EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 10:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] SPAMD stops tagging spam?
Environment is Fedora Core 1 (fully up-to-date w/ patches); SendMail
8.12.10-1.1.1 (Fedora Core RPM); SpamAssassin 2.63; spamass-milter
0.2.0+cvs. This server acts as a filtering
> Yesterday, at approximately 5:20pm, my server stopped filtering spam... it
> just decided to happily pass it along to its intended recipient. All the
> processes appeared to be running. /var/log/maillog shows calls to spamd,
> and it responding to connections, just doesn't seem to be doing any
I have installed Spamassassin 2.61-2 on Debian Sarge, but I can't get
the daemon to run. Running "/etc/init.d/spamassassin start" does not
complain about any error, but nothing happens.
There is no spamd process running. I can not find any reference to
spamassassin or spamd in /var/log either.
Environment is Fedora Core 1 (fully up-to-date w/ patches); SendMail
8.12.10-1.1.1 (Fedora Core RPM); SpamAssassin 2.63; spamass-milter
0.2.0+cvs. This server acts as a filtering relay in front of a Lotus
Domino mail server. There are no user preferences.
Yesterday, at approximately 5:20pm, m
Hi List.
Is anyone else having issues with spamd dying without notice.
All I can see in the logs is included below
Jan 25 02:30:03 jp-mx-1 spamd[10532]: clean message (-16.4/4.4) for
xadmin:501 in 74.9 seconds, 516 bytes.
Jan 25 02:30:52 jp-mx-1 spamd[10487]: identified spam (32.8/4.4) for
xad
Sending this time from the address I'm subscribed to the list... sorry for
the double posting, but my SpamAssassin relay server has just stopped
filtering mail again. This time, while it was misbehaving, I sent a known
spam to SPAMD through SPAMC at the command line:
$ spamc -c < test
yielded
Sending this time from the address I'm subscribed to the list... sorry for
the double posting, but my SpamAssassin relay server has just stopped
filtering mail again. This time, while it was misbehaving, I sent a known
spam to SPAMD through SPAMC at the command line:
$ spamc -c < test
yielded
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Dale Harris wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 01:08:56PM -0800, Dale Harris elucidated:
> >
> > I would have searched the archive for the but SF seems less than
> > helpful. I'm seeing a lot of errors like:
> >
> > Jan 20 03:44:11 skull spamd[27980]: lock: 27980 unlink of lock
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 01:08:56PM -0800, Dale Harris elucidated:
>
> I would have searched the archive for the but SF seems less than
> helpful. I'm seeing a lot of errors like:
>
> Jan 20 03:44:11 skull spamd[27980]: lock: 27980 unlink of lock file
> /home/rodmur/.spamassassin/bayes.lock faile
I would have searched the archive for the but SF seems less than
helpful. I'm seeing a lot of errors like:
Jan 20 03:44:11 skull spamd[27980]: lock: 27980 unlink of lock file
/home/rodmur/.spamassassin/bayes.lock failed: No such file or directory
Is this potentially causing mail bounces?
D
Hi there!
Recently I wondered why my spamd called by exim by
exim.conf:spamd_address = 127.0.0.1 783
is not adding asterisk to the mails.
I found out, that the whole /etc/spamassassin/local.cf seems not to be
read by spamassasin. regardeless as which user I call "spamassassin -t
< mail" or "cat
Hi!
I have:
# cat /etc/spamassassin/local.cf
rewrite_subject 0
# report_safe 1
# trusted_networks 212.17.35.
report_safe 0
use_terse_report 1
auto_learn 0
always_add_report 0
always_add_headers 0
required_hits 10
report_contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
add_header all Level _STARS(*)_
score HABEAS_SWE
Hello,
I just upgraded to SA 2.61, after patching Razor2. Last night I got this
message:
Jan 8 00:39:39 judah spamd[17577]: razor2 check skipped: Bad file
descriptor Died at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/Dns.pm line 401.
