Re: Does DIH queues up requests

um, 4) threadid FROM > my_data_view t) WHERE threadid = 1" > transformer="TemplateTransformer,LogTransformer" > logTemplate="topic thread 1" logLevel="debug"> > ... > > And so on... > > -Original Messag

Re: [Benchmark SOLR] JETTY VS TOMCAT

Did you try: Set your acceptor count, SelectChannelConnector.setAcceptors(int) to be a a value between 1 and (number_of_cpu_cores - 1). On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 3:22 AM,

Re: Does DIH queues up requests

What we do is : Run URL to delete *:*, but do not commit. 1. Kick off indexing on DIH1, clean=false, commit=false. 2. Kick off indexing on DIH2, clean=false, commit=false Then we manually commit. On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Nkeet Shah wrote: > Hi, > I have a

How to solve?

We are entering entries into SOLR like the following, and we want to see if my pt matches any of these radiuses. 1. Red, pt=39,-107, radius=10km 2. Blue, pt=39,-108, radius=50km I want to run a SOLR select with a pt=39,-104 and see if it is within 10km of point 1, and 50km of point 2? Usually I

Re: Limit = 0? Does it still calculate facet ?

? Any other way to do it? On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Tomás Fernández Löbbe < tomasflo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, facet.limit will short circuit and not calculate the facet for the > field. I'm assuming you can't just use facet=false? > > Tomas > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2016

Limit = 0? Does it still calculate facet ?

We have a qt=provider and it sets facets. We want to short circuit the facet. Can we set limit=0 and will it NOT calculate it? Or does it calculate it and not return results? Can we make it faster ? f..facet.limit = 0 -- Bill Bell billnb...@gmail.com cell 720-256-8076

Re: XFS or EXT4 on Amazon AWS AMIs

, is there an r4 instance type? The c3 and m3 are superseded > with *4 types that have notable improvements in IOPs and don't cost more. > > http://howto.unixdev.net/Test_LVM_Trim_Ext4.html -- not an extended > performance benchmark, but useful to validate discard/TRIM. > > On 12/22/201

XFS or EXT4 on Amazon AWS AMIs

So what are people recommending for SOLR on AWS on Amazon AMI - ext4 or xfs? I saw an article about MongoDB - saying performance on Amazon was better due to a mutex issue on ext4 files and threaded calls. I have been using ext4 for a long time, but I am moving to r3.* instances and TRIM /

Re: Caching multiple entities

I am not sure, but it looks like your XML is invalid. last_modified > XYZ You need to switch to or use something like a database view so that the > and other < will not cause problems. On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 7:01 AM, Per Newgro wrote: > Hello, > > we are implementing a

Re: Memory leak in Solr

What do you mean by JVM level? Run Solr on different ports on the same machine? If you have a 32 core box would you run 2,3,4 JVMs? On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 8:46 PM, Jeff Wartes wrote: > > Here’s an earlier post where I mentioned some GC investigation tools: >

timeAllowed?

When should one use timeAllowed in Solr 5.5.3? How much overhead is involved in it? Does it create a thread and a timer event if you use it? Or is the timer event used even if you don't set it explicitly? We are thinking about using it for all requests. Just set it +10 milliseconds longer than

Re: Issue in 5.5.3 with lucene localParams with type

Bump... Thoughts? It seems that {!lucene type=} would just override the lucene qp - but in 5.5.3 something changed. On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 1:15 PM, William Bell <billnb...@gmail.com> wrote: > In Solr 5.4.1 this used to work: > > fl={!lucene%20type=paylo

Issue in 5.5.3 with lucene localParams with type

In Solr 5.4.1 this used to work: fl={!lucene%20type=payloadQueryParser v='hosp_quality_spec_boost:PS628'} 24.227154, The only way I can get payloads to work is: fl={!payloadQueryParser v='hosp_quality_spec_boost:PS628'} 0.125, But the right values only come back in #2. It should be .125.

