[SAtalk] latest 2.0 broke this morning?

th ESMTP id g0IE5r324660 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 09:05:53 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 09:05:53 -0500 (EST) From: Jason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Jason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Ve

[SAtalk] All Caps

First thank you for fixing the SUBJECT header catch and adding a rule in for the ALL_CAPS_SUBJECT. Excellent Idea. Would all caps checks on the others like... TO FROM CONTENT-TYPE Be another test to add? - Jason Portwood [EMAIL PROTECTED

[SAtalk] spamc and users

hosts where the mail is not directly delivered only able to go with the default system configuration? Thanks, Jason Portwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamass

[SAtalk] RBL's and the local network

still get tagged. Jason Portwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

[SAtalk] Web Based Front End

welcome. Thanks, Jason Portwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Re: [SAtalk] Web Based Front End

On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Jason wrote: > > I finally finished a web based front end for SpamAssassin with SQL and > have gotten permission from my employer to release it as open source. > > You can check it out at http://www.wkrp.com/webusasin/ > I goofed in the source. Sorry I

Re: [SAtalk] Web Based Front End

On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Rick Macdougall wrote: > What happened? It appears to be gone now. > Ok that's two for me. I tarred I but forgot the gzip part. It should be fine now. My first project that I've actually put things out on so I'

[SAtalk] Nigeria Scam not working?

atus" at ../lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm line 1098. ) Otherwise I'd move up to the latest and try it again. Thanks, Jason Portwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

[SAtalk] greylist?

in just by duplicating check_to_in_whitelist and make it only grab the To's. Just a thought. Jason Portwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

[SAtalk] X-info

I'm seeing some spam coming in with X-Info headers mentioning "To report abuse forward this mail to..." It's being marked as spam (which it is). I'm wondering with all the data that's been collected is it worth checking for the X-info with an excuse or not? J

[SAtalk] ORBZ shutdown

Looks like ORBZ has been shutdown... As seen on slashdot http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/03/20/1528246&mode=thread&tid=111 Jason Portwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourcef

[SAtalk] Simson talks about Spam Assassin

I don't know if this has been mentioned before... Came across his mailing list this morning. http://www.simson.net/pipermail/simsoft/2002-May/08.html Jason Portwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Don't miss the 2002

[SAtalk] any known bugs with blank spamassassin reports?

ports? -- Jason Burnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ No witty signature available at this time ~ --- Sponsored by: ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[SAtalk] no whitelist defined, but a spam passed the USER_IN_WHITELIST check?

_NAME_NO_SPACES, MSGID_CHARS_SPAM, DEAR_SOMEBODY, DOUBLE_CAPSWORD, USER_IN_WHITELIST) -- Jason Burnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ No witty signature available at this time ~ --- Sponsored by: ThinkGeek at http://ww

[SAtalk] help diagnose a mis-tagged email (not spam, tagged as spam)

here a way with mailscanner + spamassassin to not scan mail originating from my network? -- Jason Burnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ No witty signature available at this time ~ --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to ge

[SAtalk] self generated black hole list

for each spam or non spam seen up to a certain threshold. That way normal messages who only tickle the rules could still have a chance to get through. Just a thought... - Jason Portwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net email is sponsored by

Re: [SAtalk] spamd/spamc help needed by newbie

r: > > smrsh: spamassassin not available for sendmail programs > 554 5.0.0 "| spamassassin || exit 75"... Service unavailable > > Anyone understand this? > Your sendmail is installed using a restricted shell which only allows you to pipe mail to certain programs, s

Re: [SAtalk] spamd/spamc help needed by newbie

On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 11:51:44AM -0500, Jason Kohles wrote: > On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 04:37:11PM +, Ian Briggs wrote: > > > > On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Ged Haywood wrote: > > > "| spamassassin || exit 75" > > > > Further to my previous reply

Re: [SAtalk] why did this trigger?

der. Any mail that actually does come from hotmail user has this header. -- Jason Kohles [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior System Architect (703)786-8036 (cellular) Red Hat Professional Consulting (703)456-2940 (office) _

Re: [SAtalk] why did this trigger?

On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 11:38:48PM -0500, dman wrote: > On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 11:22:30PM -0500, Jason Kohles wrote: > | On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 11:20:29PM -0500, dman wrote: > | > > | > A legit message triggered the > | > FROM_FORGED_HOTMAIL > | > test.