20 seconds later, spamd was a dead process, as e
Hey all,
I'm an administrator at a decently sized company
and I'm trying to give my users some relief from the spam by installing
SpamAssassin on the mail server. I'm running Linux kernel 2.4.7-10, Red Hat 7.2,
installing from the 2.61 TARballs.
I've got the latest version of Perl, I down
Hi All,
Is there a way to make spamd include the IP number of
the spammer's relay in its maillog entry?
Thanks.
-ammar
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign u
queued in this time till a spamc timeout occurs. If spamd has
finished one spamc request it will serve the next (of the 40 others).
/robert
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim B
Sent: Samstag, 3. Januar 2004 16:25
To: Spamassassin List
S
thanks! that's exactly what I needed to know!
Robert Lacroix wrote:
from the spamd documentation:
"-m number, --max-children=number
Specify a maximum number of children to spawn. Spamd will wait until
another child finishes before forking again. Meanwhile, incoming connections
will be queue
the spamd -m commandline option for max child processes... is that per
spamc call?
for instance if I use:
spamd -d -m10 -x -u filter
and I run 50 instances of spamc, does that mean that all 50 call of the
spamc process get 10 spamd child processes for a total of up to 500
spamd child processes?
I run spamd with -D from time to time in order to run statistic
gathering tools on my /var/log/maillog. Debug currently runs at
two levels, all or none. It would be nice if one could selectively
turn on debugging at a modular level. For example, for me, it
would be rare that I would want to see
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 29 December 2003 23:49, Hans Gerber wrote:
> Hello to everyone,
>
> We are running a server with some dozens of users with shell
> access. Up to now everyone has the ability to call spamassassin from
> within .procamilrc. This gives us quite
Someone recently posted a spamd modification that allows it to access
courier mta's authdaemon to properly find home directories, etc for
virtual users. It was requested that he send it over to you guys, but I
didn't see anything float through this list about it. Has it been
received? It would b
Hello to everyone,
We are running a server with some dozens of users with shell
access. Up to now everyone has the ability to call spamassassin from
within .procamilrc. This gives us quite some load for multiple
spamassassin processes.
Now we are evaluating the possible use of spamd. Our users ho
--Chris
> -Original Message-
> From: Gary Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2003 9:24 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] spamd memory usage.
>
>
>
> I was wondering how much memory spamd should be using
> (running default rul
Hi
I cannot get spamd to use user_prefs when running "spamd -d -a -c -L
--user-config" as root (v 2.61, suse9). It insists on the global settings.
Here is the user_prefs file:
rewrite_subject 1
report_header 1
defang_mime 0
razor_timeout 0
use_bayes 1
required_hits 4.5
Is there something I'm
I was wondering how much memory spamd should be using (running default rules and
bigevil.cf only). It's currently using about 30mb and a decently light load day. I'm
just trying to get a baseline so I can watch it grow/shrink as I add/remove rules.
Gary Smith
Damian Gerow schrieb:
[...]
I'm *really* looking forward to if/when this makes it into the main SA
tree.
Hm. Nice for SQL-users, but wouldn't help with ConfSourceLDAP.
Personally I'd love to set bayes_path somehow, but currently that's
impossible. However, I wouldn't want my users to be able to c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 24 December 2003 11:06, Shane Wegner wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 08:47:53PM -0800, Douglas Kirkland wrote:
> > On Tuesday 23 December 2003 14:50, Shane Wegner wrote:
> > > I currently have spamd set up to maintain separate
> > > confi
Thus spake Shane Wegner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [24/12/03 14:11]:
> I found some mention of this in the archives whilst trying
> to find an answer to this problem. However, I could only
> find a patch which implements the auto-whitelist support in
> SQL. Though I have to agree, having Bayes storage
>
Try starting spamd with the -D option which will generate debug information.
That should help you find where it's crashing.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: Sean Kirkpatrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2003 1:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk]
Howdy.