Re: Aggregate Values Inside a Facet Range

How about hours? NOW+1HR NOW+2HR NOW+12HR NOW-4HR Can we add that? On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Furkan KAMACI wrote: > I have documents like that > > id:5 > timestamp:NOW //pseudo date representation > count:13 > > id:4 > timestamp:NOW //pseudo date representation

Re: Problem with Password Decryption in Data Import Handler

OK it was echo -n "${encrypt_key}" > encrypt.key On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 12:20 PM, William Bell <billnb...@gmail.com> wrote: > I cannot get it to work either. > > Here are my steps. I took the key from the Patch in > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/atta

Re: Problem with Password Decryption in Data Import Handler

I cannot get it to work either. Here are my steps. I took the key from the Patch in https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12730862/SOLR-4392.patch. echo U2FsdGVkX19Gz7q7/4jj3Wsin7801TlFbob1PBT2YEacbPEUARDiuV5zGSAwU4Sz7upXDEPIQPU48oY1fBWM6Q== > pass.enc openssl aes-128-cbc -d -a -salt

Re: OOM Error

I would also recommend that 8GB is cutting it close for Java 8 JVM with SOLR. We use 12GB and have had issues with 8GB. But your mileage may vary. On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 1:37 AM, Toke Eskildsen wrote: > On Mon, 2016-10-24 at 18:27 -0400, Susheel Kumar wrote: > > I am

Re: Migrating to Solr 6.1.0 from 5.5.0

the documentation is not good on this. Not sure how to fix it either. On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 3:41 AM, M, Arjun (Nokia - IN/Bangalore) < arju...@nokia.com> wrote: > Hi, > > We are getting the below errors when migrating Solr from 5.5.0 to > 6.1.0. Could anyone help in resolving the

Re: Search with the start of field

Show us the FieldType and Field definitions. On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:06 AM, Mahmoud Almokadem wrote: > Hello, > > What is the best way to search with the start token of field? > > For example: the field contains these values > > Document1: ABC DEF GHI > Document2:

Healthgrades looking for Search Product Manager

Hi all. I am reaching out to see if anyone of the Search experts in this group would consider helping us out on Healthgrades search. We have a ton of ideas from chat bots, to personalization, collaborative filtering, and are going to build some ridiculously crazy ideas that consumers use to find

Re: changed query parsing between 4.10.4 and 5.5.3?

We need to get this fixed. Do you have some sample queries? On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 12:37 AM, Bernd Fehling < bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de> wrote: > Hi Greg, > > after trying several hours with all combinations of parameters and not > getting any useful search result with complex search terms

Re: Multilevel grouping?

On grouping, if I only want the first 5 responses, it would be great if the code short-circuited to improve performance. I am not sure I want it grouping 10M results, when I already have 5 that are good enough. ? On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Callum Lamb wrote: > Look at

Re: Automatic Language Identification

We should add a simple filter in Solr for this. The current way requires indexing. https://github.com/kkrugler/yalder is good, it would be a great filter: if NOT english, fail the whole text. On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 6:33 AM, Allison, Timothy B. wrote: > +1 to langdetect > >

Re: integrate SOLR with OSM

angkul" <yuza.ras...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > hi william, > > > > thx for your reply. > > is it any link article or documents that i can read for this? > > pls let me know if you've any suggestion. > > > > On 26/06/16 02:58, William Bell wrote: &

Re: integrate SOLR with OSM

It depends on if your are using TIGERLINE data in OSM to increase the accuracy of home addresses. If you are using TIGERLINE, you are talking about > 500M rows or so + millions of OSM data. Which will is a LOT of data that you will be pumping into SOLR. You will need to use Solr Cloud since you

Re: issue with 5.3.1 and index version

g used and once an index has been > written to by a newer version of Lucene, going back to an old version is > not possible in most cases. > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 4:00 AM, William Bell <billnb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > When I index 5.4.1 using luceneVer in

issue with 5.3.1 and index version

When I index 5.4.1 using luceneVer in solrlconfig.xml of 5.3.1, the segmentsw_9 files has in it Lucene54. Why? Is this a known bug? #strings segments_9 segments Lucene54 commitTimeMSec 1459374733276 -- Bill Bell billnb...@gmail.com cell 720-256-8076