[SAtalk] How about a exit-code reporting option?

d over a network, this could really reduce the load... What I'm looking at doing is moving Qmail-Scanner to a points-based system (like SpamAssassin and others), and to be able to incorporate SpamAssassin's "hits" with other filters decisions. Comments? Stupid idea? :-) -- Cheers

Re: [SAtalk] whitelist_from -- case sensitivity?

ortant, but the RFC does allow them to if they wish. -- Jason Kohles [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior System Architect (703)786-8036 (cellular) Red Hat Professional Consulting (703)456-2940 (office) ___

Re: [SAtalk] whitelist_from -- case sensitivity?

it was funky > and decided to bounce it off the list. :-) > Maybe I misunderstood the conversation when I replied =) RFC 822 only specifies that the local-part of the address have it's case maintained, the domain-name part is not included, and I'm pretty sure the DNS relate

[SAtalk] Missing (documented) feature in 2.01?

entiment about virus scanners vs spam. In Qmail-Scanner, the SpamAssassin support merely tags the messages as spam - it doesn't quarantine them like it does for viruses. Still too many false alerts I'm afraid - a lot of my Email from root cronjobs gets caught! ;-) -- Cheers Jason Haar Informat

[SAtalk] SA 2.01 mistaking MIME description for spam

r see that area these days... [hmm, great way of sneaking stuff out... ;-)] -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417 ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL P

Re: [SAtalk] SA 2.01 mistaking MIME description for spam

e name could be made more generic, as this isn't just an Exchange issue. How about "body MIME_EXPLANATION"? -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417 ___ Spamass

Re: [SAtalk] SA 2.01 mistaking MIME description for spam

On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 09:33:00AM +1300, Jason Haar wrote: > How about "body MIME_EXPLANATION"? With language issues rearing it's ugly head (or beautiful ;-), we could do the job "properly" - but I don't know if SA is up to it. You could record the boundary str

[SAtalk] Documentation change: more references to "-F" option needed :-)

:-), then "spamd -F 1" is your friend? People aren't doing this, and are then wondering why all their mail is corrupted. This isn't a bug - but it is catching a few sites... [it didn't catch me - honest!! :-)] Thanks -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager T

Re: [SAtalk] Documentation change: more references to "-F" option needed :-)

n't use that > config, and am liable to misdocument things), want to knock something up > and forward a patch? OK, it should go into http://spamassassin.org/sitewide.html -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9

Re: [SAtalk] Has anybody gotten SA to work with Qmail and Qmail s canner?

disables user config files, disables generation of a leading "From " header [that will break mail otherwise!], and only does local tests (as I believe RBL/etc tests are better done by the MTA). Works, works, works. -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager Tri

Re: [SAtalk] Variations on To/From headers

pam may be inappropriate. This is 100% always indicative of a M$ Outlook user. H, second thoughts, classify it as spam ;-) -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417 ___

Re: [SAtalk] Envelope from

em-wide - i.e. that only works if you're calling SA after local delivery (where Return-Path headers are usually added). -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417

[SAtalk] This one shot through SA

ng/e/i1/i71.htm Probably should be added to RATWARE at least? -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417 --- Begin Message --- ´ó¼ÒËùÊìϤµÄ׬ǮÍøÕ¾½ö½öÄÜÃÖ²¹ÄúµÄÉÏÍø·ÑÓ㬶øÎÒÃǽéÉܵÄÕâÒ»ÍøÕ¾ÊÇʹ²Æ¸»Æ½Ãñ»¯µÄ ׬ǮÍøÕ¾£¬Ë

Re: Re: [SAtalk] BSD rc.d script and HTML spam

| > | pid=`pidof spamd` ? > > 'pidof' is a Debian thing. > [jason@traveller jason]$ cat /etc/redhat-release Red Hat Linux release 7.2 (Enigma) [jason@traveller jason]$ pidof init 1 -- Jason Kohles [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior Sy

[SAtalk] memory utilization in SA 2.1

ftlimit -a 1000 /usr/bin/spamd -F 1 -L -x \ -u spamc > /var/log/spamd.log 2>&1 -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417 ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL

Re: [SAtalk] memory utilization in SA 2.1

-L -x \ > > -u spamc > /var/log/spamd.log 2>&1 As you can see - no "-a" option. -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417 ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing l

Re: [SAtalk] memory utilization in SA 2.1

g: is spam? score=2.9 required=5 server started on port 783 server pid: 28119 logmsg: server started on port 783 -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417 ___ Spamassassin-ta