I'm very puzzled. I've been running spamd (2.60) on a RH 9 box for some
time now and it's been working well. Recently something changed and I'm
not sure what. spamd now seems to come up just fine but dies the first
time spamc attempts to connect to it. There are no log entries anywhere
Thus spake Shane Wegner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [23/12/03 17:50]:
> I am setting up a Spam filtering system using Exim/spamd
> system-wide using multiple domains.. I would like to give
> each user control over Spam filtering via a web interface,
> giving them the ability to control any user_prefs sett
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 23 December 2003 14:50, Shane Wegner wrote:
> I currently have spamd set up to maintain separate
> configuration data for each [EMAIL PROTECTED] on the system via
> spamd running as its own user with the following options.
> -d -u spamd -x -
Every now and then a spam slips through with no header markups. I finally
tracked some of these down and found that spamd took so long to finish
that spamc finally timed out. (In this case, 742 seconds.)
I'm not sure what causes this. I'm running 2.60, and I thought that very
slow RBLs were handl
Hi,
When I run "spamd -a --vpopmail" I get this message every time an email is
handelend by qmail (in and out):
Use of uninitialized value in string ne at /usr/bin/spamd line 1101,
line 2.
Use of uninitialized value in numeric gt (>) at /usr/bin/spamd line 1123,
line 2.
Use of uninitialized v
Hi,
When I run "spamd -a --vpopmail" I get this message every time an email is
handelend by qmail (in and out):
Use of uninitialized value in string ne at /usr/bin/spamd line 1101,
line 2.
Use of uninitialized value in numeric gt (>) at /usr/bin/spamd line 1123,
line 2.
Use of uninitialized val
I've been using SA for a little while now but am still not up to speed on
all it can do. We are mostly a Windows shop here so we have very few techs
who know Linux that well. We're using SPAMD to filter email and use a
Windows-based email proxy to send/receive info to/from the SPAMD host.
It d
Hello.. I've searched the archives and Google and haven't found a specific
answer to this question. I apologize in advance if I've overlooked something simple.
I'm getting a fair amount of emails that are whitelisted because SA thinks
they're from [EMAIL PROTECTED] and is "trusting" this info. If
Hi all,
I get the following errors from spamd (tons of them in my logfiles) and I
have no idea how to fix this. Ditching my bayes_* files isn't an option as
it takes several hours to regenerate them (I have a spam corpus of about
2 which I collected over a period of 10 months...). Sa-learn --r
hello everyone,
I have a problem that's making me miserable.
I'm running spamassassin-2.44-11.8.x on a shriek (RH9) box and am having a
problem: spamd processes get spawned whenever a mail arrives but for a
particular user, they never seem to finish. therefore I end up with a bunch
of spamd inst
System:
FreeBSD 4.9
Perl 5.00503
SpamAssassin 2.6
SpamassMilter
SendMail 8.12.9p2
If I run the test GTUBE message through spamassassin using the following
command:
/usr/sbin/sendmail root <
/usr/local/share/doc/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin/sample-spam.txt
I get the following in var/log/maillog:
D
Thanks guys!
fast_spamassassin is what qmail-scanner auto-detected.. I compared it to our existing
production SpamAssassin server which is using fast_spamassassin too, but I forgot, I
think my boss made some modifications to spamc to force it to use verbose mode when we
built it... It will be a
Hi all,
I get the following errors from spamd (tons of them in my logfiles) and I
have no idea how to fix this. Ditching my bayes_* files isn't a good option
as it takes several hours to regenerate them (I have a spam corpus of about
2 which I collected over a period of 7 months...). Sa-learn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm having an odd problem with SpamAssassin 2.60, Qmail-Scanner 1.20
> and "net"qmail 1.04 compiled from source (RedHat 9).