Example Transformer

I wrote a transformer for DIH to get the value from a field using Http call. Since this runs on a SOLR node when indexing, I think I would do it with SOLRJ. How do I take this and convert it to SOLRJ and avoid the network call ? Also, this is pretty cool, and avoids the Entity for the call -

DIG issue with SolrEntityProcessor 5.4.1

We are running this inside of another entity in DIH. There appears to be an issue. We get 2 calls to the survey core if hits > 0. If hits = 0 we get 1 call. Has anyone else seen this? Shall I fix it? Any ideas where this bug may be? http://localhost:8983/solr/survey; qt="dihsurvey"

Re: DIG issue with SolrEntityProcessor 5.4.1

I will try to see if I can create a use case and fix it. On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:00 AM, William Bell <billnb...@gmail.com> wrote: > We are running this inside of another entity in DIH. There appears to be > an issue. We get 2 calls to the survey core if hits > 0. If hits = 0

Re: Field exclusion from fl and hl.fl

hannel.handle(HttpChannel.java:310)\r\n\tat > > org.eclipse.jetty.server.HttpConnection.onFillable(HttpConnection.java:257)\r\n\tat > > org.eclipse.jetty.io.AbstractConnection$2.run(AbstractConnection.java:540)\r\n\tat > > org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool.runJob(Queu

Re: Field exclusion from fl and hl.fl

it used to support fl=*,-field Does that not work now? On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 7:37 PM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo wrote: > I have yet to find any workaround so far.Still have to list out all the > remaining fields one by one. > > Does anyone else has any suggestions? > >

XX:ParGCCardsPerStrideChunk

Has anyone tried -XX:ParGCCardsPerStrideChunk with Solr? There has been reports of improved GC times. -- Bill Bell billnb...@gmail.com cell 720-256-8076

What search metrics are useful?

How do others look at search metrics? 1. Search conversion? Do you look at searches and if the user does not click on a result, and reruns the search that would be a failure? 2. How to measure auto complete success metrics? 3. Facets/filters could be considered negative, since we did not find

Re: Issue with Join

Can a committer take a look at this please? On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 4:35 PM, William Bell <billnb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah I ran it. It appears to only have an issue if the field for the core > on the outside is MultiValue, and the inside field is single value, and the > ord

Re: Issue with if() statement

w that works. I’m in > the polishing stages of a a collaborative blog post on example/files that > will detail these tricks a bit - will publish that in the next few days. > > — > Erik Hatcher, Senior Solutions Architect > http://www.lucidworks.com <http://www.lucidworks.com/> >

Re: Add support in FacetsComponent for facet.method=uif

g/jira/browse/SOLR-8466 > On Jan 2, 2016 8:45 PM, "William Bell" <billnb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Yes we would like backward compatibility. We cannot switch all the facet > > fields to DocValues and our faceting is slow. > > > > Please... > > >

Re: Add support in FacetsComponent for facet.method=uif

done in > another ticket. > > On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 4:18 PM, William Bell <billnb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Interesting that facet.method=dv or facet.method=uif. What is the > > difference? > > > > On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 6:44 AM, Jamie Johnson <jej2...@gmail

Re: Issue with if() statement

asked on numerous occasions to publish this > codebase. It is now at: > > https://github.com/upayavira/custom-solr-components > > There's no sample code in there yet. I'll see if I can stick one in > there now, but I'm not sure how much time I have today to pull it all >

Re: Add support in FacetsComponent for facet.method=uif

Yes we would like backward compatibility. We cannot switch all the facet fields to DocValues and our faceting is slow. Please... On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 7:41 AM, Jamie Johnson wrote: > Is there any interest in this? While i think it's important and inline > with faceting

Re: Issue with if() statement

Another weirdness: http://localhost:8983/solr/providersearch/select?wt=json=state:CO=state:NY=*=*:*=$state1={!lucene%20v=$tt} That does not return anything. But if I set v=$state1 I get results. Can I not set equivalent variables? On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 2:07 PM, William Bell <bil