RE: [SAtalk] CommuniGate is also RATWARE

in some spam filters as spam software just because it is not very common, so the name tends to stick out when examining headers. -- Jason Kohles [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior System Architect Red Hat Professional Consulting http://www.redhat.com/ __

[SAtalk] More falsies with SA in an M$ Exchange network

xchange Site Connector message header EXCHANGE_SITE_CONNECTOR From =~ /\/cn=Configuration\/cn=Servers\// I can't say I've ever seen spam from that type of address, so could we add that as a permanent rule? Thanks -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager Trimble Naviga

[SAtalk] Spamassassin on Postfix Relay

Howdy, I want to use Spamassassin on our Postfix bastion mail host to filter all mail before it's relayed to our MAILSweeper (which then forwards to Exchange). I've had a quick look at the Spamassassin Pages and checked Deja but I can't find any good reference to anyone who's doing this.

[SAtalk] make test fails

st.pm line 116 Not found: subj = Subject: Re: [SAtalk] auto-whitelisting t/dir_based_whitelist.NOK 12Not found: subj = Subject: 4000 Your Vacation Winning ! t/dir_based_whitelist.FAILED tests 1-12, 14-15 Failed 14/15 tests, 6.67% okay Jason -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

[SAtalk] General comments on Spamassassin, with a few questions

data base of spam messages which Spamassassin has failed to detect? This would be a good resource for the developers when updating the rule sets. I would certainly be willing to forward undetected spam to an appropriate collection address if this would assist the development effort. Regar

Re: [SAtalk] More falsies with SA in an M$ Exchange network

;s problem as to when SA should be invoked and when it shouldn't be. However, the whole issue of false-positives on known to be locally generated mail can really only be dealt with by the MTA (Qmail-Scanner in this case), so I am looking at that now as the real solution. -- Cheers Jason

Re: [SAtalk] Freedom of Press / Speech / Junk Mail (yah right)

y filtering spam. www.orbz.org has details of what happened, including the fact that the city government that originally threatened them now agrees that the problem is a buggy mail server and has apologized. -- Jason Kohles [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior System Architect

Re: [SAtalk] Re: Freedom of Press / Speech / Junk Mail (yah right)

lity... (i.e. "what? You need to run a SMTP client??, that makes you a business customer... cha-CHING!) -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417 ___ Spamassassin-talk maili

Re: [SAtalk] ORBZ reborn as DSBL [Was: Freedom of Press / Speech /Junk Mail (yah right)]

it open relays to send these specially formatted messages to add the relays to the list. Bascically what happened is they discovered that probing open relays is dangerous and can get you in trouble, so they stopped doing that, now they want everyone else to do it for them, which takes t

Re: [SAtalk] Freedom of Press / Speech / Junk Mail (yah right)

g that tag in the subject is an clear pointer that my filter > wasn't right. > I use it, and personally I prefer the very short 'SPAM', to the very long and unweildy 'POSSIBLE UNSOLICITED COMMERCIAL EMAIL', which I suspect is so long that non

Re: [SAtalk] Don't send attachments to SpamAssasin sightings mailing list

Matthew Cline writes: > Looking through the archives, anything that's been sent with an attachment > ends up not having anything; either SourceForge or GeoCrawler is stripping > them. My mailer sends forwarded messages as RFC 822 attachments. Are they making it? I typically send from my [EMAI

Re: [SAtalk] performing all tests

, you should probably make sure that negative scoring tests come first. -- Jason Kohles [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior System Architect Red Hat Professional Consulting http://www.redhat.com/ ___ Spamassassin-tal

Re: [SAtalk] reporting, filtering options

e next release of Qmail-Scanner (which includes SpamAssassin support) will only run SA over mail when RELAYCLIENT is unset - i.e. the mail wasn't locally generated. That remove 90% of the false positives SA was generating due to poorly written local M$ mail programs... -- Cheers Jason Haar

Re: [SAtalk] Porn mail deleting for school

their network, and in cases where a company does not have a policy, most states have held that they have that right because it's their network (IANAL, check http://law.freeadvice.com/intellectual_property/computer_law/email_privacy.htm) -- Jason Kohles

[SAtalk] Should spamd use gethostbyaddr?

t a nameserver, then there's going to be (could be) all these extra DNS lookups going on just to resolve 127.0.0.1... Just a thought. -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417

Re: [SAtalk] Why am I getting this?