>
> I have ran spamd in debug mode and looked at the spamd script to
> verify my config files are located here:
>
> /usr/share/spamassass
At 12:40 PM 12/3/2003, Martin, Jeremy wrote:
I'm having an odd problem with SpamAssassin 2.60, Qmail-Scanner 1.20 and
"net"qmail 1.04 compiled from source (RedHat 9).
qmail-scanner does not use spamd/spamc's modification of subject lines, it
does the subject taggigng itself.
Please read the qmail
Hi,
I'm having an odd problem with SpamAssassin 2.60, Qmail-Scanner 1.20 and
"net"qmail 1.04 compiled from source (RedHat 9).
I have ran spamd in debug mode and looked at the spamd script to verify
my config files are located here:
/usr/share/spamassassin
/etc/mail/spamassassin
/home/spamd/.sp
Hi, I have couple of questions regarding spamc/spamd.
Our email server has very heavy traffic each day (several hundred per
minute in peak time). So we are running spamd/spamc. We have noticed
some problems:
we are using sendmail. In sendmail.cf we set the local mailer
(Mblocal)
> in the foreground of shell I run:
> /usr/bin/spamd --username=popuser -D
> --virtual-config-dir=/var/qmail/mailnames/%d/%l/configs/ -a
>
>
> in my syslog files I see this:
> Using default config for qmailq:
> /var/qmail/mailnames///configs//user_prefs
>
> atleast I know why I can not get per use
in the foreground of shell I run:
/usr/bin/spamd --username=popuser -D
--virtual-config-dir=/var/qmail/mailnames/%d/%l/configs/ -a
in my syslog files I see this:
Using default config for qmailq: /var/qmail/mailnames///configs//user_prefs
atleast I know why I can not get per user config files w
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul
Constable
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 4:10 AM
To: spamassassin Mailing List (E-mail)
Subject: [SAtalk] spamd problems
Hi all,
I had a fully functioning system running SpamAssassin(daemon) 2.55
Antivir
2.66 Exim 4.12 all on top of SuSE 8.2.
Having
Hi all,
I had a fully functioning system running SpamAssassin(daemon) 2.55 Antivir
2.66 Exim 4.12 all on top of SuSE 8.2.
Having many ppieces on SpamAssassin I picked up on the fact that it was good
advice to upgrade and keep apace of the progress being made.
So I dutifu
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 15:40:34 +0100
Margit Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
I solved my problem:
I installed the perl module DB_File 1.806 and BerkeleyDB 2.7.7.
Formerly (SpamAssassin 2.55) I used NDBM_File format to save bayes
databases.
Now spamd is working fine :-))
Margit
-
Upgrade your version of perl to 5.8.x
-Jim
Jim Upwood
System Administrator
Bond, Schoeneck, and King
Syracuse, NY
-Original Message-
From: Margit Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 9:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] spamd consumes huge amounts
Hi all,
I used spamd/spamc 2.55 with procmail on a Solaris 8 box successfully for
several months. Now I tried to upgrade to spamd / spam 2.60 but now spamd
(one single process!) consumes more than 2 GB of memory. There are only a
few spamd processes running - the problem is not the amount of spamd
Russell,
I suspect you are not comparing apples to apples here, I asked for the
command you use when running manually, I am assuming a) you are not
logging in as the user spamd and b) you are not running:
(as user spamd)
$ spamd -x -H /home/spamd -d -d -c -a
Because this is the command your sta
> Yeah I can confirm a spamd startup script works
>
> Send yours, also send what you use from the command line, what OS you
> use. etc. etc.
>
> tm.
I did send that stuff before - trying to save some list bandwidth. Ce'st la
vie. Here goes:
RedHat 6.2, Perl 5.6.1, SpamAssassin 2.55
Hello,
> RedHat 6.2, Perl 5.6.1, SpamAssassin 2.55
>
> Hello,
>
> This morning I came into the office to find that qmail-scanner had gone
> insane and lots all nights emails for me. I rebooted the system to try to
> get everything back to ground zero. The problem was that the spamd init
> script decided
hi
I am using SA 2.6 on a Linux box [sendmail/procmail]. Things have
been ok till now. Since 2 days spamd is taking up too much memory. We
had 256 MB RAM, I increased both the RAM and Swap space today. Still
things haven't improved.