Re: Issue with if() statement

h case.all='*:*' case.CO='state:CO' case.NY='state:NY' v=$state1} Obviously Oregon (OR!) is an issue, and it won't work at all plus On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 2:15 PM, William Bell <billnb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Another we

Re: Issue with if() statement

Also ne: not equal. This is like KSH. On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 2:40 PM, William Bell <billnb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Forgot last bit: > > fq={!switch case.gt.0=$state1 > default=$state > func=len($state1)} > > &g

Re: Issue with if() statement

want to put an IF statement around which v to use. On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 1:52 PM, William Bell <billnb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sure. > > If the state:NY returns results filter by state:NY, if it does not, then > use state:CO. If we have results in NY, use it, otherw

Re: Issue with if() statement

?? On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 2:25 PM, William Bell <billnb...@gmail.com> wrote: > This all started with me trying to use {!switch} to indicate with CO or NY > to use. if we pass state1, that is supposed to take precedence, but if > nothing is returned, then use state Make sense n

Re: Issue with if() statement

Forgot last bit: fq={!switch case.gt.0=$state1 default=$state func=len($state1)} On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 2:39 PM, William Bell <billnb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Maybe we can add function value on a switch? > > fq={!s

Re: Issue with if() statement

s before the > QueryComponent does. > > A simple queryparser of your own would seem like a pretty lightweight > thing - probably 20 lines of code or less. > > Upayavira > > On Fri, Jan 1, 2016, at 09:40 PM, William Bell wrote: > > Forgot last bit: > &g

Re: Issue with if() statement

Sure. If the state:NY returns results filter by state:NY, if it does not, then use state:CO. If we have results in NY, use it, otherwise use CO. OK? On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 1:15 PM, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 31, 2015, at 11:50 PM, William Bel

Issue with if() statement

We are getting weird results with if(exists(a),b,c). We are getting b+c!! http://localhost:8983/solr/providersearch/select?q=*:*=json=state:%22CO%22=state:%22NY%22=if(exists(query($state1)),{!lucene%20v=$state1},{!lucene%20v=$state}) I am getting NY and CO! I only want $state1, which is NY.

SOLR 5.4.0?

How is SOLR 5.4.0 ? I heard there was a quick 5.4.1 coming out? Any major issues? -- Bill Bell billnb...@gmail.com cell 720-256-8076

Re: Issue with Join

pec_code > to=practicing_specialties_codes > fromIndex=autosuggest}*:* as a q and look at debug output. > Also there was a trick for dealing with pure negative queries q=*:* > -foo:bar though it might be obsolete. > > On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 7:02 AM, William Bell <billnb...@gma

Re: Issue with Join

Thoughts? I can duplicate it at will... On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 9:02 PM, William Bell <billnb...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have having issues with {!join}. If the core have multiValued field and > the inner join does not have a multiValued field it does not find the > ones...

Re: Memory Usage increases by a lot during and after optimization .

Question: does anyone have example good merge settings for solrconfig ? To keep the number of segments small like 6? On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 8:49 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > Some people also want to control when major segment merges happen, and > optimizing at a known time

Issue with Join

I have having issues with {!join}. If the core have multiValued field and the inner join does not have a multiValued field it does not find the ones... Solr 5.3.1... 5.3.1 Example. PS1226 is in practicing_specialties_codes in providersearch core. This field is multiValued. in the autosuggest

Re: How to check when a search exceeds the threshold of timeAllowed parameter

Great I must have missed that. On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Jeff Wartes wrote: > Looks like it’ll set partialResults=true on your results if you hit the > timeout. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-502 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5986

Re: How to check when a search exceeds the threshold of timeAllowed parameter

I agree that when using timeAllowed in the header info there should be an entry that indicates timeAllowed triggered. This is the only reason why we have not used timeAllowed. So this is a great suggestion. Something like: 1 ?? That would be great. 0 1 107 *:* 1000 On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at

Re: Best practices on monitoring Solr

Sematext.com has a service for this... Or just curl "http://localhost:8983/solr//select?q=*:*" to see if it returns ? On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Tiwari, Shailendra < shailendra.tiw...@macmillan.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Last week our Solr Search was un-responsive and we need to re-boot the >