t these are the kinds of error messages you would get when trying to run a perl script with a shell interpreter, check and make sure you have a correct #! line in the script, or change procmail to use '/usr/bin/perl /usr/bin/SpamAssassin/spamassassin' instead of just calling spama

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd Debug Output

> > SQL Error: ERROR: Missing '=' after 'spamassassin:localhost' in conninfo > This format doesn't work with postgres, you need to use: DBI:Pg:dbname=spamassassin;host=localhost perldoc DBD::Pg for other options. -- Jason Kohles

Re: [SAtalk] Why no `.bat .exe .com .pif' rule?

ld be fairly easy to integrate, but I don't know how good it is... -- Jason Kohles [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior System Architect Red Hat Professional Consulting http://www.redhat.com/ ___ Spamassassin-

Re: [SAtalk] Why no `.bat .exe .com .pif' rule?

ang. http://www.roaringpenguin.com/mimedefang/ It already has integration with SpamAssassin, File::Scan, and several other scanners. ...and if you know perl, you can get it's filter to do just about anything. Jason ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PR

[SAtalk] newbie question - getting an error trying to use this withProcmail

I'm following the instructions in the README, but when I send a message to myself (from another account), it bounces back with this message: - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - "|IFS=' ' && exec /usr/bin/procmail -f- || exit 75 #

Re: [SAtalk] newbie question - getting an error trying to use this with Procmail

Just out of curiosity, what does the IFS= part do, and how necessary is it here? By the way thanks for the info, Im reading up on smrsh now... At 07:50 PM 5/2/2002 -0500, dman wrote: >On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 05:13:03PM -0700, Jason Hough wrote: >| I'm following the instructions in

Re: [SAtalk] newbie question - getting an error trying to use this with

p exactly as the README says: > > "|IFS=' ' && exec /usr/bin/procmail -f- || exit 75 #jason" > >Hi Jason. > >What system are you running? I just installed SA myself and I didn't need a >.forward file since RH's sendmail is setup to run from a .

Re: [SAtalk] Question about SA and QMail-Scanner..

then echo "Something like the SpamAssassin spamc is present, but not working - ignoring..." SPAMC_BINARY='' ... So it ran "spamc < ./contrib/spamc-nice.eml" (which is not spam) and the output from spamc didn't contain 'X-Spam-Status: No&#

Re: [SAtalk] Re: Thinking of performance

;d suggest the opposite is better: have the real MTA relay it to spamproxyd. If you do it your way, you've just lost all anti-relaying protection... -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377

Re: [SAtalk] two newbie questions

ged only in the headers (preferably with the >analysis included somehow as, say, X-SPAM: headers) instead of having >the report and analysis in the body? I don't want to muck with the >body, even if it is nasty ol' spam. > Yes, set 'report_header 1' to move the rep

RE: [SAtalk] shirts?

. Tiny rubber ninjas: http://www.gumballmall.com/cgi-bin/miva?Merchant2/merchant.mv+Screen=PROD&Store_Code=GUMBALLMALL&Product_Code=ninja+fighters+-+toy&Category_Code=toys+1.1%22 -- Jason Kohles [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior System Architect Red Hat Pr

[SAtalk] configuring default SA behavior

Perhaps I'm missing something obvious here, but I can't seem to make SpamAssassin pay any attention to default configuration settings. I'm using spamassassin from an RPM (spamassassin-2.20-1), and have tried adding config options into /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf, into /etc/spamassassin/use

Re: [SAtalk] configuring default SA behavior

On May 22, 2002 11:46 am, Jason Baker wrote: > Perhaps I'm missing something obvious here, but I can't seem to make > SpamAssassin pay any attention to default configuration settings. > > I'm using spamassassin from an RPM (spamassassin-2.20-1), and have tried > a

[SAtalk] A pointer for nailing Korean based spam

don't read/speak Korean, so I have no idea what exactly it is, but the characters are: 광고 (hope that comes through) It may be a good basis for a very focused spam rule. I've seen it inside both () and [], but always at the front

[SAtalk] WEB_BUGS tests a negative?

spam. -- Jason Rimmer jrimmer_at_irth.net ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _

Re: [SAtalk] Effect of -L flag

e back about that not being a good idea until the positive checks were done before the negative. Has that happened? If so, would that actually save any time as the entire message would have to be checked for positive tags anyway? -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager Trimble Navigat