What could be wrong? Are there any files in .spammassassin dire
> Here's my init script (copied from the recommended RedHat
> script from SA
> tarball)
>
> #!/bin/sh
> #
> # spamassassin This script starts and stops the spamd daemon
> #
> # chkconfig: 2345 80 30
> #
> # description: spamd is a daemon process which uses
> SpamAssassin to check
> #
RedHat 6.2, Perl 5.6.1, SpamAssassin 2.55
Hello,
This morning I came into the office to find that qmail-scanner had gone
insane and lots all nights emails for me. I rebooted the system to try to
get everything back to ground zero. The problem was that the spamd init
script decided to hang and n
hi
I am using SA 2.6 on a Linux box [sendmail/procmail]. Things have been ok till now.
Since 2 days spamd is taking up too much memory. We had 256 MB RAM, I increased both
the RAM and Swap space today. Still things haven't improved.
What could be wrong? Are there any files in .spammassassin
Dennis Duval wrote:
I have to restart spamd within a couple of minutes after restarting syslogd
with the init script or it will crash the system. However doing a
killall -HUP syslogd has no affect on spamd and it continues logging. I
know of no other applications that would crash a system as a r
Justin Mason wrote:
> Dennis Duval writes:
>> Morris Jones wrote:
>>> I've never had a problem like this, of course. But I
>>> wonder what you might discover if you turned debugging
>>> on for spamd? Start it with the -D flag?
>>>
>> Thanks to Justin Mason and Tom Meunier for pointing out
>> the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dennis Duval writes:
>Morris Jones wrote:
>> I've never had a problem like this, of course. But I
>> wonder what you might discover if you turned debugging on
>> for spamd? Start it with the -D flag?
>>
>Thanks to Justin Mason and Tom Meunier for po
Morris Jones wrote:
> I've never had a problem like this, of course. But I
> wonder what you might discover if you turned debugging on
> for spamd? Start it with the -D flag?
>
Thanks to Justin Mason and Tom Meunier for pointing out the -m option and
the FAQ on this questions. Last night, I remo
t; To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] spamd using up all system memory and swap space
>
> I have created a script that monitors the number of spamd
> processes running, and stops spamd, modifies
> qmail-scanner-queue.pl to not use spamassassin, and sleeps
> for 3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
"Dennis Duval" writes:
>I'm new to spamassassin and I'm having a serious problem. The problem is
>that the number of running spamd instances suddenly start increasing
>dramatically until the point all memory and swap space are used up, thus
>locking
I'm new to spamassassin and I'm having a serious problem. The problem is
that the number of running spamd instances suddenly start increasing
dramatically until the point all memory and swap space are used up, thus
locking the system. This happens very quickly. It will go from 1 to 3
processes r
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 09:43:10PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> wondering why spamd is even looking for users, since all it's presumably
> supposed to do is tag spam. Is this something I can get spamd to stop
> even looking for, since it's only supposed to scan for relay?
all it does is tag
what is typical in your maillog?
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU! Click Here: http://
most of my emails process by spamd under a second but some are taking 150
seconds what would cause this. the box is only used for email.
thanks for any input
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net
I'm in the process of moving most of the work SA has been doing on the
mail pop3/smtp server off onto a separate box that's very lightly loaded.
So far, so good, but the maillog keeps showing the following errors for
users that aren't on the local box that spamd is running on. The mail
then gets
(Please cc me on any replies - I am not currently subscribed to the list)
I've been running spamassassin/spamd at my site quite happily for quite a
while. Recently, the load on my one incoming smtp server has gotten
quite high during peak delivery times from spamd processes.