Re: API accessible without authentication even though Basic Auth Plugin is enabled

Why would someone stay on 5.3.x instead of upgrading to 5.4? Why backport when you can just upgrade? On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Noble Paul wrote: > A 5.3.2 release is coming up which will back port the fixes introduced in > 5.4 > On Dec 17, 2015 10:25 PM, "tine-2"

Re: faceting is unusable slow since upgrade to 5.3.0

e trivial to > change and would probably be more aligned with not adding unexpected > changes to people that are currently using fc. > > -Jamie > > On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 11:03 PM, William Bell <billnb...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Can we add method=uif back when

Re: faceting is unusable slow since upgrade to 5.3.0

Can we add method=uif back when not using the JSON Facet API too? That would help a lot of people. On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 7:17 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 4:57 AM, Vincenzo D'Amore > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > given that solr 5.4

Re: faceting is unusable slow since upgrade to 5.3.0

Same question here Wondering if faceting performance is fixed and how to take advantage of it ? On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 2:57 AM, Vincenzo D'Amore wrote: > Hi all, > > given that solr 5.4 is finally released, is this what's more stable and > efficient version of

Re: Migrating from cores to collections

ok. What about using DIH handler? Does it index in a SolrCloud setup ? Or how would I convert a query to use SolrJ ? On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 5:36 AM, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 29, 2015, at 07:38 PM, William Bell wrote: > > OK. Been using Co

Migrating from cores to collections

OK. Been using Cores for 4 years. Want to migrate to collections / Cloud. Do we have to change our queries? http://loadbalancer:8983/solr/corename/select?q=*:* What does this become once we have the collection sharded? Do we need a Load Balancer or just point to one box and run the new query?

RptWithGeometrySpatialField

David, et al. 2 questions. Is this a good tradeoff for performance? Also, RptWithGeometrySpatialField improved performance on what type of searches? Does it support multivalued lat,lon fields? Does LatLonType support multivalued lat,lon fields or only RPT allows for this? -- Bill Bell

Re: Parallel SQL / calcite adapter

How is performance on Calcite? On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 5:12 AM, Joel Bernstein wrote: > After reading https://calcite.apache.org/docs/tutorial.html, I think it > should be possible to use the Solr's JDBC Driver with Calcites JDBC > adapter. > > If you give it a try and run

Re: fl=value equals?

Bell > > > Sent from mobile > > > > > > > On Nov 11, 2015, at 1:15 AM, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: > > > > > > > > I concur with Jan - what does b= do? > > > > > > > > Also asking, how did y

fl=value equals?

We are trying to look at a value, and change another value based on that. For example, for national search we want to pass in radius=national, and then set another variable equal to 0, else set the other variable = to geodist() calculation. We tried {!switch} but this only appears to work on

Re: fl=value equals?

hComponent > to construct your “b” parameter... > > -- > Jan Høydahl, search solution architect > Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com > > > 10. nov. 2015 kl. 23.52 skrev William Bell <billnb...@gmail.com>: > > > > We are trying to look at a value, and change

Solr Suggester with Geo?

http://lucidworks.com/blog/solr-suggester/ Wondering if anyone has uses these new techniques with a boost on geodist() inverted? So the rows that get returned that are closest need to come back first. We are still using Edge Grams since we have not figured out how to boost the results on geo

Re: Solr Suggester with Geo?

e/display/solr/Spatial+Search > > Thanks, > -- > *Sameer Maggon* > www.measuredsearch.com <http://measuredsearch.com/> > Fully Managed Solr-as-a-Service | Solr Consulting | Solr Support > > > > On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 11:18 AM, William Bell <billnb...@gmail.com> wrote: >