Re: [SAtalk] the war of autoreplies (why whitelists break down) and needed change of SA

On May 30, 2002 09:34 am, dman wrote: > On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 03:32:55PM +0200, Tony L. Svanstrom wrote: > | I stopped /dev/null:ing e-mails a day or so ago, just to check if there > | are any false hits there (partly due to spam passing SA and going to my > | inbox). > | > | Today when I sent

[SAtalk] An amusing spamfooter

This one got by with a 4.8/5... mostly in Korean, except for the footer. The footer was worth having to read it though. :) > If you could't understand this language, please click the rejection button. > [rejection] > Because of operation error, this e-mail may be delivered. > Please click the r

Re: [SAtalk] An amusing spamfooter

On May 31, 2002 06:31 pm, Daniel Quinlan wrote: > Jason Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > This one got by with a 4.8/5... mostly in Korean, except for the > > footer. The footer was worth having to read it though. :) > > The language guessing code (now in CVS) mig

[SAtalk] Documentation for procmail / spamassassin gateway?

ail -m $h $g $u -- I'm a bit new to Sendmail. The admin was laid off, and now suddenly I'm it. -Jason ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las V

Re: [SAtalk] spamc message size limits

runs qmail-scanner, and it could just directly access the file on disk. ..Still need the network support though - I for one actually use it to allow a REALLY old Redhat 5.0 mail server to run SA via a spamd on a newer server :-) -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation

Re: [SAtalk] Cyrillic encoding raises the spam level to 3.8

o be more obviously configurable? -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417 PGP Fingerprint: 7A2E 0407 C9A6 CAF6 2B9F 8422 C063 5EBB FE1D 66D1 ___ Don'

[SAtalk] Procmail on the Gateway

Well, I finally got Spamassassin running using procmail on a gateway device. Just in case anyone else wants a link to the config file, here it is: http://www.impsec.org/email-tools/procmail-on-gateway.txt (Thank god for google) Maybe this could find it's way into the SA website? -

[SAtalk] Newbie Q: get all zero scores?

l/IN-caughtspam folder). But the above mail message wasn't written to ~/mail/IN-caughtspam nor ~/IN-caughtspam and didn't appear in my INBOX (/vars/spool/mail/jvarsoke). It seems it got filter but deleted instead of sent anywhere (or at least I can't find it. Please, any ideas? -j _

[SAtalk] fetchmail and the "From" field as applies to auto-whitelisting

> But forwarding the same message to my self gives this in the procmail log > file when the spamassassin -D option is used: > > debug: using "/home/jvarsoke/etc/spamassassin/rules" for site rules dir > debug: using "/home/jvarsoke/.spamassassin" for user state dir > debug: using "/home/jvarsoke/.s

Re: [SAtalk] FORGED_EBAY_RCVD broken!

Dan, How do you "set score to 0.0"? I'm having the opposite problem. All my scores in the Debug log are 0.0! But spamassassin -t works fine. Any suggestions? -j On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Smart, Dan wrote: > > What's up with FORGED_EBAY_RCVD? Installed the CVS and now its been hitting > on mo

RE: [SAtalk] FORGED_EBAY_RCVD broken!

On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Smart, Dan wrote: > You set score to 0.0 by putting in local.cf > > score FORGED_EBAY_RCVD 0.0 > > Your X-Spam-Status in the message headers shows 0.0 with not tests being > hit? yes. Here's what I get. (I deleted the subject line becasue I sent a message to this list

RE: [SAtalk] FORGED_EBAY_RCVD broken!

On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Bart Schaefer wrote: > On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, jason varsoke wrote: > > > This is my recipe: > > > > :0fw > > | /usr/bin/spamassassin -P -D -c $HOME/etc/spamassassin/rules > > > > Though I don't have a file called "rules"

RE: [SAtalk] FORGED_EBAY_RCVD broken!

On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Bart Schaefer wrote: > On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, jason varsoke wrote: > > > Yes, Bart, thank you! I deleted the -c part of the line and now > > everything works; but of course I'm not using any rules. > > Obviously you're using *some* ru

[SAtalk] SA for Outlook Website

DSL line (192K up), so if anyone wants to mirror it, email me and I'll link to your mirror. The next build will use an Outlook Addin instead of VBScript, will hopefully disable the annoying warnings, and should be available

RE: [SAtalk] Porn? Am I so unimaginative?