I already have a hand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kris Deugau writes:
>"Cheryl L. Southard" wrote:
>> Does anyone know if the "-m" flag is now more stable? We've since
>> upgraded to Spamassassin 2.54 and Solaris 9.
>
>I don't recall hearing any bugs specific to -m, but I though I saw some
>odd beha
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 10:41:11PM -0700, Cheryl L. Southard wrote:
Normally, spamd takes about 30 seconds to complete, but when it's
in swapping-hell it takes approximately 550 seconds, and since
each one takes 20MB of memory, quite a few (up to MAX_DAEMON_CHILDREN,
I suppose) can start up and
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 10:41:11PM -0700, Cheryl L. Southard wrote:
> Normally, spamd takes about 30 seconds to complete, but when it's
> in swapping-hell it takes approximately 550 seconds, and since
> each one takes 20MB of memory, quite a few (up to MAX_DAEMON_CHILDREN,
> I suppose) can start u
"Cheryl L. Southard" wrote:
> Does anyone know if the "-m" flag is now more stable? We've since
> upgraded to Spamassassin 2.54 and Solaris 9.
I don't recall hearing any bugs specific to -m, but I though I saw some
odd behaviour reported on Solaris.
> Or maybe you folks can help me find another
In brief, I've found the -m flag very stable on both 2.55 and 2.60. I
found at certain times of day, a combination of a burst of spam and slow
RBLs left me with too many spamds (not to mention procmails and
sendmails) for the the amount of real memory I had. I added a bunch of RAM
and the problem
Hi All,
When we were running spamd V2.43 on our Solaris 8 computer, we found
that the '-m' flag made spamd very unstable. The program would crash
frequently so that no spamd would be running and no filtering was done.
Does anyone know if the "-m" flag is now more stable? We've since upgraded
t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to send the mail elaborated from spamd to another
external server.
I use smtproutes in order to select the relay with
AntiVirus and/or AntiSpamming.
domain1.com:localhost:2525#antivirus
domain2.com:localhost:783 #antispamming
===
Is it
possible to send the mail elaborated from spamd to another external
server.
I use smtproutes in order to select
the relay with AntiVirus and/or AntiSpamming.
domain1.com:localhost:2525 #antivirus
domain2.com:localhost:783
#antispamming
=
I'm using spamassassin 2.60-1 packaged for Debian. Various pieces of
the documentation seem contradictory on the use of user preferences by
spamd.
README says
- $USER_HOME/.spamassassin/user_prefs:
User preferences file. If it does not exist, one of the
default prefs file from above w
maillog shows -
Oct 9 13:21:07 spamd1 spamd[31846]: hit max-children limit (10):
waiting for some to exit
top shows -
31846 root 9 0 21372 20M 2148 S 0.0 2.7 0:34 spamd
30880 root 9 0 21372 20M 2148 S 0.0 2.7 0:00 spamd
30990 root 9 0 21372 20M 2148 S
> I'm using SA 2.6 spamd/spamc
>
> I'm using it in a very loaded server, I get arround 2 mail connections
> per second.
> I want to know if there are people having this kind of load, or even
> bigger, cause I don't think this should be a big load for the server.
>
> The server is Pentium III 1 g
Matt Kettler wrote on Tue, 07 Oct 2003 10:57:08 -0400:
> I was refering to the eating memory problem. And in general I'd expect
> bayes to cause some kind of slow increase too.
No, I really can't see any increase over the time. It stays almost exactly at
the same level over days and weeks.
>
I dunno. I've had mine turned off forever and I've had ZERO FNs since
upgrading to 2.60 and dumping about 200 messages through sa-learn.
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Brian Morrison wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 13:45:54 -0500 (CDT) in
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Robert A.
> Hayden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 13:45:54 -0500 (CDT) in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Robert A.
Hayden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A few things I can recommend that speed things up:
>
> 1) Turn off RBL lookups
How much additional spam did you want to have to look at?