Looking for SOLR consulting help

Healthgrades is looking for Solr consulting assistance. Rate is negotiable based on skillsets. $125 - $175/hr We are flexible on time. 1. Solr 5.x experience 2. Tuning performance 3. Relevancy and Autosuggest experience 4. Move to Solr Cloud 5. Amazon Linux Debian experience 6. Java experience

any clean test failing

It is getting stuck on resolve. ant clean test SOLR 5.3.1 [ivy:retrieve] retrieve done (5ms) Overriding previous definition of property "ivy.version" [ivy:retrieve] no resolved descriptor found: launching default resolve Overriding previous definition of property "ivy.version"

Re: any clean test failing

OK I deleted /home/solr/.ivy2 and it started working. On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 11:57 AM, William Bell <billnb...@gmail.com> wrote: > It is getting stuck on resolve. > > ant clean test > > SOLR 5.3.1 > > [ivy:retrieve] retrieve done (5ms) > > Overriding previous de

Re: Get this committed

OK I added the test case. On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 5:05 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar < shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote: > I can review and commit if you add a test. > > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 9:45 AM, William Bell <billnb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I can confirm this is w

Get this committed

I can confirm this is working in PROD at 100M hits a day. Can we commit it please? Begging here. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7993 -- Bill Bell billnb...@gmail.com cell 720-256-8076

Re: PayloadTermQuery deprecated

at returns 0, you could just clone that and change > SimScorer.score()) > > Alan Woodward > www.flax.co.uk > > > On 19 Oct 2015, at 00:39, William Bell wrote: > > > Here is my first stab at it. Thoughts? > > > > Question: > > > >

Re: PayloadTermQuery deprecated

oreQuery psq = new PayloadScoreQuery(sq, new AveragePayloadFunction()); q.add(psq, Occur.SHOULD); } } } // return q; return q.build(); } On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 4:46 PM, William Bell <billnb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Wondering how to change my

Re: Lucene Revolution ?

ion). Don't miss the next one :) > > > > > > Re ES/AWS: what about it? Solr is a first class AWS citizen, > employing > > > Solr folks, and certainly where many of our customers deploy their > > > infrastructure, Solr, Fusion, etc. > > > > > >

PayloadTermQuery deprecated

Wondering how to change my payload based on example: https://lucidworks.com/blog/2014/06/13/end-to-end-payload-example-in-solr/ PayloadTermQuery and BooleanQuery are deprecated in 5.3.x @Override public Query parse() throws SyntaxError { if (qstr == null || qstr.length() == 0) return null;

Add replication to http://localhost:8983/solr/#/~cores/extinfo

It would be very useful to add a button to replicate (like we have optimize) on http://localhost:8983/solr/#/~cores/extinfo Also a link to the core would be great too -- Bill Bell billnb...@gmail.com cell 720-256-8076

Lucene Revolution ?

How did Lucene Revolution 2015 go last week? Also, what about Amazon's release of Elastic Search as a managed service in AWS? -- Bill Bell billnb...@gmail.com cell 720-256-8076

Re: AutoComplete Feature in Solr

We want to use suggester but also want to show those results closest to my lat,long... Kinda combine suggester and bq=geodist() On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Salman Ansari wrote: > Hi, > > I have been trying to get the autocomplete feature in Solr working with no >

??

http://www.slideshare.net/lucidworks/high-performance-solr-and-jvm-tuning-strategies-used-for-map-quests-search-ahead-darren-spehr See ArrayBlockingQueue. What would this help with? -- Bill Bell billnb...@gmail.com cell 720-256-8076

solr-user@lucene.apache.org

What should this be set to? Do you set it with -Dsolr.jetty.https.acceptQueueSize=5000 ? -- Bill Bell billnb...@gmail.com cell 720-256-8076

FieldCache?

So the FieldCache was removed from Solr 5. What is the implication of this? Should we move all facets to DocValues when we have high cardinality (lots of values) ? Are we adding it back? Other ideas to improve performance? >From Mike M: FieldCache is gone (moved to a dedicated

Ideas

We have some Denial of service attacks on our web site. SOLR threads are going crazy. Basically someone is hitting start=15 + and rows=20. The start is crazy large. And then they jump around. start=15 then start=213030 etc. Any ideas for how to stop this besides blocking these IPs?

