this:
>>
>> mySearchField:"ov ve ... erflow overflo verflow overflow"
>>
>> But if I misspelled "overflow",
> I'm using the NGramFilterFactory for indexing and querying.
>
> So if I'm searching for "overflow" it creates an query like
> this:
>
> mySearchField:"ov ve ... erflow overflo verflow overflow"
>
> But if I misspelled "overflow", i.e. "owerflow" there are no
> matches
> because the quotes arou
501 - 600 of 799 matches
Mail list logo