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot u
We are receiving near this much mail traffic, I get about 1 connection every
2 seconds, average of 50k messages per day.
I am using spamD on 3 different servers to spread the load around, it's
working great!
In am also running my own creation (WinSpamC) which allows for
load-balancing between mul
I am running 2.6 on a P4-2.4GHz that gets about 1/3 that amount of traffic
and most of my analyses are completed in under .25 seconds. The box is
running RH9.0 and using postfix to call procmail.
A few things I can recommend that speed things up:
1) Turn off RBL lookups
2) Run a local cachin
I'm using SA 2.6 spamd/spamc
I'm using it in a very loaded server, I get arround 2 mail connections
per second.
I want to know if there are people having this kind of load, or even
bigger, cause I don't think this should be a big load for the server.
The server is Pentium III 1 ghz, 512 MB ram.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to write in log the IP of the source server and not
127.0.0.1?
I use qmail->qmail-scanner ->spamd (spamassassin)
Thanks
Sep 8 07:03:47 email spamd[7832]: connection from localhost
[127.0.0.1] at port 40938
Sep 8 07:03:47 email spamd[18364]: chec
Original Message -
From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 5:03 PM
Subject: [SAtalk] Spamd log
Is it possible to write in log the IP of the source server and not
127.0.0.1?
I use qmail->qmail-scan
Is it possible to write in log the IP of the
source server and not 127.0.0.1?
I use qmail->qmail-scanner ->spamd
(spamassassin)
Thanks
Sep 8 07:03:47
email spamd[7832]: connection from localhost [127.0.0.1] at port 40938
Sep 8 07:03:47 email spamd[18364]: checking message <[EMAIL PROT
Hi all,
I am using spamassassin sitewide with qmail + qmailqscanner scanning avg 1K
messages an hour. Tonight spamd suddenly stopped logging. I know that spam
was being marked correctly during this time and functionally everything was
ok, but no logs. System CPU jumped to 5 times normal for the l
At 03:31 PM 10/7/03 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Matt Kettler wrote on Mon, 06 Oct 2003 11:16:04 -0400:
> If you're using it, disable bayes and see what happens.. Bayes is a very
> heavy memory consumer and could be a significant portion of the problem.
> Disabling it will at least help clarify if i
Matt Kettler wrote on Mon, 06 Oct 2003 11:16:04 -0400:
> If you're using it, disable bayes and see what happens.. Bayes is a very
> heavy memory consumer and could be a significant portion of the problem.
> Disabling it will at least help clarify if it's bayes database size
> related, or someth
Bill Polhemus wrote on Mon, 6 Oct 2003 11:41:53 -0500:
> What's the problem?
>
You didn't mean that serious, did you?
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 03:30:17PM -0400, Rob Mangiafico wrote:
> Actually, when I type "spamd --help" from the command line with our newly
> installed 2.60 software, I get:
> ---
> Insecure directory in $ENV{PATH} while running with -T switch at
> /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0/Cwd.pm line 85.
Perhaps y
> Actually, when I type "spamd --help" from the command line with our newly
> installed 2.60 software, I get:
> ---
> Insecure directory in $ENV{PATH} while running with -T switch at
> /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0/Cwd.pm line 85.
> ---
>
> spamd appears to be running fine currently. Any ideas why this i
> > It's the first option on the list if you type spamd --help
>
> Thanks. Just didn't see it in the online docs, so wanted to make sure and
> feed it back to the doc maintainers.
Actually, when I type "spamd --help" from the command line with our newly
installed 2.60 software, I get:
---
In
> It's the first option on the list if you type spamd --help
Thanks. Just didn't see it in the online docs, so wanted to make sure and
feed it back to the doc maintainers.
> > In the 2.60 docs, the -a "auto whitelist" parameter is no
> > longer listed as an option. Is it still supported? If n
1 - 100 of 658 matches
Mail list logo