Re: solr training

How about in Denver? On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 7:53 PM, Otis Gospodnetić < otis.gospodne...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Tim, > > A slightly delayed reply ;) > We are running Solr training in NYC next month - > http://sematext.com/training/solr-training.html - 2nd seat is 50% off. > > Otis > -- >

Re: DataImportHandler scheduling

We should add a simple scheduler in the UI. It is very useful. To schedule various actions: - Full index - Delta Index - Replicate On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote: > On 9/1/2015 11:45 AM, Troy Edwards wrote: > > My initial thought was to use

Re: Query timeAllowed and its behavior.

As we reported, we are having issues with timeAllowed on 5.2.1. If we set a timeAllowed=1 and then run the same query with timeAllowed=3 we get the # of rows that was returned on the first query. It appears the results are cached when exceeding the timeAllowed, like the results are correct -

SOLR 5.3

At lucene.apache.org/solr it says SOLR 5.3 is there, but when I click on downloads it shows Solr 5.2.1... ?? APACHE SOLR™ 5.3.0Solr is the popular, blazing-fast, open source enterprise search platform built on Apache Lucene™. -- Bill Bell billnb...@gmail.com cell 720-256-8076

Re: DIH delta-import pk

Send the SQL and Schema.xml. Also logs. Does it complain about _id_ or you field in schema? On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 4:55 AM, CrazyDiamond crazy_diam...@mail.ru wrote: Now I set db id as unique field and uuid field,which should be generated automatically as required. but when i add document

jetty.xml

We sometimes get a spike in Solr, and we get like 3K of threads and then timeouts... In Solr 5.2.1 the defult jetty settings is kinda crazy for threads - since the value is HIGH! What do others recommend? Fusion jetty settings for Threads: Get name=ThreadPool Set name=minThreads

SOLR 5.3

When do we think SOLR 5.3 might come out? It is nearly ready? -- Bill Bell billnb...@gmail.com cell 720-256-8076

Why is /query needed for Json Facet?

I tried using /select and this query does not work? Cannot understand why. Passing Parameters via JSON We can also pass normal request parameters in the JSON body within the params block: $ curl http://localhost:8983/solr/query?fl=title,author-d ' { params:{ q:title:hero, rows:1 } } '

Re: Why is /query needed for Json Facet?

( DebugComponent.COMPONENT_NAME ); names.add( ExpandComponent.COMPONENT_NAME); return names; } On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 11:31 AM, William Bell billnb...@gmail.com wrote: I tried using /select and this query does not work? Cannot understand why. Passing Parameters via JSON We can also pass normal request

Re: Parameterized values

That would be pretty bizarre. I'll try it. On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Mikhail Khludnev mkhlud...@griddynamics.com wrote: hm. Did you try str name=pspecPS127/str str name=hqval1hosp_quality_spec_boost:${pspec:${pspec}}/str ? On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 8:16 PM, William Bell billnb

Parameterized values

http://yonik.com/solr-query-parameter-substitution/ This is not working as part of QTs. Cannot load the core, since ${value} is being used for XML parameters for system property substitution. https://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrConfigXml#System_property_substitution Can we support both? str

Re: Parameterized values

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7846 On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 11:16 AM, William Bell billnb...@gmail.com wrote: http://yonik.com/solr-query-parameter-substitution/ This is not working as part of QTs. Cannot load the core, since ${value} is being used for XML parameters for system

Re: Unexpected docvalues type error using result grouping - Use UninvertingReader or index with docvalues

You could try stopping SOLR, going into the data directory and rm -rf * and starting SOLR again. Did you use the schema REST api? Residual ? On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 6:57 PM, Shamik Bandopadhyay sham...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm facing this weird error while running result grouping queries.

Re: LFU vs solr.FastLRUCache

We should get that done!! :) On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 7:09 AM, Shawn Heisey apa...@elyograg.org wrote: On 7/5/2015 10:11 PM, William Bell wrote: Has anyone used solr.LFUCache in Production to replace: filterCache class=solr.FastLRUCache size=4096 initialSize=4096

  1   2   3   4   >