  There is a line in there "Must be 18 yrs. old" which probably triggered it. -Original Message-From: Marsha Hanchrow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 10:41 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [SAtalk] Porn? Am I so unimaginative?I never did manage

[SAtalk] Bolting SA into EZMLM lists

Before I start wandering down this path, I thought I'd check to see if it's already been done (and a quick google came up emptyhanded). Has anyone added spamassassin into EZMLM mailing lists? I'm essentially thinking to bounce to moderator if the score is above the limit, rather than message-

Re: [SAtalk] Jane! Stop this crazy thing!

d delivery modes, get a reminder of your password, or unsubscribe from Spamassassin-talk), enter your subscription email address:" Pay special attention to the parts of that sentence that say "get a reminder of your password" and "unsubscribe from Spamassassin-talk". -- Jaso

Re: [SAtalk] SMTPD_IN_RCVD test is unfair discrimination...?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Could there be a simple explanation? I can't see "SMTPD32" as a particularly unique string... could something other than Imail also stick this string in there? I don't have any spam that trips this, or I'd look at the identifier a little more clo

RE: [SAtalk] Sending SPAM To Oblivion

Does something like this work? Just trying to think of safety. :0fw | spamassassin -P :0 * ^X-Spam-Level: \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\* /dev/null :0 * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes Spam -Original Message- From: Skip Montanaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 5:15 AM To:

Re: [SAtalk] Microsoft developer newsletter tagged as spam

cial Email", both get hit, and that's something they must understand. Our SA documentation further tells users to filter off their SCE before applying a SA rule - gets rid of 100% of the problem as the users know who is sending them SCE. -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager, T

[SAtalk] maildrop and spamd = no mail

I have a .qmail-default file with this in it | preline maildrop .mailfilter and a .mailfilter file in my domain.com dir with the below contents. And no mail gets delivered it just gets queued up. Once i put the .qmail-default back to no rmail i get the mail. What is wrong here? Mail drop

[SAtalk] test

__ Jay Silver [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ 103463692 Pegasus Web Technologies http://www.pwebtech.com Web Hosting and Dedicated Servers --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf

Re: [SAtalk] Odd formmail.cgi spam

at has formmail.cgi installed. -- Jason Kohles [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior Engineer Red Hat Professional Consulting --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http

[SAtalk] separate inbound and outbound

eople trying to log all inbound and outbound email. I'd be very happy with just a pointer in the right direction. -Jason --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkg

RE: [SAtalk] separate inbound and outbound

Looks like I was thinking too complicated again. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Jeremy Zawodny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 2:51 PM To: Jason Qualkenbush Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] separate inbound and outbound On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at

RE: [SAtalk] separate inbound and outbound

g to get rid of complication and go back to two boxes. I did a test which looked like you guys are right about procmail, but testing is very limited due to the config I currently have. It's just confusing when set up as a gateway. -Jason -Original Message- From: Stephane Lentz [mailto:[EM

Re: [SAtalk] SA performance info

ny given day. My guess is the variability is caused by, as others have suggested, how fast razor, rbl's, and other external services are. I'm sure you've already figured this out, but ... Use SPAMD!!! I've run it both ways and averaged the processing. SPAMD is consistentl

RE: [SAtalk] Re: Spamd 2.42 Problems

months. 2.31 was rock solid...never died once. 2.42 spamd has died twice in the last 15 hours. Like you, there is no cause of death indicated in syslog. I am currently running spamd in debug mode, undaemonized, to make sure I see why it dies. Redhat 7.2. * Jason Brunette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) * E

[SAtalk] Razor freeze, possible explaination

pamd is running and razor1 rediscovery takes place in a child, it is run in every child spamd spawns from then on regardless of whether or not the razor1 server is responding. Fun! * Jason Brunette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) * Excel.Net,Inc. - http://www.excel.net/ * (920) 452-0455 - Sheboygan/Plymo

[SAtalk] Big increase in Spam getting through

screen. Gah!! Just wondering what your experiences are. Thanks in advance, Jason --- Jason Hough Zono Inc. --- --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf __

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

vious one didn't (which is how I interpreted your requirements), you probably want to change the first part of this to: :0: E > } > -- Jason Kohles [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior Engineer Red Hat Professional Consulting ---

RE: [SAtalk] spamd log to mrtg

You might need to clear the log file when you make a change like that. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2002 9:41 AM To: Jonathan Nichols Cc: Tony Hoyle; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SAtalk] spamd log to mrtg On Sat, 1

  1   2   >